How Many Days Until Someone Sues Mandalay Bay?

[miketx]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

On the grounds that lax security allowed him to set up an arsenal in his hotel room and once the shooting started they allowed it to continue.

 

[miketx]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Failure to safeguard their guests. Come on, the guy brought 10 suitcases full of guns and ammo with him and was there for 3 days.

That is not illegal.

 

[miketx]

A hotel that allows someone to bring 20 high powered rifles to their hotel room and they have no responsibility? Not likely.

Better question is how long until the next mass slaughter that is endorsed by the NRA, Republicans, and gun manufacturers. And then the next. And the next. This gun cult has no problem with this becoming the new norm for the US.

The only real question is what is the number that will cause the American public to say "that is it, enough, this has to change". 500 dead? 1,000? Is there a number? Certainly if a nuclear weapon were detonated in a major city that would be enough to force change. So the number is somewhere between 60 and 2,000,000. But what is it.

Why to stains like you lie so much? No one endorses this shit, but you try to help it along.

 

[JoeB131]

How does the number of guns impact the hotel's liability here?

The relevant standard is "reasonable".

Is it reasonable to expect the hotel to inspect every bag that a guest brings in? Is it reasonable to expect that the hotel should inspect all 3,500 rooms for hidden weapons?

I think the sheer quantity of guns and ammo makes them negligent.

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather sue the gun sellers who sold this nut enough guns to start a war. And the company that made the Bump Stock. But our wonderful government has decided to immunize these guys from liability.

So maybe when other companies start paying for the gun cult's negligence, we might get some change.

 

[JoeB131]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Failure to safeguard their guests. Come on, the guy brought 10 suitcases full of guns and ammo with him and was there for 3 days.

That is not illegal.

well, it should be.

 

[miketx]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Failure to safeguard their guests. Come on, the guy brought 10 suitcases full of guns and ammo with him and was there for 3 days.

That is not illegal.

well, it should be.

Sieg Heil!

 

[JoeB131]

Sieg Heil!

60 people are dead. Seriously, go fuck yourself.

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
Are there images available of the exact weapons the murderer used? I for one believe this guy was using military grade automatic weapons.not something "bump stocked."

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Liberal greed and stupidity

 

[KissMy]

Be thankful the fucker used a gun.....being creative he could have set up and detonated a bomb big enough to level a few floors and kill many more than he did.

He did try to set off a bomb to blow a huge aviation fuel storage tank near the crowd. The AR15 with Bump Stock was simply much more reliable & efficient cheap easy killing machine.

 

[Montrovant]

How does the number of guns impact the hotel's liability here?

The relevant standard is "reasonable".

Is it reasonable to expect the hotel to inspect every bag that a guest brings in? Is it reasonable to expect that the hotel should inspect all 3,500 rooms for hidden weapons?

I think the sheer quantity of guns and ammo makes them negligent.

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather sue the gun sellers who sold this nut enough guns to start a war. And the company that made the Bump Stock. But our wonderful government has decided to immunize these guys from liability.

So maybe when other companies start paying for the gun cult's negligence, we might get some change.

You say the quantity of guns and ammo makes them negligent. How many suitcases is suspicious? If you determine a number for that, then there's the question of if he brought all of the suitcases up at one time. I haven't seen anything to indicate the hotel staff had any reason to suspect that the man's luggage contained weapons, so the only way to consider them negligent is to say that allowing someone to bring X number of bags to their room is negligence.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Letting him get so much firepower in the hotel?

Unless he was openly carrying his guns around the hotel, it would be hard to imagine that it could be considered reasonable to search every hotel room for possible mass shooters.

Even open carrying guns would not be grounds as Las Vegas hosts numerous gun shows every year. I think I saw where two were scheduled in the new few days. It is also an open carry state IIRC.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You know it's coming. Who will be the first ones to try and cash in on the death of a family member by suing the casino Paddock shot from?

A woman got $1,000,000 dollars from McDonalds, because like the stupid liberal that she is, she put hot coffee between her legs and then drove off. 50 innocent young men and women lost their lives, and the fucker was on the 32 floor of that hotel.

That is an old story and she didn't get anywhere close to that amount.

Although a New Mexico civil jury awarded $2.86 million to plaintiff Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman who suffered third-degree burns in her pelvic region when she accidentally spilled hot coffee in her lap after purchasing it from a McDonald's restaurant, ultimately Liebeck was only awarded $640,000.

So how is the hotel liable?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Letting him get so much firepower in the hotel?

Unless he was openly carrying his guns around the hotel, it would be hard to imagine that it could be considered reasonable to search every hotel room for possible mass shooters.

Even open carrying guns would not be grounds as Las Vegas hosts numerous gun shows every year. I think I saw where two were scheduled in the new few days. It is also an open carry state IIRC.

Every hotel on the strip prohibits carrying weapons in the casino and hotel.

It's not against the law, but they can absolutely arrest you for trespassing, and lock you up in casino jail, until the police come and get you.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No reason for one person to be able to shoot 600 people in a few minutes. If you feel you have to defend yourself against 600, then you are the problem. The makers & sellers of rapid fire bump fire stocks should & will be sued. They are WMD's to cause mass casualties & death. Not accurate enough to target only bad guys & spare innocent people.

You cannot sue someone for making a perfectly legal product. It has been tried and failed more times than you can count.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Letting him get so much firepower in the hotel?

Unless he was openly carrying his guns around the hotel, it would be hard to imagine that it could be considered reasonable to search every hotel room for possible mass shooters.

Even open carrying guns would not be grounds as Las Vegas hosts numerous gun shows every year. I think I saw where two were scheduled in the new few days. It is also an open carry state IIRC.

Every hotel on the strip prohibits carrying weapons in the casino and hotel.

It's not against the law, but they can absolutely arrest you for trespassing, and lock you up in casino jail, until the police come and get you.

So I guess that policy worked to perfection, right?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

On the grounds that lax security allowed him to set up an arsenal in his hotel room and once the shooting started they allowed it to continue.

Allowed?

Are you feeling OK?

 

[Lewdog]

Families of some of the victims have put in the paper work to freeze the assets of Paddock for when they file a civil suit.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

Letting him get so much firepower in the hotel?

Unless he was openly carrying his guns around the hotel, it would be hard to imagine that it could be considered reasonable to search every hotel room for possible mass shooters.

Even open carrying guns would not be grounds as Las Vegas hosts numerous gun shows every year. I think I saw where two were scheduled in the new few days. It is also an open carry state IIRC.

Every hotel on the strip prohibits carrying weapons in the casino and hotel.

It's not against the law, but they can absolutely arrest you for trespassing, and lock you up in casino jail, until the police come and get you.

So I guess that policy worked to perfection, right?

It depends on what you think that policy was meant to do.

 

[miketx]

On what grounds do you expect them to sue?

On the grounds that lax security allowed him to set up an arsenal in his hotel room and once the shooting started they allowed it to continue.

Allowed?

Are you feeling OK?

Yeah, that's how libtards will call it. Since they had no idea he had those guns up there, to the lib that means they allowed it.