Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
How China Stole 2020 Election from Trump Through Dominion Voting Systems - Mind Blowing Un-Debunked Documentary
- Thread starter munkle
- Start date
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,053
- 51,961
- 3,615
Computerized voting can be manipulated with a few strokes of a keyboard
or an autorun batch file uploaded from a USB.
Nothing computerized ever gets hacked….come on.
No one has yet produced a single valid reason why elections cannot be tabulated with paper ballots.
The Democrats support these Dominion things.
All you need to know.
Because it would take months to tabulate and verify
.
.
About 93% of people already cast votes with paper ballots:
- 70% hand marked paper ballots.
- 23% voters mark electronically their choice and the machine prints a paper ballot for review and for turning in for tabulation.
.
.
rightwinger - "paper ballots" does not mean "hand counting". Paper ballots are scanned by tabulators which is very fast. Normally final counts can be completed in a couple days.
What most people "see" as the results on "election night" are not completion of the vote counting process. They are media "projections" based on primary data. Those that think we can have "official results" and the "counting completed" election night have no clue about the process.
WW
- May 20, 2009
- 144,283
- 66,610
- 2,330
Fox News got sued by Dominion for saying this kind of stuff, Fox chickened out and settled even though it was true. But notice Dominion didn't sue Epoch Times. Because Epoch Times would have told them bring it on.
Like any media they have their slant but Epoch Times is an actual news organization and Josh Phillips is an actual reporter.
This is the most factual and level-headed treatment of the 2020 election steal I have seen yet. If you watch just one documentary, this should be it IMO. Guaranteed to blow your mind.
What’s the remedy?
- May 20, 2009
- 144,283
- 66,610
- 2,330
Not happening.ID required to vote and signature matching.
20 and 22 were stolen and nothings changed. What do we suppose will happen in November? Biden Body Double wins, getting 98,000,000 votes but wins only 40 counties
Epoch Times has its slant all right – an international media company founded in the US more than two decades ago by practitioners of Falun Gong.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,032
- 33,240
- 2,300
We DO use paper ballots you idiotsNo one has yet produced a single valid reason why elections cannot be tabulated with paper ballots.
The Democrats support these Dominion things.
All you need to know.
Dominion just counts those paper ballots
Last edited:
Aldo Raine
Gold Member
Look who you are debating with!...you think that FOX paid almost 800 millions dollars to Dominion for TRUE reporting and well grounded allegations?
How fucking stupid can you be?
MAGA
I've said it before, and I'll say it again....
What a great name for a nation destroying voting system:
DOMINION
What a great name for a nation destroying voting system:
DOMINION
PeterPilot
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 1,337
- 926
- 1,938
Some horses wear blinders. You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge, but you cannot make him think, cannot make him watch or participate in analysis.Munkle offers allegations without provable evidence.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,032
- 33,240
- 2,300
And if you lead a horse to a mirage… he’s still thirstySome horses wear blinders. You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge, but you cannot make him think, cannot make him watch or participate in analysis.
Yes but that can be discovered through computer forensics. Evidence could be provided that would stand up in court. Trump did not provide any evidence that held up in court.Computerized voting can be manipulated with a few strokes of a keyboard
or an autorun batch file uploaded from a USB.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,032
- 33,240
- 2,300
All you need to do is compare their tallies to the actual paper ballots THAT STILL EXIST.Yes but that can be discovered through computer forensics. Evidence could be provided that would stand up in court. Trump did not provide any evidence that held up in court.
Oh but wait
That would show what a farce these claims are
- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,929
- 51,496
- 3,605
2 years ago 7.85M
Last edited:
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 51,016
- 14,756
- 2,180
Fox News got sued by Dominion for saying this kind of stuff, Fox chickened out and settled even though it was true. But notice Dominion didn't sue Epoch Times. Because Epoch Times would have told them bring it on.
Like any media they have their slant but Epoch Times is an actual news organization and Josh Phillips is an actual reporter.
This is the most factual and level-headed treatment of the 2020 election steal I have seen yet. If you watch just one documentary, this should be it IMO. Guaranteed to blow your mind.
Undebunkable? You mean it has actual evidence rather than random and unsupported supposition?
If so, why didn't y'all present this in court rather than the layer cake of meaningless speculation and tinfoil batshit?
Who knew that YOUTUBE was the going to have what MAGA has always failed to produce in court.
- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,929
- 51,496
- 3,605
Not necessarily.Undebunkable? You mean it has actual evidence rather than random and unsupported supposition?
Much of the evidence, might have been factual, and real, and may, in fact, have affected the election. . . however. . . When ever cases were brought to the courts, they were not heard, the were rejected due to lack of standing.
Standing requirements
"There are three standing requirements:- Injury-in-fact: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent (that is, neither conjectural nor hypothetical; not abstract).[42][43] The injury can be either economic, non-economic, or both.
- Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.[44]
- Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.[45]"
Standing (law) - Wikipedia
Even had the courts so found in favor of Trump, there was no conceivable redress according to law, but to throw the whole system into chaos, for the nefarious actor was not before the court.
Moot point. No benefit to hearing any of the cases or the supposed evidence. No standing.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,032
- 33,240
- 2,300
Not necessarily.
Much of the evidence, might have been factual, and real, and may, in fact, have affected the election. . . however. . . When ever cases were brought to the courts, they were not heard, the were rejected due to lack of standing.
Standing requirements
"There are three standing requirements:
- Injury-in-fact: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent (that is, neither conjectural nor hypothetical; not abstract).[42][43] The injury can be either economic, non-economic, or both.
- Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.[44]
- Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.[45]"
Standing (law) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Even had the courts so found in favor of Trump, there was no conceivable redress according to law, but to throw the whole system into chaos, for the nefarious actor was not before the court.
Moot point. No benefit to hearing any of the cases or the supposed evidence. No standing.
Lack of merit
Similar threads
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 407
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 1K
- Views
- 9K
- Replies
- 222
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 213
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8052
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-