How Homosexual Activists For Now Got Away With Making A Mockery Of Marriage

[MrDVS1]

60% of all Christian marriages end in divorce. Are you sure it's the homos making a mockery of marriage?

Divorce doesn't disrespect that marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions. But thanks for sharing an example of you trying to make something irrelevant the issue.

Also notice that not one person here contests the fact with so much as a shred of validity that hundreds / thousands of years of exclusively heterosexual unions being honored with marriage proves that marriage honors the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we all owe our very existence and that sexual orientation is quite obviously heterosexuality.

love

David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!

Marriage was "created" to unite economic resources between families. Concept of marriage for love and procreation is only a few hundred years old.

More directly marriage was created to give a man title of ownership to a woman and any property she may have, so that he may freely use such property as he wishes.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

How Homosexual Activists For Now Got Away With Making A Mockery Of Marriage

Homosexual activists avoided the primary fact about marriage to make their lies and deceptions the issue to create corrupt legislation based upon every lie and deception they could possibly fathom. Some of them just became scholars just so they could start trying to make every gay relationship recorded throughout history a marriage because they are using every lie and deception that they can possibly fathom to try and hide the fact that thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honored with marriage proves that marriage is about honoring the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we owe our very existence which is quite obviously worth honoring.

If it were up to gays to sustain the population w would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and what is there to be proud of or where is the honor in that?

which is the very obvious evidence proving that homosexuality does not and never did equal heterosexuality. It is homosexuals who have a hard time accepting the reality of what they are while they try and put the blame on everyone else for their very own non acceptance of what they themselves are.

As humans we all have the equal right to marry the opposite sex because that was marriage was created for and in honor of. Homosexual activists making up lies such as false claims of discrimination does not change this fact.

Marriage:

Homosexual activists have managed to temporarily make a complete mockery of marriage on some parts of the globe and they did this by ignoring and avoiding the very foundation of what marriage is about. Instead they scrambled to make marriage about anything else other than what marriage has always been about. For hundreds or even thousands of years since marriage was created, only heterosexual unions were ever honored with marriage thus is the very non contestable factual evidence proving that marriage is exclusively about honoring the union of the one sexual orientation to which we all owe our very existence which is quite obviously heterosexual unions. Even different variations of the human race getting married was also always in honor of the unity of male and female. They even deceptively tried to make marriage to be about being with who you love. They again ignored the fact that love may have been present in many marriages but marriage itself was always between heterosexual unions of which beside that primary fact to do with this issue, not every heterosexual couple got married out of love.They also tried to make the issue about heterosexual couples who are not able to birth children and can still get married. That was when they were trying to make the issue of marriage into "marriage isn't about procreation." What they avoided, I find quite obvious, is the fact that heterosexual couples that can not have children still doesn't disrespect that marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions. Marriage wouldn't even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions. None of us would even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions which quite obviously makes heterosexual unions, well above all other unions, worth honoring..if it were up to homosexuality to sustain the human population, we quite obviously would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and where is the honor in that?

The primary foundation of what marriage is = Thousands of years prove that marriage is exclusively about honoring heterosexual unions because for thousands of years since marriage was created, only heterosexual unions were ever honored with marriage.

They take the one thing that heterosexuals have had for thousands of years which honors the unity and the importance of heterosexual unions, and they treat both marriage and heterosexuality like it's a piece of garbage that doesn't deserve to be respected. Homosexuals are not heterosexuals and the two are not equal. One leads to decay and the other leads to life. As humans we equally have the right to marry the opposite sex. Even our ancestors realized the significance us such unions yet homosexual activists don't even have the capacity to understand something so simple all by themselves. Instead, all homosexual activist demonstrate to care about is forcing themselves on some sort of pedestal with every lie and deception they can possibly fathom to do it.

They do it while demonstrating that to them, heterosexual unions are no more significant than any other union of any other sexual orientation even though our very existence proves that it is!

You prove to the world that homosexuality equals heterosexuality and you have a case but you never will because one does not equal the other no matter how much you choose to ignore this simple fact.

Marriage will soon be restored to a respectable state that it was created for and in honor of globally thus ending this short lived mockery that homosexuals activists have managed to make of it in only a couple of countries where homosexual activists managed to hide the primary fact of what marriage is behind an onslaught of homosexual activist lies and deceptions upon weaker minded parliamentarians.

My pleasure to play a primary role in restoring marriage to a respectable state.

the following video was made a couple of years back and I have become much more well versed on the subject than I was back then. I will some time in the near future make a new video that will blow this one away but for now it will do. I also took a nicer approach, but the next one I make on this subject, there will be no more Mr. nice guy.





love

David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!

Nothing makes a mockery out of marriage more than multiple divorces. How many times has Gingrich been married and what were the frivolous reasons for his divorces, even one that was purely political, too old and not pretty enough to be first lady.

Shows too how straight people married make LGBT offspring.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

What is with the flood of fag threads lately? Live & let live.

 

[MrDVS1]

What is with the flood of fag threads lately? Live & let live.

Mud dumb haters don't know how to do anything else'

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

What is with the flood of fag threads lately? Live & let live.

Mud dumb haters don't know how to do anything else'

Looks more like a left wing troll with an alt account trying to make the right look bad.
Just a thought

 

[Pop23]

“...marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions.”

Incorrect.

Marriage is contract law written by the states to recognize the committed relationships of consenting adult partners, same- or opposite-sex.

You do realize you include a quote from the OP, then didn't address the quote itself.

The quote YOU included was about the CREATION of marriage. You believe differently? How so?

You state the quote as being incorrect. How is it incorrect?

Are you really that delusional?

 

[Pop23]

How Homosexual Activists For Now Got Away With Making A Mockery Of Marriage

Homosexual activists avoided the primary fact about marriage to make their lies and deceptions the issue to create corrupt legislation based upon every lie and deception they could possibly fathom. Some of them just became scholars just so they could start trying to make every gay relationship recorded throughout history a marriage because they are using every lie and deception that they can possibly fathom to try and hide the fact that thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honored with marriage proves that marriage is about honoring the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we owe our very existence which is quite obviously worth honoring.

If it were up to gays to sustain the population w would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and what is there to be proud of or where is the honor in that?

which is the very obvious evidence proving that homosexuality does not and never did equal heterosexuality. It is homosexuals who have a hard time accepting the reality of what they are while they try and put the blame on everyone else for their very own non acceptance of what they themselves are.

As humans we all have the equal right to marry the opposite sex because that was marriage was created for and in honor of. Homosexual activists making up lies such as false claims of discrimination does not change this fact.

Marriage:

Homosexual activists have managed to temporarily make a complete mockery of marriage on some parts of the globe and they did this by ignoring and avoiding the very foundation of what marriage is about. Instead they scrambled to make marriage about anything else other than what marriage has always been about. For hundreds or even thousands of years since marriage was created, only heterosexual unions were ever honored with marriage thus is the very non contestable factual evidence proving that marriage is exclusively about honoring the union of the one sexual orientation to which we all owe our very existence which is quite obviously heterosexual unions. Even different variations of the human race getting married was also always in honor of the unity of male and female. They even deceptively tried to make marriage to be about being with who you love. They again ignored the fact that love may have been present in many marriages but marriage itself was always between heterosexual unions of which beside that primary fact to do with this issue, not every heterosexual couple got married out of love.They also tried to make the issue about heterosexual couples who are not able to birth children and can still get married. That was when they were trying to make the issue of marriage into "marriage isn't about procreation." What they avoided, I find quite obvious, is the fact that heterosexual couples that can not have children still doesn't disrespect that marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions. Marriage wouldn't even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions. None of us would even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions which quite obviously makes heterosexual unions, well above all other unions, worth honoring..if it were up to homosexuality to sustain the human population, we quite obviously would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and where is the honor in that?

The primary foundation of what marriage is = Thousands of years prove that marriage is exclusively about honoring heterosexual unions because for thousands of years since marriage was created, only heterosexual unions were ever honored with marriage.

They take the one thing that heterosexuals have had for thousands of years which honors the unity and the importance of heterosexual unions, and they treat both marriage and heterosexuality like it's a piece of garbage that doesn't deserve to be respected. Homosexuals are not heterosexuals and the two are not equal. One leads to decay and the other leads to life. As humans we equally have the right to marry the opposite sex. Even our ancestors realized the significance us such unions yet homosexual activists don't even have the capacity to understand something so simple all by themselves. Instead, all homosexual activist demonstrate to care about is forcing themselves on some sort of pedestal with every lie and deception they can possibly fathom to do it.

They do it while demonstrating that to them, heterosexual unions are no more significant than any other union of any other sexual orientation even though our very existence proves that it is!

You prove to the world that homosexuality equals heterosexuality and you have a case but you never will because one does not equal the other no matter how much you choose to ignore this simple fact.

Marriage will soon be restored to a respectable state that it was created for and in honor of globally thus ending this short lived mockery that homosexuals activists have managed to make of it in only a couple of countries where homosexual activists managed to hide the primary fact of what marriage is behind an onslaught of homosexual activist lies and deceptions upon weaker minded parliamentarians.

My pleasure to play a primary role in restoring marriage to a respectable state.

the following video was made a couple of years back and I have become much more well versed on the subject than I was back then. I will some time in the near future make a new video that will blow this one away but for now it will do. I also took a nicer approach, but the next one I make on this subject, there will be no more Mr. nice guy.





love

David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!

Nothing makes a mockery out of marriage more than multiple divorces. How many times has Gingrich been married and what were the frivolous reasons for his divorces, even one that was purely political, too old and not pretty enough to be first lady.

No, the mockery would be if the divorced individual remarried a member of the same sex.

Good, cleared that up.

 

[Avatar4321]

“...marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions.”

Incorrect.

Marriage is contract law written by the states to recognize the committed relationships of consenting adult partners, same- or opposite-sex.

not at all correct. Marriage existed before the state. And was designed for the creating and nurturing of children. The state cannot give a marriage rights only recognize them.

you guys want to disconnect the children aspect from marriage. You can't do it. It's the biggest flaw of the same sex marriage movement. No matter how much you want to pretend they are married they will never create life. It's just a cheap imitation of the real thing.

 

[007]

Lots of mentally ill butt fuck supporters in this thread.

"YEAH WE LOVE ALL THAT SICK, PERVERTED SHIT PACKING. THE DEVIL SAYS YES WE CAN."

Progrards, some sick sons a bitches. If it's perverted, disgusting or immoral, the progtards love it.

 

[JoeB131]

not at all correct. Marriage existed before the state. And was designed for the creating and nurturing of children. The state cannot give a marriage rights only recognize them.

you guys want to disconnect the children aspect from marriage. You can't do it. It's the biggest flaw of the same sex marriage movement. No matter how much you want to pretend they are married they will never create life. It's just a cheap imitation of the real thing.

Marriage that existed before 1776 is something no modern woman would want any part of.



Also, realistically, there are all sorts of way gays can have children- surrogacy, artificial insemination, and so on.

Lots of straights use those methods, too.

 

[JoeB131]

Lots of mentally ill butt fuck supporters in this thread.

"YEAH WE LOVE ALL THAT SICK, PERVERTED SHIT PACKING. THE DEVIL SAYS YES WE CAN."

Progrards, some sick sons a bitches. If it's perverted, disgusting or immoral, the progtards love it.

It's only disgusting and immoral to you.

Do you kn ow what I find disgusting and immoral. That in the richest country in the world, we still have children who go to bed hungry at night or die of treatable diseases.

 

[Mac1958]

.

According to this link, 41% of first marriages end in divorce, 60% of 2nd marriages end in divorce, 73% of third marriages end in divorce.

I don't know if gays make much more of a mockery of marriage than straights do.

Divorce in America infographic

.

 

[007]

Lots of mentally ill butt fuck supporters in this thread.

"YEAH WE LOVE ALL THAT SICK, PERVERTED SHIT PACKING. THE DEVIL SAYS YES WE CAN."

Progrards, some sick sons a bitches. If it's perverted, disgusting or immoral, the progtards love it.

It's only disgusting and immoral to you.

Do you kn ow what I find disgusting and immoral. That in the richest country in the world, we still have children who go to bed hungry at night or die of treatable diseases.

Wrong... it's disgusting and immoral to the vast majority of people on the planet.

 

[007]

.

According to this link, 41% of first marriages end in divorce, 60% of 2nd marriages end in divorce, 73% of third marriages end in divorce.

I don't know if gays make much more of a mockery of marriage than straights do.

Divorce in America infographic

So, explain this "divorce mocks marriage" business to me... why is that?

 

[Mac1958]

.

According to this link, 41% of first marriages end in divorce, 60% of 2nd marriages end in divorce, 73% of third marriages end in divorce.

I don't know if gays make much more of a mockery of marriage than straights do.

Divorce in America infographic

So, explain this "divorce mocks marriage" business to me... why is that?

It devalues marriage. It dilutes marriage. It trivializes marriage.

Obviously.

Was this a trick question?

.

 

[mdk]

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the marriage of others.

 

[Pop23]

not at all correct. Marriage existed before the state. And was designed for the creating and nurturing of children. The state cannot give a marriage rights only recognize them.

you guys want to disconnect the children aspect from marriage. You can't do it. It's the biggest flaw of the same sex marriage movement. No matter how much you want to pretend they are married they will never create life. It's just a cheap imitation of the real thing.

Marriage that existed before 1776 is something no modern woman would want any part of.



Also, realistically, there are all sorts of way gays can have children- surrogacy, artificial insemination, and so on.

Lots of straights use those methods, too.

Oh my, where do we start:

There were no happily married women prior to 1776? Delusions run deep in you skywalker

Second, your deflection is noted

No same sex coupling has EVER create a child. Never has, never will. Those children that same sex couples "have", were created using members of opposite sex.

EVERY Man, Woman and Child that ever has, or ever will walk this planet has and will come from a very unique union. Same sex coupling is not at all unique. It CANNOT create a child. Making opposite sex couplings REQUIRED for the existence of the species.

Keep deflecting, it continues the delusion.

 

[Pop23]

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the marriage of others.

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two cars in the garage of two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the garage of others.

There, makes as much sense as your deflection did.

 

[mdk]

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the marriage of others.

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two cars in the garage of two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the garage of others.

There, makes as much sense as your deflection did.

If your marriage is in any way belittled by other people getting married then you marriage is in sad state of affairs. Again, you should spend less time worrying the marriages of others and more time worrying about your own.

 

[Pop23]

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the marriage of others.

If your marriage can be mocked or belittled by two cars in the garage of two people you don't know then maybe you should spend more time worrying about your marriage instead of the garage of others.

There, makes as much sense as your deflection did.

If your marriage is in any way belittled by other people getting married then you marriage is in sad state of affairs. Again, you should spend less time worrying the marriages of others and more time worrying about your own.

My marriage INCLUDES members of opposing sex, making it unique. It also involved aspect of human natural function that same sex relationship NEVER will.

My marriage is fine and NOT based on delusion.

Quit making ridiculous statements based on deflection and delusion.