House conservatives demand offsets for Hurricane Sandy aid

J.E.D

Gold Member
Jul 28, 2011
14,159
2,229
280
Once again the far-right of the GOP (are there any moderates left?) show us how compassionate they are and prove why a majority of Americans hold them in low regard concerning the welfare of the nation.

House conservatives demand offsets for Hurricane Sandy aid - The Hill's On The Money

House conservatives are wasting no time in demanding that emergency spending for Hurricane Sandy be offset by spending cuts to the rest of the budget.

The White House on Friday requested Congress to pass a $60.4 billion bill to pay for damage resulting from Sandy.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders have so far been mum on whether they will demand spending cuts to match.
The right wing members of the House conference are not waiting to make their feelings known.

Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who sits on the Appropriations Committee, said she will need to see offsets on Wednesday as did Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho).

“We have these emergencies every year and we should prepare for that in our budget,” Labrador said.

“No pun intended, we should have a rainy day fund,” Rep. Jeff Landry (R-La.) said.

The August 2011 debt deal allows the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s disaster relief fund to have up to $11 billion this year in extra funds for a disaster, but this money is not enough for the historic damage cause by Sandy according to the governors of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.
 
Once again the far-right of the GOP (are there any moderates left?) show us how compassionate they are and prove why a majority of Americans hold them in low regard concerning the welfare of the nation.

Bullshit. Your point would be pointy if the Rs said "no Sandy relief for you!". They didn't.

Republicans know that budgeting for a rainy day and off-setting emergency spending with cutting someplace else is common sense. When oh when will they learn that Dems lack common sense and the Dems pea-brains damn near explode when you inject it into a conversation.

No spending cuts! Tax the rich a bit more! Free ice cream for everyone! <--- The Dem way or no way!

See ya at the bottom.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
So, the victims of Sandy should have to wait for relief because Republicans want unrelated spending cuts in return? Talk about bullshit -- you're wading in it.
 
Yea well as usual, it's packed with other spending, mark me not surprised:rolleyes:

for example -


SENATE SANDY AID PROPOSAL: The Senate released details of its $60.4 billion Sandy aid legislation. Among the spending: $482 million to NOAA for severe weather forecasting, marine debris cleanup, repair of facilities and equipment and coastal ecosystem protection; $810 million to EPA for clean water and drinking water state revolving funds to upgrade water infrastructure; $5 million for EPA’s leaking underground storage tank cleanup program; $2 million for Superfund sites; $3 million to the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement to repair a New Jersey oil spill response testing facility; $78 million to the Fish and Wildlife Service for national wildlife refuges; and $4.4 million for Forest Service recovery efforts.

POLITICO Morning Energy - POLITICO.com


Get the point?
 
Once again the far-right of the GOP (are there any moderates left?) show us how compassionate they are and prove why a majority of Americans hold them in low regard concerning the welfare of the nation.

House conservatives demand offsets for Hurricane Sandy aid - The Hill's On The Money

House conservatives are wasting no time in demanding that emergency spending for Hurricane Sandy be offset by spending cuts to the rest of the budget.

The White House on Friday requested Congress to pass a $60.4 billion bill to pay for damage resulting from Sandy.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders have so far been mum on whether they will demand spending cuts to match.
The right wing members of the House conference are not waiting to make their feelings known.

Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who sits on the Appropriations Committee, said she will need to see offsets on Wednesday as did Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho).

“We have these emergencies every year and we should prepare for that in our budget,” Labrador said.

“No pun intended, we should have a rainy day fund,” Rep. Jeff Landry (R-La.) said.

The August 2011 debt deal allows the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s disaster relief fund to have up to $11 billion this year in extra funds for a disaster, but this money is not enough for the historic damage cause by Sandy according to the governors of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.


Hmmmmm. I didn't hear Lummis or Labrador preaching that when their states were burning and FEMA responded with help. And, I didn't hear Landry after Hurricane Isaac earlier this year either. In fact, I recall him meeting with the President when he went down to Louisiana and I'll just bet you he never said, "Don't send us any help until you can find an offset."
 
Yea well as usual, it's packed with other spending, mark me not surprised:rolleyes:

for example -


SENATE SANDY AID PROPOSAL: The Senate released details of its $60.4 billion Sandy aid legislation. Among the spending: $482 million to NOAA for severe weather forecasting, marine debris cleanup, repair of facilities and equipment and coastal ecosystem protection; $810 million to EPA for clean water and drinking water state revolving funds to upgrade water infrastructure; $5 million for EPA’s leaking underground storage tank cleanup program; $2 million for Superfund sites; $3 million to the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement to repair a New Jersey oil spill response testing facility; $78 million to the Fish and Wildlife Service for national wildlife refuges; and $4.4 million for Forest Service recovery efforts.

POLITICO Morning Energy - POLITICO.com


Get the point?

Did they roll in free birth control for that lady?
 
I agree we should offset the Sandy aid money with cuts to the military budget.

Defense budget is a favorite of the the left to decimate.
Just as taxing the shit out of the rich.They say it's only a few points.
Well now it's just a few points and so much in cuts to defense...

What do we do when we find raising taxes and cutting the defense budget
doesn't do what the lefties believe it will do...

WE go back and hit defense and those evil rich people again...
 
Once again the far-right of the GOP (are there any moderates left?) show us how compassionate they are and prove why a majority of Americans hold them in low regard concerning the welfare of the nation.

House conservatives demand offsets for Hurricane Sandy aid - The Hill's On The Money

House conservatives are wasting no time in demanding that emergency spending for Hurricane Sandy be offset by spending cuts to the rest of the budget.

The White House on Friday requested Congress to pass a $60.4 billion bill to pay for damage resulting from Sandy.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders have so far been mum on whether they will demand spending cuts to match.
The right wing members of the House conference are not waiting to make their feelings known.

Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who sits on the Appropriations Committee, said she will need to see offsets on Wednesday as did Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho).

&#8220;We have these emergencies every year and we should prepare for that in our budget,&#8221; Labrador said.

&#8220;No pun intended, we should have a rainy day fund,&#8221; Rep. Jeff Landry (R-La.) said.

The August 2011 debt deal allows the Federal Emergency Management Agency&#8217;s disaster relief fund to have up to $11 billion this year in extra funds for a disaster, but this money is not enough for the historic damage cause by Sandy according to the governors of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

God forbid that we actually consider a way to pay for anything.
 
So, the victims of Sandy should have to wait for relief because Republicans want unrelated spending cuts in return? Talk about bullshit -- you're wading in it.

Unrelated spending cuts? I dont think cutting spending elsewhere to pay for more important spending is unrelated in the least.

Are you really going to fight against spending cuts rather than help the Sandy victims?
 
Why is it the politicians we elect will just end up doing the bare
minimum again...they will not do a whole lot to resolve this and they
will again kick the can down the road and will promise to get back to spending cuts
some time soon... but will not.
 
Why is it the politicians we elect will just end up doing the bare
minimum again...they will not do a whole lot to resolve this and they
will again kick the can down the road and will promise to get back to spending cuts
some time soon... but will not.

True and we keep on electing them or their clones from the 2 partys.
 
I agree we should offset the Sandy aid money with cuts to the military budget.

Defense budget is a favorite of the the left to decimate.
Just as taxing the shit out of the rich.They say it's only a few points.
Well now it's just a few points and so much in cuts to defense...

What do we do when we find raising taxes and cutting the defense budget
doesn't do what the lefties believe it will do...

WE go back and hit defense and those evil rich people again...

Do we really need troops in Germany, Japan, South Korea,,,,and every knook and cranny worldwide? The US is going broke and we sure the hell have to stop defending countries and regions of the world that can afford to defend themselves.
You people cry and moan about spending without not blinking an eye for the billions of dollars we must spend on defense even though we out-spend Russia and China by six-seven times annually. And then you want fiscal responsibility. That is 100% hypocrisy. Suck it up and get over your dreams of world control, we can't afford it.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top