Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Simply enough, limo-liberal Democrat Party adherents could do so much to alleviate inequality by giving all their assets to those who have the least.
But they won't.
Of course not. No one should give 100% of their income to anyone else; it's the set of 1% who want more. Why?
I suppose that's because most of the 1% are callous conservatives.
too stupid of course. if people buy billions of dollars of your products its not because you are callous but the exact opposite, you slavishly meet their exacting needs better than anyone in the entire world.
See why we have to be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Word salad ^^^. Callous, showing or having an insensitive and cruel disregard for others. .
total lie and no evidence to support the BS.Income inequality comes into play when we hear conservatives whine that we don't have enough money to feed the poor,
Simply enough, limo-liberal Democrat Party adherents could do so much to alleviate inequality by giving all their assets to those who have the least.
But they won't.
Of course not. No one should give 100% of their income to anyone else; it's the set of 1% who want more. Why?
why?? its godly!!! to get $1 you have to sell $50 of stuff that folks buy to improve their standard of living.
Why don't you become a billionaire by selling $50 billion in goods that are the best in the world and improve standards of living the fastest in the entire world??
I have no interest in becoming a billionaire. I have everything I need,
I have no interest in becoming a billionaire. I have everything I need,
too 100% stupid its not about what you need but what others need!!
Are you too stupid to grasp that??
dear, if you're not stupid how did you not know that capitalism is about serving others??I have no interest in becoming a billionaire. I have everything I need,
too 100% stupid its not about what you need but what others need!!
Are you too stupid to grasp that??
I'm several standard deviations above being stupid, the more you post, the more I doubt you have the maturity or experience of an independent adult.
Then Christians do not make very good capitalist....dear, if you're not stupid how did you not know that capitalism is about serving others??I have no interest in becoming a billionaire. I have everything I need,
too 100% stupid its not about what you need but what others need!!
Are you too stupid to grasp that??
I'm several standard deviations above being stupid, the more you post, the more I doubt you have the maturity or experience of an independent adult.
Of course not. No one should give 100% of their income to anyone else; it's the set of 1% who want more. Why?
Paradoxical usually, but callous conservatives come in all sizes and shapes. The one commonality being they all believe, "I got mine, fuck the rest of you!".
Thats not b.c. govt programs are too generous, theyre not they suck. Its because the public sector kept up with the COLA whereas private compensation, the whole point, has remained stagnant.Frank question."Income Inequality" is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
Unless you have been living in a cave with no internet access for a couple years, you have undoubtedly heard scores of Democrat politicians and pundits whining about “income inequality.” Many have deemed Income Inequality to be the defining crisis of this Age.
But the expression itself is insidious and stupid.
The actual problem in the U.S. – from a public policy standpoint – is the phenomenon of persistent, generational poverty (“PGP”). Occasional poverty, temporary poverty, and the poverty that people experience at the beginning of their working lives, are problems that are already addressed in one way or another, and they are arguably more a “personal” issue than one that requires a Government solution.
But PGP is growing and, from a societal economic standpoint, is a cancer that can eventually consume so many resources that it will bring Government to its knees (along with public pensions and CSO).
But the Left is unable to even address PGP.
It’s causes are broadly and unquestionably known, as are its solutions. The cause is illegitimacy, and the solution is three-fold: (1) finish school, (2) get a job – any job, and (3) don’t have kids until/unless you are married. Living according to those simple, easy guidelines reduces one’s chances of living in poverty by 80%. But a Leftist government is powerless to broadly publish that message, because to do so would be tantamount to being judgmental about the lifestyle of millions of people now living in poverty. And the Cardinal Sin of the Left is being judgmental – even when the data are incontrovertible proving that the judgment is correct. They simply cannot be judgmental about anything (except smoking).
So they made up the expression, “Income Inequality.” Income Inequality takes the focus OFF of poverty and the obvious causes thereof, and places it on people who are SUCCESSFUL, as though the reasons for PGP were the success of others – which is economic nonsense. So the Left abandons the possibility of a united campaign to fight PGP – one which both ends of the political spectrum could support, each in their own way, and in its place they construct a shining monument to Envy of The Rich! That monument being the expression, "Income Inequality."
The next time you hear a politician bemoaning the “crisis” of Income Inequality, ask yourself why they have chosen NOT to address it as “fighting poverty.” There is only one reason: they want to use the expression as a means of blame Rich Republicans for the real problem of persistent generational poverty. (Parenthetically, it is quite perverse that the Left and the MSM have been able to sell the B.S. narrative that it is the Right where all the rich people are; this is provably false).
Imagine a teacher who is confronted by a small group of students who decide at the beginning of the school year that they will refuse to do anything the teacher says, and will do their best to fail utterly, just to see what the school will do to them. What would you think of the teacher who presented this issue to her Principal as a problem of “an unacceptable gap between the grades of the best students and the worst”? Delusional? Stupid?
We do bothUnless you have been living in a cave with no internet access for a couple years, you have undoubtedly heard scores of Democrat politicians and pundits whining about “income inequality.” Many have deemed Income Inequality to be the defining crisis of this Age.
But the expression itself is insidious and stupid.
The actual problem in the U.S. – from a public policy standpoint – is the phenomenon of persistent, generational poverty (“PGP”). Occasional poverty, temporary poverty, and the poverty that people experience at the beginning of their working lives, are problems that are already addressed in one way or another, and they are arguably more a “personal” issue than one that requires a Government solution.
But PGP is growing and, from a societal economic standpoint, is a cancer that can eventually consume so many resources that it will bring Government to its knees (along with public pensions and CSO).
But the Left is unable to even address PGP.
It’s causes are broadly and unquestionably known, as are its solutions. The cause is illegitimacy, and the solution is three-fold: (1) finish school, (2) get a job – any job, and (3) don’t have kids until/unless you are married. Living according to those simple, easy guidelines reduces one’s chances of living in poverty by 80%. But a Leftist government is powerless to broadly publish that message, because to do so would be tantamount to being judgmental about the lifestyle of millions of people now living in poverty. And the Cardinal Sin of the Left is being judgmental – even when the data are incontrovertible proving that the judgment is correct. They simply cannot be judgmental about anything (except smoking).
So they made up the expression, “Income Inequality.” Income Inequality takes the focus OFF of poverty and the obvious causes thereof, and places it on people who are SUCCESSFUL, as though the reasons for PGP were the success of others – which is economic nonsense. So the Left abandons the possibility of a united campaign to fight PGP – one which both ends of the political spectrum could support, each in their own way, and in its place they construct a shining monument to Envy of The Rich! That monument being the expression, "Income Inequality."
The next time you hear a politician bemoaning the “crisis” of Income Inequality, ask yourself why they have chosen NOT to address it as “fighting poverty.” There is only one reason: they want to use the expression as a means of blame Rich Republicans for the real problem of persistent generational poverty. (Parenthetically, it is quite perverse that the Left and the MSM have been able to sell the B.S. narrative that it is the Right where all the rich people are; this is provably false).
Imagine a teacher who is confronted by a small group of students who decide at the beginning of the school year that they will refuse to do anything the teacher says, and will do their best to fail utterly, just to see what the school will do to them. What would you think of the teacher who presented this issue to her Principal as a problem of “an unacceptable gap between the grades of the best students and the worst”? Delusional? Stupid?
Politicians will always look for the "bandaid" fix vs. the larger issue fix.
We spend too many of our $ on other countries and causes and ignore our own.
Not sure why it's always a default to giving people stuff vs. making them accountable. Like bad parenting.
stereotyping much. why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?Frank question."Income Inequality" is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
stereotyping much. why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?Frank question."Income Inequality" is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
stereotyping much. why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?Frank question."Income Inequality"
why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes? is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
Im sorry. I don't speak moron, what part of my post was "Stereotype"
stereotyping much. why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?Frank question."Income Inequality"
why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes? is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
Im sorry. I don't speak moron, what part of my post was "Stereotype"
unfortunately for you, i know how to read shrimp gumbo recipes.
this is the "stereotype" part: why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?
does the right merely allege to subscribe to Faith Only to appeal to ignorance not only of our supreme laws of the land, but also the laws of demand and supply?
stereotyping much. why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?Frank question.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
Im sorry. I don't speak moron, what part of my post was "Stereotype"
unfortunately for you, i know how to read shrimp gumbo recipes.
this is the "stereotype" part: why doesn't your brother quit so he won't have to work or pay income taxes?
does the right merely allege to subscribe to Faith Only to appeal to ignorance not only of our supreme laws of the land, but also the laws of demand and supply?
So you make the stereotype statement. No wonder I couldn't understand you
