I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.
The entire thing appears to be bullshit
The only thing you need to ask is why the dress wasn't tested for DNA. Would it have proved she's a liar?
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.
The entire thing appears to be bullshit
Too late. Trials over. Trump was found guiltyThe only thing you need to ask is why the dress wasn't tested for DNA. Would it have proved she's a liar?
.
In New York, the statute of limitations for defamation, libel, or slander is one year from the act. One year from the act means that the victim has one year from the publication or broadcast of the defamation to file suit against the perpetrator.The book was published in 2019, they are well within the Statute of Limitations for the filing of a Civil Defamation case.
WW
The only thing you need to ask is why the dress wasn't tested for DNA. Would it have proved she's a liar?
.
In New York, the statute of limitations for defamation, libel, or slander is one year from the act. One year from the act means that the victim has one year from the publication or broadcast of the defamation to file suit against the perpetrator.
New York Defamation Statute of Limitations - Her Lawyer
Victims of defamation should know the law and New York Defamation Statute of Limitations surrounding defamation.herlawyer.com
Too late. Trials over. Trump was found guilty
The rulings made in this case are egregious, and you know it...Loading…
www.npr.org
View attachment 891790
Yep, the book was published in the summer of 2019, Trump defamed her.
She sued for defamation in November 2019. Well within the SOL.
WW
Still not seeing her claim it was 1994Loading…
www.npr.org
View attachment 891790
Yep, the book was published in the summer of 2019, Trump defamed her.
She sued for defamation in November 2019. Well within the SOL.
WW
The rulings made in this case are egregious, and you know it...
Multiple threads on this already.Neither does her story
Report: Dress E. Jean Carroll Claims She Wore During Alleged Trump Assault Did Not Exist at the Time
The dress that E. Jean Carroll claims she wore during the alleged attack did not even exist at the time, Trump's lawyer pointed out.www.breitbart.com
who is this Carroll?
Oh dear, now she will sue you for $100 million for defamation, and win at any court in New York by a half wit leftist judge.The woman is a liar
That issue of sexual assault has already been settled.Neither does her story
Report: Dress E. Jean Carroll Claims She Wore During Alleged Trump Assault Did Not Exist at the Time
The dress that E. Jean Carroll claims she wore during the alleged attack did not even exist at the time, Trump's lawyer pointed out.www.breitbart.com