I find it really cool that the Democrats bleating most loudly about economic inequality are the ones in the upper quartile of the 1%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You dont have to be rich or be a democrat to look at the data and see that something is awry.I find it really cool that the Democrats bleating most loudly about economic inequality are the ones in the upper quartile of the 1%.
You dont have to be rich or be a democrat to look at the data and see that something is awry.
What part of "if theres a problem it needs to be addressed" does being a rich democrat negate?You dont have to be rich or be a democrat to look at the data and see that something is awry.
What part of "most loudly" do you find so challenging?
Because that would be retarded.Simply enough, limo-liberal Democrat Party adherents could do so much to alleviate inequality by giving all their assets to those who have the least.
But they won't.
Because that would be retarded.
Frank question."Income Inequality" is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
Frank question."Income Inequality" is the first lie told by every Progressive dictator like Hilter, Mao, Stalin and Fidel. It's always the Kulaks (1%, Jews) who are making our Low Information Progressive unhappy and poor. Only by surrendering power to the Progressive Dictator will things be alright. Not for the morons in the Progressive Base, they get stale bread once a week, but for the leaders it's all good.
Are wages relatively stagnant for the same positions over the last 40 years, or are they not?
Cute diatribes are cute and make you feel nice and superior I get it......
But the point youre missing is that your hard mosed spit a whacley tobaccy into a moonshine bottle logic isnt matching up with the actual data.
That should be a red flag for ya bud.
More government causes less freedom and overall prosperity; its a fact of life.
My brothers secretary just quit, she figured out that she could make almost as much money by maxing out on government programs. Why work?
If $100 were divided by 100 people in the U.S.
Crisis?
You can look to your capitalist friends for that as well as the disparity in wealth from that chartIf $100 were divided by 100 people in the U.S.
Crisis?
so why do liberal keep shipping our jobs off shore thus destroying the middle class??
and why did liberals attack and destroy the American family and schools thus insuring a huge and growing welfare class?
actually dear Reagan opposed the liberal war on the family and schools, and high taxes.Reagan destroyed the middle class
I find it really cool that the Democrats bleating most loudly about economic inequality are the ones in the upper quartile of the 1%.
I find it really cool that the Democrats bleating most loudly about economic inequality are the ones in the upper quartile of the 1%.
You do? I suppose that's because most of the 1% are callous conservatives, like you. And those with talent and empathy are not.
Simply enough, limo-liberal Democrat Party adherents could do so much to alleviate inequality by giving all their assets to those who have the least.
But they won't.
I suppose that's because most of the 1% are callous conservatives.
I find it really cool that the Democrats bleating most loudly about economic inequality are the ones in the upper quartile of the 1%.
You do? I suppose that's because most of the 1% are callous conservatives, like you. And those with talent and empathy are not.
Using the wealthiest 1% and Dear Henry in the same sentence is laughable