John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 23,389
- 12,419
- 1,288
Where in the Constitution does it give it oversight powers on individual cases. It does not.Of course it does…Art 1 Sect 8 clause 18, gives congress oversight powers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where in the Constitution does it give it oversight powers on individual cases. It does not.Of course it does…Art 1 Sect 8 clause 18, gives congress oversight powers
I literally just provided you the part of the constitution where it does.Where in the Constitution does it give it oversight powers on individual cases. It does not.
We have separation of powers for a reason. Looks like Jordan doesn't agree with that or doesn't care.If Smith doesn't turn the documents over it's clearly an attempt to obstruct, he obviously is underming the law and hiding something
It says nothing about individual cases. The Watergate investigation in Congress did not supervise the DOJ's investigation of the case.I literally just provided you the part of the constitution where it does.
Nowhere does it say, but not over individual cases.
There are historical examples of them doing just that…the Watergate prosecution for example
Correct it doesn’t exclude individual cases.It says nothing about individual cases. The Watergate investigation in Congress did not supervise the DOJ's investigation of the case.
who said Congress supervises anything at the DOJ? LinkYes, some bozo above says that Congress supervises individual DOJ cases. It does not. Congress investigated Watergate but did not superives the DOJ's handling of it.
You are nobody. Look above for the boobs who are saying it.who said Congress supervises anything at the DOJ? Link
Ah so you are just making things up againYou are nobody. Look above for the boobs who are saying it.
You boob.Ah so you are just making things up again
"Fox keep telling me that Biden is corrupt so it must be true"!12,000 pages of bank records, and Creepy Comer can't find a single illegal dime on Joe Biden.
No bribes from Burisma.
No bribes from China.
Even Comer's own witnesses testified he doesn't have the goods. How embarrassing for him!
Yet the tard herd thinks there is evidence!
Mass psychosis.
"I want to bleev it, so it must be true!"