homosexual marriage

[Where_r_my_Keys]

That is exactly what the Bill of Rights- and all such similar laws are for- to protect persons from government, from the tyranny of the majority.

Marriage is recognized as a Right in the United States- which means that you- and I- have a Right to marry- and that right can only be denied if the State can establish a compelling reason to deny that right. And that includes the right to marry the person we want to marry- whether that person happens to be of another race, or of the same gender.

The Bill of Rights recognizes God-given rights and limits the power of government from usurping the means of individuals to exercise their rights.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman...

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Marriage is one man and one woman. Nor is there any Superior Court case which says our Right to marriage is limited to a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court had an opportunity to make that decision.

Instead they left stand the Federal Courts decision that the right of marriage applies equally to a couple consisting of two people of the same gender.

What your opinion is regarding what marriage is- or is not- ultimately is meaningless.

10 states and the District of Columbia have recognized that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.
Some additional 20 states have had courts recognize that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.

But don't worry- no one will force you to 'gay marry'- or even force you to attend a wedding you don't approve of.

Of course "Gay Marriage" might well harm your marriage...........

Gay marriage does more than harm other marriages. It injects a poison into the entire culture.

What harm do other marriages cause?
Who has died because of gay marriage?
How have you been personally harmed by two persons of the same gender marrying?

I wonder who that is you speak of.

Certainly not anyone who is for the privacy of adults to be free from the Government Sex Police telling them how they can- or cannot have sex.

I don't care how anyone gets off

Only one of those ways can, and often does creates a child

Doing so is not without considerable risk.

And is far far different then the others

Well for someone who doesn't care- you keep bringing it up.

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Yes, I think the government should jail fathers for attempted marriage to their daughters. Even as adults the dynamics of the relationship is do far distant from other opposite gender marriages. Just as it is for same gender relationships.

Hope this clears that up.

Were you planning on marrying your daughter?

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

So fathers/daughters can't have babies?

Yes, I think the government had an interest in creating population

Without opposite gender coupling, population is impossible, and the government does not exist


And neither do you.

You can thank us later

Great post... The noteworthy point which I came away with, was her intentional refusal to find a moral repugnance over the incest thing. For years, I used to force them into having to explain how they would stop the Polygamists from demanding marriage... and what reasoning would they use to contest the legalization of incest and the sexual pursuit of children by adults... but since they've regressed the court through their judicial insurgency, they have settled in to the regression that 'government has no place in the sexual lives of people'.

Which sucks, because I used to LIVE for the moment when I cornered one into admitting that their feigned repulsion of pedophilia, was oriented around "LEGALITIES" and decidedly NOT moral reasons.

So, given the current pace, by the time obama is frog marched out of the white house, they should be back to public demands that "Some children actually benefit from a loving relationship with a caring adult''.

And won't we have a great time, then?

 

[Czernobog]

What Konspiracy dreck.

If I wanted to 'intentionally import' Ebola into the United States- me personally- If one person wanted to intentionally import Ebola into the U.S. there would be thousands dead now. You- or Republican operatives- could easily bring Ebola contaminated product from Africa and infect people.

Instead we have had exactly 5 cases that I am aware of here.

2 American healthcare workers who were brought here for treatment- nobody infected by them.
1 African who arrived apparently healthy but was caring the Ebola virus.
2 healthcare workers who caught the virus from him.

IF anyone had intentionally brought Ebola into the U.S. there would be thousands of cases, and hundreds of deaths.

Just more Konservative Kraziness.

Keep denying the obvious Sally... it won't save ya. Nature has had its fill of evil. And it's game over.

Now you think I am someone named Sally.....and you think that Ebola is because "Nature has had its fill of evil".

Between that and your call for people to murder people like me, I am starting to get concerned about your sanity.

Murder is the morally unjustified taking of a human life... I have never and never would advocate for such a thing.

The thing about being a degenerate Sally is that what you are concerned about is irrelevant to people who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the immutable principles of nature.

See how that works?

Okay. You are now, officially, no better than the Westboro "God Hates Fags" idiots. Welcome to my ignore pile.

Buh bye.

More like Landover Baptist Church...

Oh no. Westboro. At least Landover is satire, and isn't meant to be taken seriously. This moron, and the Westboro jackasses actually mean the hateful shit they're spewing.

 

[Syriusly]

4 States- the number of states that voters have approved recognizing marriage equality for same gender couples.
7- the number of states and District of Columbia that have recognized marriage equality for same gender couples.

No 'judicially fabricated fraud'- that is just the whiny claim by those who are upset that discrimination is ending.

ZERO- the number of children ever produced by same gender coupling.

ALL- the number of human beings produced by opposite gender couplings.

Incredible I know

Which is exactly the same number produced by infertile and elderly couples. A bigot only wants to keep the gays from civil marriage and not infertile or childless by choice couples.

I know many infertile couples and elderly opposite gender couples who have had children.

There have never been any truly infertile couples who have had biological children together.
There have never been any couples who have married in the 80's who have produced children together after they have married.

And none of that has anything to do with homosexual marriage.

Oh reallllllyyyyyyy

Tell these guys K?

Fertility Treatments for Females

Is elderly now 80?

Here's a clue

The elderly many many many times have had children within there lifetimes, even many many many gay ones.

Now, name a single child ever produced by a same sex coupling

Just one

Shouldn't be that difficult.

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Keep denying the obvious Sally... it won't save ya. Nature has had its fill of evil. And it's game over.

Now you think I am someone named Sally.....and you think that Ebola is because "Nature has had its fill of evil".

Between that and your call for people to murder people like me, I am starting to get concerned about your sanity.

Murder is the morally unjustified taking of a human life... I have never and never would advocate for such a thing.

The thing about being a degenerate Sally is that what you are concerned about is irrelevant to people who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the immutable principles of nature.

See how that works?

Okay. You are now, officially, no better than the Westboro "God Hates Fags" idiots. Welcome to my ignore pile.

Buh bye.

More like Landover Baptist Church...

Oh no. Westboro. At least Landover is satire, and isn't meant to be taken seriously. This moron, and the Westboro jackasses actually mean the hateful shit they're spewing.

Hateful? Ya mean like reveling in the collective forcing of innocent people into servitude, because they reject your choices and behavior?

Now THAT is HATE.

Westboro are just common idiots, sure, they're mean, but such is the nature of evil.

 

[Syriusly]

That is exactly what the Bill of Rights- and all such similar laws are for- to protect persons from government, from the tyranny of the majority.

Marriage is recognized as a Right in the United States- which means that you- and I- have a Right to marry- and that right can only be denied if the State can establish a compelling reason to deny that right. And that includes the right to marry the person we want to marry- whether that person happens to be of another race, or of the same gender.

The Bill of Rights recognizes God-given rights and limits the power of government from usurping the means of individuals to exercise their rights.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman...

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Marriage is one man and one woman. Nor is there any Superior Court case which says our Right to marriage is limited to a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court had an opportunity to make that decision.

Instead they left stand the Federal Courts decision that the right of marriage applies equally to a couple consisting of two people of the same gender.

What your opinion is regarding what marriage is- or is not- ultimately is meaningless.

10 states and the District of Columbia have recognized that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.
Some additional 20 states have had courts recognize that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.

But don't worry- no one will force you to 'gay marry'- or even force you to attend a wedding you don't approve of.

Of course "Gay Marriage" might well harm your marriage...........

Gay marriage does more than harm other marriages. It injects a poison into the entire culture.

What harm do other marriages cause?
Who has died because of gay marriage?
How have you been personally harmed by two persons of the same gender marrying?

I wonder who that is you speak of.

Certainly not anyone who is for the privacy of adults to be free from the Government Sex Police telling them how they can- or cannot have sex.

I don't care how anyone gets off

Only one of those ways can, and often does creates a child

Doing so is not without considerable risk.

And is far far different then the others

Well for someone who doesn't care- you keep bringing it up.

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Yes, I think the government should jail fathers for attempted marriage to their daughters. Even as adults the dynamics of the relationship is do far distant from other opposite gender marriages. Just as it is for same gender relationships.

Hope this clears that up.

Were you planning on marrying your daughter?

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

So fathers/daughters can't have babies?

Yes, I think the government had an interest in creating population

Without opposite gender coupling, population is impossible, and the government does not exist


And neither do you.

You can thank us later

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Not difficult questions.

I wonder why you are so unwilling to answer them.

Well not really- i have a pretty good idea why you won't.

 

[Syriusly]

Ladies and gents of the USMB Homosexual Marriage Forum. I present you the obligatory MELTDOWN of the cult which Advocates for the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

It actually took longer than I expected. But such was inevitable...

Now just to recap... anyone who opposes them is guilty of threatening to murder them... REPUBLICANS BROUGHT EBOLA INTO THE US and (my personal fave: NO CULTURE HAS EVER FALLEN INTO EXTINCTION because it lost the means to discern truth, to trust and to agree upon a soundly reasoned morality, inevitably finding itself incapable of promoting and serving justice for one another. LOL! No no...
.

I notice no quote......because of course you couldn't find a quote that says what you say.

Lets recap:

You claim that the Left intentionally brought Ebola to the United States.
I showed what an idiotic claim that was

You suggested that the 'people' should kill those of the Left.
I showed how repugnant your suggestion was.

And I challenged you to show us the civilizations that have fallen into extinction because they had sex you don't approve of.

And then you have this melt down.

To use the words of Joseph Welch

"Have you no sense of decency"?

 

[Syriusly]

Now you think I am someone named Sally.....and you think that Ebola is because "Nature has had its fill of evil".

Between that and your call for people to murder people like me, I am starting to get concerned about your sanity.

Murder is the morally unjustified taking of a human life... I have never and never would advocate for such a thing.

The thing about being a degenerate Sally is that what you are concerned about is irrelevant to people who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the immutable principles of nature.

See how that works?

Okay. You are now, officially, no better than the Westboro "God Hates Fags" idiots. Welcome to my ignore pile.

Buh bye.

More like Landover Baptist Church...

Oh no. Westboro. At least Landover is satire, and isn't meant to be taken seriously. This moron, and the Westboro jackasses actually mean the hateful shit they're spewing.

Hateful? Ya mean like reveling in the collective forcing of innocent people into servitude, because they reject your choices and behavior?

Now THAT is HATE.

Westboro are just common idiots, sure, they're mean, but such is the nature of evil.

Can you show us any difference between you and the Westboro Church?

So far you seem joined at the hip.

 

[Syriusly]

So now you are advocating the murder of anyone on the Left.

And using Ebola as the excuse.

Not a surprise.

The Ideological Left has intentionally imported Ebola into the US. In a few months, it will be in full blown epidemic mode and within a year, the US Economy will be dead as a door-nail... with millions sick and dying.
.

What Konspiracy dreck.

If I wanted to 'intentionally import' Ebola into the United States- me personally- If one person wanted to intentionally import Ebola into the U.S. there would be thousands dead now. You- or Republican operatives- could easily bring Ebola contaminated product from Africa and infect people.

Instead we have had exactly 5 cases that I am aware of here.

2 American healthcare workers who were brought here for treatment- nobody infected by them.
1 African who arrived apparently healthy but was caring the Ebola virus.
2 healthcare workers who caught the virus from him.

IF anyone had intentionally brought Ebola into the U.S. there would be thousands of cases, and hundreds of deaths.

Just more Konservative Kraziness.

Keep denying the obvious Sally... it won't save ya. Nature has had its fill of evil. And it's game over.

Now you think I am someone named Sally.....and you think that Ebola is because "Nature has had its fill of evil".

Between that and your call for people to murder people like me, I am starting to get concerned about your sanity.

Murder is the morally unjustified taking of a human life... I have never and never would advocate for such a thing.

Ah so that is how you justify saying that people like myself should be killed?

Once again here is what you said:

Threatening the lives of MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, who's only crime is that they haven't taken to the streets, dragging you people from your homes and annihilating you where you're found. .

Right there where you said that the only crime is that people haven't killed us.

I guess you rationalize your murderous suggestions by thinking that our deaths is justifiable.

 

[Syriusly]

For instance, there is no right to engage in sex with a person of one's own gender... therefore there is no right to publicly advocate for such.
.

Wrong

And wrong.

Lawrence v. Texas established that all Americans have a right to private consensual sex.

And the First Amendment says that we all have the right to publicly advocate for whatever we believe is right- even the American Taliban of the Far Right has that right.

Isn't it cool how they turn to specious judicial edicts?

ROFLMNAO... They won't save you. They're subjective opinions of people who are as animated by evil as you are.

And when it turns, you and you most special friends will yearn for the day when you were peacefully cloistered in that comfy ol'e closet.

What you confuse as specious we call the law

Lawrence v. Texas established that all Americans have a right to private consensual sex.

And the First Amendment says that we all have the right to publicly advocate for whatever we believe is right- even the American Taliban of the Far Right has that right.

So, you feel that law cannot be superficially plausible, but actually invalid, unsustainable and counter productive to the service of justice, which is of course the only legitimate purpose for law..

No once again you don't have a clue.

About anything.

Once again

What you confuse as specious we call the law

Lawrence v. Texas established that all Americans have a right to private consensual sex.

 

[Pop23]

ZERO- the number of children ever produced by same gender coupling.

ALL- the number of human beings produced by opposite gender couplings.

Incredible I know

Which is exactly the same number produced by infertile and elderly couples. A bigot only wants to keep the gays from civil marriage and not infertile or childless by choice couples.

I know many infertile couples and elderly opposite gender couples who have had children.

There have never been any truly infertile couples who have had biological children together.
There have never been any couples who have married in the 80's who have produced children together after they have married.

And none of that has anything to do with homosexual marriage.

Oh reallllllyyyyyyy

Tell these guys K?

Fertility Treatments for Females

Is elderly now 80?

Here's a clue

The elderly many many many times have had children within there lifetimes, even many many many gay ones.

Now, name a single child ever produced by a same sex coupling

Just one

Shouldn't be that difficult.

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

And here's your silly argument in a nutshell

Your bicycle is exactly the same as my motorcycle because some motorcycles have blown engines and still others are old, rusty and can no longer run. Therefor, your bicycle must be the same.

Preposterous

It shows how delusional you are

Get this, 50 years ago those "infertile" couples could never hope to create a child. Now many can

No (that is an absolute and not debate able) same sex coupling has ever or will ever produce a child.

Claim your bike the equal to my motorcycle all you want. Crying and stomping your feet will not make it so no matter how many enablers you might convince.

Sorry, facts is facts.

 

[Syriusly]

[
I mean look at the evidence before you. I am here, pleading with you, a person who publicly promotes evil .

LOL.....from the person who believes Ebola is Nature's response to sodomy.........

 

[Pop23]

The Bill of Rights recognizes God-given rights and limits the power of government from usurping the means of individuals to exercise their rights.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman...

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Marriage is one man and one woman. Nor is there any Superior Court case which says our Right to marriage is limited to a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court had an opportunity to make that decision.

Instead they left stand the Federal Courts decision that the right of marriage applies equally to a couple consisting of two people of the same gender.

What your opinion is regarding what marriage is- or is not- ultimately is meaningless.

10 states and the District of Columbia have recognized that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.
Some additional 20 states have had courts recognize that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.

But don't worry- no one will force you to 'gay marry'- or even force you to attend a wedding you don't approve of.

Of course "Gay Marriage" might well harm your marriage...........

Gay marriage does more than harm other marriages. It injects a poison into the entire culture.

What harm do other marriages cause?
Who has died because of gay marriage?
How have you been personally harmed by two persons of the same gender marrying?

I don't care how anyone gets off

Only one of those ways can, and often does creates a child

Doing so is not without considerable risk.

And is far far different then the others

Well for someone who doesn't care- you keep bringing it up.

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Yes, I think the government should jail fathers for attempted marriage to their daughters. Even as adults the dynamics of the relationship is do far distant from other opposite gender marriages. Just as it is for same gender relationships.

Hope this clears that up.

Were you planning on marrying your daughter?

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

So fathers/daughters can't have babies?

Yes, I think the government had an interest in creating population

Without opposite gender coupling, population is impossible, and the government does not exist


And neither do you.

You can thank us later

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Not difficult questions.

I wonder why you are so unwilling to answer them.

Well not really- i have a pretty good idea why you won't.

I've answered. Your delusions keep you from listening.

Not my problem but yours. I will not enable you.

 

[BULLDOG]

Wow keys....I guess I might have missed something here, but are you saying the left intentionally brought Ebola into this country to cause a pandemic? Please tell me you aren't that crazy.

 

[Syriusly]

Which is exactly the same number produced by infertile and elderly couples. A bigot only wants to keep the gays from civil marriage and not infertile or childless by choice couples.

I know many infertile couples and elderly opposite gender couples who have had children.

There have never been any truly infertile couples who have had biological children together.
There have never been any couples who have married in the 80's who have produced children together after they have married.

And none of that has anything to do with homosexual marriage.

Oh reallllllyyyyyyy

Tell these guys K?

Fertility Treatments for Females

Is elderly now 80?

Here's a clue

The elderly many many many times have had children within there lifetimes, even many many many gay ones.

Now, name a single child ever produced by a same sex coupling

Just one

Shouldn't be that difficult.

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

And here's your silly argument in a nutshell

Your bicycle is exactly the same as my motorcycle because some motorcycles have blown engines and still others are old, rusty and can no longer run. Therefor, your bicycle must be the same.

Preposterous

It shows how delusional you are

Get this, 50 years ago those "infertile" couples could never hope to create a child. Now many can

No (that is an absolute and not debate able) same sex coupling has ever or will ever produce a child.

Claim your bike the equal to my motorcycle all you want. Crying and stomping your feet will not make it so no matter how many enablers you might convince.

Sorry, facts is facts.

so you can't tell the differences between motorcycles and people?

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

 

[Syriusly]

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Marriage is one man and one woman. Nor is there any Superior Court case which says our Right to marriage is limited to a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court had an opportunity to make that decision.

Instead they left stand the Federal Courts decision that the right of marriage applies equally to a couple consisting of two people of the same gender.

What your opinion is regarding what marriage is- or is not- ultimately is meaningless.

10 states and the District of Columbia have recognized that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.
Some additional 20 states have had courts recognize that the right of marriage extends to same gender couples.

But don't worry- no one will force you to 'gay marry'- or even force you to attend a wedding you don't approve of.

Of course "Gay Marriage" might well harm your marriage...........

Gay marriage does more than harm other marriages. It injects a poison into the entire culture.

What harm do other marriages cause?
Who has died because of gay marriage?
How have you been personally harmed by two persons of the same gender marrying?

Well for someone who doesn't care- you keep bringing it up.

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Yes, I think the government should jail fathers for attempted marriage to their daughters. Even as adults the dynamics of the relationship is do far distant from other opposite gender marriages. Just as it is for same gender relationships.

Hope this clears that up.

Were you planning on marrying your daughter?

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

So fathers/daughters can't have babies?

Yes, I think the government had an interest in creating population

Without opposite gender coupling, population is impossible, and the government does not exist


And neither do you.

You can thank us later

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Not difficult questions.

I wonder why you are so unwilling to answer them.

Well not really- i have a pretty good idea why you won't.

I've answered. Your delusions keep you from listening.

Not my problem but yours. I will not enable you.

You have carefully avoided answering.

Because you have no morally sound response.

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

 

[Pop23]

I know many infertile couples and elderly opposite gender couples who have had children.

There have never been any truly infertile couples who have had biological children together.
There have never been any couples who have married in the 80's who have produced children together after they have married.

And none of that has anything to do with homosexual marriage.

Oh reallllllyyyyyyy

Tell these guys K?

Fertility Treatments for Females

Is elderly now 80?

Here's a clue

The elderly many many many times have had children within there lifetimes, even many many many gay ones.

Now, name a single child ever produced by a same sex coupling

Just one

Shouldn't be that difficult.

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

And here's your silly argument in a nutshell

Your bicycle is exactly the same as my motorcycle because some motorcycles have blown engines and still others are old, rusty and can no longer run. Therefor, your bicycle must be the same.

Preposterous

It shows how delusional you are

Get this, 50 years ago those "infertile" couples could never hope to create a child. Now many can

No (that is an absolute and not debate able) same sex coupling has ever or will ever produce a child.

Claim your bike the equal to my motorcycle all you want. Crying and stomping your feet will not make it so no matter how many enablers you might convince.

Sorry, facts is facts.

so you can't tell the differences between motorcycles and people?

LOL- here is a clue- infertile means infertile.

An infertile couple will have no more natural children than an infertile couple that happens to be infertile and same gender.

Why you keep asking for a child produced by same sex coupling I have no idea.

Just as two 80 year olds are not having children together, just as an infertile couple are not having children together, a same gender couple will not be having natural children together.

And so what?

Wisconsin will not even allow some couples to marry unless they prove that they are unable to procreate.

And so what?

Poor delusional soul. In the future more and more infertile couples will be treated in more and more ways.

And still, you will be a bicycle to my Harley.

Sad for you. But that's the choice you made

 

[Syriusly]

Wow keys....I guess I might have missed something here, but are you saying the left intentionally brought Ebola into this country to cause a pandemic? Please tell me you aren't that crazy.

Here are his exact words:

The Ideological Left has intentionally imported Ebola into the US. In a few months, it will be in full blown epidemic mode and within a year, the US Economy will be dead as a door-nail... with millions sick and dying.

I THINK he is saying we did this just because he thinks were are EBIL!

 

[Pop23]

Gay marriage does more than harm other marriages. It injects a poison into the entire culture.

What harm do other marriages cause?
Who has died because of gay marriage?
How have you been personally harmed by two persons of the same gender marrying?

Yes, I think the government should jail fathers for attempted marriage to their daughters. Even as adults the dynamics of the relationship is do far distant from other opposite gender marriages. Just as it is for same gender relationships.

Hope this clears that up.

Were you planning on marrying your daughter?

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

So fathers/daughters can't have babies?

Yes, I think the government had an interest in creating population

Without opposite gender coupling, population is impossible, and the government does not exist


And neither do you.

You can thank us later

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Not difficult questions.

I wonder why you are so unwilling to answer them.

Well not really- i have a pretty good idea why you won't.

I've answered. Your delusions keep you from listening.

Not my problem but yours. I will not enable you.

You have carefully avoided answering.

Because you have no morally sound response.

Here were my questions to you:

Do you think that Government should be telling you what kind of sex you can have in the privacy of your bedroom?
Do you believe that Government should limit sex to sex which is intended to create babies?

Morals?

Ain't that the ironic post of the day

LMAO

You can't make this shit up folks!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ladies and gents of the USMB Homosexual Marriage Forum. I present you the obligatory MELTDOWN of the cult which Advocates for the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

It actually took longer than I expected. But such was inevitable...

Now just to recap... anyone who opposes them is guilty of threatening to murder them... REPUBLICANS BROUGHT EBOLA INTO THE US and (my personal fave: NO CULTURE HAS EVER FALLEN INTO EXTINCTION because it lost the means to discern truth, to trust and to agree upon a soundly reasoned morality, inevitably finding itself incapable of promoting and serving justice for one another. LOL! No no...
.

I notice no quote......because of course you couldn't find a quote that says what you say.

Lets recap:

You claim that the Left intentionally brought Ebola to the United States.
I showed what an idiotic claim that was

You suggested that the 'people' should kill those of the Left.
I showed how repugnant your suggestion was.

And I challenged you to show us the civilizations that have fallen into extinction because they had sex you don't approve of.

And then you have this melt down.

To use the words of Joseph Welch

"Have you no sense of decency"?

ROFLMNAO! A degenerate cries out for 'decency'. Hysterical (in every sense of the word).

Off the top of my head, extinct cultures would include, in no particular order:

The cultures of the Greek and Roman city states, the Japanese Samurai, the Mayans ... add to that, the Myceanaeans, the Khmer, the Aksumite, the Nabateans, the Olmec... and the list goes on and on.

LOL! But how cool is it that you implied that such NEVER HAPPENED?

Now any 8th grader who went to school in the US in the 60s and 70s would have known that. So we can deduce from that, that you're a youngin', whose now established yourself as being profoundly ignorant of world history. Yet you've NO TROUBLE making decisions and advancing feckless conclusions publicly... all of which rest within the abyss of that intellectual hole in which you store your eyeballs.


Now how cool is THAT? WOO! MAN! Look at all this HATE!

 

[Syriusly]

Ladies and gents of the USMB Homosexual Marriage Forum. I present you the obligatory MELTDOWN of the cult which Advocates for the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

It actually took longer than I expected. But such was inevitable...

Now just to recap... anyone who opposes them is guilty of threatening to murder them... REPUBLICANS BROUGHT EBOLA INTO THE US and (my personal fave: NO CULTURE HAS EVER FALLEN INTO EXTINCTION because it lost the means to discern truth, to trust and to agree upon a soundly reasoned morality, inevitably finding itself incapable of promoting and serving justice for one another. LOL! No no...
.

I notice no quote......because of course you couldn't find a quote that says what you say.

Lets recap:

You claim that the Left intentionally brought Ebola to the United States.
I showed what an idiotic claim that was

You suggested that the 'people' should kill those of the Left.
I showed how repugnant your suggestion was.

And I challenged you to show us the civilizations that have fallen into extinction because they had sex you don't approve of.

And then you have this melt down.

To use the words of Joseph Welch

"Have you no sense of decency"?

ROFLMNAO! A degenerate cries out for 'decency'. Hysterical (in every sense of the word).

Off the top of my head, extinct cultures would include, in no particular order:

The cultures of the Greek and Roman city states, the Japanese Samurai, the Mayans ... add to that, the Myceanaeans, the Khmer, the Aksumite, the Nabateans, the Olmec... and the list goes on and on.

LOL! But how cool is it that you implied that such NEVER HAPPENED?
!

Well since what I actually said was

And I challenged you to show us the civilizations that have fallen into extinction because they had sex you don't approve of.

I look forward to you explaining how the Samurai's civilization(which is not a Civilization at all) went extinct because they had the wrong kind of sex.