- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,122
- 9,140
- 2,030
But when it's a Muslim it's okay to play politics with the dead bodies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They`re responsible for more bloodshed in this country than ISIS. Why shouldn`t she be going after them?
Dear Liberals,
Gun laws won't stop shootings. Heroin has been illegal for 100 years, yet today we have a bigger heroin problem than before it was banned. Besides, what makes you think criminals will obey gun laws?
Try using a little common sense.
The scariest thing about your post is I think you actually believe that shit!NO DECENCY? Who else are speaking for these victims? Im sure it’s not you or the rest of snowflakes.
Yes, Hillary Clinton declaring more lives would have been lost if the shooter, shooting from across the street from a window on the 32nd floor during the middle of a loud concert had been using a Silencer.
Shamelessly Democrats - and sheep like you who defend them no matter what they do, are opportunistically using this tragedy and the massive amount of emotion during the chaos, shock, and death to push a liberal agenda.
Again, there has been no facts ascertained, no motive, no news on the source or legality of the guns, no news on if they were registered / owned legally, etc - which should damn-well take a back seat to the continuing tally of dead and wounded, sensitivity to victims and family members, etc.
"Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste"
---- Former Chief Of Staff Rahm Emanuel
That's all the pathetic Democrats are doing right now.
Way to go, DNC - keep working on doubling that number of 1,000+ elections losses!
You are a good example of either a lying delusional or a lying moron.
Well you are a liar anyway. So it’s not a surprise.
Yes if the shooter used a silencers he could have killed probably thousands not 59. That’s a fact.
Did you even try to listening to the news? Did Fox News told you a different story?
People at the concert run and took cover after they heard the gun shots. They taught its part of the show or a fire works. It took a while for most of them to realize it was a gun shots. Without those pop pop pop pop pop pop ——— Just imagine if this guy used a silencer.
Tell me what I missed.
In the wake of Sunday night’s mass shooting in Las Vegas that left at least 58 people dead, the attention of those advocating for stricter gun control laws seized on a current debate in Washington. The Hearing Protection Act, sponsored by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), would allow more people to purchase silencers for firearms — which, some argued, would have made the shooting in Vegas much deadlier.
Among those making that case was Hillary Clinton. “The crowd fled at the sound of gunshots,” Clinton wrote on Twitter. “Imagine the deaths if the shooter had a silencer, which the NRA wants to make easier to get.”
But the effect of having a silencer probably would have been negligible. Clinton and others appear to be assuming that silencers — or “suppressors,” as they’re known in the industry — work the way that they do in the movies. Screw a little barrel on the end of your pistol, and you can run through enemy headquarters picking off bad guys with no more audio footprint than a little zip.
In reality, trying to suppress an automatic weapon sounds like this.
Full Auto M4 Carbine w/Suppressor - Machine Gun Fun
The gunfire is clearly audible, as our Washington Post fact-checkers noted in March.
The video above features a weapon from Asymmetric Solutions, a firearm training firm based in Missouri. Thomas Satterly, the company’s director of development, spoke by phone with The Post to explain why a suppressor wouldn’t have silenced the noise of the gunfire in the way Clinton assumed. Satterly is a veteran who served in Somalia in 1993. When we spoke, he was with several friends who served in law enforcement and who contributed their thoughts, as well.
A silencer would not have allowed him to kill 'thousands' but that is blatantly obvious. There is nothing but asinine conjecture trying to state that to would have allowed him to kill anymore than he managed to in the first place.THOUSANDS.The scariest thing about your post is I think you actually believe that shit!NO DECENCY? Who else are speaking for these victims? Im sure it’s not you or the rest of snowflakes.
Yes, Hillary Clinton declaring more lives would have been lost if the shooter, shooting from across the street from a window on the 32nd floor during the middle of a loud concert had been using a Silencer.
Shamelessly Democrats - and sheep like you who defend them no matter what they do, are opportunistically using this tragedy and the massive amount of emotion during the chaos, shock, and death to push a liberal agenda.
Again, there has been no facts ascertained, no motive, no news on the source or legality of the guns, no news on if they were registered / owned legally, etc - which should damn-well take a back seat to the continuing tally of dead and wounded, sensitivity to victims and family members, etc.
"Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste"
---- Former Chief Of Staff Rahm Emanuel
That's all the pathetic Democrats are doing right now.
Way to go, DNC - keep working on doubling that number of 1,000+ elections losses!
You are a good example of either a lying delusional or a lying moron.
Well you are a liar anyway. So it’s not a surprise.
Yes if the shooter used a silencers he could have killed probably thousands not 59. That’s a fact.
Did you even try to listening to the news? Did Fox News told you a different story?
People at the concert run and took cover after they heard the gun shots. They taught its part of the show or a fire works. It took a while for most of them to realize it was a gun shots. Without those pop pop pop pop pop pop ——— Just imagine if this guy used a silencer.
Tell me what I missed.
THE SKY IS FALLING.
You have no idea what you are speaking about.
Okay bud. Tell me what I missed.
It's not about "playing politics" gun control is a political issue. Like all political issues, there are real life consequences.
Good for Hillary, those bloody NRA retards need to get over their absurd phallic fixation and stop blocking positive change. Jeez, some people's kids.
Good for Hillary, those bloody NRA retards need to get over their absurd phallic fixation and stop blocking positive change. Jeez, some people's kids.