Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your beloved isotopes can actually be from multiple sources, not just people.
Forest fires by lighting,
naturally combusting coal dust,
volcanic activity
and many others.
Actually, the FACT that none of the Faithers models nor Chicken Little cries nor sea level scares nor anything they have made up to date work or reflect the reality we live in. A climate change made by people simply does not exist. It is a politically driven mantra of conmen and the weak minded.
Nobody cares what an uneducated slob thinks about a scientific topic. Nobody. Your opinions on this are utterly worthless.
lol.....the people of the religion still don't get it. They are always talking about "the science" but............
"About one in four Republicans with only a high school education said they worried about climate change a great deal. But among college-educated Republicans, that figure decreases, sharply, to 8 percent.
This may seem counterintuitive, because better-educated Republicans are more likely to be aware of the scientific consensus that human activity is contributing to climate change. But in the realm of public opinion, climate change isn’t really a scientific issue. It’s a political one."
In todays REALCLEARPOLITICS..........
The Suicidal Narrative of the Modern Environmental Left
How do we know that its all about politics?
Because the AGW k00ks have barely moved the ball in the past 20 years......despite all the bomb throwing. When is the last time anybody heard congress talking about climate change legislation?Look at Paris!!
Look at the pathetic growth of renewable energy!
Indeed.........nobody out there is caring about the science.
And that's the only thing that matters s0ns!!
Yes, google for agreeable headlines that contain no science. That's a perfect job for an uneducated slob like you.
Humans do not emit CO2.Global CO2 emissions 'stalled' in 2014
By Helen Briggs
Environment Correspondent
BBCNews.com
Wind turbines in China [Caption for photo that did not come along]
China is now by far the world's biggest investor in renewable energy, far outstripping the US
The growth in global carbon emissions stalled last year, according to data from the International Energy Agency.
It marks the first time in 40 years that annual CO2 emissions growth has remained stable, in the absence of a major economic crisis, the agency said.
Annual global emissions remained at 32 gigatonnes in 2014, unchanged from the previous year.
But the IEA warned that while the results were "encouraging", this was "no time for complacency".
"This is both a very welcome surprise and a significant one," said IEA Chief Economist Fatih Birol.
An important factor could be that China's coal consumption fell in 2014, driven by their efforts to fight pollution, use energy more efficiently and deploy renewables"
Prof Corinne Le Quere
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
"It provides much-needed momentum to negotiators preparing to forge a global climate deal in Paris in December: for the first time, greenhouse gas emissions are decoupling from economic growth."
And IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven said while the data was "encouraging", this was "no time for complacency" and "certainly not the time to use this positive news as an excuse to stall further action".
Changing patterns
Analysts attribute the slowdown in emissions to changing patterns of energy consumption in China and OECD countries.
Prof Corinne Le Quere, of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, said: "An important factor could be that China's coal consumption fell in 2014, driven by their efforts to fight pollution, use energy more efficiently and deploy renewables.
"Efforts to reduce emissions elsewhere will have played a role, but there are also more random factors such as the weather and the relative price of oil, coal and gas."
The IEA said changing patterns of energy use in China and in OECD countries, including the shift towards more renewable energy, was having the desired effect of decoupling economic growth from greenhouse emissions.
The Paris-based organisation said that in the 40 years it had been collecting data on carbon dioxide emissions, annual emissions had stalled or fallen only three other times, which were all associated with global downturns:
After the US recession in the early 1980s
In 1992 after the collapse of the former Soviet Union
In 2009 during the global financial crisis.
Greenhouse gas emissions may finally be decoupling from economic growth
Full details of the IEA report will be released in June, ahead of UN negotiations to sign a new international climate change agreement at talks in Paris in December.
Countries are aiming to reach agreement on a deal that will come into force from 2020.
The aim is to limit the increase of the average global surface temperature to no more than 2C (3.6F) compared with pre-industrial levels, to avoid "dangerous" climate change.
***************************************************************************************
This tickles me pink for several reasons:
How many times have we heard from the deniers here that all our efforts were pointless because China and India would never follow along. Yet here they are most determinedly in the lead.
And how many times have we heard that slowing fossil fuel consumption would destroy the world's industrial economies. Apparently not.
Actually, the FACT that none of the Faithers models nor Chicken Little cries nor sea level scares nor anything they have made up to date work or reflect the reality we live in. A climate change made by people simply does not exist. It is a politically driven mantra of conmen and the weak minded.
Nobody cares what an uneducated slob thinks about a scientific topic. Nobody. Your opinions on this are utterly worthless.
lol.....the people of the religion still don't get it. They are always talking about "the science" but............
"About one in four Republicans with only a high school education said they worried about climate change a great deal. But among college-educated Republicans, that figure decreases, sharply, to 8 percent.
This may seem counterintuitive, because better-educated Republicans are more likely to be aware of the scientific consensus that human activity is contributing to climate change. But in the realm of public opinion, climate change isn’t really a scientific issue. It’s a political one."
In todays REALCLEARPOLITICS..........
The Suicidal Narrative of the Modern Environmental Left
How do we know that its all about politics?
Because the AGW k00ks have barely moved the ball in the past 20 years......despite all the bomb throwing. When is the last time anybody heard congress talking about climate change legislation?
And that's the only thing that matters s0ns!!
Yes, google for agreeable headlines that contain no science. That's a perfect job for an uneducated slob like you.
but winning..........
Humans do not emit CO2.Global CO2 emissions 'stalled' in 2014
By Helen Briggs
Environment Correspondent
BBCNews.com
Wind turbines in China [Caption for photo that did not come along]
China is now by far the world's biggest investor in renewable energy, far outstripping the US
The growth in global carbon emissions stalled last year, according to data from the International Energy Agency.
It marks the first time in 40 years that annual CO2 emissions growth has remained stable, in the absence of a major economic crisis, the agency said.
Annual global emissions remained at 32 gigatonnes in 2014, unchanged from the previous year.
But the IEA warned that while the results were "encouraging", this was "no time for complacency".
"This is both a very welcome surprise and a significant one," said IEA Chief Economist Fatih Birol.
An important factor could be that China's coal consumption fell in 2014, driven by their efforts to fight pollution, use energy more efficiently and deploy renewables"
Prof Corinne Le Quere
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
"It provides much-needed momentum to negotiators preparing to forge a global climate deal in Paris in December: for the first time, greenhouse gas emissions are decoupling from economic growth."
And IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven said while the data was "encouraging", this was "no time for complacency" and "certainly not the time to use this positive news as an excuse to stall further action".
Changing patterns
Analysts attribute the slowdown in emissions to changing patterns of energy consumption in China and OECD countries.
Prof Corinne Le Quere, of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, said: "An important factor could be that China's coal consumption fell in 2014, driven by their efforts to fight pollution, use energy more efficiently and deploy renewables.
"Efforts to reduce emissions elsewhere will have played a role, but there are also more random factors such as the weather and the relative price of oil, coal and gas."
The IEA said changing patterns of energy use in China and in OECD countries, including the shift towards more renewable energy, was having the desired effect of decoupling economic growth from greenhouse emissions.
The Paris-based organisation said that in the 40 years it had been collecting data on carbon dioxide emissions, annual emissions had stalled or fallen only three other times, which were all associated with global downturns:
After the US recession in the early 1980s
In 1992 after the collapse of the former Soviet Union
In 2009 during the global financial crisis.
Greenhouse gas emissions may finally be decoupling from economic growth
Full details of the IEA report will be released in June, ahead of UN negotiations to sign a new international climate change agreement at talks in Paris in December.
Countries are aiming to reach agreement on a deal that will come into force from 2020.
The aim is to limit the increase of the average global surface temperature to no more than 2C (3.6F) compared with pre-industrial levels, to avoid "dangerous" climate change.
***************************************************************************************
This tickles me pink for several reasons:
How many times have we heard from the deniers here that all our efforts were pointless because China and India would never follow along. Yet here they are most determinedly in the lead.
And how many times have we heard that slowing fossil fuel consumption would destroy the world's industrial economies. Apparently not.
Like cows however, they/we emit methane (CH4).
Actually, the FACT that none of the Faithers models nor Chicken Little cries nor sea level scares nor anything they have made up to date work or reflect the reality we live in. A climate change made by people simply does not exist. It is a politically driven mantra of conmen and the weak minded.
Nobody cares what an uneducated slob thinks about a scientific topic. Nobody. Your opinions on this are utterly worthless.
lol.....the people of the religion still don't get it. They are always talking about "the science" but............
"About one in four Republicans with only a high school education said they worried about climate change a great deal. But among college-educated Republicans, that figure decreases, sharply, to 8 percent.
This may seem counterintuitive, because better-educated Republicans are more likely to be aware of the scientific consensus that human activity is contributing to climate change. But in the realm of public opinion, climate change isn’t really a scientific issue. It’s a political one."
In todays REALCLEARPOLITICS..........
The Suicidal Narrative of the Modern Environmental Left
How do we know that its all about politics?
Because the AGW k00ks have barely moved the ball in the past 20 years......despite all the bomb throwing. When is the last time anybody heard congress talking about climate change legislation?
And that's the only thing that matters s0ns!!
Yes, google for agreeable headlines that contain no science. That's a perfect job for an uneducated slob like you.
but winning..........
You're not winning anything. This denial garbage is a distinctly American right wing idiot phenomenon. You and your fellow Cletuses are the laughingstock of the world, and a global embarrassment to our country.
Nobody cares what an uneducated slob thinks about a scientific topic. Nobody. Your opinions on this are utterly worthless.
lol.....the people of the religion still don't get it. They are always talking about "the science" but............
"About one in four Republicans with only a high school education said they worried about climate change a great deal. But among college-educated Republicans, that figure decreases, sharply, to 8 percent.
This may seem counterintuitive, because better-educated Republicans are more likely to be aware of the scientific consensus that human activity is contributing to climate change. But in the realm of public opinion, climate change isn’t really a scientific issue. It’s a political one."
In todays REALCLEARPOLITICS..........
The Suicidal Narrative of the Modern Environmental Left
How do we know that its all about politics?
Because the AGW k00ks have barely moved the ball in the past 20 years......despite all the bomb throwing. When is the last time anybody heard congress talking about climate change legislation?
And that's the only thing that matters s0ns!!
Yes, google for agreeable headlines that contain no science. That's a perfect job for an uneducated slob like you.
but winning..........
You're not winning anything. This denial garbage is a distinctly American right wing idiot phenomenon. You and your fellow Cletuses are the laughingstock of the world, and a global embarrassment to our country.
Show me where your side is winning s0n..........some links please!!!
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: WSJ: Why climate-change activists are losing the battle for public opinion
Keep heehawing, Cletus. You arent breaking any new ground. The entire world already knows we have an epidemic of stupid hillbillies in this country.
Keep heehawing, Cletus. You arent breaking any new ground. The entire world already knows we have an epidemic of stupid hillbillies in this country.
Sea levels drop and CO2 too, please explain how increases can result in the exact opposite outcome you cling to dingleberry.
Keep heehawing, Cletus. You arent breaking any new ground. The entire world already knows we have an epidemic of stupid hillbillies in this country.
Sea levels drop and CO2 too, please explain how increases can result in the exact opposite outcome you cling to dingleberry.
He cant explain dick...........like any good progressive, slings mud and provides no credible response. I'm still waiting for a single link to show where the science is mattering in the real world!!
Sea levels drop and CO2 too, please explain how increases can result in the exact opposite outcome you cling to dingleberry.
Not a peep out of the lot when we have mild hurricane seasons counter to the predictions. We get a few bigger ones this year and the sky is falling.
Sea levels drop and CO2 too, please explain how increases can result in the exact opposite outcome you cling to dingleberry.
Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, ...
Who feeds you this nonsense, and why are you stupid enough to fall for it?
Not a peep out of the lot when we have mild hurricane seasons counter to the predictions. We get a few bigger ones this year and the sky is falling.
There haven't been any mild seasons recently, dumbass.
Oh wait. You're confusing "lack of landfalls in the USA" with "mild". In your cult kingdom of drooling imbeciles, the US coastline is the entire world.
That would be NASA...
