If Trump Were A Democrat

The word 'silly' doesn't enter into this discussion.
Guaranteeing nuclear weapons to Iran is treachery of the highest order.
It is jaw-droppingly appalling in its enormity, its anti-American and anti-civilization dimension.

I understand that dealing and communicating in hyperbole is easier than addressing nuance but it is nuanced. Sorry that you disagree



Are you standing with Obama's insistence on Iran getting nuclear weapons....is that it?

I disagree with your verbiage and your conclusion regarding Obama’s intent. That’s it


There is no disputing either what I said or my conclusions.....if you'd like to be correct.

If you'd rather lick the boots of this anti-America and anti-Western Civilization villain, Barack Hussein Obama, well, that's your right.


"Obama Gave Iran A Faster Route To A Nuke -- And Didn't Tell Us
President Obama's deal with Iran was supposed to keep that nation's mullahs from creating a nuclear weapon with which it could intimidate and dominate the Mideast and much of Europe. Instead, it actually makes it more possible -- and in shorter time.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of a secret side deal that, in the words of the normally circumspect AP, advances "Tehran's ability to build a bomb even before the end of the pact." The accord as agreed to by the U.S. and five other nations was supposed to last 15 years. Or so we were told. Turns out, that's not the case.


...the deal as signed all but guarantees that Iran will someday get a nuclear weapon with which to terrorize its neighbors. What the AP document does is move up the time under which Iran can make a nuclear weapon. So we'll all be at risk sooner than we think.

The so-called "add-on" agreement lets Iran expand its uranium enrichment program after 10 years -- not 15 years, as the public parts of the deal suggested."
Obama Gave Iran A Faster Route To A Nuke -- And Didn't Tell Us | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD




BTW....

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....



3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal


Nuclear_explosion_obama.jpg


You cite an editorial in support of your conclusive statements. The editorial of course repeats and reiterates the same old statements and of course forgets the most important problem, but for the deal does Iran have a nuke soon or later?


How about this one, you dunce?

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


The 'deal' guarantees that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism will have a nuclear bomb.....and the ballistic missiles to deliver same.


In seven years.



You do know that it could have been prevented by Obama...as Reagan did:

....Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he actually intended to end Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism and its desire for nuclear weapons:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.
Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p. , p.185




Reagan .... thought the aim of American foreign policy should be not to get along with the Communist powers but to hasten their end.


Obama's aim was always to nuclear arm the worst of western civilization's enemies.
And he did.


Wise up, dope.
 

Forum List

Back
Top