“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

[Two Thumbs]

A stripper!!!!!!

What do I win?

 

[Grandma]

Monica Lewinsky wasn't a victim. She was a golddigger, she actually thought Bill would ditch Hillary and marry her.

She was a naive 21-year-old who was seduced by a man old enough to be her father. It was a disgusting abuse of power, and you are disgusting to defend him. Shame on you.

Misogyny is alive and well.

She was naive and innocent like I'm a starship captain. Bitch was stupid to think he's dump his wife for the likes of her, but she wasn't a naive little girl.

Funny no one speaks to the naivete of Trump's victims.

 

[bripat9643]

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary’s approval — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn’t fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton’s top advisers as “trailer park” trash, as someone so craven she’d crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he’d have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their fellow character assassins told us then that character didn’t matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible, were it not for Bill and Hillary and their continuing “anything goes” lack of character.

****

There you have it folks. You think Trump's unacceptable because of the way he treats women? Remember that the Clintons did it all first, and lowered the bar for everyone else to come.

Paula Jones was dug up by the Republicans who were desperate for anything to pin on Bill that would stick. She was trailer trash and she looked it.

Republicans cleaned her up, bought her a new wardrobe, some cosmetic dentistry and a nose job, and they paid her legal bills.

The case was dismissed by a federal judge, so your claim that she had a case is false. Jones refiled and Clinton settled the second suit to put an end to it.

The case was not "dismissed." Clinton settled out of court. Why do you think he paid her $850,000? Just about everything you post turns out to be wrong and just plain stupid. I love the way you trash Slick's victim, just like Hillary. You're just as much of a douche bag as she is.

Remember what Hillary said about victims of sexual assault:

"you have the right to be believed."​

 

[bripat9643]

Monica Lewinsky wasn't a victim. She was a golddigger, she actually thought Bill would ditch Hillary and marry her.

She was a naive 21-year-old who was seduced by a man old enough to be her father. It was a disgusting abuse of power, and you are disgusting to defend him. Shame on you.

Misogyny is alive and well.

She was naive and innocent like I'm a starship captain. Bitch was stupid to think he's dump his wife for the likes of her, but she wasn't a naive little girl.

Funny no one speaks to the naivete of Trump's victims.

Here we have another leftwinger attacking the victim. I love the way left wingers are constantly engaging in the behavior they claim to despise.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Monica Lewinsky wasn't a victim. She was a golddigger, she actually thought Bill would ditch Hillary and marry her.

She was a naive 21-year-old who was seduced by a man old enough to be her father. It was a disgusting abuse of power, and you are disgusting to defend him. Shame on you.

Misogyny is alive and well.

She was naive and innocent like I'm a starship captain. Bitch was stupid to think he's dump his wife for the likes of her, but she wasn't a naive little girl.

Funny no one speaks to the naivete of Trump's victims.

still waiting on the link that backs up your assumption

 

[JoeB131]

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Yes, Congress totally abused the impeachment process for political gain against the will of the American people. What's your point?

Here's the thing. Paula Jones case was thrown out of court as having no merit. Whatever happened between her and Clinton (if anything), it didn't rise to the definition of sexual harassment.

 

[JoeB131]

The case was not "dismissed." Clinton settled out of court. Why do you think he paid her $850,000? Just about everything you post turns out to be wrong and just plain stupid. I love the way you trash Slick's victim, just like Hillary. You're just as much of a douche bag as she is.

actually,t he case WAS dismissed. He paid her the money to avoid years of appeals which would have cost more, once she dropped her insistence on an admission and an apology.

Companies and people do this all the time, and usually you wingnuts are against this kind of abuse of the court system.

 

[FJO]

The Hildebeast is so corrupt, she'd crawl on her knees for a$100 bill

thats Madam President to you.

Madame Prisoner...correcting you is easy.

prisoner ... ya know, I've been reading something about that ...



for the LAST THREE YEARS.

BBBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Well when your in charge of the corrupt justice depth. it's easy to get away with murder

oh, she's been in charge of the DOJ for the last three years too?

great imagination !

Her party was, you blind idiot!

 

[FJO]

The Hildebeast is so corrupt, she'd crawl on her knees for a$100 bill

thats Madam President to you.

An empty punk like Hillary would only satisfied by refer to as "your majesty".

"Madam" in her case, is more like a person who runs a whorehouse.

 

[Dragonlady]

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary’s approval — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn’t fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton’s top advisers as “trailer park” trash, as someone so craven she’d crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he’d have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their fellow character assassins told us then that character didn’t matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible, were it not for Bill and Hillary and their continuing “anything goes” lack of character.

****

There you have it folks. You think Trump's unacceptable because of the way he treats women? Remember that the Clintons did it all first, and lowered the bar for everyone else to come.

Paula Jones was dug up by the Republicans who were desperate for anything to pin on Bill that would stick. She was trailer trash and she looked it.

Republicans cleaned her up, bought her a new wardrobe, some cosmetic dentistry and a nose job, and they paid her legal bills.

The case was dismissed by a federal judge, so your claim that she had a case is false. Jones refiled and Clinton settled the second suit to put an end to it.

The case was not "dismissed." Clinton settled out of court. Why do you think he paid her $850,000? Just about everything you post turns out to be wrong and just plain stupid. I love the way you trash Slick's victim, just like Hillary. You're just as much of a douche bag as she is.

Remember what Hillary said about victims of sexual assault:

"you have the right to be believed."​

Yes, victims of sexual assault have the right to be believed, but there is much about Jones and this whole incident which makes her a less than creditable witness, not the least of which is the Republican funding of her makeover, and her court case. They also hired a publicist to make her appear less trashy and opportunistic.

Jones never claimed that Bill sexually assaulted her. She claimed he sexually harassed her, which is to say, she said he demanded sexual favours from her and threatened her or her husband's employment if she declined. Neither Jones nor her husband were fired, demoted, nor were their jobs in any way impacted by her refusal to have sex with Clinton. And yes, the suit was dismissed because Jones failed to prove any damages. Jones appealed the dismissal, and while waiting for her appeal to be heard, Clinton settled, to put an end to the litigation.

On April 2, 1998, before the case could reach trial,[12] Judge Susan Webber Wright granted President Clinton's motion for dismissal, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages.[12] Jones soon appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[9]

Conclusion of case[edit]
On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. Robert S. Bennett, Clinton's attorney, still maintained that Jones's claim was baseless and that Clinton only settled so he could end the lawsuit and move on with his life.[9] In March 1999, Judge Wright ruled that Jones would only get $200,000 from the settlement and that the rest of the money would pay for her legal expenses.[13]

Why I don't believe her
Jones did not report the incident, files charges or make any claims against Clinton for 3 years. She filed after an article about the incident appeared in the American Spectator, and the article made it sound like she came on to Clinton and he had to fend her off. She filed the lawsuit to protect her reputation.

Then there was the makeover, the new wardrobe, the cosmetic dentistry, all provided to make her look less like trashy, and more creditable for the American public, the Washington DC law firm handling her case, and the California Republican public relations rep who was there to put the right spin on it all.

It was a professional Republican smear job, not a legitimate claim for sexual harassment, since the court found she hadn't been harassed or suffered any damages. I have no doubt that Bill made a clumsy pass at all, but she declined and nothing further happened. Until the Republicans got wind of it, and promised her big bucks if she pursued her claim.

 

[bripat9643]

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary’s approval — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn’t fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton’s top advisers as “trailer park” trash, as someone so craven she’d crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he’d have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their fellow character assassins told us then that character didn’t matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible, were it not for Bill and Hillary and their continuing “anything goes” lack of character.

****

There you have it folks. You think Trump's unacceptable because of the way he treats women? Remember that the Clintons did it all first, and lowered the bar for everyone else to come.

Paula Jones was dug up by the Republicans who were desperate for anything to pin on Bill that would stick. She was trailer trash and she looked it.

Republicans cleaned her up, bought her a new wardrobe, some cosmetic dentistry and a nose job, and they paid her legal bills.

The case was dismissed by a federal judge, so your claim that she had a case is false. Jones refiled and Clinton settled the second suit to put an end to it.

The case was not "dismissed." Clinton settled out of court. Why do you think he paid her $850,000? Just about everything you post turns out to be wrong and just plain stupid. I love the way you trash Slick's victim, just like Hillary. You're just as much of a douche bag as she is.

Remember what Hillary said about victims of sexual assault:

"you have the right to be believed."​

Yes, victims of sexual assault have the right to be believed, but there is much about Jones and this whole incident which makes her a less than creditable witness, not the least of which is the Republican funding of her makeover, and her court case. They also hired a publicist to make her appear less trashy and opportunistic.

Jones never claimed that Bill sexually assaulted her. She claimed he sexually harassed her, which is to say, she said he demanded sexual favours from her and threatened her or her husband's employment if she declined. Neither Jones nor her husband were fired, demoted, nor were their jobs in any way impacted by her refusal to have sex with Clinton. And yes, the suit was dismissed because Jones failed to prove any damages. Jones appealed the dismissal, and while waiting for her appeal to be heard, Clinton settled, to put an end to the litigation.

On April 2, 1998, before the case could reach trial,[12] Judge Susan Webber Wright granted President Clinton's motion for dismissal, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages.[12] Jones soon appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[9]

Conclusion of case[edit]
On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. Robert S. Bennett, Clinton's attorney, still maintained that Jones's claim was baseless and that Clinton only settled so he could end the lawsuit and move on with his life.[9] In March 1999, Judge Wright ruled that Jones would only get $200,000 from the settlement and that the rest of the money would pay for her legal expenses.[13]

Why I don't believe her
Jones did not report the incident, files charges or make any claims against Clinton for 3 years. She filed after an article about the incident appeared in the American Spectator, and the article made it sound like she came on to Clinton and he had to fend her off. She filed the lawsuit to protect her reputation.

Then there was the makeover, the new wardrobe, the cosmetic dentistry, all provided to make her look less like trashy, and more creditable for the American public, the Washington DC law firm handling her case, and the California Republican public relations rep who was there to put the right spin on it all.

It was a professional Republican smear job, not a legitimate claim for sexual harassment, since the court found she hadn't been harassed or suffered any damages. I have no doubt that Bill made a clumsy pass at all, but she declined and nothing further happened. Until the Republicans got wind of it, and promised her big bucks if she pursued her claim.

In other words, victims of sexual assault "have the right to be believed" unless they are accusing a Democrat politician. In that case they are trailer trash who deserve to have their reputations dragged through the sewer.

You only proved that you're as much of a lying douche bag as Hillary and Slick.

 

[Dragonlady]

You only proved that you're as much of a lying douche bag as Hillary and Slick.

She was never the victim of "sexual assault" so stop trying to pretend she was.

This was a woman who only came forward at all because she felt that she was maligned in the magazine story, which implied that she had consensual sex with Bill Clinton. That the Republican Party paid for her lawyer, her makeover and her wardrobe implies the she was just in it for the money.

When someone goes after a high profile/rich person, you ask yourself "What's in it for the accuser", in this case, there was a lot in it for her and no down side. Even the judge dismissed her case as having no merit.

 

[rdean]

The Hildebeast is so corrupt, she'd crawl on her knees for a$100 bill

Not when she's making a hundred thousand a speech.

Don't be jealous. If you work hard, you too can get out of mom's double wide.

 

[bripat9643]

You only proved that you're as much of a lying douche bag as Hillary and Slick.

She was never the victim of "sexual assault" so stop trying to pretend she was.

This was a woman who only came forward at all because she felt that she was maligned in the magazine story, which implied that she had consensual sex with Bill Clinton. That the Republican Party paid for her lawyer, her makeover and her wardrobe implies the she was just in it for the money.

When someone goes after a high profile/rich person, you ask yourself "What's in it for the accuser", in this case, there was a lot in it for her and no down side. Even the judge dismissed her case as having no merit.

Why do you continue trying to prove you're a douche bag who likes attacking the victim? Don't waste your time. We're already convinced.

 

[Dragonlady]

Why do you continue trying to prove you're a douche bag who likes attacking the victim? Don't waste your time. We're already convinced.

You picked the wrong woman to champion, but being on the wrong side of an argument is standard operating procedure for you. Not once ever have you defended victims of sexual assault. The only reason you're blaming Clinton is because you hate him. If someone had leveled a similar charge against Reagan, you'd be calling her the tramp of the western world, just like you trashed that poor woman who was raped behind the dumpster.

This is the case of a woman who was prepared to say anything to salvage her reputation after an right-wing magazine called her an adulterer - just another of Bill Clinton's bimbos. And for the record, women who go after other women who sleep with their husbands are perfectly justified in doing so. These women knew Bill Clinton was married when they became involved with him. They didn't care. Monica Lewinsky being a prime example. She revelled in her role as Bill Clinton's mistress, bragging about her exploits with him. That's how Linda Tripp heard about her - through the Washington grapevine.

Republicans were more than ready to bankroll an attack on the Clintons because they were desperate to derail his re-election bid. The lawsuit was filed May 6, 1994, just before the statute of limitations expired. The fact that the Jones family suffered no repercussions from Paula's refusal to have sex with Bill, shows there was no harassment involved, just a clumsy pass that she decline.

You're an idiot to think this was some poor agrieved woman. Carville was absolutely spot-on in his charactization of Jones.

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you continue trying to prove you're a douche bag who likes attacking the victim? Don't waste your time. We're already convinced.

You picked the wrong woman to champion, but being on the wrong side of an argument is standard operating procedure for you. Not once ever have you defended victims of sexual assault. The only reason you're blaming Clinton is because you hate him. If someone had leveled a similar charge against Reagan, you'd be calling her the tramp of the western world, just like you trashed that poor woman who was raped behind the dumpster.

This is the case of a woman who was prepared to say anything to salvage her reputation after an right-wing magazine called her an adulterer - just another of Bill Clinton's bimbos. And for the record, women who go after other women who sleep with their husbands are perfectly justified in doing so. These women knew Bill Clinton was married when they became involved with him. They didn't care. Monica Lewinsky being a prime example. She revelled in her role as Bill Clinton's mistress, bragging about her exploits with him. That's how Linda Tripp heard about her - through the Washington grapevine.

Republicans were more than ready to bankroll an attack on the Clintons because they were desperate to derail his re-election bid. The lawsuit was filed May 6, 1994, just before the statute of limitations expired. The fact that the Jones family suffered no repercussions from Paula's refusal to have sex with Bill, shows there was no harassment involved, just a clumsy pass that she decline.

You're an idiot to think this was some poor agrieved woman. Carville was absolutely spot-on in his charactization of Jones.

More attacks on the victim. You are a totally shameless douche bag. Hillary has trained you well. She doesn't even need to feed you the talking points any longer. The fact that pieces of crap like you support Hillary is all the reason we need to do everything in our power to keep her out of the Oval Office. We don't need 8 more years of Clinton rape, sexual assault, corruption and criminality.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary’s approval — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn’t fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton’s top advisers as “trailer park” trash, as someone so craven she’d crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he’d have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their fellow character assassins told us then that character didn’t matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible, were it not for Bill and Hillary and their continuing “anything goes” lack of character.

****

There you have it folks. You think Trump's unacceptable because of the way he treats women? Remember that the Clintons did it all first, and lowered the bar for everyone else to come.

If someone other than Trump were your nominee, this might have relevance.

But Trump is your nominee, so it doesn't.

 

[Dragonlady]

Why do you continue trying to prove you're a douche bag who likes attacking the victim? Don't waste your time. We're already convinced.

You picked the wrong woman to champion, but being on the wrong side of an argument is standard operating procedure for you. Not once ever have you defended victims of sexual assault. The only reason you're blaming Clinton is because you hate him. If someone had leveled a similar charge against Reagan, you'd be calling her the tramp of the western world, just like you trashed that poor woman who was raped behind the dumpster.

This is the case of a woman who was prepared to say anything to salvage her reputation after an right-wing magazine called her an adulterer - just another of Bill Clinton's bimbos. And for the record, women who go after other women who sleep with their husbands are perfectly justified in doing so. These women knew Bill Clinton was married when they became involved with him. They didn't care. Monica Lewinsky being a prime example. She revelled in her role as Bill Clinton's mistress, bragging about her exploits with him. That's how Linda Tripp heard about her - through the Washington grapevine.

Republicans were more than ready to bankroll an attack on the Clintons because they were desperate to derail his re-election bid. The lawsuit was filed May 6, 1994, just before the statute of limitations expired. The fact that the Jones family suffered no repercussions from Paula's refusal to have sex with Bill, shows there was no harassment involved, just a clumsy pass that she decline.

You're an idiot to think this was some poor agrieved woman. Carville was absolutely spot-on in his charactization of Jones.

More attacks on the victim. You are a totally shameless douche bag. Hillary has trained you well. She doesn't even need to feed you the talking points any longer. The fact that pieces of crap like you support Hillary is all the reason we need to do everything in our power to keep her out of the Oval Office. We don't need 8 more years of Clinton rape, sexual assault, corruption and criminality.

All you are doing is spouting Republicans bloggers lies. There is no record of Bill Clinton raping anyone. No one single verifiable charge. Anita Broderick, who would be your most creditable "victim", signed an affidavit saying Bill Clinton did not rape her.

None of these women has come forward with any sort of believable allegations.

I have no doubt that Bill is a no-good dog, but it's not my marriage, and it hasn't affected the job he did for the people. Anything allegations of anything else need to be made in a believable way, not the partisan crap put out by internet bloggers.

 

[bripat9643]

You only proved that you're as much of a lying douche bag as Hillary and Slick.

She was never the victim of "sexual assault" so stop trying to pretend she was.

This was a woman who only came forward at all because she felt that she was maligned in the magazine story, which implied that she had consensual sex with Bill Clinton. That the Republican Party paid for her lawyer, her makeover and her wardrobe implies the she was just in it for the money.

When someone goes after a high profile/rich person, you ask yourself "What's in it for the accuser", in this case, there was a lot in it for her and no down side. Even the judge dismissed her case as having no merit.

She sued Slick for sexual harassment. Although sexual assault was the more appropriate crime, the statute of limitations had run out on it. What time should she file her lawsuit, after the deadline has passed? You really come up with some silly excuses for attacking the victim. Who do you think should have paid for her lawyer, the DNC? The conditions you impose on women to be classified as "legitimate" would please Joseph Goebbels. You're defending a serial rapist and the women who covers up his crimes. You're a piece of crap. That's all there is to it.

 

[CowboyTed]

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary’s approval — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn’t fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton’s top advisers as “trailer park” trash, as someone so craven she’d crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he’d have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the “nuts and sluts strategy,” denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury. And he was impeached.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their fellow character assassins told us then that character didn’t matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible, were it not for Bill and Hillary and their continuing “anything goes” lack of character.

****

There you have it folks. You think Trump's unacceptable because of the way he treats women? Remember that the Clintons did it all first, and lowered the bar for everyone else to come.

Where is your proof... He never admitted guilt and settled out of Court...

So anything you claim Clinton is guilty of you have to first admit Trump is guilty of if he paid...

So before you get started Trump is guilty of:
Trump University
Fucking a Porn Star
Raping his Wife
.....