Hillary immediately plays politics with the Las Vegas disaster/tragedy

Dear Liberals,

Gun laws won't stop shootings. Heroin has been illegal for 100 years, yet today we have a bigger heroin problem than before it was banned. Besides, what makes you think criminals will obey gun laws?

Try using a little common sense.

It certainly won't stop someone like this Las Vegas murderer. Someone extreme enough that literally is willing to spray bullets into a crowd of strangers, and knowing that he is likely either going to be killed himself, or going to be spending the rest of his life in prison, is not going to let gun laws stop him from his death spiral.
 
NO DECENCY? Who else are speaking for these victims? Im sure it’s not you or the rest of snowflakes.
The scariest thing about your post is I think you actually believe that shit!

Yes, Hillary Clinton declaring more lives would have been lost if the shooter, shooting from across the street from a window on the 32nd floor during the middle of a loud concert had been using a Silencer.

Shamelessly Democrats - and sheep like you who defend them no matter what they do, are opportunistically using this tragedy and the massive amount of emotion during the chaos, shock, and death to push a liberal agenda.

Again, there has been no facts ascertained, no motive, no news on the source or legality of the guns, no news on if they were registered / owned legally, etc - which should damn-well take a back seat to the continuing tally of dead and wounded, sensitivity to victims and family members, etc.

"Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste"
---- Former Chief Of Staff Rahm Emanuel

That's all the pathetic Democrats are doing right now.

Way to go, DNC - keep working on doubling that number of 1,000+ elections losses!

You are a good example of either a lying delusional or a lying moron.
Well you are a liar anyway. So it’s not a surprise.

Yes if the shooter used a silencers he could have killed probably thousands not 59. That’s a fact.

Did you even try to listening to the news? Did Fox News told you a different story?

People at the concert run and took cover after they heard the gun shots. They taught its part of the show or a fire works. It took a while for most of them to realize it was a gun shots. Without those pop pop pop pop pop pop ——— Just imagine if this guy used a silencer.

Tell me what I missed.

No it is not a fact, you are simply wrong.

Why the debate over gun suppressors isn’t really relevant to what happened in Las Vegas

In the wake of Sunday night’s mass shooting in Las Vegas that left at least 58 people dead, the attention of those advocating for stricter gun control laws seized on a current debate in Washington. The Hearing Protection Act, sponsored by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), would allow more people to purchase silencers for firearms — which, some argued, would have made the shooting in Vegas much deadlier.

Among those making that case was Hillary Clinton. “The crowd fled at the sound of gunshots,” Clinton wrote on Twitter. “Imagine the deaths if the shooter had a silencer, which the NRA wants to make easier to get.”

But the effect of having a silencer probably would have been negligible. Clinton and others appear to be assuming that silencers — or “suppressors,” as they’re known in the industry — work the way that they do in the movies. Screw a little barrel on the end of your pistol, and you can run through enemy headquarters picking off bad guys with no more audio footprint than a little zip.

In reality, trying to suppress an automatic weapon sounds like this.



Full Auto M4 Carbine w/Suppressor - Machine Gun Fun


The gunfire is clearly audible, as our Washington Post fact-checkers noted in March.

The video above features a weapon from Asymmetric Solutions, a firearm training firm based in Missouri. Thomas Satterly, the company’s director of development, spoke by phone with The Post to explain why a suppressor wouldn’t have silenced the noise of the gunfire in the way Clinton assumed. Satterly is a veteran who served in Somalia in 1993. When we spoke, he was with several friends who served in law enforcement and who contributed their thoughts, as well.

Analysis | Why the debate over gun suppressors isn’t really relevant to what happened in Las Vegas
 
NO DECENCY? Who else are speaking for these victims? Im sure it’s not you or the rest of snowflakes.
The scariest thing about your post is I think you actually believe that shit!

Yes, Hillary Clinton declaring more lives would have been lost if the shooter, shooting from across the street from a window on the 32nd floor during the middle of a loud concert had been using a Silencer.

Shamelessly Democrats - and sheep like you who defend them no matter what they do, are opportunistically using this tragedy and the massive amount of emotion during the chaos, shock, and death to push a liberal agenda.

Again, there has been no facts ascertained, no motive, no news on the source or legality of the guns, no news on if they were registered / owned legally, etc - which should damn-well take a back seat to the continuing tally of dead and wounded, sensitivity to victims and family members, etc.

"Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste"
---- Former Chief Of Staff Rahm Emanuel

That's all the pathetic Democrats are doing right now.

Way to go, DNC - keep working on doubling that number of 1,000+ elections losses!

You are a good example of either a lying delusional or a lying moron.
Well you are a liar anyway. So it’s not a surprise.

Yes if the shooter used a silencers he could have killed probably thousands not 59. That’s a fact.

Did you even try to listening to the news? Did Fox News told you a different story?

People at the concert run and took cover after they heard the gun shots. They taught its part of the show or a fire works. It took a while for most of them to realize it was a gun shots. Without those pop pop pop pop pop pop ——— Just imagine if this guy used a silencer.

Tell me what I missed.
THOUSANDS.

THE SKY IS FALLING.

You have no idea what you are speaking about.

Okay bud. Tell me what I missed.
A silencer would not have allowed him to kill 'thousands' but that is blatantly obvious. There is nothing but asinine conjecture trying to state that to would have allowed him to kill anymore than he managed to in the first place.
 
Facts:

UK: 933 violent crimes per 100,000 people
US: 399 violent crimes per 100,000 people

Gun confiscation doesn't work
 
NRA is nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization

In 1960's NRA trained African Americans to defend themselves against KKK
 
I thought this was funny.. Leftists are so TERRIBLE at debating.. no wonder they use feelings instead LOL

DLLFof9WAAMSdvs.jpg
 
The fact Crooked Hillary was shocked she lost is proof the Left always forgets they are lying to deceive us and end up deceiving themselves.
 
Crooked Clinton recalled that on the eve of polling day ‘’everyone was so confident.’’ That's because you believed D+12 polls you silly goose.
 
"Why do so many Americans love guns? It’s easy to see why you’d love sex. Or sunsets, skiing, music, nature, art, wine. But GUNS? Why guns?" - Godless Richard Dawkins
 
Crooked Hillary Clinton and Crazy Diane Feinstein say they hate guns, yet they won't spend 1 second of their entire lives without armed guards

Where were the democrat gun-grabbers to stop Obama when he was selling guns to Mexican Drug Cartels?
 
dear hillary you lying snake,

just as you don't blame muslims for the actions of the few, how come you blame all gun owners for the actions of Paddock?
 
Bodies not even cold yet, and the bitch goes after the NRA

Twitter
Good for Hillary, those bloody NRA retards need to get over their absurd phallic fixation and stop blocking positive change. Jeez, some people's kids.

Hillary's beef was with suppressors. Go ahead and ban them, and you can make all the ones you could ever need out of an ordinary oil filter>

upload_2017-10-8_18-0-42.jpeg



 

Forum List

Back
Top