How The Democrats Created A Nation of Terrorists

[Moonglow]

Here's the bottom line, dimocrap scum..... Under Jimmy The Peanut, Iran got a Goatfucker Fundamentalist Theocracy.

Under the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, they got the right to build Nukes.

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Arms to Iran Weren't for Hostages, Reagan Says

And he also did it because dimocrrap FILTH in Congress had barred him from fighting COMMUNIST SCUM in Nicaragua.

Kinda figures, don't it? Reagan wants to fight communists, dimocrap FILTH want to protect them??

Ortega is still there.

Nicaraguan President wins re-election with wife as VP - CNN.com

dimocraps are scum

 

[PoliticalChic]

PC, if you haven't already, take a minute to read this.

Then, because you're a woman and, therefore, instinctively have the patience to deal with children (you poor thing), you can translate this into a goo-goo, ga-ga sort of language that dimocraps can understand.

Or not.

Worth a look.

Hemingway: Journalists Should Be Skeptical Of Info From Intel Officials

The Left needs to find something,....anything.....to explain why Americans kicked them to the curb.


And....specifically......the intel community has quite a spotty record.....and a willingness to be used by the administration.

1. "The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html

2. "U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb

3. "...the FBI dropped the ball yet again. After all these fumbles, the FBI should change its name from the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the Forever Bunch of Idiots. The latest misstep has generated the death of five innocent people at the Ft. Lauderdale airport.
Now maybe Esteban Santiago isn’t an agent for ISIS or Al-Qaeda — and maybe he isn’t even a jihadist terrorist — but he did have a history of erratic behavior and he was complaining of hearing voices. And although he was investigated several times, he was let go, allowed to keep a weapon, and no one thought at the bureau that this person should be on a watch list. Wow.
What did the FBI need to consider him credible? An engraved invitation with a time, place, and an RSVP?
Why was this man allowed to roam free? He obviously needed psychiatric help. He obviously had issues. He was a time bomb just waiting to go off, and the system failed again — not only in failing to help Santiago, but also in preventing the deaths of innocent victims.
How many more times does the bureau need to bungle in the jungle before there is one big shake-up where procedure is re-evaluated and drastic changes are made?" FBI bungled Ft. Lauderdale shooter


4. In May 1998, the CIA didn’t get wind of India’s intention to set off several underground nuclear blasts, in what Richard Shelby, then chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called a “colossal failure of our nation’s intelligence gathering.” The intelligence agency saved some face a couple weeks later when it warned that Pakistan was preparing to conduct its own nuclear tests, which it did on May 28, 1998. The Ten Biggest American Intelligence Failures


5. In its report on the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the 9/11 Commission noted that the intelligence community, assailed by “an overwhelming number of priorities, flat budgets, an outmoded structure, and bureaucratic rivalries,” had failed to pin down the big-picture threat posed by “transnational terrorism” throughout the 1990s and up to 9/11. In response to the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations, Congress created a national intelligence director and the National Counterterrorism Center to pool intelligence. The Ten Biggest American Intelligence Failures


6. In a February 2003 appearance before the U.N. Security Council to make the case for confronting Iraq, Secretary of State Colin Powell declared that his accusations about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were based on “solid intelligence.” Indeed, an October 2002 intelligence estimate had concluded that Iraq was continuing its WMD program and could make a nuclear weapon “within several months to a year” if it acquired sufficient fissile material. But the United States never found evidence for such programs after its invasion of Iraq — an intelligence failure that President George W. Bush called his “biggest regret.” The Ten Biggest American Intelligence Failures


7. When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth


8. "... the CIA failed to see the coming collapse of the shah’s government in Iran as well as the fall of the Soviet Union—not to mention the entry of Pakistan and India into the nuclear club. Then came 9/11.
In the wake of that failure, Congress and the Bush administration reorganized the 16 different agencies of the intelligence community (known in the trade as the IC). Among the changes was the effective demotion of the CIA director, long considered the head of the IC, and the creation of a new top job, the director of national intelligence.

In theory, this was supposed to streamline the chain of command and get the IC’s disparate factions—including the vast new Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, the various military intelligence services and others—to pull together under a leader with direct access to the president.
In practice, it hasn’t worked out that way, with the DNI’s authority more theoretical than practical. In less than six years, we’ve already had five DNIs. In that time, we’ve also seen the Fort Hood massacre, the attempted bombing of an airliner over Detroit, the deaths of seven CIA agents and contractors in Afghanistan in a security-lapse suicide bombing, and the Times Square near-miss." Our "intelligence community" keeps making wild mistakes about Muslims--because it is ideologically committed not to know the truth about Islam


9. "A series of stumbles over the past seven years have given credence to the red flags raised by these experts. In quick succession, the IC failed to predict the so-called Arab Spring, the resurgence of al-Qaeda,[1] the adventurism of Putin, the aggressiveness of China,[2] and a number of terrorist attacks on the U.S., from the Detroit “underwear bomber” to the San Bernardino massacre.[3] The intelligence failures surrounding the Arab Spring were especially important, since the IC had not understood the implications of an entire series of seismic shifts in the strategic landscape, suggesting that there are serious problems with the analytical side of the community. It is noteworthy that the community’s intelligence collection—clandestine and open source—appears not to have focused on the deeper questions of regime stability and the underlying causes for the Arab Spring. In this Backgrounder, the focus will remain on analysis and improvements to the analytic aspects of the IC." Reforming Intelligence: A Proposal for Reorganizing the Intelligence Community and Improving Analysis


10. "The tactical blame falls on the U.S. government, which has grievously failed in its topmost duty to protect American citizens from harm. Specialists on terrorism have been aware for years of this dereliction of duty; now the whole world knows it. Despite a steady beat of major, organized terrorist incidents over 18 years (since the car bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut in 1983), Washington has not taken the issue seriously. … American officials have consistently held the view that terrorism is a form of criminal activity. Consequently, they have made their goal the arrest and trying of perpetrators who carry out violent acts. That's all fine and good as far as it goes, but it does not go far enough. This legalistic mindset allows the funders, planners, organizers, and commanders of terrorism to continue their work untouched, ready to carry out more attacks. The better approach is to see terrorism as a form of warfare and to target not just those foot soldiers who actually carry out the violence but the organizations and governments who stand behind them. … Many indications point to the development of a large Islamist terror network within the United States, one visible to anyone who cared to see it. … The information was out there but law enforcement and politicians did not want to see it." U.S Intelligence Mistakes Pre-9/11



On the other hand.....
"President-elect Donald Trump has indicated that he intends to dramatically downsize the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He would be right to do so.
Even before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, there was concern that the structure of the U.S. intelligence community was fundamentally flawed." Trump is right to want changes to the intelligence community

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Shah of Iran was his own enemy...Corruption, extreme brutality,poor economic models which produced bottlenecks,shortages and inflation, all the finer things that republicans cherish..
Yet the Shah's military was defeated by the Iranian upheaval that western money could not defeat...In other words, they wanted it more than the despotic monarchy of the Shah..
Why Carter loved the Islamic revolutionaries so much he let the Shah stay in the US while other nations kicked him out while dying from a terminal disease..Which lead to the hostile takeover of the US embassy by Carter's most favorite Islamic revolutionary guards...

Must give credence to polislick for linking a site that demands a subscription, you think she is employed by them as a circulation manager...Yet she still lies about Carter being the one to give Iran away, as usual she shows no bias in her slurring, and her syllogistic fallacy rhetoric...
The real problem was Nixon's avocation of Iranian membership in OPEC and his unorthodox ordainment of the organization, which in turn led to the oil crisis because of US support of Israel during the Yom Kippur war....

When Democrat supporters, e.g., this dunce, glean their education from bumper stickers, they post this sort of thing:

"The Shah of Iran was his own enemy...Corruption, extreme brutality,poor economic models which produced bottlenecks,shortages and inflation, ....Yet the Shah's military was defeated by the Iranian upheaval that western money could not defeat...In other words, they wanted it more than the despotic monarchy of the Shah.."

What a buffoon.


Now for educational remediation:

9. During the 1953 through 1969, Eisenhower and Kennedy and Johnson pressured the Shah to engage in various reforms based on their fear of a popular uprising, as predicted by the CIA as “…just around the corner!” In mid-1958, “Tomorrow will be a revolution!” Of course, the CIA was premature by some twenty years! In comparison, in 1978, the CIA was dismally incorrect: “…the Shah is here to stay! There will be no fundamental change…no group is powerful enough.”
[The CIA....just as accurate in claims about 'Russians hacked the election'!]


a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as
a) land reform,

b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads,

c) education,

d) enfranchising women,

e) urbanization,

f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


I'll get to the bogus tale that America overthrew the duly elected government in a moment...but....remember how wrong the CIA was in all of its assessments.


See the problem in f) above?

This was an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini, Jimmy Carter's man in Iran, immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition.

Notice that my cited web page doesn't require a subscription..Polichic does that to deny the reader an opportunity to peruse her sources..She does it intentionally...

Viewed in terms of the full range of human rights concerns, the Shah's dictatorial regime deserves many negative, but also some positive marks. Despite the publicity associated with land reform, the Shah's white revolution placed low priority on satisfaction of the basic needs of his poorest subjects.1 s Land reform benefited primarily the well-to-do peasants and agricultural entrepreneurs. Landless and poor peasants were often compelled to migrate to large urban centers. Wages for unskilled laborers lagged far behind those of skilled labor and the income distribution gap steadily broadened. This development was not politically dangerous as long as those at the low end of the scale were experiencing some improvement in their standard of living-which was true in the pre-inflationary period of 1963-1974. After 1974, however, the inflation rate was often in the thirty-five to fifty percent range and many of the Iranian poor suffered a real income decline.

In the area of individual freedom and political rights, the regime was about as repressive as the state of Iranian technology allowed. The coercive system, best known for its internal security and information organization known by its acronym "SAVAK", was highly effective. It was considered by most Iranians to be omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. Press and speech were tightly controlled and Iran's modern history was rewritten. The number of political prisoners ranged between 3,500-the admitted official figure-and 125,000-the top figure given by opposition leaders.20 Given the nature of the regime, even visits to prisons by international organizations told little since the government certainly had the capability to orchestrate a clean visitation. Torture certainly occurred. Testimony apparently freely given in the 1979 trials, in fact, seems to confirm some of the worst and least believed reports.
. The extent to which Carter's human rights policy was, in fact, responsible for the developing momentum toward disintegration of the Shah's regime can never be evaluated satisfactorily. Undoubtedly both the Shah and ,the opposition were responding in early 1977 to the Carter policy. But by the summer of 1977, signals from the Carter administration regarding Iran were strong and clear.
When Carter arrived in Tehran he described Iran as an island of stability and the Shah as a broadly popular figure. Acts of violence against and persecution of the signatories followed as predicted. Then on September 8, 1978, a day of infamy in Iran known as Black Friday, on which as many as 4,500 unarmed demonstrators were shot to death, Carter took time out from his Camp David discussions to telephone and assure the Shah of continuing American support. As far as the opposition was concerned, there was no longer any ambivalence in their view of Carter-they saw him as a total hypocrite in the area of human rights.2 "

http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1913&context=jil

2. First the 'micro' result:
"When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108

3. And, the 'macro' result of Carter's magnum opus:
The 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran has been compared in importance to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. “The central problems of world affairs today spring from the Iranian Revolution much as those of the 20th century sprang from the Russian Revolution.” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703583404576080290722622876.html


And so, Democrat Jimmy Carter bequeathed to the world, a home-base for terrorism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).

Why do you refuse to answer the simple questions you were asked? When people refuse and evade asking reasonable simple questions it means they are hiding something, afraid of being caught lying or misrepresenting and simple cowardly.

Which one are you?

Sooooo sorry....I'm not going to allow you to change the subject.


Third time for this query:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

Is this true?

Practically the whole US society had a problem with Jews,both democrats and republicans...

Bigotry has few limits, targets in the past have been the Chinese, the Irish, the Germans and Eastern Europeans, the Japanese and today Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims and those American's who challenge the dogma, hate and fear mongering of the Dumpsters and Alt Right.

By 'Bigotry' you Leftists mean 'thought crimes'?

.....can't have anyone thinking differently than the mandated thought, can you, Nazis....er, Liberals.

BTW.....against whom are most real crimes committed?

'Of the 1,340 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

62.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
11.6 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.'
Victims


Yet you support Obama, who committed the greatest offense against a religion....the back-stabbing snake authorized the UN vote against Israel, and wants the 7th century savages on their doorstep.

Go figure.

I have, often. And your numbers never add up. Here's a number that does: PoliticalChic is intolerant of those who challenge her(?), 100% of the time.

In every post when challenged PoliticalChic defends her biases not by reason, but by attacking the morality or intelligence of anyone who does not kill her(?) ass. As Yogi said, "You can look it up".

Why did I use (?) in the post?

"....PoliticalChic defends her biases not by reason, but by attacking the morality or intelligence...."


Be serious.....how could I 'attack' what is clearly imaginary???

A careful analysis of your......'intelligence'.....would find you best equipped to sit in front of a thatched hut, poking a stick into the dirt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's the bottom line, dimocrap scum..... Under Jimmy The Peanut, Iran got a Goatfucker Fundamentalist Theocracy.

Under the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, they got the right to build Nukes.

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Arms to Iran Weren't for Hostages, Reagan Says

And he also did it because dimocrrap FILTH in Congress had barred him from fighting COMMUNIST SCUM in Nicaragua.

Kinda figures, don't it? Reagan wants to fight communists, dimocrap FILTH want to protect them??

Ortega is still there.

Nicaraguan President wins re-election with wife as VP - CNN.com

dimocraps are scum

Essentially, Edgetho is correct...


1. The Democrat Congress was strongly in favor of the communists of Nicaragua, and the scandal was an attempt to tie the hands of the President, who was strongly anti-communist.

2. And, two, congressional attempts to conduct foreign policy were, at the very least, constitutionally dubious. Reagan often complained that it was not possible to carry out foreign policy with 535 secretaries of state in Congress.

3. The Iran-Contra scandal involved the sale of arms to Iran, basically to ransom American hostages that Islamic extremists held, and diverting proceeds from the sale to the Contras in Nicaragua. Neither the sale nor the diversions of funds were clear violations of existing laws: subsequent independent counsel investigations directly charged anyone with crimes for either the arms sales nor the diversions.

 

[Moonglow]

Here's the bottom line, dimocrap scum..... Under Jimmy The Peanut, Iran got a Goatfucker Fundamentalist Theocracy.

Under the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, they got the right to build Nukes.

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Arms to Iran Weren't for Hostages, Reagan Says

And he also did it because dimocrrap FILTH in Congress had barred him from fighting COMMUNIST SCUM in Nicaragua.

Kinda figures, don't it? Reagan wants to fight communists, dimocrap FILTH want to protect them??

Ortega is still there.

Nicaraguan President wins re-election with wife as VP - CNN.com

dimocraps are scum

Essentially, Edgetho is correct...


1. The Democrat Congress was strongly in favor of the communists of Nicaragua, and the scandal was an attempt to tie the hands of the President, who was strongly anti-communist.

2. And, two, congressional attempts to conduct foreign policy were, at the very least, constitutionally dubious. Reagan often complained that it was not possible to carry out foreign policy with 535 secretaries of state in Congress.

3. The Iran-Contra scandal involved the sale of arms to Iran, basically to ransom American hostages that Islamic extremists held, and diverting proceeds from the sale to the Contras in Nicaragua. Neither the sale nor the diversions of funds were clear violations of existing laws: subsequent independent counsel investigations directly charged anyone with crimes for either the arms sales nor the diversions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).

Why do you refuse to answer the simple questions you were asked? When people refuse and evade asking reasonable simple questions it means they are hiding something, afraid of being caught lying or misrepresenting and simple cowardly.

Which one are you?

Sooooo sorry....I'm not going to allow you to change the subject.


Third time for this query:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

Is this true?

Practically the whole US society had a problem with Jews,both democrats and republicans...

Bigotry has few limits, targets in the past have been the Chinese, the Irish, the Germans and Eastern Europeans, the Japanese and today Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims and those American's who challenge the dogma, hate and fear mongering of the Dumpsters and Alt Right.

By 'Bigotry' you Leftists mean 'thought crimes'?

.....can't have anyone thinking differently than the mandated thought, can you, Nazis....er, Liberals.

BTW.....against whom are most real crimes committed?

'Of the 1,340 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

62.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
11.6 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.'
Victims


Yet you support Obama, who committed the greatest offense against a religion....the back-stabbing snake authorized the UN vote against Israel, and wants the 7th century savages on their doorstep.

Go figure.

So Oblama back stabbed a religion? And here I thought Israel had Jews in it...Jews is not a religion...Judaism is though....

"So Oblama back stabbed a religion?"

1. You may try to tap-dance around it....but it is exactly what he did.
"After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean"
After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean | New York Post


The explanation is here:
Which is the only 'religion' that Barack Hussein Obama has stood up for, shielded from criticism, defended and advanced?


2. Further, he sent troops to Poland to poison any chance the Trump administration has of a detente with the Russians, essentially stabbing America in the back.


QED...He is a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's the bottom line, dimocrap scum..... Under Jimmy The Peanut, Iran got a Goatfucker Fundamentalist Theocracy.

Under the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, they got the right to build Nukes.

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Arms to Iran Weren't for Hostages, Reagan Says

And he also did it because dimocrrap FILTH in Congress had barred him from fighting COMMUNIST SCUM in Nicaragua.

Kinda figures, don't it? Reagan wants to fight communists, dimocrap FILTH want to protect them??

Ortega is still there.

Nicaraguan President wins re-election with wife as VP - CNN.com

dimocraps are scum

Essentially, Edgetho is correct...


1. The Democrat Congress was strongly in favor of the communists of Nicaragua, and the scandal was an attempt to tie the hands of the President, who was strongly anti-communist.

2. And, two, congressional attempts to conduct foreign policy were, at the very least, constitutionally dubious. Reagan often complained that it was not possible to carry out foreign policy with 535 secretaries of state in Congress.

3. The Iran-Contra scandal involved the sale of arms to Iran, basically to ransom American hostages that Islamic extremists held, and diverting proceeds from the sale to the Contras in Nicaragua. Neither the sale nor the diversions of funds were clear violations of existing laws: subsequent independent counsel investigations directly charged anyone with crimes for either the arms sales nor the diversions.

I fully accept and anticipated your inability to respond.

 

[Moonglow]

Here's the bottom line, dimocrap scum..... Under Jimmy The Peanut, Iran got a Goatfucker Fundamentalist Theocracy.

Under the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, they got the right to build Nukes.

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Arms to Iran Weren't for Hostages, Reagan Says

And he also did it because dimocrrap FILTH in Congress had barred him from fighting COMMUNIST SCUM in Nicaragua.

Kinda figures, don't it? Reagan wants to fight communists, dimocrap FILTH want to protect them??

Ortega is still there.

Nicaraguan President wins re-election with wife as VP - CNN.com

dimocraps are scum

Essentially, Edgetho is correct...


1. The Democrat Congress was strongly in favor of the communists of Nicaragua, and the scandal was an attempt to tie the hands of the President, who was strongly anti-communist.

2. And, two, congressional attempts to conduct foreign policy were, at the very least, constitutionally dubious. Reagan often complained that it was not possible to carry out foreign policy with 535 secretaries of state in Congress.

3. The Iran-Contra scandal involved the sale of arms to Iran, basically to ransom American hostages that Islamic extremists held, and diverting proceeds from the sale to the Contras in Nicaragua. Neither the sale nor the diversions of funds were clear violations of existing laws: subsequent independent counsel investigations directly charged anyone with crimes for either the arms sales nor the diversions.

I fully accept and anticipated your inability to respond.

Yours also....

 

[Moonglow]

Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).
Sooooo sorry....I'm not going to allow you to change the subject.


Third time for this query:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

Is this true?

Practically the whole US society had a problem with Jews,both democrats and republicans...

Bigotry has few limits, targets in the past have been the Chinese, the Irish, the Germans and Eastern Europeans, the Japanese and today Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims and those American's who challenge the dogma, hate and fear mongering of the Dumpsters and Alt Right.

By 'Bigotry' you Leftists mean 'thought crimes'?

.....can't have anyone thinking differently than the mandated thought, can you, Nazis....er, Liberals.

BTW.....against whom are most real crimes committed?

'Of the 1,340 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

62.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
11.6 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.'
Victims


Yet you support Obama, who committed the greatest offense against a religion....the back-stabbing snake authorized the UN vote against Israel, and wants the 7th century savages on their doorstep.

Go figure.

So Oblama back stabbed a religion? And here I thought Israel had Jews in it...Jews is not a religion...Judaism is though....

"So Oblama back stabbed a religion?"

1. You may try to tap-dance around it....but it is exactly what he did.
"After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean"
After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean | New York Post


The explanation is here:
Which is the only 'religion' that Barack Hussein Obama has stood up for, shielded from criticism, defended and advanced?


2. Further, he sent troops to Poland to poison any chance the Trump administration has of a detente with the Russians, essentially stabbing America in the back.


QED...He is a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.

I see, yet Israel is not a religion, you do understand that much? Huh Perfect Polly?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Practically the whole US society had a problem with Jews,both democrats and republicans...

Bigotry has few limits, targets in the past have been the Chinese, the Irish, the Germans and Eastern Europeans, the Japanese and today Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims and those American's who challenge the dogma, hate and fear mongering of the Dumpsters and Alt Right.

By 'Bigotry' you Leftists mean 'thought crimes'?

.....can't have anyone thinking differently than the mandated thought, can you, Nazis....er, Liberals.

BTW.....against whom are most real crimes committed?

'Of the 1,340 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

62.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
11.6 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.'
Victims


Yet you support Obama, who committed the greatest offense against a religion....the back-stabbing snake authorized the UN vote against Israel, and wants the 7th century savages on their doorstep.

Go figure.

So Oblama back stabbed a religion? And here I thought Israel had Jews in it...Jews is not a religion...Judaism is though....

"So Oblama back stabbed a religion?"

1. You may try to tap-dance around it....but it is exactly what he did.
"After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean"
After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean | New York Post


The explanation is here:
Which is the only 'religion' that Barack Hussein Obama has stood up for, shielded from criticism, defended and advanced?


2. Further, he sent troops to Poland to poison any chance the Trump administration has of a detente with the Russians, essentially stabbing America in the back.


QED...He is a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.

I see, yet Israel is not a religion, you do understand that much? Huh Perfect Polly?

Is you post an admission of my statement that the dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake, Obama, stabbed Israel in the back by inciting the UN resolution?

 

[Camp]

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Liar or hopelessly ill-informed. The weapons went directly into the Iranian Military and Iranian Guard. The deal led directly to the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by the terrorist who quickly kidnapped more Americans for further deals.
Should have read your link. It confirms what I have written and confirms you as a dunce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Liar or hopelessly ill-informed. The weapons went directly into the Iranian Military and Iranian Guard. The deal led directly to the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by the terrorist who quickly kidnapped more Americans for further deals.
Should have read your link. It confirms what I have written and confirms you as a dunce.

Oh....BTW.....is it true that your god, Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, despised minorities such as Jews, blacks and Asians?

 

[Edgetho]

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Liar or hopelessly ill-informed. The weapons went directly into the Iranian Military and Iranian Guard. The deal led directly to the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by the terrorist who quickly kidnapped more Americans for further deals.
Should have read your link. It confirms what I have written and confirms you as a dunce.

I can read, cockbreath. You evidently can not

from the Slimes article --

IRAN 'MODERATES': GENUINE OR FRAUD?

But the officials and one member of the Iran-contra committees said the contacts were an important factor in the Administration's decision to approve arms shipments to Iran and try to probe for openings in that country.

Israeli officials, who arranged and attended some of the meetings with Iranians, also saw them as a possible means to make an alliance with what they, too, believed was a moderate faction in Iran.

Now here's why the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media is disgusting filth.......

In the same paragraph, the douchebag writer sez -- Some specialists on the Middle East say, however, that they believe there are no moderates in Iran, at least in the Western sense. Focus of Dealings Changed

See how the yellow-bellied, cum-slurping bitch mixes opinion in with FACTS?

Then there's this..... I guess you missed it because it's hard to read with your face buried so deeply in your buddy's crotch --

The officials said the pro-Western Iranians met with Israeli officials and a National Security Council consultant, Michael Ledeen, in 1985 at several overseas locations. The Iranians said they wanted to change the policies of their Government by undermining or displacing political factions hostile to Western interests.

Wipe your chin and read this --

Representative Jim Courter, Republican of New Jersey, who is on the House Iran-contra committee, said the committee has uncovered evidence that the Admininstration had indeed talked with Iranians who said they wanted to change their Government.....

Last paragraph in the article.....As recorded in a document, he was quoted as having said: ''Mike says his contact, Gorbanifahr, [ sic ] has access and influence with a dissident ayatollah . . . as well as disloyal elements spread throughout the military and bazaars. There is great potential here, Mike feels, for a U.S. covert program to undermine the regime.''

dimocraps are scum

period

 

[Camp]

The modern era of terrorist attacking US targets was begun in first term of the Reagan administration when Muslim ME terrorist targeted and bombed the US Embassy in Beirut Lebanon on April 18, 1983. It killed 63 people, including 17 American citizens. It was the first targeted American violent attack by Muslim middle eastern terrorist.

The OP was asked in several posts or provide or explain the Reagan response. She has refused to answer the simple question because it was obviously not of any merit. Instead, she has reverted to her method of deflection by changing the subject and piling on endless cut and paste to divert attention from the fact she is afraid to answer the question.

The question has an ugly answer and shows how Reagan started the downhill slide into the era of terrorism that is still with us. Marines were in Lebanon. Our last remaining Battleship was off the coast of Lebanon. An aircraft carrier task force was off the coast of Lebanon. Allied French paratroopers were in Lebanon, a NATO force trained to coordinate with US Marines.

On Oct 23, 1983, having no fear of US retribution or significant response to the Embassy bombing, the terrorist blew up the Marine Barracks with a truck bomb that killed over 243 Marines. The modern era of terrorism had begun. Terrorist saw the profits and benefits to using the targeting of Americans and American interest as a reliable and acceptable tactic.

 

[Camp]

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Liar or hopelessly ill-informed. The weapons went directly into the Iranian Military and Iranian Guard. The deal led directly to the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by the terrorist who quickly kidnapped more Americans for further deals.
Should have read your link. It confirms what I have written and confirms you as a dunce.

I can read, cockbreath. You evidently can not

from the Slimes article --

IRAN 'MODERATES': GENUINE OR FRAUD?

But the officials and one member of the Iran-contra committees said the contacts were an important factor in the Administration's decision to approve arms shipments to Iran and try to probe for openings in that country.

Israeli officials, who arranged and attended some of the meetings with Iranians, also saw them as a possible means to make an alliance with what they, too, believed was a moderate faction in Iran.

Now here's why the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media is disgusting filth.......

In the same paragraph, the douchebag writer sez -- Some specialists on the Middle East say, however, that they believe there are no moderates in Iran, at least in the Western sense. Focus of Dealings Changed

See how the yellow-bellied, cum-slurping bitch mixes opinion in with FACTS?

Then there's this..... I guess you missed it because it's hard to read with your face buried so deeply in your buddy's crotch --

The officials said the pro-Western Iranians met with Israeli officials and a National Security Council consultant, Michael Ledeen, in 1985 at several overseas locations. The Iranians said they wanted to change the policies of their Government by undermining or displacing political factions hostile to Western interests.

Wipe your chin and read this --

Representative Jim Courter, Republican of New Jersey, who is on the House Iran-contra committee, said the committee has uncovered evidence that the Admininstration had indeed talked with Iranians who said they wanted to change their Government.....

Last paragraph in the article.....As recorded in a document, he was quoted as having said: ''Mike says his contact, Gorbanifahr, [ sic ] has access and influence with a dissident ayatollah . . . as well as disloyal elements spread throughout the military and bazaars. There is great potential here, Mike feels, for a U.S. covert program to undermine the regime.''

dimocraps are scum

period

Hey, asshole, none of the Iranians in your article were recipients of the weapons given to Iran by Reagan. The article merely indicates there were dissident factions in Iran, not that they got the TOW or Hawk missiles. So, it is you with the poor reading skills it seems.

 

[Edgetho]

The modern era of terrorist attacking US targets was begun in first term of the Reagan administration when Muslim ME terrorist targeted and bombed the US Embassy in Beirut Lebanon on April 18, 1983. It killed 63 people, including 17 American citizens. It was the first targeted American violent attack by Muslim middle eastern terrorist.

The OP was asked in several posts or provide or explain the Reagan response. She has refused to answer the simple question because it was obviously not of any merit. Instead, she has reverted to her method of deflection by changing the subject and piling on endless cut and paste to divert attention from the fact she is afraid to answer the question.

The question has an ugly answer and shows how Reagan started the downhill slide into the era of terrorism that is still with us. Marines were in Lebanon. Our last remaining Battleship was off the coast of Lebanon. An aircraft carrier task force was off the coast of Lebanon. Allied French paratroopers were in Lebanon, a NATO force trained to coordinate with US Marines.

On Oct 23, 1983, having no fear of US retribution or significant response to the Embassy bombing, the terrorist blew up the Marine Barracks with a truck bomb that killed over 243 Marines. The modern era of terrorism had begun. Terrorist saw the profits and benefits to using the targeting of Americans and American interest as a reliable and acceptable tactic.

You are a seriously stupid, uninformed bitch.

The golden age of terrorism - CNN.com

 

[Moonglow]

Bigotry has few limits, targets in the past have been the Chinese, the Irish, the Germans and Eastern Europeans, the Japanese and today Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims and those American's who challenge the dogma, hate and fear mongering of the Dumpsters and Alt Right.

By 'Bigotry' you Leftists mean 'thought crimes'?

.....can't have anyone thinking differently than the mandated thought, can you, Nazis....er, Liberals.

BTW.....against whom are most real crimes committed?

'Of the 1,340 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

62.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
11.6 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.'
Victims


Yet you support Obama, who committed the greatest offense against a religion....the back-stabbing snake authorized the UN vote against Israel, and wants the 7th century savages on their doorstep.

Go figure.

So Oblama back stabbed a religion? And here I thought Israel had Jews in it...Jews is not a religion...Judaism is though....

"So Oblama back stabbed a religion?"

1. You may try to tap-dance around it....but it is exactly what he did.
"After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean"
After back-stabbing Israel, Team Obama pretends its hands are clean | New York Post


The explanation is here:
Which is the only 'religion' that Barack Hussein Obama has stood up for, shielded from criticism, defended and advanced?


2. Further, he sent troops to Poland to poison any chance the Trump administration has of a detente with the Russians, essentially stabbing America in the back.


QED...He is a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.

I see, yet Israel is not a religion, you do understand that much? Huh Perfect Polly?

Is you post an admission of my statement that the dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting snake, Obama, stabbed Israel in the back by inciting the UN resolution?

You admitted it,why do I need to admit what you have already admitted?

 

[Moonglow]

Piss off

And Reagan was selling those arms to a revolutionary faction in Iran that was interested in overthrowing the Assahollah

Liar or hopelessly ill-informed. The weapons went directly into the Iranian Military and Iranian Guard. The deal led directly to the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by the terrorist who quickly kidnapped more Americans for further deals.
Should have read your link. It confirms what I have written and confirms you as a dunce.

Oh....BTW.....is it true that your god, Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, despised minorities such as Jews, blacks and Asians?

So did republicans....and your point is?

 

[Camp]

The modern era of terrorist attacking US targets was begun in first term of the Reagan administration when Muslim ME terrorist targeted and bombed the US Embassy in Beirut Lebanon on April 18, 1983. It killed 63 people, including 17 American citizens. It was the first targeted American violent attack by Muslim middle eastern terrorist.

The OP was asked in several posts or provide or explain the Reagan response. She has refused to answer the simple question because it was obviously not of any merit. Instead, she has reverted to her method of deflection by changing the subject and piling on endless cut and paste to divert attention from the fact she is afraid to answer the question.

The question has an ugly answer and shows how Reagan started the downhill slide into the era of terrorism that is still with us. Marines were in Lebanon. Our last remaining Battleship was off the coast of Lebanon. An aircraft carrier task force was off the coast of Lebanon. Allied French paratroopers were in Lebanon, a NATO force trained to coordinate with US Marines.

On Oct 23, 1983, having no fear of US retribution or significant response to the Embassy bombing, the terrorist blew up the Marine Barracks with a truck bomb that killed over 243 Marines. The modern era of terrorism had begun. Terrorist saw the profits and benefits to using the targeting of Americans and American interest as a reliable and acceptable tactic.

You are a seriously stupid, uninformed bitch.

The golden age of terrorism - CNN.com

Keep trying to divert and deflect. The subject is middle eastern terrorism.