How many death warrants of innocent cops did the judge in Cleveland sign?

[September]

"Innocent" cops lol
​

 

[bucs90]

How many innocent cops will die because of the Judge in Cleveland, that acquitted the cop who shot two unarmed people in their car? 150 shots fired at these two unarmed people, really? The cop stood on the hood of the car and fired like 43 shots. How many times did he have to reload? How many clips to cops carry?

That judge gave no thought to "no justice, no peace". How many blacks are going to kill innocent cops for revenge? That judge didn't give a solution, he created a problem. And that problem will probably spread to more than just Cleveland.

Wait...so he should've found him guilty to honor "No justice No peace"? We arent a society of human sacrifices. If he felt he wasnt guilty...then thats his ruling.

The "No justice No peace" crowd can go suck it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

[
Wait...so he should've found him guilty to honor "No justice No peace"?

That's -exactly- what she thinks.

 

[bucs90]

[
Wait...so he should've found him guilty to honor "No justice No peace"?

That's -exactly- what she thinks.

Thats what I wondered. Idiot asked "didnt judge hear no justice no peace"? All that matters...or should matter...is was THIS defendant guilty or not.

But then again....the affirmative action prosecutor in Baltimore may have set new precedent. If a black dies due to police action...someone must be sacrificed to the mob. Justified or not.

 

[hangover]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

OJ Simpson

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.

Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.

Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho

I still haven't seen evidence that this was a bench trial though. It wouldn't surprise me if that was bullshit too.

 

[M14 Shooter]

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Why do you believe the potential reaction of thugs and miscreants should have some bearing on the outcome of a criminal trial?

 

[hangover]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.

Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho

I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me. he tries to sound soooo grown up.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.

Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho

I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me. he tries to sound soooo grown up.

Age jokes? Stfu loser

 

[M14 Shooter]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.

Juries decide guilt or innocence.

Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.

Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho

I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me.

Your friends insult you? Huh.

 

[Publius1787]

How many innocent cops will die because of the Judge in Cleveland, that acquitted the cop who shot two unarmed people in their car? 150 shots fired at these two unarmed people, really? The cop stood on the hood of the car and fired like 43 shots. How many times did he have to reload? How many clips to cops carry?

That judge gave no thought to "no justice, no peace". How many blacks are going to kill innocent cops for revenge? That judge didn't give a solution, he created a problem. And that problem will probably spread to more than just Cleveland.

I don't think a judge should take into account the social repercussions of his decision, only the facts. You would have it otherwise? By that same thinking a judge should say "If I rule for the defendant there will be riots in the streets so I will rule against him despite his innocence."

 

[Scorpion]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

Bench trial. No jury.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

Bench trial. No jury.

And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.

 

[Scorpion]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

Bench trial. No jury.

And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.

I live in Cleveland dickhead.
Look it up on cleveland.com from Saturday and his explanation for aquittal is clear.
It could not be determine through the evidence that any of Brelos shots were the kill shots.
And a motor vehicle can also be used as a deadly weapon.....just sayin'.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

Bench trial. No jury.

And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.

I live in Cleveland dickhead.
Look it up on cleveland.com from Saturday and his explanation for aquittal is clear.
It could not be determine through the evidence that any of Brelos shots were the kill shots.
And a motor vehicle can also be used as a deadly weapon.....just sayin'.

Still no link?

 

[Scorpion]

Everything you need to know about the Michael Brelo verdict cleveland.com

You could have looked it up just as well Mr. Potato Head.

It even has some FAQ's for you.

 

[Scorpion]

why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.

A jury found them not guilty, system works.

Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?

Bench trial. No jury.

And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.

I live in Cleveland dickhead.
Look it up on cleveland.com from Saturday and his explanation for aquittal is clear.
It could not be determine through the evidence that any of Brelos shots were the kill shots.
And a motor vehicle can also be used as a deadly weapon.....just sayin'.

Still no link?

Still no comment?