Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WTF was Hillary saying? She didn't get the memo or read the cables?
...
Just remember guys.... What fucking difference does it make..?
I still can't believe that SKANK WHORE said that shit today & got away with it..!!
Folks, we are so fucked!
Just remember guys.... What fucking difference does it make..?
I still can't believe that SKANK WHORE said that shit today & got away with it..!!
Folks, we are so fucked!
Just remember guys.... What fucking difference does it make..?
I still can't believe that SKANK WHORE said that shit today & got away with it..!!
Folks, we are so fucked!
I haven't been able to watch the Benghazi hearings, but I've checked my Twitter feed, and the lefties who've been watching are 100% convinced that Hillary Clinton has been wiping the floor with the Republicans who are trying to take her down.
The righties in my feed have a very different perspective. They have what they want: a soundbite they can rip from context and use as a cudgel to beat the administration and Secretary Clinton with. I'm not sure if they really expect their efforts to color mainstream coverage of this story, but it's clear that that's what they're hoping. They have a new "you didn't build that," a new "spread the wealth around," and they're going to wring everything they can out of it.
WTF was Hillary saying? She didn't get the memo or read the cables?
...
No one in 'Secretary's Office' saw cable about security issues
For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success. This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government department. But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation. There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead. At the same time, it is imperative for the State Department to be mission-driven, rather than resource-constrained particularly when being present in increasingly risky areas of the world is integral to U.S. national security. The recommendations in this report attempt to grapple with these issues and err on the side of increased attention to prioritization and to fuller support for people and facilities engaged in working in high risk, high threat areas. The solution requires a more serious and sustained commitment from Congress to support State Department needs, which, in total, constitute a small percentage both of the full national budget and that spent for national security. One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives.
Mindful of these considerations, the ARB has examined the terrorist attacks in Benghazi...
Sounds like a tacit admission that she was derelict in her duties.
She should resign.. oh.. wait. Never mind.
WTF was Hillary saying? She didn't get the memo or read the cables?
...
"At no time did I have a live feed of the attack."
Republican Rep McCaul of Texas was spanked and corrected... http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf
Security Cables never went above Assistant Secretary level where the ARB (report) placed responsibility 'where the rubber hits the road'
No one in 'Secretary's Office' saw cable about security issues
"With regard to the security requests subsequent to the August 16 cable, our personnel in Libya had not submitted any additional security requests to Washington at the time of the Sept 11 attack"
FACT: August 16th cable stated security requests for Ben Ghazzi will be forthcoming ... the RSO in Ben Ghazzi submitted to Tripoli a preliminary list of proposed security recommendations on August 23rd BUT NO REQUESTS WERE SUBMITTED TO WASHINGTON BEFORE THE ATTACKS
--
[youtube]DUKpRlfAf8s[/youtube]..
"At no time did I have a live feed of the attack."
---
Put it all together
"What difference, at this point, does it make?" What was Secretary Clinton referring to?
With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. If it was because of a protest or if it was because guys out for a walk decided to go kill some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?
It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer my questions about this but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get the best information but you know, to be clear, it is from my perspective, less important today looking backward as to why these militants decided to do it, as to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe well figure out what was going on in the meantime.
No one in 'Secretary's Office' saw cable about security issues
The Dingos ate your cables.
Sounds like a tacit admission that she was derelict in her duties.
She should resign.. oh.. wait. Never mind.
She obviously did not have control of her ship. Whose ship was it? Obama's?
For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success. This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government department. But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation. There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead. At the same time, it is imperative for the State Department to be mission-driven, rather than resource-constrained particularly when being present in increasingly risky areas of the world is integral to U.S. national security. The recommendations in this report attempt to grapple with these issues and err on the side of increased attention to prioritization and to fuller support for people and facilities engaged in working in high risk, high threat areas. The solution requires a more serious and sustained commitment from Congress to support State Department needs, which, in total, constitute a small percentage both of the full national budget and that spent for national security. One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives.
Mindful of these considerations, the ARB has examined the terrorist attacks in Benghazi...
No one in 'Secretary's Office' saw cable about security issues
The Dingos ate your cables.
Marco Rubio..
