HUGE! E. Jean Carroll Jacket Dress Comes into Question – Trump Accuser Stumbles During Testimony

[noonereal]

Yeah, found liable by the partisan leftwing handpicked jury. That's what I said.

That is not how juries are formed.
Education would be of benefit to you.

 

[AntonToo]

You may apologize at any time.

NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M

A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House. The verdict was announced in a federal courtroom in New York City on...

apnews.com

No need to apologize. You are welcome.

Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable

Donald Trump is set to stand trial in a defamation case by E. Jean Carroll just as the 2024 Republican presidential nomination primaries are set to start.

www.cnbc.com

A federal judge ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he raped her decades earlier.

Upcoming trial for Carroll’s lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages for defaming her.

 

[Lesh]

Supposed to be claimed as 1994 in the article

“Supposed to be..”

It’s not there

 

[eagle1462010]

“Supposed to be..”

It’s not there

I cant read it lol

 

[Lesh]

I cant read it lol

You seem to have problems. I had no problem

 

[eagle1462010]

You seem to have problems. I had no problem

Its says free trial to read it.

 

[Lesh]

Its says free trial to read it.

All I did was click

 

[eagle1462010]

All I did was click

So did I. It says free trial to continue. No thanks

 

[Lesh]

So did I. It says free trial to continue. No thanks

Why does it work for me and everyone else then?

 

[OKTexas]

So quote and link should be easy. Please provide it. I couldn’t find it

Try reading the link, it makes it easier to find. See from the link:

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place.

Reading is fundamental.

.

 

[eagle1462010]

Why does it work for me and everyone else then?

Lol. I told you what it says when I try to read it

 

[Mashmont]

No need to apologize. You are welcome.

Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable

Donald Trump is set to stand trial in a defamation case by E. Jean Carroll just as the 2024 Republican presidential nomination primaries are set to start.

www.cnbc.com

A federal judge ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he raped her decades earlier.

Upcoming trial for Carroll’s lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages for defaming her.

Per your article: He cited the fact that jurors at a trial in a separate but related lawsuit in May found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, and defamed her in statements he made when he denied her allegation last fall.

 

[Lesh]

Try reading the link, it makes it easier to find. See from the link:

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place.

Reading is fundamental.

.

According to Trump’s lawyer. Was that in a deposition? If so it should have been entered into evidence and be available to the public.

Can you find it?

 

[Lesh]

Try reading the link, it makes it easier to find. See from the link:

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place.

Reading is fundamental.

.

That is NOT a quote. Nor is it linked to a quote. That’s something a lawyer claimed … outside of the courtroom as far as I can tell

 

[OKTexas]

According to Trump’s lawyer. Was that in a deposition? If so it should have been entered into evidence and be available to the public.

Can you find it?

Why are you trying to deflect from the thread?

.

 

[OKTexas]

That is NOT a quote. Nor is it linked to a quote. That’s something a lawyer claimed … outside of the courtroom as far as I can tell

And???????????

.

 

[Lesh]

And???????????

.

And there’s no proof she said that

 

[Lesh]

Why are you trying to deflect from the thread?

.

I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.

The entire thing appears to be bullshit

 

[j-mac]

I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.

The entire thing appears to be bullshit

What's bullshit, is that if it concerns Trump, we seem to want to throw out Statutes of limitations, Defendant rights, and what ever avenues the Defendant has to argue his case...Disgusting....

 

[WorldWatcher]

What's bullshit, is that if it concerns Trump, we seem to want to throw out Statutes of limitations, Defendant rights, and what ever avenues the Defendant has to argue his case...Disgusting....

The book was published in 2019, they are well within the Statute of Limitations for the filing of a Civil Defamation case.

WW