Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #101
They are facts not talking points.
I know you think they are the same thing though hack
I know you think they are the same thing though hack
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They are facts not talking points.
I know you think they are the same thing though hack
Congress Project : Publications : Bimonthly Column on Procedural Politics from Roll Call
A ROLL CALL article from 2006 folks, its from the Rs themselves
Congress Project : Publications : Bimonthly Column on Procedural Politics from Roll Call
A ROLL CALL article from 2006 folks, its from the Rs themselves
you do understand that the HOUSE has not passed the Senate bill, which is why all the examples you are giving mean nothing. for some reason you seem to be missing that point.
And when the house votes on this issue they are voting on the bill at the same time.
If they vote to defeat it you win right?
If they vote to approve it they vote to approve it right.
EVERYONE voting in the house knows this.
Congress Project : Publications : Bimonthly Column on Procedural Politics from Roll Call
A ROLL CALL article from 2006 folks, its from the Rs themselves
you do understand that the HOUSE has not passed the Senate bill, which is why all the examples you are giving mean nothing. for some reason you seem to be missing that point.
And when the house votes on this issue they are voting on the bill at the same time.
If they vote to defeat it you win right?
If they vote to approve it they vote to approve it right.
EVERYONE voting in the house knows this.
Because it's unconstitutional. Article 1, Section 7 specifies the order of the House passing a bill, then it goes to the Senate. If no amendments are proposed, it then goes to the President for signing.
In this case, the bill under consideration is the Senate Version. The house cannot amend something that it hasn't already passed.
Because it's unconstitutional. Article 1, Section 7 specifies the order of the House passing a bill, then it goes to the Senate. If no amendments are proposed, it then goes to the President for signing.
In this case, the bill under consideration is the Senate Version. The house cannot amend something that it hasn't already passed.
No you people dont get it.
EVERY person voting on this issue KNOWS it means the healthcare bill will go straight to the presidents desk for signing.
That means they know its voting for the bills approval.
You can pretend that is not the case but it is.
This was fine by you when Rs did it.
I proved precident , you just ignored the facts given to you.
Newt used it repetedly, do you want him in jail?
Congress Project : Publications : Bimonthly Column on Procedural Politics from Roll Call
A ROLL CALL article from 2006 folks, its from the Rs themselves
you do understand that the HOUSE has not passed the Senate bill, which is why all the examples you are giving mean nothing. for some reason you seem to be missing that point.