How quickly Socialism can destroy a country

Do you understand that this is not at all responsive to what he said? The mere fact that he likes the system he lives under is a rebuttal of your claim that it's a crappy system without virtues; if that were so, people who live under it wouldn't like it. The fact that you seem to think (without any first-hand knowledge, by the way) that YOU wouldn't like it doesn't answer this in any way.

I said nothing about virtues... except in the round about way to say if your 'virtue' calls you to pay more into a system of government, knock yourself out

Been in foreign countries... by business and by deployment.... I'll take the free society this is supposed to be over that crap any day

And I will fight til my dying breath, those like you who wish to turn this away from a free society into your bullshit socialist style' 'paradise'

How much time have you spent living in Europe? You do not know about freedom, just what has been shoved down your throat.

2 years in Germany... 6 months in Belgium

Not to mention 1 year in South Korea, 9 months in Hong Kong, 18 months in Australia

You are talking out your ass when it comes to freedom, not me... and I, unlike the likes of you, have had the background of fighting to secure it

Socialism is the antithesis of freedom, buddy boy
 
I said nothing about virtues... except in the round about way to say if your 'virtue' calls you to pay more into a system of government, knock yourself out

When I say that an economic system "has virtues" (or doesn't), I'm not referring to morality but rather to positive benefits of any kind.

Been in foreign countries... by business and by deployment.... I'll take the free society this is supposed to be over that crap any day

And I will fight til my dying breath, those like you who wish to turn this away from a free society into your bullshit socialist style' 'paradise'

You still aren't saying anything, or at least not anything coherent, in response to what the other poster said. Yes, we realize that the suggestion of incorporating civilized socialist features into the U.S. economy produces a storm of emotion in you and makes you spout reflexive, knee-jerk responses like the above. That however is not an argument, not an attempt to persuade, not really anything to suggest that he is wrong.

socialism is the antithesis of freedom

Whose freedom to do what?
 
Last edited:
I have no problem with the tax rates, we receive many benefits from them.

I receive many more benefits from my own earnings... And I am the one entitled to them, in a free country

You ain't owed shit by society...

You can keep your 60+% taxation, your crappy rationed health care, etc.... I am sure if you feel like you should give extra, they will let you... just like there is no stopping someone from paying extra to sooth their guilt in the US

You are as ignorant of the tax rates as you are about the health care. Stick to discussing something that you know about.

You wish to start showing the total tax rates of the socialist paradises such as Sweden and Denmark, which the little socialist supporters love to cheer?? And remember, I will also be including their little confiscation schemes like their huge VATs
 
I said nothing about virtues... except in the round about way to say if your 'virtue' calls you to pay more into a system of government, knock yourself out

When I say that an economic system "has virtues" (or doesn't), I'm not referring to morality but rather to positive benefits of any kind.

Been in foreign countries... by business and by deployment.... I'll take the free society this is supposed to be over that crap any day

And I will fight til my dying breath, those like you who wish to turn this away from a free society into your bullshit socialist style' 'paradise'

You still aren't saying anything, or at least not anything coherent, in response to what the other poster said. Yes, we realize that the suggestion of incorporating civilized socialist features into the U.S. economy produces a storm of emotion in you and makes you spout reflexive, knee-jerk responses like the above. That however is not an argument, not an attempt to persuade, not really anything to suggest that he is wrong.

socialism is the antithesis of freedom

Whose freedom to do what?

You may feel it is a 'positive benefit' because you are getting the 'benefit' at the expense of someone else's contribution..... it is not a benefit when you are the one paying the burden, being one of the 50% that pays for the other 50%

What is wrong, is the concept of socialist practices... just was wrong as the land grants by kinds to lords to maintain their power in those days... it is another side of the same power coin

Oh... and the freedom of the earner/contributor... being bound to those who either cannot or choose not to do for themselves... and that freedom is stripped by the government, empowered by the lazy greedy who willingly give up their freedoms and the freedoms of others for that greed
 
Last edited:
You may feel it is a 'positive benefit' because you are getting the 'benefit' at the expense of someone else's contribution..... it is not a benefit when you are the one paying the burden, being one of the 50% that pays for the other 50%

It is a positive benefit because it produces a society that is more pleasant to live in, with less crime and violence, with better-educated people and healthier people, with better quality of life all around. That's worth more to me than a little extra spending money.

Oh... and the freedom of the earner/contributor... being bound to those who either cannot or choose not to do for themselves...

So what you're championing here is the maximum freedom of a society's biggest winners, to abdicate all social responsibility or all sense of community, and to behave with complete selfishness. At the expense of those who are less able, for whatever reason, having the freedom that comes with a decent minimum standard of living. You are in short championing the maximal freedom of the rich, at the expense of even minimal freedoms for anyone else.

I'm sorry, but I don't find that even slightly admirable.
 
Thanks again to Booosh Administration and their cronies on Wall St. for wrecking the world economy....Spanish bankers bought heavily into toxic assets, from US and at home.
Many thanks to Pubs blocking all normal jobs bills, blocking the WORLD recovery just to get Obama, pushing failed ideology in BS electioneering, and blaming everything on socialism, lazy unemployed etc.

More proof that Rush is not only a big fat idiot, but a braindead hateful troll. Spain had 24% unemployment in 1994/5 under conservatives when I was there. Anyway, their conservatives are dittohead "commies".
 
Last edited:
It is a positive benefit because it produces a society that is more pleasant to live in, with less crime and violence, with better-educated people and healthier people, with better quality of life all around. That's worth more to me than a little extra spending money.

that's becuase personalized emotional reckoning is your compass

if you can reconcile how it feels.....it is absolute reality

the entitlement mentality is the driving causation behind most social ills
 
It is a positive benefit because it produces a society that is more pleasant to live in, with less crime and violence, with better-educated people and healthier people, with better quality of life all around. That's worth more to me than a little extra spending money.

that's becuase personalized emotional reckoning is your compass

if you can reconcile how it feels.....it is absolute reality

the entitlement mentality is the driving causation behind most social ills

Ones like this leftist scum are basically saying

Give them things so they don't steal.... whether or not it is confiscated from others anyway...

And when reminded that he is free to give as much to nanny government as he chooses too, it is dismissed... because he wants OTHERS to be forced to give for his own feelings of liberal guilt
 
You may feel it is a 'positive benefit' because you are getting the 'benefit' at the expense of someone else's contribution..... it is not a benefit when you are the one paying the burden, being one of the 50% that pays for the other 50%

It is a positive benefit because it produces a society that is more pleasant to live in, with less crime and violence, with better-educated people and healthier people, with better quality of life all around. That's worth more to me than a little extra spending money.

Oh... and the freedom of the earner/contributor... being bound to those who either cannot or choose not to do for themselves...

So what you're championing here is the maximum freedom of a society's biggest winners, to abdicate all social responsibility or all sense of community, and to behave with complete selfishness. At the expense of those who are less able, for whatever reason, having the freedom that comes with a decent minimum standard of living. You are in short championing the maximal freedom of the rich, at the expense of even minimal freedoms for anyone else.

I'm sorry, but I don't find that even slightly admirable.

What I am advocating is the freedom to fail that goes hand in hand with the freedom to succeed.... and the freedom to help others as much as you choose to, or not choose to... whatever causes speak to you, or none if none do...

Your 'fairness' or 'decency' feelings are on you... not Joe Blow in Bald Knob Arkansas, not me, not Suzy Sunshine Hippee in SanFrancisco

What I advocate is freedom, and all the positives AND negatives that come inherent with it....
 
How quickly Socialism can destroy a country]

Nonsense.

That's only if you refer to the socioeconomic system as socialist.

Here in this country we call ours progressivism or occupying wall streetism.

So we will be fine. It's not like we are a quadrillion dollars in debt - it's just 15 trillion.

.

.
 
Last edited:
US Socialism has given us: Detroit, Newark, bankrupt social programs, public housing and public education.
 
Thanks again to Booosh Administration and their cronies on Wall St. for wrecking the world economy....Spanish bankers bought heavily into toxic assets, from US and at home.
Many thanks to Pubs blocking all normal jobs bills, blocking the WORLD recovery just to get Obama, pushing failed ideology in BS electioneering, and blaming everything on socialism, lazy unemployed etc.

More proof that Rush is not only a big fat idiot, but a braindead hateful troll. Spain had 24% unemployment in 1994/5 under conservatives when I was there. Anyway, their conservatives are dittohead "commies".

........another frothing 'Blame Boooosher'......:cuckoo:

but regarding Spain.....it has historically had high unemployment for many decades.......however take a gander at the recent SPIKE after living under the socialist party for about 8 years.....

images
 

9 of the 10 lack a leech class

are predominately homogenous

there is sense of self-accountability, work ethic and responsibilty culturally engrained

actually i have to disagree with you after a point....because nations such as Sweden do have a "leech class"......able-bodied people who collect welfare....over time this has developed and will ultimately be their undoing unless they correct it....
 
...It only took the liberals and the socialists seven years to practically destroy Spain. It only took them seven years. It wasn't that long ago that they elected this far-left government after 9/11, because the terrorists blew up a train station, and the leader of Spain wanted to cave and give the terrorists whatever they wanted to make sure that there were no more terror attacks on the train station or anything else. That was a rebuke to Bush. Was a rebuke to Bush. So the people of Spain elected this far-left, fringe government. In seven years, less than seven years, with a green jobs economy. It was one of the foundational building blocks of the new socialist regime, green jobs. They created 21% unemployment.

They did exactly what Barack Obama's trying to do here. Obama's on a faster pace than the leftist government of Spain. He's been less than three years, and look at the destruction. It took the government of Spain seven years, but the people of Spain said no mas, don't want it anymore, voted en masse for conservatism.

Spain Says, "No Mas!" to Socialists Who Destroyed the Country, Votes Conservative - The Rush Limbaugh Show
S&P’s list of AAA Rated Countries, All of Which Have Socialized Health Care

..... Republicans, Conservatives and Tea Partiers united, saying Socialized Health Care would wreak havoc on our economy. They proceeded to deem President Obama as an evil Socialist trying to turn this country into an evil-Marxist-Maoist-Communist [just fill in the blank] entity, but the following countries have socialized medicine and they have an AAA status with Standard & Poor’s.

Now that the USA no longer has a stellar AAA status, all remaining countries with AAA ratings have socialized medicine .....

AAA countries according to Standard & Poor’s:

Austrailia
Austria
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Guernsey
Hong Kong
Isle of Man
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Singapore
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom

http://freakoutnation.com/2011/08/06/s-all-of-which-have-socialized-health-care/
It must be a "bitter pill" for "ScreamingEagle" to swallow when confronted by the fact that the countries who have retained their S&P AAA ratings also have public healthcare systems and would all be considered "socialist" by American standards.
 
Last edited:
actually i have to disagree with you after a point....because nations such as Sweden do have a "leech class"......able-bodied people who collect welfare....over time this has developed and will ultimately be their undoing unless they correct it....

i can see where western liberal value influence, drug use and decline in traditional Swedish values could trend towards less self-accountability today

great point
 
...It only took the liberals and the socialists seven years to practically destroy Spain. It only took them seven years. It wasn't that long ago that they elected this far-left government after 9/11, because the terrorists blew up a train station, and the leader of Spain wanted to cave and give the terrorists whatever they wanted to make sure that there were no more terror attacks on the train station or anything else. That was a rebuke to Bush. Was a rebuke to Bush. So the people of Spain elected this far-left, fringe government. In seven years, less than seven years, with a green jobs economy. It was one of the foundational building blocks of the new socialist regime, green jobs. They created 21% unemployment.

They did exactly what Barack Obama's trying to do here. Obama's on a faster pace than the leftist government of Spain. He's been less than three years, and look at the destruction. It took the government of Spain seven years, but the people of Spain said no mas, don't want it anymore, voted en masse for conservatism.

Spain Says, "No Mas!" to Socialists Who Destroyed the Country, Votes Conservative - The Rush Limbaugh Show
S&P’s list of AAA Rated Countries, All of Which Have Socialized Health Care

..... Republicans, Conservatives and Tea Partiers united, saying Socialized Health Care would wreak havoc on our economy. They proceeded to deem President Obama as an evil Socialist trying to turn this country into an evil-Marxist-Maoist-Communist [just fill in the blank] entity, but the following countries have socialized medicine and they have an AAA status with Standard & Poor’s.

Now that the USA no longer has a stellar AAA status, all remaining countries with AAA ratings have socialized medicine .....

AAA countries according to Standard & Poor’s:

Austrailia
Austria
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Guernsey
Hong Kong
Isle of Man
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Singapore
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom

FreakOutNation » S&P’s list of AAA Rated Countries, All of Which Have Socialized Health Care
It must be a "bitter pill" for "ScreamingEagle" to swallow when confronted with the fact that all of the countries with S&P AAA ratings have public healthcare systems and would all be considered "socialist" by American standards.

It must be a bitter pill for you to realize that Obamacare and Obama's "Green Scheme" will send us into bankruptcy just like Spain....
 
First of all, the US's version of socialism does not fit the model of true socialism.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Definition of SOCIALISM

1
: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2
a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3
: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

We have programs that fall under socialistic programs (safety nets) such as Social Security and Medicare. But the US isn't even close to the socialistic programs offered by European countries.
The question that arises in my mind is do we need to fix our current system which also isn't working for a huge majority of Americans?
It seems to me that those who are crying and whining about socialism are satisfied with the status quo of wealth/income inequality which factually exists in the US. The continuation of this trend cannot continue, if it does we can say goodbye the Middle Class. If the Middle Class of America continues to weaken or just plain disappears the US economy will continue to slide downwards. There is no rational reason for wanting this to happen, yet it is happening.
Let's not forget that 70% of the US economy is driven by consumer spending. How can this model continue if the Middle Class continues to lose wealth and continues to receive flat wages that don't keep up with inflation?
Yes, capitalism is good as history clearly shows. Unfettered capitalism is not good as the last decade clearly indicates.
 

Forum List

Back
Top