If our Constitution made liberalism, in effect, illegal what should we do with them?.

Liberalism means what it always has, moving forward not standing still or backsliding.

So does that make Hitler Stalin and Mao liberals??
Ummm, you think what those people did is "moving forward"?
.

well HItler Stalin and Mao were socialists like Sanders, the leader of Democratic Party. How do you define moving forward? Is Sanders moving backwards/forward??
Lol, those guys were fascist, your team not mine.

Bernie is moving forward of course.
 
Lol, so do tRump and his loyal oompa-loompas.

But they aren't.
great so according to your brilliant definition everyone thinks he is a liberal but apparently only you know who really is a liberal!! See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Actually definitions:

liberal: mentally slow so like child imagines govt can provide magical solutions to every problem

conservative: intelligent so can understand exactly what our Founders did, namely, that freedom works.
 
Bernie is moving forward of course.

How is socialism moving forward when it has already killed 120 million? Bernie wants to start out with a European style economy when they have 65% of our per capita GDP and even Krugman describes it as Eurosclerosis. See why we say liberalism is based in ignorance?
 
Liberalism is based on socialism and communism, which are as incompatible with the U.S.constitution as Sharia Law would be.

The leftists will jump up and down and scream "It ain't true", but conservatism mirrors the doctrine that the framers of the constitution intended for this country. They looked at many other countries' constitutions and found them all wanting. So they came up with the most unique set of rights and rules the world had ever seen before then.

Special Ed gurgles again, blissfully unaware that Liberals are exactly who WROTE the Constitution. And that by the same token the Constitution is not only based on but a written expression of Liberalism.


/thread
Those liberals are the exact opposite of modern day liberals. Your constant attempts to claim the two are equivalent doesn't pass the laugh test.
 
Liberalism is based on socialism and communism, which are as incompatible with the U.S.constitution as Sharia Law would be.

The leftists will jump up and down and scream "It ain't true", but conservatism mirrors the doctrine that the framers of the constitution intended for this country. They looked at many other countries' constitutions and found them all wanting. So they came up with the most unique set of rights and rules the world had ever seen before then.

Classic Liberalism is not based on communism and socialism. Name your sources for "They looked at many other countries' constitutions and found them all wanting." I would find it quite interesting.

The post about "classic Liberalism" is classic revisionism. The conservatives at the time the Constitution was writ were the Loylalists who wanted to remain England's colony and believed in government hierarchy/meritocracy. The conservatives were King George's people. Now he wants to open the history books and change everybody's clothes because his own people were on the wrong side.
Leftwing propaganda. The term "conservative" was utterly meaningless at the time.

The bottom line is that pretending you have anything in common with 18th Century liberals is a joke.
 
Is aiding the poor a form of liberalism?
Since when do liberals aid the poor?
Aiding their fellow-man is one of the core beliefs of liberalism. One only needs to read these posts to find the conservative core beliefs.

The latter appears to be about smearing jelly all over one's face and giving everybody the finger.

Oh, and characterizing political science as "a joke". Which is really the same thing.
 
Liberalism means what it always has, moving forward not standing still or backsliding.
certainly Hitler Stalin Mao and a billion followers thought they were moving forward. Do you understand?
Clearly you don’t understand.

Liberalism means to embrace change, celebrate diversity, and defend the rights and protected liberties of the American people from conservatives who, for the most part, seek to violate those rights and protected liberties.

Indeed, it’s the fear of change central to conservative dogma that renders conservativism the bane of American liberty, justice, and the rule of law – as conservatives seek to compel conformity through the force of law, they invariably trample on the rights of the people.

Your posts are further proof of the right’s authoritarianism and contempt for citizens’ rights as liberties, such as your ridiculous advocacy that liberalism be made ‘illegal.’
 

Forum List

Back
Top