If you disparage the Tea Partiers based on a few individuals how do you treat muslims

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Do you also think that all muslims are represented by a few individual muslim terrorists?


If you are consistent in how you analyize individuals and groups I would be led to beleive that due to your views on all tea partiers being racist right wing obama hating republicans that you would also hold the view that all muslims are Koran bastardizing, suicide bombing of innocents, terrorists.


What say you?

I say, pot meet kettle!

I love how CON$, who stereotype everyone they hate, always pretend they are the poor innocent VICTIMS of stereotyping.

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

 

[daveman]

I say, pot meet kettle!

I love how CON$, who stereotype everyone they hate, always pretend they are the poor innocent VICTIMS of stereotyping.

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

Judging from most of his responses, he has only a nodding acquaintance with reality.

 

[manifold]

Broad brushing groups is juvenile, be it thinking all Muslims are terrorists, all blacks are lazy criminals, all Jews are money grubbers or all Tea Partiers are redneck racists.

Exactly...

It's just the one's we know about.

 

[manifold]

I distrust members of both groups... almost equally.

Why would you distrust someone based on their religion or political view? How odd.

I don't.

I base it on their actions.

 

[edthecynic]

Do you also think that all muslims are represented by a few individual muslim terrorists?


If you are consistent in how you analyize individuals and groups I would be led to beleive that due to your views on all tea partiers being racist right wing obama hating republicans that you would also hold the view that all muslims are Koran bastardizing, suicide bombing of innocents, terrorists.


What say you?

I say, pot meet kettle!

I love how CON$, who stereotype everyone they hate, always pretend they are the poor innocent VICTIMS of stereotyping.

You missed this post

Broad brushing groups is juvenile, be it thinking all Muslims are terrorists, all blacks are lazy criminals, all Jews are money grubbers or all Tea Partiers are redneck racists.

Ty sir

I missed nothing. The Teabaggers have been stereotyping anyone who supports health care reform as Nazi Socialistic Marxists. And now you are whining that Teabaggers should not be stereotyped as racists. The Beck Baggers are now hiding behind God, but now you are whining when the Golden Rule bites you in your hypocritical butts.
The Golden Rule is a BITCH.
If the Teabaggers do not want to be stereotyped then they should stop THEIR stereotyping first rather than whining about stereotyping.

 

[edthecynic]

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

Judging from most of his responses, he has only a nodding acquaintance with reality.

When CON$ know they've lost the argument, they stoop to personal insults.
Thank you.

 

[edthecynic]

I say, pot meet kettle!

I love how CON$, who stereotype everyone they hate, always pretend they are the poor innocent VICTIMS of stereotyping.

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

The title sets up the Teabaggers as unfair VICTIMS of stereotyping rather than the purveyors of stereotyping. The Teabaggers reap what they sow, and rightly so.

 

[Jeremy]

Prejudism in any form is a sign of mental ineptness. I agree with the OP.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

I say, pot meet kettle!

I love how CON$, who stereotype everyone they hate, always pretend they are the poor innocent VICTIMS of stereotyping.

You missed this post

Ty sir

I missed nothing. The Teabaggers have been stereotyping anyone who supports health care reform as Nazi Socialistic Marxists. And now you are whining that Teabaggers should not be stereotyped as racists. The Beck Baggers are now hiding behind God, but now you are whining when the Golden Rule bites you in your hypocritical butts.
The Golden Rule is a BITCH.
If the Teabaggers do not want to be stereotyped then they should stop THEIR stereotyping first rather than whining about stereotyping.

Oh i get it since some people behave poorly that excuses all other people's poor behavior.

The fact that you feel this is an acceptable way to be explains a lot of why you and I never see eye to eye on things.

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

The title sets up the Teabaggers as unfair VICTIMS of stereotyping rather than the purveyors of stereotyping. The Teabaggers reap what they sow, and rightly so.

So you feel that all Muslims are terrorists based off the fact that just a very small minority of Muslims have performed terrorist acts? You also agree with anti-Muslim sentiment that has grown out of such actions?

Are those correct statements about your mindset?

Just curious because you seem more than willing to paint every person who goes to the teaparties as racists based off your perceptions of a very small minority of people who have attended a tea party rally.


Or were you trying to get away from the basic truth of the OP with your "reading into" my original post. It was very concise and hard to misinterpret but you seemed to do so anyway.

 

[edthecynic]

You missed this post

I missed nothing. The Teabaggers have been stereotyping anyone who supports health care reform as Nazi Socialistic Marxists. And now you are whining that Teabaggers should not be stereotyped as racists. The Beck Baggers are now hiding behind God, but now you are whining when the Golden Rule bites you in your hypocritical butts.
The Golden Rule is a BITCH.
If the Teabaggers do not want to be stereotyped then they should stop THEIR stereotyping first rather than whining about stereotyping.

Oh i get it since some people behave poorly that excuses all other people's poor behavior.

The fact that you feel this is an acceptable way to be explains a lot of why you and I never see eye to eye on things.

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

The title sets up the Teabaggers as unfair VICTIMS of stereotyping rather than the purveyors of stereotyping. The Teabaggers reap what they sow, and rightly so.

So you feel that all Muslims are terrorists based off the fact that just a very small minority of Muslims have performed terrorist acts? You also agree with anti-Muslim sentiment that has grown out of such actions?

Are those correct statements about your mindset?

Just curious because you seem more than willing to paint every person who goes to the teaparties as racists based off your perceptions of a very small minority of people who have attended a tea party rally.


Or were you trying to get away from the basic truth of the OP with your "reading into" my original post. It was very concise and hard to misinterpret but you seemed to do so anyway.

Now you are a mindreader.

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

Again, since the Beck Baggers are hiding behind God:

Lu 6:42 Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.

 

[Jeremy]

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

So If I call you a socialist I have no right to complain if you call me a racist?

Fucking weak.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

I missed nothing. The Teabaggers have been stereotyping anyone who supports health care reform as Nazi Socialistic Marxists. And now you are whining that Teabaggers should not be stereotyped as racists. The Beck Baggers are now hiding behind God, but now you are whining when the Golden Rule bites you in your hypocritical butts.
The Golden Rule is a BITCH.
If the Teabaggers do not want to be stereotyped then they should stop THEIR stereotyping first rather than whining about stereotyping.

Oh i get it since some people behave poorly that excuses all other people's poor behavior.

The fact that you feel this is an acceptable way to be explains a lot of why you and I never see eye to eye on things.

The title sets up the Teabaggers as unfair VICTIMS of stereotyping rather than the purveyors of stereotyping. The Teabaggers reap what they sow, and rightly so.

So you feel that all Muslims are terrorists based off the fact that just a very small minority of Muslims have performed terrorist acts? You also agree with anti-Muslim sentiment that has grown out of such actions?

Are those correct statements about your mindset?

Just curious because you seem more than willing to paint every person who goes to the teaparties as racists based off your perceptions of a very small minority of people who have attended a tea party rally.


Or were you trying to get away from the basic truth of the OP with your "reading into" my original post. It was very concise and hard to misinterpret but you seemed to do so anyway.

Now you are a mindreader.

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

Again, since the Beck Baggers are hiding behind God:

Lu 6:42 Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.

If I was a mindreader I wouldn't have had to ask you if my assumptions were right or wrong about you. From that very comment, combined with your others in the thread it is plain and obvious that you have either a limited capacity to comprehend simple statements or are intentionally misrepresenting what is being discussed.

 

[edthecynic]

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

So If I call you a socialist I have no right to complain if you call me a racist?

Fucking weak.

That is known as The Golden Rule.

Too weak for you, of course, but not too weak for people who believe God.

Matthew 7:12 In everything, do to others what you would want them to do to you. This is what is written in the Law and in the Prophets.

Luke 6:31 Do to others as you want them to do to you.

"Do to no one what you yourself dislike."
—Tobit 4:15

"That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn."
—Talmud, Shabbat 31a

"Recognize that your neighbor feels as you do, and keep in mind your own dislikes."
—Sirach 31:15

 

[Jeremy]

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

So If I call you a socialist I have no right to complain if you call me a racist?

Fucking weak.

That is known as The Golden Rule.

Too weak for you, of course, but not too weak for people who believe God.

Matthew 7:12 In everything, do to others what you would want them to do to you. This is what is written in the Law and in the Prophets.

Luke 6:31 Do to others as you want them to do to you.

"Do to no one what you yourself dislike."
—Tobit 4:15

"That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn."
—Talmud, Shabbat 31a

"Recognize that your neighbor feels as you do, and keep in mind your own dislikes."
—Sirach 31:15

Well, at least you feel that the label of "socialist" is in insult. Maybe you're not half bad.

 

[edthecynic]

Oh i get it since some people behave poorly that excuses all other people's poor behavior.

The fact that you feel this is an acceptable way to be explains a lot of why you and I never see eye to eye on things.




So you feel that all Muslims are terrorists based off the fact that just a very small minority of Muslims have performed terrorist acts? You also agree with anti-Muslim sentiment that has grown out of such actions?

Are those correct statements about your mindset?

Just curious because you seem more than willing to paint every person who goes to the teaparties as racists based off your perceptions of a very small minority of people who have attended a tea party rally.


Or were you trying to get away from the basic truth of the OP with your "reading into" my original post. It was very concise and hard to misinterpret but you seemed to do so anyway.

Now you are a mindreader.

My "mindset" is Teabaggers have no right to complain about stereotyping since they have been stereotyping health care reformers all along.

Again, since the Beck Baggers are hiding behind God:

Lu 6:42 Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.

If I was a mindreader I wouldn't have had to ask you if my assumptions were right or wrong about you. From that very comment, combined with your others in the thread it is plain and obvious that you have either a limited capacity to comprehend simple statements or are intentionally misrepresenting what is being discussed.

Thank you for your condescension and PROJECTION.

If you really wanted to have a serious discussion, rather than the trolling you are doing, you would have chosen a different example than the Teabaggers. They are hardly innocent VICTIMS. You sound like your MessiahRushie whining that the Teabaggers were called Nazis, even though they weren't, after the Teabaggers called health care reformers Nazis.

 

[edthecynic]

So If I call you a socialist I have no right to complain if you call me a racist?

Fucking weak.

That is known as The Golden Rule.

Too weak for you, of course, but not too weak for people who believe God.

Matthew 7:12 In everything, do to others what you would want them to do to you. This is what is written in the Law and in the Prophets.

Luke 6:31 Do to others as you want them to do to you.

"Do to no one what you yourself dislike."
—Tobit 4:15

"That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn."
—Talmud, Shabbat 31a

"Recognize that your neighbor feels as you do, and keep in mind your own dislikes."
—Sirach 31:15

Well, at least you feel that the label of "socialist" is in insult. Maybe you're not half bad.

The fact remains, the Teabaggers have been making a point that they are God fearing people, so they want to be stereotyped, unless they are lying about their belief in God for political purposes.

 

[daveman]

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

Judging from most of his responses, he has only a nodding acquaintance with reality.

When CON$ know they've lost the argument, they stoop to personal insults.
Thank you.

And you're too stupid to realize that CON$ is insulting.

So it looks like you're a flaming hypocrite, too.

 

[daveman]

...he said, simultaneously stereotyping conservatives.

You're just not very bright, are you?

Judging soley from this response of his I think he jumped to a conclusion that was not based in the reality of what was said in the OP or the thread prior to his post.

The title sets up the Teabaggers as unfair VICTIMS of stereotyping rather than the purveyors of stereotyping. The Teabaggers reap what they sow, and rightly so.

So, in summary:

You make bigoted statements about Tea Party members (remember, "teabaggers" is insulting, and you don't engage in ad hominym, right? ).

Then, as proof of your bigoted statements, you point to your own bigotry.

 

[edthecynic]

Judging from most of his responses, he has only a nodding acquaintance with reality.

When CON$ know they've lost the argument, they stoop to personal insults.
Thank you.

And you're too stupid to realize that CON$ is insulting.

So it looks like you're a flaming hypocrite, too.

Only if I pretended to believe in God like CON$ do. I am merely showing sincere respect for the Golden Rule of their professed religious beliefs.

 

[Zona]

Do you also think that all muslims are represented by a few individual muslim terrorists?


If you are consistent in how you analyize individuals and groups I would be led to beleive that due to your views on all tea partiers being racist right wing obama hating republicans that you would also hold the view that all muslims are Koran bastardizing, suicide bombing of innocents, terrorists.


What say you?

I respect any tea party member who made noise BEFORE Obama took office. If they were complaining back then and now, they are real. The rest are tea baggers.