- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,405
- 142,690
- 2,615
LOL, I can still hit a 2 pretty good, but a 1 is a bit muchBen Hogan....1 iron.....What I see in Owl's thread is Obamas' a big fat lyer
Even God can't hit a 1 iron
<old joke>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL, I can still hit a 2 pretty good, but a 1 is a bit muchBen Hogan....1 iron.....What I see in Owl's thread is Obamas' a big fat lyer
I have to agree with Jack, I don't see how this supports the conservative stance against gun control.Read what you just wrote, Clementine, and then check the numbers.
We have the top three and five of the top nine. And less population than those others combined.
The numbers don't work for you. And when you add it all up with China, Brazil, and Japan as well, it all goes to shit for you. And TheOwl is just wacky about it. Got his feathers plucked.
So let me get this...
A RW supporter puts up a argument that having 5 out of the top 9 most deadly gun massacres is a good thing.
The US population is 4.4 percent of the world population.
So way to go....
Thing is the RWers come out for every massacre that is is not guns but this and that... I want to know one thing:
Whats you number?
How many people have to did before you say guns might be the problem. The statistics comparison between US and EU makes it obvious what the problem is. You just need to tell how many dead kids does it need?
Any more gun control would not have helped in any of those... Criminals are criminals because of what they do.
They committ crimes they do not do things like legally buy guns. Why buy a gun that can be traced back to the criminal when it is easier, faster and cheaper to steal guns.
Universal background checks mean nothing, will do nothing. They just make do gooders feel better but, accomplishing nothing.
Of the 20 Deadliest School Killings in World History, Just How Many are in the United States?
How many of those countries have strict gun control I wonder.
So let me get this...
A RW supporter puts up a argument that having 5 out of the top 9 most deadly gun massacres is a good thing.
The US population is 4.4 percent of the world population.
So way to go....
Thing is the RWers come out for every massacre that is is not guns but this and that... I want to know one thing:
Whats you number?
How many people have to did before you say guns might be the problem. The statistics comparison between US and EU makes it obvious what the problem is. You just need to tell how many dead kids does it need?
How many people have to die before you say not allowing people to shoot back might be the problem?
So let me get this...
A RW supporter puts up a argument that having 5 out of the top 9 most deadly gun massacres is a good thing.
The US population is 4.4 percent of the world population.
So way to go....
Thing is the RWers come out for every massacre that is is not guns but this and that... I want to know one thing:
Whats you number?
How many people have to did before you say guns might be the problem. The statistics comparison between US and EU makes it obvious what the problem is. You just need to tell how many dead kids does it need?
How many people have to die before you say not allowing people to shoot back might be the problem?
So you want to give people guns now?
The straight fact is that a gun in house is more likely to shoot a family member than an intruder.
So your solution is to arm more people.
So let me get this...
A RW supporter puts up a argument that having 5 out of the top 9 most deadly gun massacres is a good thing.
The US population is 4.4 percent of the world population.
So way to go....
Thing is the RWers come out for every massacre that is is not guns but this and that... I want to know one thing:
Whats you number?
How many people have to did before you say guns might be the problem. The statistics comparison between US and EU makes it obvious what the problem is. You just need to tell how many dead kids does it need?
How many people have to die before you say not allowing people to shoot back might be the problem?
So you want to give people guns now?
The straight fact is that a gun in house is more likely to shoot a family member than an intruder.
So your solution is to arm more people.
Strawman, I said nothing about wanting to "give people guns." Where do you people come up with this shit?
So let me get this...
A RW supporter puts up a argument that having 5 out of the top 9 most deadly gun massacres is a good thing.
The US population is 4.4 percent of the world population.
So way to go....
Thing is the RWers come out for every massacre that is is not guns but this and that... I want to know one thing:
Whats you number?
How many people have to did before you say guns might be the problem. The statistics comparison between US and EU makes it obvious what the problem is. You just need to tell how many dead kids does it need?
How many people have to die before you say not allowing people to shoot back might be the problem?
So you want to give people guns now?
The straight fact is that a gun in house is more likely to shoot a family member than an intruder.
So your solution is to arm more people.
Strawman, I said nothing about wanting to "give people guns." Where do you people come up with this shit?
This is your direct quote
"How many people have to die before you say not allowing people to shoot back might be the problem?"
Are you saying they can't shoot back today?