Hillary Clinton was a paid Russian agent who sold the Russians our uranium supplies...

[idb]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

 

[miketx]

What gets me is that here we have is actual proof that Hillary Clinton is a paid Russian agent, who treasonously sold American uranium supplies for a $500,000 bribe.

'proof'?

You do realize that no one 'sold American uranium supplies'? Right?

He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

But you believe Putin orchestrated a US election? Pot kettle hilarious!

Someone has to pull the strings, like when you put on your corset..

Looks like the Clintons pulled them pretty good. LOL!

 

[Moonglow]

What gets me is that here we have is actual proof that Hillary Clinton is a paid Russian agent, who treasonously sold American uranium supplies for a $500,000 bribe.

'proof'?

You do realize that no one 'sold American uranium supplies'? Right?

He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

But you believe Putin orchestrated a US election? Pot kettle hilarious!

Someone has to pull the strings, like when you put on your corset..

Looks like the Clintons pulled them pretty good. LOL!

Same as every other politician..

 

[Moonglow]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

Probably swingers..

 

[Lumpy 1]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope

.
Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

Notice how you didn't dispute Politifact's article- you just screamed 'bias'.

Lets go to what Politifact said- and see if you can contradict the article

First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

That included Clinton as secretary of state, but also the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.

While it’s conceivable Clinton advocated for the deal, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer himself admitted that he doesn’t have "direct evidence" proving Clinton played a part. The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."

I see you gettin all snowflakey but notice, I merely posted a link..

It should all be fully investigated, wouldn't you agree, soooo many questions need answers, don't you think..?

Already has been duhhhh,...

Yeah right....

 

[my2¢]

Yeah, luckily she'll never be President.

 

[Moonglow]

Yeah, luckily she'll never be President.

That's not luck, it's providence..

 

[Lumpy 1]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

All investigated, no evidence of ANY quid pro quo ANYWHERE. We'll see if the Trumps do so well in their investigation...And of course she had no control over the sale.

You are correct, it took 9 federal agencies to okay the deal..

mmm ... all under the Obama administration... correct

 

[Eloy]

This thread belongs in the Conspiracy Theory section.

 

[Lakhota]

Just another fake news thread. This conspiracy theory has been thoroughly debunked.

• Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia
  http://www.cnbc.com / 2017 / 02 / 16 / trump-claims--falsely--t... - 257k - similar pages
  Feb 16, 2017 ... "We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our country. ... However, Clinton did not represent the State Department on the ...
• Fact-checking Donald Trump's tweets about Hillary Clinton and Russia
  http://www.politifact.com / truth-o-meter / article / 2017 / mar / 28 / fact-checking-donald-tru / - 181k - similar pages
  Mar 28, 2017 ... "Why isn't the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill & Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech ...
  • Donald Trump repeats his Mostly False claim about Hillary Clinton ...
    http://www.politifact.com / wisconsin / article / 2017 / feb / 16 / donald-trump-repeats-his / - 123k - similar pages
    Feb 16, 2017 ... Russia was mentioned 61 times by reporters and President Donald ... We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our ...
• Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia ...
  FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations? - 183k - similar pages
  Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. .... Hillary, ifRussia is such a threat, why did you sell them 20% of our uranium?
• No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium” in ...
  No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium" in the US - 124k -similar pages
  Feb 17, 2017 ... Trump is misleading the public on her Russia policy because he's afraid of looking like Putin's stooge.

 

[Moonglow]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

All investigated, no evidence of ANY quid pro quo ANYWHERE. We'll see if the Trumps do so well in their investigation...And of course she had no control over the sale.

You are correct, it took 9 federal agencies to okay the deal..

mmm ... all under the Obama administration... correct

mmmm, I think so..Yet it is not unusual..since the GOP and Russia re such good buddies, right?

 

[francoHFW]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

But wait- you keep telling us the New York Times is fake news!

LOL

Meanwhile- of course Hillary Clinton had no authority- or ability to sell uranium to anyone- you are just lying again.

Among the agencies- 9 total- Hillary Clinton was one person who signed off on the deal.

Which then had to be approved of by the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

And then had to be approved by President Obama.

So Hillary was one of at least 10 people who had to approve this deal.

She didn't sell anything.

Sooo .. you fully support the Clintons receiving millions from the Russians, no problem at all, not the least bit suspicious... correct..?

The FOUNDATION did- a great charity, dupe.

I don't believe you ... Pecker Head...

US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial? - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37168505
Aug 23, 2016 - The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is an international charitable ... and that there was no evidence that Mrs Clinton did anything improper. ... There have been no clear quid-pro-quoconnections found in any of ...

 

[Lumpy 1]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

 

[Lumpy 1]

This thread belongs in the Conspiracy Theory section.

Sheesh, what doesn't anymore..

 

[francoHFW]

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope

.
Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

Notice how you didn't dispute Politifact's article- you just screamed 'bias'.

Lets go to what Politifact said- and see if you can contradict the article

First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

That included Clinton as secretary of state, but also the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.

While it’s conceivable Clinton advocated for the deal, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer himself admitted that he doesn’t have "direct evidence" proving Clinton played a part. The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."

I see you gettin all snowflakey but notice, I merely posted a link..

It should all be fully investigated, wouldn't you agree, soooo many questions need answers, don't you think..?

Already has been duhhhh,...

Yeah right....

Try an actual news station, dupe.
US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial? - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37168505
Aug 23, 2016 - The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is an international charitable ... and that there was no evidence that Mrs Clinton did anything improper. ... There have been no clear quid-pro-quoconnections found in any of ...

 

[Moonglow]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

He could have slipped her a sawbuck to cop a feel..

 

[francoHFW]

After considerable research I've found incontrovertible visual proof of Clinton collusion!!!!

View attachment 138484

It looks like Melania is keeping Bill from groping her butt...

The Trumps just did quick photo ops- He's a fraud.

 

[hunarcy]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

All investigated, no evidence of ANY quid pro quo ANYWHERE. We'll see if the Trumps do so well in their investigation...And of course she had no control over the sale.

You are correct, it took 9 federal agencies to okay the deal..

mmm ... all under the Obama administration... correct

mmmm, I think so..Yet it is not unusual..since the GOP and Russia re such good buddies, right?

Perhaps you're being duped.
Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya Facebook page filled with anti-Putin, anti-Trump posts - The American Mirror

 

[Lumpy 1]

...in return for a bribe to her husband, Bill.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

This story was in the NEW YORK TIMES so liberals, do not bother to impeach the source as biased against the Clintons.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

But wait- you keep telling us the New York Times is fake news!

LOL

Meanwhile- of course Hillary Clinton had no authority- or ability to sell uranium to anyone- you are just lying again.

Among the agencies- 9 total- Hillary Clinton was one person who signed off on the deal.

Which then had to be approved of by the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

And then had to be approved by President Obama.

So Hillary was one of at least 10 people who had to approve this deal.

She didn't sell anything.

Sooo .. you fully support the Clintons receiving millions from the Russians, no problem at all, not the least bit suspicious... correct..?

The FOUNDATION did- a great charity, dupe.

I don't believe you ... Pecker Head...

US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial? - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37168505
Aug 23, 2016 - The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is an international charitable ... and that there was no evidence that Mrs Clinton did anything improper. ... There have been no clear quid-pro-quoconnections found in any of ...

I'm not satisfied, I want a full investigation by reputable investigators, not your fake news sources.. Duppy

 

[Moonglow]

Given this history, the chances that Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary Clinton are practically nil.

She was already a paid agent of the FSB.

And she committed treason.

All investigated, no evidence of ANY quid pro quo ANYWHERE. We'll see if the Trumps do so well in their investigation...And of course she had no control over the sale.

You are correct, it took 9 federal agencies to okay the deal..

mmm ... all under the Obama administration... correct

mmmm, I think so..Yet it is not unusual..since the GOP and Russia re such good buddies, right?

Perhaps you're being duped.
Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya Facebook page filled with anti-Putin, anti-Trump posts - The American Mirror

I stink not, it's called sarcasm..