Indiana is for Bigots - video and Pence running for cover

no.... you are exaggerating
They came for the homos but....

what??

don't understand
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

you are surely exaggerating
Am I now, well he didn't think so, and he spent seven years as a prisoner of the Nazis.

PaintMyHouse..... I don't agree with your viewpoints...

we don't see eye to eye in politics PMH...I am sorry.

Don't apologize to PMH. He isn't worthy to lick the bottom of your shoes, let alone receive an apology.
 
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.
He made the reference, I showed the truth of it. Once someone is the "other", mass graves start being dug.

Yes, because that's the very next step after a baker says he cannot bake a cake for a fag wedding.
Same mentality. All it needs is opportunity.

nothing hurts gays more than hysterical claims that not serving a gay is the same as zyklon b gas chambers
It's not, but the reasoning is exactly the same, hate those faggots.
 
look....if that's what Indiana wants ....who are we to say no? :dunno:

I do respect their decision.
They came for the homos but....

what??

don't understand
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.

Ya gotta laugh at the over-the-top rhetoric of the queers. According to them not baking a cake for someone is the equivalent of shoving Jews into gas ovens. And then these numskulls scoff at the idea that their demand might get even more ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is that there are a lot of homosexuals in this country, and they have a shitload of money to spend. They also own a lot of businesses. Perhaps they should start refusing to do business with conservatives and their evangelical minders who promoted this farce of a law (you can bet they won't be voting for any conservatives in the future). Or the religious folk can grow some cahones, grow up, and end the hate:

tumblr_mj88a6x4TH1s3x75mo1_1280.png
 
what??

don't understand
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.
He made the reference, I showed the truth of it. Once someone is the "other", mass graves start being dug.

You're the only one in this debate who has come out in favor of mass graves.
Your mentality is what dug them. I'm just honest about saying that's what humans do.

No, you're hooting for the Arab savages to do it. Don't try to pin the blame on me.
 
what??

don't understand
its an allusion to that pastor in nazi germany who basically said if you don't speak up for the first victims of oppression, no one will speak up for you

Its easy to support what Indiana did without being anti gay,
ok then...do so I am all ears


1) I believe a business has the right to serve whom it wants. that is based on my view of private property and the proper role of government

2) The federal government doesn't have any proper power to dictate such things. while state governments have more leeway, I oppose such laws

3) I support gay marriage, gay military service etc. When I owned a business we certainly did not discriminate against gays and to do so is a poor business decision since gays tend to have more disposable income. But I oppose forcing a business to serve someone no matter what reason
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
 
Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.
He made the reference, I showed the truth of it. Once someone is the "other", mass graves start being dug.

Yes, because that's the very next step after a baker says he cannot bake a cake for a fag wedding.
Same mentality. All it needs is opportunity.

nothing hurts gays more than hysterical claims that not serving a gay is the same as zyklon b gas chambers
It's not, but the reasoning is exactly the same, hate those faggots.

you left-wingers never can understand that people can have support for freedom that has nothing to do with the fact that freedom sometimes allows bigots to be jerks. the cost to society by giving the government all the power people like you want it to have is far far worse
 
its an allusion to that pastor in nazi germany who basically said if you don't speak up for the first victims of oppression, no one will speak up for you

Its easy to support what Indiana did without being anti gay,
ok then...do so I am all ears


1) I believe a business has the right to serve whom it wants. that is based on my view of private property and the proper role of government

2) The federal government doesn't have any proper power to dictate such things. while state governments have more leeway, I oppose such laws

3) I support gay marriage, gay military service etc. When I owned a business we certainly did not discriminate against gays and to do so is a poor business decision since gays tend to have more disposable income. But I oppose forcing a business to serve someone no matter what reason
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
your concept of reality is such that you make Timothy Leary look like a realist
 
They came for the homos but....

what??

don't understand
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.

Ya gotta laugh at the over-the-top rhetoric of the queers. According to them not baking a cake for someone is the equivalent of shoving Jews into gas ovens. And then these numskulls scoff at the idea that their demand might get even more ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is that there are a lot of homosexuals in this country, and they have a shitload of money to spend. They also own a lot of businesses. Perhaps they should start refusing to business with conservatives and their evangelical minders who promoted this farce of a law (you can bet they won't be voting for any conservatives in the future). Or the religious folk can grow some cahones, grow up, and end the hate:

tumblr_mj88a6x4TH1s3x75mo1_1280.png

Yeah, let the queers refuse to do business with 40% of their customer base. That's a winning business strategy. And no conservative is worrying about not getting the fag vote. I think they got about 0.0001% of the fag vote in the last election. Your threats about the dire consequences of this law are absolutely comical.
 
I'm not quite sure how baking a cake "caters" to anyone's lifestyle. Its just a cake.
Its agreeing to make a cake for something you don't believe in which is a homosexual "marriage".

I don't believe in a lot of things that I tolerate. Get over it. Live and let live.

Let the queers get over it.

That's right, wear that bigotry on your sleeve like a good chap.

It's not bigotry. It's well deserved contempt.

Definitely bigotry.
 
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niem ller First they came for the Socialists...

Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.
He made the reference, I showed the truth of it. Once someone is the "other", mass graves start being dug.

You're the only one in this debate who has come out in favor of mass graves.
Your mentality is what dug them. I'm just honest about saying that's what humans do.

No, you're hooting for the Arab savages to do it. Don't try to pin the blame on me.
Those "savages", and you, more or less the same, only you are even more stupid and far less faithful since you are only out for yourself.
 
"The hits just keep on coming for the state of Indiana.

Since the signing of the so-called the so-called Religious Freedom Restoration Act into law on Thursday, one of the top trending topics on Twitter is #BoycottIndiana.

With Gov. Mike Pence (R) taking a beating on Twitter, and businesses reviewing their plans in the state, little beyond next week’s Final Four in Indianapolis is going right for the Hoosier State.

With that in mind, the good folks at the Internet Action Force have stepped up and pitched in, creating a tourist pitch selling Indiana as ” It’s a great place to be a bigot.”

Internetactionforce_screencap-800x430.jpg


Well kids, the days of beating on the gays are coming to an end. It's time to move on, deal with the fact that business is business, not church, and cash, not Jesus, is king in this case. Have your faith but bake the cake, or face this from all sides.



Oh well, the outright murder of homosexuals in Iran doesn't seem to bother you too much. :D
 
ok then...do so I am all ears


1) I believe a business has the right to serve whom it wants. that is based on my view of private property and the proper role of government

2) The federal government doesn't have any proper power to dictate such things. while state governments have more leeway, I oppose such laws

3) I support gay marriage, gay military service etc. When I owned a business we certainly did not discriminate against gays and to do so is a poor business decision since gays tend to have more disposable income. But I oppose forcing a business to serve someone no matter what reason
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
your concept of reality is such that you make Timothy Leary look like a realist
My version of reality is brutal, which means it's accurate,
 
"The hits just keep on coming for the state of Indiana.

Since the signing of the so-called the so-called Religious Freedom Restoration Act into law on Thursday, one of the top trending topics on Twitter is #BoycottIndiana.

With Gov. Mike Pence (R) taking a beating on Twitter, and businesses reviewing their plans in the state, little beyond next week’s Final Four in Indianapolis is going right for the Hoosier State.

With that in mind, the good folks at the Internet Action Force have stepped up and pitched in, creating a tourist pitch selling Indiana as ” It’s a great place to be a bigot.”

Internetactionforce_screencap-800x430.jpg


Well kids, the days of beating on the gays are coming to an end. It's time to move on, deal with the fact that business is business, not church, and cash, not Jesus, is king in this case. Have your faith but bake the cake, or face this from all sides.



Oh well, the outright murder of homosexuals in Iran doesn't seem to bother you too much. :D

Did the Jews not do that? The Christians? Have you no historical perspective at all?
 
1) I believe a business has the right to serve whom it wants. that is based on my view of private property and the proper role of government

2) The federal government doesn't have any proper power to dictate such things. while state governments have more leeway, I oppose such laws

3) I support gay marriage, gay military service etc. When I owned a business we certainly did not discriminate against gays and to do so is a poor business decision since gays tend to have more disposable income. But I oppose forcing a business to serve someone no matter what reason
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
your concept of reality is such that you make Timothy Leary look like a realist
My version of reality is brutal, which means it's accurate,

your vision appears to be the product of a failing intellect that was never very strong to begin with.
 
its an allusion to that pastor in nazi germany who basically said if you don't speak up for the first victims of oppression, no one will speak up for you

Its easy to support what Indiana did without being anti gay,
ok then...do so I am all ears


1) I believe a business has the right to serve whom it wants. that is based on my view of private property and the proper role of government.

2) The federal government doesn't have any proper power to dictate such things. while state governments have more leeway, I oppose such laws

3) I support gay marriage, gay military service etc. When I owned a business we certainly did not discriminate against gays and to do so is a poor business decision since gays tend to have more disposable income. But I oppose forcing a business to serve someone no matter what reason
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

They are true, obviously.

he's too stupid to understand 1 is a belief and most of 2 is as well. And he isn't smart enough to argue why the FDR expansion of the commerce clause is bogus

None of them do. Whenever you mention it they just go "huh?" like a dear caught in the headlights.

None of them understand that rights and the law are two separate things. But then they get indignant when you point out that if rights are whatever the law says then no one violated the rights of black slaves.

It boggles the mind how stupid these people are.
 
1 and 2, untrue, obviously,

how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
your concept of reality is such that you make Timothy Leary look like a realist
My version of reality is brutal, which means it's accurate,

your vision appears to be the product of a failing intellect that was never very strong to begin with.
You have zero ability to judge, so don't.
 
Its agreeing to make a cake for something you don't believe in which is a homosexual "marriage".

I don't believe in a lot of things that I tolerate. Get over it. Live and let live.

Let the queers get over it.

That's right, wear that bigotry on your sleeve like a good chap.

It's not bigotry. It's well deserved contempt.

Definitely bigotry.

Go squat on a flagpole, Nimrod.
 
how does a moron like you claim my belief is untrue? and you aren't smart enough to argue 10A jurisprudence with me
I deal in reality. God only knows where you got the nonsense you posted.
your concept of reality is such that you make Timothy Leary look like a realist
My version of reality is brutal, which means it's accurate,

your vision appears to be the product of a failing intellect that was never very strong to begin with.
You have zero ability to judge, so don't.
actually that is not true. I am a judge in real life for a NGB (US Olympic committee) charged with making decisions on violations of a code of conduct. and if Romney had won, I would have been most likely a federal judge. so stuff that in your douche bag and clyster it
 
Yes, one baker not baking a cake out of dozens of competitors who will is equivalent to rounding up Jews and putting them into death camps.

Idiot.
He made the reference, I showed the truth of it. Once someone is the "other", mass graves start being dug.

You're the only one in this debate who has come out in favor of mass graves.
Your mentality is what dug them. I'm just honest about saying that's what humans do.

No, you're hooting for the Arab savages to do it. Don't try to pin the blame on me.
Those "savages", and you, more or less the same, only you are even more stupid and far less faithful since you are only out for yourself.

You're are the one on the side of the genocidal savages. You endorse their policy. You are a despicable piece of shit. What are you "faithful" to, mass murder? How am I "out for myself?" How do I benefit if Israel isn't wiped out?
 

Forum List

Back
Top