How to Stop Mass Killings with One Congressional Act. (With Petition to Congress)

This isn't a question, it's a petition to Congress. Do you urge them to pass this Act?

  • Yes! Congress act now to protect our citizens.

  • No, I'll take mass killings if it means not curbing free speech at all.


Results are only viewable after voting.
It's time we take away the limelight from attention-whores like these guys were/are. Now if I was an FBI agent looking for a profile for these types, I'd definitely be searching for a group known for its attention seeking behaviors..

Dylan Roof, shot 9 Christians at a church Bible study the day after a southern Christian church announced publicly it wouldn't support gay marriage.

Dylann%20roof%20burning%20flag_zpsqrdudeqf.jpg


Chris Mercer, gunned down specifically Christians just after the Pope's talk with Americans, denouncing gay marriage publicly:

Chris-Harper-Mercer%20beard%20driving_zps3msap9wu.jpg

chris-harper-mercer%20suit%20shaved_zpsy04sz89a.jpg


And now the AZ Killer Steven Jones....

arizona%20shooter%20copy_zpswiwqwwyk.jpg


steven-jones-nau-shooter-photos-2.jpg


Yes, we definitely should pass a law that would curb this demographic, young 20-something gym-going trim and spiffy male attention whores from getting any limelight at all by mention of names. Of course this post would be against the law at that point. But I could have said "South Carolina shooter", "Oregon shooter" and "Arizona shooter"..

Just raise your hand amateur sleuths if you see a pattern here... :desk:

'Congress act now'...to do what?

I made the key part at the top bigger for you. Now, go read the OP and figure out what it is I'm wanting Congress to do.
 
Silhouette, name the law that would stop these shootings!

Oregon has the background checks Obama is calling for. Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, and they're having back-to-back weekends of 50+ shootings.

How about we address the REAL problem?! Our CULTURE!
- Our movies and video ganes glamorize violence and death while de-sensitizing our kids to murder and violence.
- We have taken discipline out of schools and let kids get away with all kinds of things
- Single parent families ... where ther's no dad. Libs want to teach 8yos how to don a condom, engage in oral sex, and how killing babies (abortion at ANY stage of abortion, then cutting up the kids and selling off the parts) is ok but not about RESPECTING LIFE!
 
Last edited:
Common sense: criminals are called criminals because they do and/or think of crimes they want/do to committ.
Less we want to form a thought police part of the government, more laws are just bluster and feel good, warm and fuzzies for the bleeding hearts.

This foolishness of political correctness and more laws and more spending is breaking the nation, in a real way, Financially.

The problem with socialism/progressivism, responsibility is absent from its naïveté, childish "looks good on paper" blueprint. Common sense plays no part in its unworkable implementation, thus "looks good on paper but, in the real world it can and never has worked" reality.

Hashtag real world solutions, ignore the feel good window dressing
 
15-minutes of fame is getting out of hand. Time to act to put a stop to the motivation.

Given nearly every shooter's motive for doing these killings, the only law that should be passed should be that in any mass shooting or killing, the perpetrator's name cannot be mentioned....ever...period. And anyone who does so in major media does jail time mandatory, because just fining them wouldn't work. They'd gladly pay it for the PR advertising fund inflow. Anyone in minor media (social media) gets a mandatory stiff and punitive fine.

1st Amendment exception for the clear an inarguable better benefit to all US citizens and their safety. If they can make exceptions for the Patriot Act, Congress can make exceptions for the "Anonymous Murderer Act".



.

see-no-evil.jpg
 
If a child throws a tantrum and gets attention it wants each time, should the adults expect that in the future that child won't throw a tantrum when it wants attention again?

The key is:

1. Look at the demographic committing the crime.

2. Remove the attention factor first by disallowing the mention of their name.

3. Get them counselling for untreated anger & mental wounds from having been (statistically) molested as boys.
 
I find it hysterical that Sil thinks going to gym makes you a fag. lol.

Besides your imagination, what evidence do you have that these killers are gay? Each time I ask you flee the thread. I wonder why? lol.
 
Going to a gym AND having a right ear piercing AND liking romatic comedies AND "always dieting, BRAINS!" AND dainty wristwatch upside down in the right wrist AND hating women AND hating Christians AND...

And you guys are trying to pass these dapper Twinks off as "typical conservative whack jobs". What evidence do you have that they are conservative that beats my evidence they are gay terrorists?
 
Going to a gym AND having a right ear piercing AND liking romatic comedies AND "always dieting, BRAINS!" AND dainty wristwatch upside down in the right wrist AND hating women AND hating Christians AND...

And you guys are trying to pass these dapper Twinks off as "typical conservative whack jobs". What evidence do you have that they are conservative that beats my evidence they are gay terrorists?

Nobody in this thread have said they are 'typical conservative whack jobs' but you. What evidence you do have that these three men are gay? Going to the gym does not a faggot make.
 
15-minutes of fame is getting out of hand. Time to act to put a stop to the motivation.

Given nearly every shooter's motive for doing these killings, the only law that should be passed should be that in any mass shooting or killing, the perpetrator's name cannot be mentioned....ever...period. And anyone who does so in major media does jail time mandatory, because just fining them wouldn't work. They'd gladly pay it for the PR advertising fund inflow. Anyone in minor media (social media) gets a mandatory stiff and punitive fine.

1st Amendment exception for the clear an inarguable better benefit to all US citizens and their safety. If they can make exceptions for the Patriot Act, Congress can make exceptions for the "Anonymous Murderer Act".

You better check with all the RWnuts around here who say the 1st, and 2nd, Amendments are literal, and unequivocal,

and absolutely not open to exceptions of infringement, or abridgement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top