Impeachment is a Political Process: When Enough GOP Politicians Eventually Turn On Trump

[kyzr]

I can't vote in the poll because "collusion" is not a crime under the law, it would need to be a conspiracy.
I would need a "high crime" by Trump to vote for removal. Let's see what Mueller actually has on Trump.
Yet the OP lets the Hillary campaign skate on their collusion with Steele and the Russian Dossier, and the deep state DOJ/FBI with their illegal surveillance and phony investigation.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I can't vote in the poll because "collusion" is not a crime under the law, it would need to be a conspiracy.
I would need a "high crime" by Trump to vote for removal. Let's see what Mueller actually has on Trump.
Yet the OP lets the Hillary campaign skate on their collusion with Steele and the Russian Dossier, and the deep state DOJ/FBI with their illegal surveillance and phony investigation.

/—-/ And this has been explained a thousand times to the libtard moonbats

 

[Jantje_Smit]

I can't vote in the poll because "collusion" is not a crime under the law, it would need to be a conspiracy....

Sounds like a weak excuse, just say you're clueless instead (I did)....

And who cares about the law, it was Hillary's turn, all the 17 intelligence agencies agreed and Mueller will prove it

 

[kyzr]

I can't vote in the poll because "collusion" is not a crime under the law, it would need to be a conspiracy....

Sounds like a weak excuse, just say you're clueless instead (I did)....

And who cares about the law, it was Hillary's turn, all the 17 intelligence agencies agreed and Mueller will prove it

I'm hoping that Barr will straighten out the DOJ and get back to the rule of law, regardless of party affiliation. The current double standard is totally unacceptable. If Trump is guilty, fine, he goes. But then the dems who broke the law also need to be prosecuted.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

I'm hoping that Barr will straighten out the DOJ and get back to the rule of law, regardless of party affiliation.

Hmm, maybe you should read up on this guy.... his devotion the 'rule of law' isn't exactly what stands out on his resume.

The current double standard is totally unacceptable.

Sorry to say this comrade but you sound a bit naive, there's nothing current about the double standard, it has been that way since laws were invented.

If Trump is guilty, fine, he goes.

Guilty of what?

But then the dems who broke the law also need to be prosecuted.

That's a nice thought but that's really not the way the (deep state) system works

 

[Polishprince]

Republican senators are not going to vote to remove President Trump from office, even if Mueller has evidence that the gentleman has been flashing broads from his bedroom window in the Trump Tower.

The reason is this. They realize that getting rid of someone with such tremendous popular support among Republican voters would mean the end of their own careers.

T

 

[JoeB131]

/——-/ If the GOP turns on Trump.....And if Santa brings you a pony for your birthday then the other kids in the neighborhood will like you.

You don't think that the GOP senators hate Trump as much as the Democrats do, you are delusional.

They are just looking for political cover to do so. Clear evidence Trump was involved in the collusion or the cover up would be enough.

 

[Polishprince]

/——-/ If the GOP turns on Trump.....And if Santa brings you a pony for your birthday then the other kids in the neighborhood will like you.

You don't think that the GOP senators hate Trump as much as the Democrats do, you are delusional.

They are just looking for political cover to do so. Clear evidence Trump was involved in the collusion or the cover up would be enough.

Sure , a number of Republican senators hate their President. But they still answer to the electorate and will collectively suffer their just desserts if they decide to betray their nation and get rid of this great man who is returning America to greatness.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure , a number of Republican senators hate their President. But they still answer to the electorate and will collectively suffer their just desserts if they decide to betray their nation and get rid of this great man who is returning America to greatness.

The majority of the Nation doesn't want him and never did.

And if they keep supporting him in face of obvious evidence of corruption, they will suffer their just deserts even more in 2020.

I should point out that Richard Nixon won 49 states in 1972, but in 1974, Republicans were calling on him to go.

And he didn't even order the break in, he just tried to cover it up.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Sure , a number of Republican senators hate their President. But they still answer to the electorate and will collectively suffer their just desserts if they decide to betray their nation and get rid of this great man who is returning America to greatness.

The majority of the Nation doesn't want him and never did.

And if they keep supporting him in face of obvious evidence of corruption, they will suffer their just deserts even more in 2020.

I should point out that Richard Nixon won 49 states in 1972, but in 1974, Republicans were calling on him to go.

And he didn't even order the break in, he just tried to cover it up.

/----/ The difference is Watergate actually happened - Russian collusion only happened with the Clintons.

 

[JoeB131]

/----/ The difference is Watergate actually happened - Russian collusion only happened with the Clintons.

Okay, you keep telling yourself that...

So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really.

Turn off the hate radio and do some reading, buddy.

 

[22lcidw]

/----/ The difference is Watergate actually happened - Russian collusion only happened with the Clintons.

Okay, you keep telling yourself that...

So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really.

Turn off the hate radio and do some reading, buddy.

It is not hate radio. It is hate progressive socialist TV.

 

[Ambivalent1]

LOL, they are indeed...yet none of them have anything to do with Trump...but hey, ANY DAY NOW.

 

[Anathema]

No, collusion is not the boundary for impeachment.... Verifiable additions, deletions or changes to ballots in the 2016 election is the standard that should be used. Unless and until there is verifiable proof that actual votes were impacted AFTER THEY WERE CAST, I have seen nothing that would suggest to me that the POTUS should be impeached.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ The difference is Watergate actually happened - Russian collusion only happened with the Clintons.

Okay, you keep telling yourself that...

So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really.

Turn off the hate radio and do some reading, buddy.

/---/
"Okay, you keep telling yourself that... " Don't have to but I have to keep telling you LIbtards that 24/7
"So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really. " Pleading guilty to things????? what things???? You mean process crimes - not collusion.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——-/ If the GOP turns on Trump.....And if Santa brings you a pony for your birthday then the other kids in the neighborhood will like you.

You don't think that the GOP senators hate Trump as much as the Democrats do, you are delusional.

They are just looking for political cover to do so. Clear evidence Trump was involved in the collusion or the cover up would be enough.

/---/ the RINOs hate him but you can't prove all of them do.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

View attachment 241010

useless post as usual

Kind of like your OP

 

[Ambivalent1]

/----/ The difference is Watergate actually happened - Russian collusion only happened with the Clintons.

Okay, you keep telling yourself that...

So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really.

Turn off the hate radio and do some reading, buddy.

Because kos and HuffPo are reliable rags?

 

[JoeB131]

"Okay, you keep telling yourself that... " Don't have to but I have to keep telling you LIbtards that 24/7
"So all these guys around Trump are pleading guilty to things, but there was no Collusion. No, really. " Pleading guilty to things????? what things???? You mean process crimes - not collusion.

Again, you keep telling yourself that..

 

[blackhawk]

Keep pushing impeachment and the left all but guarantee Trumps reelection in 2020 doubt this look what happened to the Republicans with Bill Clinton in the 90s when they went down that road.