If this is true, we are in trouble...

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Anyone who thinks Capitalism is going to bring about Conservative, or Patriotic values is DELUSIONAL, or RETARDED.

Basically Capitalism is all about unpatriotic outsourcing, and hiring illegals for cheaper, and Liberal values like Drug Dealers selling drugs, selling Abortions, selling Porn, selling Gangster Rap, selling Liberal shoot 'em up Hollywood films, media Liberalism, selling Gay marriage apparel, or banquets for Gay marriages, or Google / Youtube / Facebook / Twitter censoring out Right-Wing opinions.

That's basically all tenets of Capitalism, in order to promote Patriotic, or Conservative values, you must REGULATE Capitalism.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

The biggest bottleneck roads in the World are in the USA, rather than more overpopulated Europe for a reason, and that's plain, and simple, they do have more public transit.

As for Mopeds in Italy, they simply have very chaotic, and many narrow streets, and centrally located cities, it doesn't make much sense to drive big pick up trucks there.

Of course it doesn't, especially when you are paying seven or eight bucks for a gallon of gasoline. I seriously doubt you'll find many models riding around on mopeds in the US; maybe NYC, I don't know. But I value the ability to get in my car anytime I want and drive to anywhere I want.

My grandparents never had a license, and my mother followed in their footsteps. I always hear her say "I would like to go here, or I would like to go there!" But she can't unless she gets a ride from one of us. She can't just jump in a car and go to another state for a little vacation.

In NYC it can cost a bundle just to store a "Car"

Since everything's basically there, they can walk to, or use transit pretty quickly.

NYC would be a lot worse without public transit, it would be a lot more crowded, AKA a lot worse of a travel nightmare.

That is true because they packed so many people there and no streets can be wide enough to handle that amount of travelers. But I would never want to see that across the country like DumBama tried to do. Our Governor told DumBama to shove his mass transit money for our state. Good thing he did too, because places like California are spending billions on top of the federal grant to complete their rail systems. The funny thing is nobody will use the damn thing.

NYC built up a lot, because of the Erie Canal it became the major Port City at the Mouth of the Hudson River.
Which NYC became a connected inter-section between Inner-America with Europe.

Despite the expenses, a lot of people say the job opportunities, and life experiences are just better in New York.

What does sustain NYC, and it's "Metro" is largely it's "Educated masses" indeed, New York City tends to pull in a lot more educated, productive, and innovative heads, than say Bum-f*ck Nebraska.

That's the engine that drives the NYC economy.

Not that it doesn't have it's problems with "Heavy costs" HOWEVER, some of us who bought houses cheap 30 years ago have cleaned up on our investments.

Furthermore, NYC becoming expensive has infact pushed a lot of ghetto Blacks, and ghetto Puerto Ricans out of the worst neighborhoods of NYC, at one time most of Manhattan, and almost all of Brooklyn were terrible, now-a-days they are so expensive the "Ghetto folks" leave in mass.
As for the Bronx it has gotten safer too, but not as much gentrification as the other two YET, However, the investmnet in police, and Stop & Frisk have kept down crime in the entire city.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

The biggest bottleneck roads in the World are in the USA, rather than more overpopulated Europe for a reason, and that's plain, and simple, they do have more public transit.

As for Mopeds in Italy, they simply have very chaotic, and many narrow streets, and centrally located cities, it doesn't make much sense to drive big pick up trucks there.

Of course it doesn't, especially when you are paying seven or eight bucks for a gallon of gasoline. I seriously doubt you'll find many models riding around on mopeds in the US; maybe NYC, I don't know. But I value the ability to get in my car anytime I want and drive to anywhere I want.

My grandparents never had a license, and my mother followed in their footsteps. I always hear her say "I would like to go here, or I would like to go there!" But she can't unless she gets a ride from one of us. She can't just jump in a car and go to another state for a little vacation.

In NYC it can cost a bundle just to store a "Car"

Since everything's basically there, they can walk to, or use transit pretty quickly.

NYC would be a lot worse without public transit, it would be a lot more crowded, AKA a lot worse of a travel nightmare.

That is true because they packed so many people there and no streets can be wide enough to handle that amount of travelers. But I would never want to see that across the country like DumBama tried to do. Our Governor told DumBama to shove his mass transit money for our state. Good thing he did too, because places like California are spending billions on top of the federal grant to complete their rail systems. The funny thing is nobody will use the damn thing.

NYC built up a lot, because of the Erie Canal it became the major Port City at the Mouth of the Hudson River.
Which NYC became a connected inter-section between Inner-America with Europe.

Despite the expenses, a lot of people say the job opportunities, and life experiences are just better in New York.

What does sustain NYC, and it's "Metro" is largely it's "Educated masses" indeed, New York City tends to pull in a lot more educated, productive, and innovative heads, than say Bum-f*ck Nebraska.

That's the engine that drives the NYC economy.

Not that it doesn't have it's problems with "Heavy costs" HOWEVER, some of us who bought houses cheap 30 years ago have cleaned up on our investments.

Furthermore, NYC becoming expensive has infact pushed a lot of ghetto Blacks, and ghetto Puerto Ricans out of the worst neighborhoods of NYC, at one time most of Manhattan, and almost all of Brooklyn were terrible, now-a-days they are so expensive the "Ghetto folks" leave in mass.
As for the Bronx it has gotten safer too, but not as much gentrification as the other two YET, However, the investmnet in police, and Stop & Frisk have kept down crime in the entire city.

Rudy was a huge advantage to that city, especially during the worst of it's times. But I don't know if I'd want to live in a place where unless you are wealthy, it's near impossible to find a decent place to live.

I forget what they are called now, but places have boards you must satisfy in order to move into an apartment or condo there. Howard Stern was discussing this for a period of time because he was rejected from getting a condo simply because of what he said on the radio, and he's Jewish.

My cousin's daughter lives there, she's an actress. She wants to move back to Cleveland because (according to her) our city will be the future when it comes to live entertainment like plays. Plus she wants to get out of NYC because it's a madhouse. Nice place to visit, but another to live there.

 

[Lesh]

Nowadays, they just zoom into that phone n twiddle-thumb it. Oh yeah, no need for "bugs" anymore when everybody carries an audio listening device with a built-in video camera.

And unfortunately that includes our stupid friggin President

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

The biggest bottleneck roads in the World are in the USA, rather than more overpopulated Europe for a reason, and that's plain, and simple, they do have more public transit.

As for Mopeds in Italy, they simply have very chaotic, and many narrow streets, and centrally located cities, it doesn't make much sense to drive big pick up trucks there.

Of course it doesn't, especially when you are paying seven or eight bucks for a gallon of gasoline. I seriously doubt you'll find many models riding around on mopeds in the US; maybe NYC, I don't know. But I value the ability to get in my car anytime I want and drive to anywhere I want.

My grandparents never had a license, and my mother followed in their footsteps. I always hear her say "I would like to go here, or I would like to go there!" But she can't unless she gets a ride from one of us. She can't just jump in a car and go to another state for a little vacation.

In NYC it can cost a bundle just to store a "Car"

Since everything's basically there, they can walk to, or use transit pretty quickly.

NYC would be a lot worse without public transit, it would be a lot more crowded, AKA a lot worse of a travel nightmare.

That is true because they packed so many people there and no streets can be wide enough to handle that amount of travelers. But I would never want to see that across the country like DumBama tried to do. Our Governor told DumBama to shove his mass transit money for our state. Good thing he did too, because places like California are spending billions on top of the federal grant to complete their rail systems. The funny thing is nobody will use the damn thing.

NYC built up a lot, because of the Erie Canal it became the major Port City at the Mouth of the Hudson River.
Which NYC became a connected inter-section between Inner-America with Europe.

Despite the expenses, a lot of people say the job opportunities, and life experiences are just better in New York.

What does sustain NYC, and it's "Metro" is largely it's "Educated masses" indeed, New York City tends to pull in a lot more educated, productive, and innovative heads, than say Bum-f*ck Nebraska.

That's the engine that drives the NYC economy.

Not that it doesn't have it's problems with "Heavy costs" HOWEVER, some of us who bought houses cheap 30 years ago have cleaned up on our investments.

Furthermore, NYC becoming expensive has infact pushed a lot of ghetto Blacks, and ghetto Puerto Ricans out of the worst neighborhoods of NYC, at one time most of Manhattan, and almost all of Brooklyn were terrible, now-a-days they are so expensive the "Ghetto folks" leave in mass.
As for the Bronx it has gotten safer too, but not as much gentrification as the other two YET, However, the investmnet in police, and Stop & Frisk have kept down crime in the entire city.

Rudy was a huge advantage to that city, especially during the worst of it's times. But I don't know if I'd want to live in a place where unless you are wealthy, it's near impossible to find a decent place to live.

I forget what they are called now, but places have boards you must satisfy in order to move into an apartment or condo there. Howard Stern was discussing this for a period of time because he was rejected from getting a condo simply because of what he said on the radio, and he's Jewish.

My cousin's daughter lives there, she's an actress. She wants to move back to Cleveland because (according to her) our city will be the future when it comes to live entertainment like plays. Plus she wants to get out of NYC because it's a madhouse. Nice place to visit, but another to live there.

The Hudson Valley's the best place I've been, we can commute, or visit NYC pretty quickly, yet it's a lot cheaper up here, a lot prettier, a lot more park-land, a lot less crowded, and we retain a lot of "Ethnic" and "Good" foods like NYC, it pours up into the Hudson Valley.

 

[percysunshine]

These statistics are claimed to be true:
1. 50% of American wage earners earn less than $30k.
2. 63% of Americans can’t afford a $1,000 emergency.
3. 80% of American workers live pay check to pay check.
4. Since 1973 American productivity has increased by 77%, yet hourly pay has grown by 12%. If the minimum wage was tracked to productivity, it would be over $20 an hour today.
5. 41% of American workers earn less than $12 per hour, with most without employer provided HC.
6. Since 2008 the federal government and the Fed created $26 trillion out of nothing. Was any of this enormous sum spent on infrastructure, public education, universal HC, bail out 5.1 million people who lost their homes?

Not a pretty picture for the poor and middle class. Hopefully things are improving or we are headed for big trouble.

The good news is that internet bandwidth is at an all time high.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Japan, Russia, and Germany have quite big populations, each have national healthcare, and spend far less than the USA on healthcare.

Any questions?

Like the old saying goes, you get what you pay for:

View attachment 225059

If we get better healthcare, than Germany, or Japan, how come they live longer, exactly?

There are a number of reasons.

First off, we have more vehicle deaths than most any country in the world. Last time I checked, we were rated second place.

We have a huge drug problem in the US. An increasing number of OD deaths compared to the rest of the world, and like vehicle deaths, many are younger people which brings down our lifespan expectation.

Along with the drug problem are drug gangs. This is a problem in many major cities across the US, but most prominently in places like Chicago where dozens of shootings happen every weekend. I live in Cleveland, I understand this. Drive-by shootings kill many innocents as well.

Obesity is another cause. We are the fattest country in the world and that decreases lifespan.

American women are in the workforce. This is a factor in avoiding prenatal care. Work is important to all of us, so getting to work is more important than the success of having a child in good health.

Some countries have different standards in infant mortality. In other words, if a baby in the US takes one breath and dies, it's considered a loss of life. In other countries, a baby with health problems is not considered a life until a certain age. So if a child passes away from some medical condition, that child is not considered a loss of life.

If you think of it, most of the people that die in this country are on some government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. These are social programs or social medicine as you might wish to call it. But because many of our people die on some social program doesn't mean all social medical programs are terrible.

We do have more obesity from a Capitaliat society, junk food is more readily available than in Europe & socialized medicine tries to get people to lose weight as preventive care.

As for car accidents same thing we have a lot less public transit than Europe.

Even Poland now has some faster & better trains than the USA.

We really are a nation behind the times.

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

Europe also doesn't have as many cars because their cities tend to all be very old, and have streets that were laid out before cars existed.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Like the old saying goes, you get what you pay for:

View attachment 225059

If we get better healthcare, than Germany, or Japan, how come they live longer, exactly?

There are a number of reasons.

First off, we have more vehicle deaths than most any country in the world. Last time I checked, we were rated second place.

We have a huge drug problem in the US. An increasing number of OD deaths compared to the rest of the world, and like vehicle deaths, many are younger people which brings down our lifespan expectation.

Along with the drug problem are drug gangs. This is a problem in many major cities across the US, but most prominently in places like Chicago where dozens of shootings happen every weekend. I live in Cleveland, I understand this. Drive-by shootings kill many innocents as well.

Obesity is another cause. We are the fattest country in the world and that decreases lifespan.

American women are in the workforce. This is a factor in avoiding prenatal care. Work is important to all of us, so getting to work is more important than the success of having a child in good health.

Some countries have different standards in infant mortality. In other words, if a baby in the US takes one breath and dies, it's considered a loss of life. In other countries, a baby with health problems is not considered a life until a certain age. So if a child passes away from some medical condition, that child is not considered a loss of life.

If you think of it, most of the people that die in this country are on some government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. These are social programs or social medicine as you might wish to call it. But because many of our people die on some social program doesn't mean all social medical programs are terrible.

We do have more obesity from a Capitaliat society, junk food is more readily available than in Europe & socialized medicine tries to get people to lose weight as preventive care.

As for car accidents same thing we have a lot less public transit than Europe.

Even Poland now has some faster & better trains than the USA.

We really are a nation behind the times.

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

Cars also give you more freedom in where you live. The move out of cities and into the suburbs happened when cars became widely owned, because people no longer had to live close to their jobs, regardless of how crappy the neighborhood was.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

The biggest bottleneck roads in the World are in the USA, rather than more overpopulated Europe for a reason, and that's plain, and simple, they do have more public transit.

As for Mopeds in Italy, they simply have very chaotic, and many narrow streets, and centrally located cities, it doesn't make much sense to drive big pick up trucks there.

Of course it doesn't, especially when you are paying seven or eight bucks for a gallon of gasoline. I seriously doubt you'll find many models riding around on mopeds in the US; maybe NYC, I don't know. But I value the ability to get in my car anytime I want and drive to anywhere I want.

My grandparents never had a license, and my mother followed in their footsteps. I always hear her say "I would like to go here, or I would like to go there!" But she can't unless she gets a ride from one of us. She can't just jump in a car and go to another state for a little vacation.

In NYC it can cost a bundle just to store a "Car"

Since everything's basically there, they can walk to, or use transit pretty quickly.

NYC would be a lot worse without public transit, it would be a lot more crowded, AKA a lot worse of a travel nightmare.

That is true because they packed so many people there and no streets can be wide enough to handle that amount of travelers. But I would never want to see that across the country like DumBama tried to do. Our Governor told DumBama to shove his mass transit money for our state. Good thing he did too, because places like California are spending billions on top of the federal grant to complete their rail systems. The funny thing is nobody will use the damn thing.

Well, good Lord, of course not! Have you been on public transit lately? First few drops of rain come down, it's full of wet homeless people looking to avoid the weather. You know what homeless people smell like when they get wet?

No one subjects themselves to the misery of public transit unless they have no other option.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

The biggest bottleneck roads in the World are in the USA, rather than more overpopulated Europe for a reason, and that's plain, and simple, they do have more public transit.

As for Mopeds in Italy, they simply have very chaotic, and many narrow streets, and centrally located cities, it doesn't make much sense to drive big pick up trucks there.

Of course it doesn't, especially when you are paying seven or eight bucks for a gallon of gasoline. I seriously doubt you'll find many models riding around on mopeds in the US; maybe NYC, I don't know. But I value the ability to get in my car anytime I want and drive to anywhere I want.

My grandparents never had a license, and my mother followed in their footsteps. I always hear her say "I would like to go here, or I would like to go there!" But she can't unless she gets a ride from one of us. She can't just jump in a car and go to another state for a little vacation.

In NYC it can cost a bundle just to store a "Car"

Since everything's basically there, they can walk to, or use transit pretty quickly.

NYC would be a lot worse without public transit, it would be a lot more crowded, AKA a lot worse of a travel nightmare.

That is true because they packed so many people there and no streets can be wide enough to handle that amount of travelers. But I would never want to see that across the country like DumBama tried to do. Our Governor told DumBama to shove his mass transit money for our state. Good thing he did too, because places like California are spending billions on top of the federal grant to complete their rail systems. The funny thing is nobody will use the damn thing.

Well, good Lord, of course not! Have you been on public transit lately? First few drops of rain come down, it's full of wet homeless people looking to avoid the weather. You know what homeless people smell like when they get wet?

No one subjects themselves to the misery of public transit unless they have no other option.

I haven't been on a bus since I was a kid going to school, and I hated it back then. I never been on a train.

Speaking on a professional level, people who have jobs transporting other people are the worst drivers on the road. I don't know why that is, just observation on my part.

Here we have a sales tax to support our public transportation which I'm totally against. Currently it's eight cents on every dollar you spend. Mind you some of that tax goes for other things, but the lions share is for public transportation. In fact people by the county lines usually go to the next county to make major purchases to avoid the sales tax.

 

[eagle1462010]

Promoting is putting ads out suggesting people do X. When government tells you that you will do X, it's more than just promotion.

Give Democrats and inch and they will take a mile. Their strategy of incremental advancement has been quite successful for their party.

Years ago the gay community said they just want to be out of the closet. That's all, just let them come out of the closet and they will be happy. Fast forward 40 years or so, now they are forcing states to accept their marriages, adopting children, and kissing in front of our children in the park.

They said they wanted to ban smoking in movie theaters. That's all, just let them enjoy a movie without cigarettes. Fast forward to today, and smoking isn't even allowed outside in some places. States (like mine) even made it law you cannot smoke anyplace inside, and now some places are working to make it illegal to smoke in your own home or car.

I remember them complaining about lead in gasoline and paint. That's all they wanted, the elimination of lead and they will be happy. Fast forward to today and trillions of dollars later, they are still unhappy. They want to pressure people into electric cars, give subsidies for it, close down our power plants and some places it's illegal to have a wood fire to have a cookout.

It never stops with these people. It will not stop at government "just" taking over healthcare. That's only the start.

Republicans have "Tolerated" Democrats, Republicans are basically just Democrats who cut-taxes, that's ALL THEY HAVE to show for the past 50, or so years is "Tax cuts"

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Liberal propaganda in school. REPUBLICANS did NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Liberal propaganda in media, and Hollywood. REPUBLICANS did NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Liberal propaganda in Science. REPUBLICANS did NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Abortion (Baby murder). REPUBLICANS did NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Illegal Immigrants. REPUBLICANS Joined them.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Gay Marriage. REPUBLICANS did NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Liberal propaganda in silencing the Right Wing opinions with Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter.REPUBLICANS do NOTHING.

Meanwhile, Democrats started pushing Liberal biases in Google search engines, and REPUBLICANS do NOTHING.




The Republican motto must be "Do Nothing" and everything "Political" will somehow "Pan out"
Talk about Very Impotent people.

Republicans don't believe in controlling companies to their liking. That's what they do in Cuba. Furthermore some of the items you listed were stopped by the liberal courts--not because Republicans didn't do anything.

Facebook, Google, Twitter are all private entities. We don't do anything but heavily criticize them because that's all we can do. Wanting government control over social media is like saying Democrats should have control over Fox or AM radio. We don't do that in a free country. All we can do is boycott them.

You must really have your head in the sand if you think Republicans didn't try to stop gay marriage which again, was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court.

So, basically Republicans believe in Capitalism over Conservative values, Interesting, indeed.

/---/ One is not mutually exclusive of the other - YOU DIM BULB.
View attachment 225134

Liberalism of the market means to loosen regulations.

The first Leftists were Capitalists.

Those are the classical definitions.

How Americans turned everything upside down politically, and called Republicans as "Conservatives" or "Right-Wingers" is beyond me.

 

[OnePercenter]

Is that why Sweden has more Muslims percentage wise than the USA, because they're "So choosy" about "Immigrants". Oh yeah, really?

No, it's because of their population compared to ours. We have half the percentage of Muslims they do but well more than twice as many per capita. They don't even have 10 million people in Sweden. We have over 7 million people just in NYC.

Yeah, the U.S.A has more "Minorities" than Western Europe, and Western Europe has more "Minorities" than Eastern Europe, this is because this is a SYMPTOM of Capitalism. This is because Capitalists tend to demand more labor, and cheaper labor.

The U.S.A always being more Capitalist than Western Europe, and Western Europe being more Capitalist than Eastern Europe is EXACTLY why there are more "Minorities" towards the West.

Many parts of Eastern Europe in the 1990's were basically 0 Immigrant nations, now-a-days there's literally millions of Muslims in Moscow, alone, and over a million Ukrainians in Poland, and well other countries too have seen similar, following a larger degree of "Immigration" following Capitalism.

Now, Russia's not a heck of a lot richer than it was in 1990 now-a-days, so it seems it's not even a sign of wealth, it is a sign of Capitalism to bring in the poor, huddled masses for "Cheap Labor".

Actually minority growth is more of Democrat policies than capitalism. Democrats have fixed it so these people could have endless size families whether they could support them or not. Immigrants come here for jobs and to have anchor babies and get on welfare that way. Kids get SNAP's, free school lunches, free medical care, and the ability for the parents to apply for HUD.

After the black invasion of our suburb, at least a dozen new daycare businesses opened up, and it's government subsidies why they can afford them.

No Mike, workers wages of the cause of that, or I should say the lack of workers wages.

WTF is Mike and what do wages have to do with the expansion of minorities in the US?

Because of your earlier faux pas, we now know you are also Miketx.

 

[OnePercenter]

No, it's because of their population compared to ours. We have half the percentage of Muslims they do but well more than twice as many per capita. They don't even have 10 million people in Sweden. We have over 7 million people just in NYC.

Leftists get all pissy when you point out the differences between our country and Sweden, particularly the difference in population. They understand so little about what they spout that they really can't grasp why the numbers make a difference.

Japan, Russia, and Germany have quite big populations, each have national healthcare, and spend far less than the USA on healthcare.

Any questions?

/-----/ The Japs and Krauts can afford healthcare because their national defense if paid for by the US Taxpayers. Russia is a third world country with a second world army and first world nuclear weapons.

Only problem is the government od Japan & Germany spend less healthcare per person.

/----/ Only problem is Japan and Germany have tort reform. With far fewer medical malpractice lawsuits medical care is significantly lower. But the American Trial Lawyers own the DNC.

Malpractice lawsuits account for 2.4% of healthcare spending. Even if we reduced healthcare costs by 2.4% we'd continue to have the most expensive healthcare in the world.

 

[OnePercenter]

/——-/ If Socialism is so good and Capitalism is so bad, then why isn't the Caravan heading to Venezuela....?

It's one dimensional thinking to think that Venezuela a Communist style country, somehow represents everything other than Capitalism.

News-flash, Franco, and Hitler two Fascist type guys, both achieved faster economic growth than any U.S.A Presidents of the 20th Century.

And how did it end for those Fascists pricks.....................

Mussolini killed less than Churchill, FDR, Truman, LBJ, W Bush, & Abe Lincoln.

Why was it so important to get rid of him?

Maybe he was a threat to the establishment?

He was a Fascist prick hung by his own people..........Perhaps you should ask the Italians............

He joined Hitler..........they were at War.........and got their Fascists asses kicked................got what they deserved...............and the world is a better place for it.

Mussolini killed over 150,000 in Ethiopia, and just over 50,000 in Greece.

Give or take 200,000 +.

Now, the USA has killed 13,000,000 - 30,000,000 since WW2.

Now, you tell me who are the "Real Predatory Punks"?????????

When are "Americans" going to stand up to, or at least stop voting for their "Predatory" political parties like Democrats, and Republicans?

Factoring in the ideology change in the 60's, how many Democrats started wars?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Leftists get all pissy when you point out the differences between our country and Sweden, particularly the difference in population. They understand so little about what they spout that they really can't grasp why the numbers make a difference.

Japan, Russia, and Germany have quite big populations, each have national healthcare, and spend far less than the USA on healthcare.

Any questions?

/-----/ The Japs and Krauts can afford healthcare because their national defense if paid for by the US Taxpayers. Russia is a third world country with a second world army and first world nuclear weapons.

Only problem is the government od Japan & Germany spend less healthcare per person.

/----/ Only problem is Japan and Germany have tort reform. With far fewer medical malpractice lawsuits medical care is significantly lower. But the American Trial Lawyers own the DNC.

Malpractice lawsuits account for 2.4% of healthcare spending. Even if we reduced healthcare costs by 2.4% we'd continue to have the most expensive healthcare in the world.

Yes, but we'd still have the best healthcare in the world. 2.4% is still a good chunk of change.

But that's only a small fraction of the problem. There are nearly a dozen ways to lower the cost of our care.

 

[OnePercenter]

Like the old saying goes, you get what you pay for:

View attachment 225059

If we get better healthcare, than Germany, or Japan, how come they live longer, exactly?

There are a number of reasons.

First off, we have more vehicle deaths than most any country in the world. Last time I checked, we were rated second place.

We have a huge drug problem in the US. An increasing number of OD deaths compared to the rest of the world, and like vehicle deaths, many are younger people which brings down our lifespan expectation.

Along with the drug problem are drug gangs. This is a problem in many major cities across the US, but most prominently in places like Chicago where dozens of shootings happen every weekend. I live in Cleveland, I understand this. Drive-by shootings kill many innocents as well.

Obesity is another cause. We are the fattest country in the world and that decreases lifespan.

American women are in the workforce. This is a factor in avoiding prenatal care. Work is important to all of us, so getting to work is more important than the success of having a child in good health.

Some countries have different standards in infant mortality. In other words, if a baby in the US takes one breath and dies, it's considered a loss of life. In other countries, a baby with health problems is not considered a life until a certain age. So if a child passes away from some medical condition, that child is not considered a loss of life.

If you think of it, most of the people that die in this country are on some government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. These are social programs or social medicine as you might wish to call it. But because many of our people die on some social program doesn't mean all social medical programs are terrible.

We do have more obesity from a Capitaliat society, junk food is more readily available than in Europe & socialized medicine tries to get people to lose weight as preventive care.

As for car accidents same thing we have a lot less public transit than Europe.

Even Poland now has some faster & better trains than the USA.

We really are a nation behind the times.

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

"A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

Are you sure that isn't a marketing slogan?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, it's because of their population compared to ours. We have half the percentage of Muslims they do but well more than twice as many per capita. They don't even have 10 million people in Sweden. We have over 7 million people just in NYC.

Yeah, the U.S.A has more "Minorities" than Western Europe, and Western Europe has more "Minorities" than Eastern Europe, this is because this is a SYMPTOM of Capitalism. This is because Capitalists tend to demand more labor, and cheaper labor.

The U.S.A always being more Capitalist than Western Europe, and Western Europe being more Capitalist than Eastern Europe is EXACTLY why there are more "Minorities" towards the West.

Many parts of Eastern Europe in the 1990's were basically 0 Immigrant nations, now-a-days there's literally millions of Muslims in Moscow, alone, and over a million Ukrainians in Poland, and well other countries too have seen similar, following a larger degree of "Immigration" following Capitalism.

Now, Russia's not a heck of a lot richer than it was in 1990 now-a-days, so it seems it's not even a sign of wealth, it is a sign of Capitalism to bring in the poor, huddled masses for "Cheap Labor".

Actually minority growth is more of Democrat policies than capitalism. Democrats have fixed it so these people could have endless size families whether they could support them or not. Immigrants come here for jobs and to have anchor babies and get on welfare that way. Kids get SNAP's, free school lunches, free medical care, and the ability for the parents to apply for HUD.

After the black invasion of our suburb, at least a dozen new daycare businesses opened up, and it's government subsidies why they can afford them.

No Mike, workers wages of the cause of that, or I should say the lack of workers wages.

WTF is Mike and what do wages have to do with the expansion of minorities in the US?

Because of your earlier faux pas, we now know you are also Miketx.

So how did I get from Cleveland to Texas? I believe Mike is also a truck driver, but that doesn't mean we're the same person. By all means, give me a quote that made you think we are the same person.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If we get better healthcare, than Germany, or Japan, how come they live longer, exactly?

There are a number of reasons.

First off, we have more vehicle deaths than most any country in the world. Last time I checked, we were rated second place.

We have a huge drug problem in the US. An increasing number of OD deaths compared to the rest of the world, and like vehicle deaths, many are younger people which brings down our lifespan expectation.

Along with the drug problem are drug gangs. This is a problem in many major cities across the US, but most prominently in places like Chicago where dozens of shootings happen every weekend. I live in Cleveland, I understand this. Drive-by shootings kill many innocents as well.

Obesity is another cause. We are the fattest country in the world and that decreases lifespan.

American women are in the workforce. This is a factor in avoiding prenatal care. Work is important to all of us, so getting to work is more important than the success of having a child in good health.

Some countries have different standards in infant mortality. In other words, if a baby in the US takes one breath and dies, it's considered a loss of life. In other countries, a baby with health problems is not considered a life until a certain age. So if a child passes away from some medical condition, that child is not considered a loss of life.

If you think of it, most of the people that die in this country are on some government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. These are social programs or social medicine as you might wish to call it. But because many of our people die on some social program doesn't mean all social medical programs are terrible.

We do have more obesity from a Capitaliat society, junk food is more readily available than in Europe & socialized medicine tries to get people to lose weight as preventive care.

As for car accidents same thing we have a lot less public transit than Europe.

Even Poland now has some faster & better trains than the USA.

We really are a nation behind the times.

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

"A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

Are you sure that isn't a marketing slogan?

I know it wasn't a marketing slogan, it was a campaign slogan by Hoover. It was a promise of a milestone of American success.

 

[OnePercenter]

Japan, Russia, and Germany have quite big populations, each have national healthcare, and spend far less than the USA on healthcare.

Any questions?

/-----/ The Japs and Krauts can afford healthcare because their national defense if paid for by the US Taxpayers. Russia is a third world country with a second world army and first world nuclear weapons.

Only problem is the government od Japan & Germany spend less healthcare per person.

/----/ Only problem is Japan and Germany have tort reform. With far fewer medical malpractice lawsuits medical care is significantly lower. But the American Trial Lawyers own the DNC.

Malpractice lawsuits account for 2.4% of healthcare spending. Even if we reduced healthcare costs by 2.4% we'd continue to have the most expensive healthcare in the world.

Yes, but we'd still have the best healthcare in the world. 2.4% is still a good chunk of change.

But that's only a small fraction of the problem. There are nearly a dozen ways to lower the cost of our care.

The US doesn't rank in the top 16 for healthcare. We used to be number one before Reagan deregulated the HMO act. Republicans and Corporate America will fuck you every time.

 

[OnePercenter]

There are a number of reasons.

First off, we have more vehicle deaths than most any country in the world. Last time I checked, we were rated second place.

We have a huge drug problem in the US. An increasing number of OD deaths compared to the rest of the world, and like vehicle deaths, many are younger people which brings down our lifespan expectation.

Along with the drug problem are drug gangs. This is a problem in many major cities across the US, but most prominently in places like Chicago where dozens of shootings happen every weekend. I live in Cleveland, I understand this. Drive-by shootings kill many innocents as well.

Obesity is another cause. We are the fattest country in the world and that decreases lifespan.

American women are in the workforce. This is a factor in avoiding prenatal care. Work is important to all of us, so getting to work is more important than the success of having a child in good health.

Some countries have different standards in infant mortality. In other words, if a baby in the US takes one breath and dies, it's considered a loss of life. In other countries, a baby with health problems is not considered a life until a certain age. So if a child passes away from some medical condition, that child is not considered a loss of life.

If you think of it, most of the people that die in this country are on some government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. These are social programs or social medicine as you might wish to call it. But because many of our people die on some social program doesn't mean all social medical programs are terrible.

We do have more obesity from a Capitaliat society, junk food is more readily available than in Europe & socialized medicine tries to get people to lose weight as preventive care.

As for car accidents same thing we have a lot less public transit than Europe.

Even Poland now has some faster & better trains than the USA.

We really are a nation behind the times.

Makes so much sense............Mr. Fascist here is gonna tell you what you can eat now...........then take your car so you can walk to work.............

Europe doesn't have so many dang cars because the fuel is too dang much and people pay too large of an amount to the gov't..................so they can decide what is best for you...

Sorry......I like my truck.......and lower gas prices.....and like to buy whatever the fuck I want......so piss off.

It was once said "A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

That was a goal years ago when many people used public transportation. You didn't have the liberty to go anywhere you wanted as most in the US do today. Private transportation is liberty. If I want to go to the store at midnight to buy some milk, I can do that. If I want to go to work all by myself and sing with the radio, I can do that.

My employer likes to visit Italy. He said he loves it because his grandfather was from Italy. But public transportation is a killer he said. He watched as beautiful models would get out of a building for a photo shoot and jump on mopeds to go home.

I don't want to live like that.

"A car in every driveway and a chicken in every pot."

Are you sure that isn't a marketing slogan?

I know it wasn't a marketing slogan, it was a campaign slogan by Hoover. It was a promise of a milestone of American success.

A marketing campaign by Hoover.