If Mexico were a white Christian nation would Democrats still encourage illegal immigration?

Why or why not?
Would they but only if they were desperate and dependent?
Would they but only if they promised to have litters of children that would be desperate, dependent, criminal minded and vote Democrat?
Would there need to be some caveat....OR would they be kind, caring and noble with other people’s money just as they are now?
They are mostly Catholic, doing the will of the Pope. Having huge families is part of the deal.

Catholics - also in the middle ages - lived nearly always in little families with 1-3 children. Extended families in the western world were a problem of the industrialization.

A little story for you: A short time ago a man, his wife and their 2 years old daughter decided to go from South America to the USA. The man swam with the little daughter across the Rio Grande. His daughter should wait in the USA, while he swam back to Mexico to help his wife to cross the Rio Grande too. But while he swam back the little daughter followed him and so he turned and tried to save here. But in the end he and his daughter had no chance and both died.


He should have applied legally-they would still be alive.


Hmmm ... Will you allow the wife of the dead man and mother of the dead daughter to live in the USA now?


Only if she applies legally.


Odd considering Mexicans are mostly native, and most US citizens are descendants of illegal immigrants who murdered the actual native owners and took the land by force.

And if one believes in capitalism, then the Mexicans have the right to find the best paying employment anywhere they wish to go.


Mexico was taken by Spain.


Since Spain is white Christians, then they should be welcomed immigrants?
But the reality is the Spanish did not stay. Just like the French did not stay.
Only in North America did we intend to stay and manage to wipe out the natives.
 
Why or why not?
Would they but only if they were desperate and dependent?
Would they but only if they promised to have litters of children that would be desperate, dependent, criminal minded and vote Democrat?
Would there need to be some caveat....OR would they be kind, caring and noble with other people’s money just as they are now?
They are mostly Catholic, doing the will of the Pope. Having huge families is part of the deal.

Catholics - also in the middle ages - lived nearly always in little families with 1-3 children. Extended families in the western world were a problem of the industrialization.

A little story for you: A short time ago a man, his wife and their 2 years old daughter decided to go from South America to the USA. The man swam with the little daughter across the Rio Grande. His daughter should wait in the USA, while he swam back to Mexico to help his wife to cross the Rio Grande too. But while he swam back the little daughter followed him and so he turned and tried to save here. But in the end he and his daughter had no chance and both died.


He should have applied legally-they would still be alive.


Hmmm ... Will you allow the wife of the dead man and mother of the dead daughter to live in the USA now?


Only if she applies legally.


Odd considering Mexicans are mostly native, and most US citizens are descendants of illegal immigrants who murdered the actual native owners and took the land by force.

And if one believes in capitalism, then the Mexicans have the right to find the best paying employment anywhere they wish to go.


Mexico was taken by Spain.


Since Spain is white Christians, then they should be welcomed immigrants?
But the reality is the Spanish did not stay. Just like the French did not stay.
Only in North America did we intend to stay and manage to wipe out the natives.


Why would welcome them just because they're considered white Christians?
Sounds pretty racist.
But you obviously missed my point,they're illegals as well using your metric.
 
Only if she applies legally.

For some people seem to exist no place in heaven nor in hell. So do not forget to apply legally a place in our purgatory. Your responsible official will be a woman, who lost her husband and daughter on her way over a "paradise" on earth to her heavenly paradise. Perhaps you will have to wait a little until she will have been finished her vocational training.


Do you really believe 80 years here will determine an eternity elsewhere?


Strange question. Sure I believe what I say.

Also, did you ever consider YOUR politics may be wrong, and you are sinning by judging another's?

Don't worry. Some people I will personally transform to a spaghetti in a black hole and weave a flying carpet out of them after my death. And I'm sure god will allow me to do so.

Cute twist with vocational training.

The death of this man and this child was evitable. The reason is in this case not a natural catastrophe - it's a malfunction of the complete inhuman race. My hope is everyone will take more serios the real teachings of the Allmighty: God is love, god is life, god is reason.

And in this context I'm very concerned about the growth of a structural Nazi-racism in the USA. I hope it will never come the day, when I will have to accept that the whole USA grew to be a lost country.




The man got greedy and ended up killing himself and his daughter. I guess God did not like his actions-and the way you talk, he may not like yours.


You don't believe in god - that's one of your problems. And the other problem is that you replace the lightful reality with your own dark and evil schemes. Your greatest problem: You are not able to realize you lost a brother and his daughter - your sister - and another sister - her mother - still lives in our world here. What a jewel she is. How fragile. A breath of a breath could kill her. So it's perhaps good that you don't like to help her. Others have to do this. But is it good for you not to be able to help in such a case?


I believe in God-just not the way you do. There are seven billion people on planet earth-I can't save them all. And when they do things against the laws of God or man, bad things happen.


God gave them all of the Americas.
They crossed the Bearing Straits to get here, so the ones in Mexico has to have lived in North American before.
And God could not have given the recent illegal European invaders the right to make laws preventing Mexicans from coming back up to North America, where they used to live.

How far back do you want to go Gustavo?
Cavemen occupied land throughout the world...we’re all descendants of cavemen...right? I suppose we all have the right to settle anywhere in the world we please huh? No boundaries or borders...right?
I suppose the first occupant of your home could throw you out anytime they want THEIR home back...right?
FOOLS!


No, there were no cavemen in the New World. (western hemisphere)
Humans could not get there until they had weapons, tents, pack animals, agriculture, etc.

If I stole the house and never paid for it, then yes, I should expect the legal owners to throw me out anytime.


You should probably do a little due-diligence before detesting our Declaration Of Independence and popping off at the mouth...The first settlers in North America hailed from Eastern Asia...third graders know this.
Further, Mexico was paid for this land in a time when bigger stronger armies conquered territory and made no payment.

Back to the drawing board in that cardboard box you’re sitting in on the streets of Tijuana...Good luck Gustavo.
 
Nazis were socialists, I am not. The radical left have more in common with Nazis than anyone else.

Absolutely WRONG!
The Nazis were National Socialists, which means ANTI-Socialists.

They were pure capitalists and executed all the socialists.
There was absolutely no government owned or regulated businesses.
Hitler was the most free market capitalist that ever existed in all of history.

None of the Axis powers in WWII were remotely socialist, and all were extremely capitalist and anti-socialist, including Mussolini, Japan, and Franco of Spain.
 
Why would welcome them just because they're considered white Christians?
Sounds pretty racist.
But you obviously missed my point,they're illegals as well using your metric.

The racism is not mine, but that of the thread.
The title is:
{....

If Mexico were a white Christian nation would Democrats still encourage illegal immigration?​

....}
 
Absolutely WRONG!
The Nazis were National Socialists, which means ANTI-Socialists.

They were pure capitalists and executed all the socialists.
There was absolutely no government owned or regulated businesses.
Hitler was the most free market capitalist that ever existed in all of history.

None of the Axis powers in WWII were remotely socialist, and all were extremely capitalist and anti-socialist, including Mussolini, Japan, and Franco of Spain.


Actually, you have things half assed backwards.

National Socialist Germany had socialized medicine. Joe Mengele was a government hired physician, that's a fact.

Not only that, Germany actually mandated union membership. All German citizens who worked had to pay due to the German Labor Front- very similar to the "Pro Act" which would outlaw America's Right to Work.

BTW, Spain wasn't a member of the axis powers at all, and maintained neutrality during the second world war.
 
Why or why not?
Would they but only if they were desperate and dependent?
Would they but only if they promised to have litters of children that would be desperate, dependent, criminal minded and vote Democrat?
Would there need to be some caveat....OR would they be kind, caring and noble with other people’s money just as they are now?
How much is kept track of illegal immigration from Canada? There's your answer.
 
You should probably do a little due-diligence before detesting our Declaration Of Independence and popping off at the mouth...The first settlers in North America hailed from Eastern Asia...third graders know this.
Further, Mexico was paid for this land in a time when bigger stronger armies conquered territory and made no payment.

Back to the drawing board in that cardboard box you’re sitting in on the streets of Tijuana...Good luck Gustavo.

Your statements make no sense.
The fact Asians crossed the Bearing Straits to the Americas has always been known and has not changed.
The fact it is now known to have happened in 15,000 BC instead of 13,000 BC, is a very minor change.
They are still Asians.

And payment for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo is not relevant, since the main point is we were not supposed to harm the Mexican land owners.
But we did.
We murdered thousands and force the rest out, illegally.
 
Actually, you have things half assed backwards.

National Socialist Germany had socialized medicine. Joe Mengele was a government hired physician, that's a fact.

Not only that, Germany actually mandated union membership. All German citizens who worked had to pay due to the German Labor Front- very similar to the "Pro Act" which would outlaw America's Right to Work.

BTW, Spain wasn't a member of the axis powers at all, and maintained neutrality during the second world war.

Back then, everyone had socialized medicine.
There really is no other way to do medicine.
And that had nothing to do with Hitler.
He changed nothing.
He socialized nothing.

Mandatory unions are not at all socialist.
When they are mandatory, they are to control the workers, are ultra capitalist.

Spain stayed out of WWII, but in the Spanish civil war, Franco was on the side with Hitler and Mussolini, while the US, British, French, and Soviets were on the rebel side.
 
Back then, everyone had socialized medicine.
There really is no other way to do medicine.
And that had nothing to do with Hitler.
He changed nothing.
He socialized nothing.

Mandatory unions are not at all socialist.
When they are mandatory, they are to control the workers, are ultra capitalist.

Spain stayed out of WWII, but in the Spanish civil war, Franco was on the side with Hitler and Mussolini, while the US, British, French, and Soviets were on the rebel side.


Actually, Franco was the rebel power during the Spanish Civil War, fighting against the Spanish Communist "Republic".
 
You should probably do a little due-diligence before detesting our Declaration Of Independence and popping off at the mouth...The first settlers in North America hailed from Eastern Asia...third graders know this.
Further, Mexico was paid for this land in a time when bigger stronger armies conquered territory and made no payment.

Back to the drawing board in that cardboard box you’re sitting in on the streets of Tijuana...Good luck Gustavo.

Mexico is Christian.
 
Actually, Franco was the rebel power during the Spanish Civil War, fighting against the Spanish Communist "Republic".

You are correct.
I had to look it up.
{...
The Spanish Civil War (Spanish: Guerra Civil Española)[note 2] was a civil war in Spain fought from 1936 to 1939. Republicans loyal to the left-leaning Popular Front government of the unstable Second Spanish Republic, in alliance with anarchists of the communist and syndicalist variety, fought against an insurrection by the Nationalists, an alliance of Falangists, monarchists, conservatives and traditionalists, led by a military group among whom General Francisco Franco soon achieved a preponderant role. Due to the international political climate at the time, the war had many facets and was variously viewed as class struggle, a religious struggle, a struggle between dictatorship and republican democracy, between revolution and counterrevolution, and between fascism and communism.[10] According to Claude Bowers, U.S. ambassador to Spain during the war, it was the "dress rehearsal" for World War II.[11] The Nationalists won the war, which ended in early 1939, and ruled Spain until Franco's death in November 1975.
...}
 
You are correct.
I had to look it up.
{...
The Spanish Civil War (Spanish: Guerra Civil Española)[note 2] was a civil war in Spain fought from 1936 to 1939. Republicans loyal to the left-leaning Popular Front government of the unstable Second Spanish Republic, in alliance with anarchists of the communist and syndicalist variety, fought against an insurrection by the Nationalists, an alliance of Falangists, monarchists, conservatives and traditionalists, led by a military group among whom General Francisco Franco soon achieved a preponderant role. Due to the international political climate at the time, the war had many facets and was variously viewed as class struggle, a religious struggle, a struggle between dictatorship and republican democracy, between revolution and counterrevolution, and between fascism and communism.[10] According to Claude Bowers, U.S. ambassador to Spain during the war, it was the "dress rehearsal" for World War II.[11] The Nationalists won the war, which ended in early 1939, and ruled Spain until Franco's death in November 1975.
...}


Thank you for looking it up. The beloved Caudillo of Spain was no friend of Mr. Hitler by any stretch of the imagination.

In 1941, Hitler had a summit with Franco and was so frustrated that he pointed out he would rather have all of his teeth pulled one by one rather than deal with that impossible man (Franco) again.

Franco defense of the Pillars of Hercules was one of the key features to America winning WW2 in Europe.
 
There’s nothing anecdotal about anything I’ve posted Gustavo.
You can’t declare everything that doesn’t align with your FEELZ as anecdotal.
Sure I can, Emilio. It's purely anecdotal. You're just used to the 'magaturd morality' you're spoon fed daily. I understand, bro. :itsok:
 
Sure I can, Emilio. It's purely anecdotal. You're just used to the 'magaturd morality' you're spoon fed daily. I understand, bro. :itsok:
Be specific…..what have I posted that is anecdotal?
I’ll happily enlighten you further to prove otherwise…I take great pride in enlightening ignorant fools.
 
Well maybe for health care.



.
Canada, UK and practically every other nation in the industrialized world have better medical outcomes, with higher life expectancy than the US. Even the most complex medical procedures are easily performed in these countries with very good results, so don't continue deceiving yourself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top