Hillary Calls For War AND Boots On the Ground

Let's hear her proposal. She'll find a way, or she won't do it. It's the republican base that wants our soldiers dying over there. She knows her base is against it. And if she fucks up, luckily Democrats will have taken back the Senate and be able to convince her not to. :thup:
She's already fucked up with Benghazi, emails, Whitewater, Watergate, a rape defense case, and... just plain being butt-ugly.
Yeah and Obama was born in Kenya. :rolleyes:
Y'know... that is yet to be definitively resolved.

You corn-hole hillbilly Liberal.
Change the channel, hater dupe. lol. Oh sexist AND brainwashed...Watergate and Hill is a total lie, for hater dupes only.
The Disease runs deep in this one.
Only Rushbots know the truth! Or whatever. All the same crap...Argument? or just phony crises...
 
images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.
 
images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.


^^^^^HUGE IRONY RIGHT THERE!!!^^^^^
 
images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.


^^^^^HUGE IRONY RIGHT THERE!!!^^^^^

The thread title is a lie. Clinton never called for war or boots on the ground. The best you hater dupes can do to bash Clinton about the debate is make up a blatant lie. Funny, when not accusing Clinton of being a liar you are all busy telling lies. Difference is the ones you guys tell are always easy to prove as blatant lies.
 
images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.

images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.

So in other words YOU don't have ANY. Why not just be honest with the members and admit you can no more reply to the problem or the question then the average nitwit democrat.

They are USED to low life mental midgets such as yourself with ego but NO balls and NO brains.
 
You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.
Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.
Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.
The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.

^^^^^HUGE IRONY RIGHT THERE!!!^^^^^
The thread title is a lie. Clinton never called for war or boots on the ground. The best you hater dupes can do to bash Clinton about the debate is make up a blatant lie. Funny, when not accusing Clinton of being a liar you are all busy telling lies. Difference is the ones you guys tell are always easy to prove as blatant lies.

Your OPINION, others may differ on INTERPRETING what that fucking murderous, corrupt, lying bitch said!

Hillary-Comedy-Tragedy.jpg
 
images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.

images


If Hillary is elected and starts the draft up, to create her safe zones, I know who should be first pick in that draft.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:tank:

You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.

Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
And of course the OP is RW fantasy...
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.

Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.

The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.

So in other words YOU don't have ANY. Why not just be honest with the members and admit you can no more reply to the problem or the question then the average nitwit democrat.

They are USED to low life mental midgets such as yourself with ego but NO balls and NO brains.

Russia has backed away from Ukraine due to international pressure and sanctions. Didn't even have to use SWIFT.
Turkey has been calling for the no fly zone along it's border. They might be the main one to enforce it. That might get them in trouble with Russia and cause a breakdown in Russian and Turkish relations. Now go look at a map. See if you can find a way for Russia to get to Syria and the port at Tartus without good relations with Turkey.
 
Last edited:
You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.
Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.
Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.
The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.
You just can't have "safe zones" without boots on the ground. And if she makes "safe zones" that means WE DIE protecting THEM.
Why do you start so many threads with outright lies? How did you become such an expert about how to create no fly zones and safe zones?
Her words idiot. If you want to leave your head up your ass your choice.
Your distorted and warped interpretation. Your OP is factually incorrect. That means it is a lie. There are multiple ways to accomplish what Clinton proposed without putting "boots on the ground". You just don't have the wisdom or knowledge to be aware of those options.
Oh so you mean those well run safe zones like say Detroit? It's been working for years right? How are you or Hillary planning on TAKING the current air space AWAY from Putin? You think he is just going to give it to you?

And why do you want it? To many terrorists may die? You see dead terrorists as a problem? Speak up stupid, board needs a laugh.
The board gets plenty of laughs from you. Explaining options to you would be a waste of time. Your thread is based on a lie and your OP is full of stupidity.
So in other words YOU don't have ANY. Why not just be honest with the members and admit you can no more reply to the problem or the question then the average nitwit democrat.

They are USED to low life mental midgets such as yourself with ego but NO balls and NO brains.
Russia has backed away from Ukraine due to international pressure and sanctions. Didn't even have to use SWIFT.
Turkey has been calling for the no fly zone along it's border. They might be the main one to enforce it. That might get them in trouble with Russia and cause a breakdown in Russian and Turkish relations. Now go look at a map. See if you can find a way for Russia to get to Syria and the port at Tartus without good relations with Turkey.
Russia has already rebuilt and up graded that port. It will have no problem moving equipment in as there is nobody to stop them.
Why Russia Is Expanding Its Naval Base in Syria | Business
 
  • Russia starts building secure Refugee Camps in Syria.
    Soviet Times ^ | 10/14/2015 | SOTT
    Now Russia starts construction of secure refugee camps in Syria, in cooperation with local authorities. Russia has set up a first reception center for 500 refugees at a racetrack in the Syrian city of Hama. There are tents, four field kitchens, dining rooms and sanitary facilities, writes the German-speaking newspaper Sputnik. During the past week, two Russian transport aircraft have flown 80 tons of supplies to the crisis area. The Russian planes have brought 15 tons of food and other supplies. At the opening of the camp, the governor of the province of Hama, Hassan Omar Haljaf, and representatives of...
 
  • Russia starts building secure Refugee Camps in Syria.
    Soviet Times ^ | 10/14/2015 | SOTT
    Now Russia starts construction of secure refugee camps in Syria, in cooperation with local authorities. Russia has set up a first reception center for 500 refugees at a racetrack in the Syrian city of Hama. There are tents, four field kitchens, dining rooms and sanitary facilities, writes the German-speaking newspaper Sputnik. During the past week, two Russian transport aircraft have flown 80 tons of supplies to the crisis area. The Russian planes have brought 15 tons of food and other supplies. At the opening of the camp, the governor of the province of Hama, Hassan Omar Haljaf, and representatives of...
Russia is NOT going to give that up to Hillary because she has a vagina. He has the air and by your add we can see he has the ground.

Hillary is stupid for even thinking she can take that from him. And for what reason anyway? Where is the logic for even taking it?
Oh that's right. Democrats NO brains NO headaches.
 
Let's hear her proposal. She'll find a way, or she won't do it. It's the republican base that wants our soldiers dying over there. She knows her base is against it. And if she fucks up, luckily Democrats will have taken back the Senate and be able to convince her not to. :thup:
Trump has already said let Putin own that sh8t.

Trump said he would put boots on the ground to fight isis. War in Syria is coming. Inevitable of one of those two is elected. Still likely no matter what.
Trump said just a few days ago he would leave Syria to Putin.
Islamic state WILL attack Russia if we keep our nose out.

So he is talking out both sides of his mouth. shocking. That's more reason to not support him
No its a good plan and with good reason. We ARE trying to get OFF a war economy. Let Putin be the proxy while we rebuild America. Why put our economy at risk when he is so willing to put his?

Except you're still ignoring the fact that he said he would put boots on the ground.

He says whatever He thinks will get him elected. How is that good?
 
Trump has already said let Putin own that sh8t.

Trump said he would put boots on the ground to fight isis. War in Syria is coming. Inevitable of one of those two is elected. Still likely no matter what.
Trump said just a few days ago he would leave Syria to Putin.
Islamic state WILL attack Russia if we keep our nose out.

So he is talking out both sides of his mouth. shocking. That's more reason to not support him
No its a good plan and with good reason. We ARE trying to get OFF a war economy. Let Putin be the proxy while we rebuild America. Why put our economy at risk when he is so willing to put his?
Damn if only you'd felt that anti-war in 2003.

If either of you were truly anti war you wouldn't be supporting either of those clowns.

But then there are times to be anti war. When the world catches on fire it's a good thing not to throw fuel on the fire
 
She's already fucked up with Benghazi, emails, Whitewater, Watergate, a rape defense case, and... just plain being butt-ugly.
Yeah and Obama was born in Kenya. :rolleyes:
Y'know... that is yet to be definitively resolved.

You corn-hole hillbilly Liberal.
Change the channel, hater dupe. lol. Oh sexist AND brainwashed...Watergate and Hill is a total lie, for hater dupes only.
The Disease runs deep in this one.
Only Rushbots know the truth! Or whatever. All the same crap...Argument? or just phony crises...

Rush must really worry you if you bring him up in a completely non related topic to insult him.
 
Trump has already said let Putin own that sh8t.

Trump said he would put boots on the ground to fight isis. War in Syria is coming. Inevitable of one of those two is elected. Still likely no matter what.
Trump said just a few days ago he would leave Syria to Putin.
Islamic state WILL attack Russia if we keep our nose out.

So he is talking out both sides of his mouth. shocking. That's more reason to not support him
No its a good plan and with good reason. We ARE trying to get OFF a war economy. Let Putin be the proxy while we rebuild America. Why put our economy at risk when he is so willing to put his?

Except you're still ignoring the fact that he said he would put boots on the ground.

He says whatever He thinks will get him elected. How is that good?
The coming war there is still in flux. Another poster here who lives in the area is posting Turkey is now moving into north Syria.
Changing his mind and opting to stay totally out may well prove to be the best.

If Hillary had here CURRENT way we would we wedged in between Russia and Turkey. Trump is right, maybe not as fast as you want him to be right but ahead of the others. And being ahead CAN save lives.
 
Trump said he would put boots on the ground to fight isis. War in Syria is coming. Inevitable of one of those two is elected. Still likely no matter what.
Trump said just a few days ago he would leave Syria to Putin.
Islamic state WILL attack Russia if we keep our nose out.

So he is talking out both sides of his mouth. shocking. That's more reason to not support him
No its a good plan and with good reason. We ARE trying to get OFF a war economy. Let Putin be the proxy while we rebuild America. Why put our economy at risk when he is so willing to put his?
Damn if only you'd felt that anti-war in 2003.

If either of you were truly anti war you wouldn't be supporting either of those clowns.

But then there are times to be anti war. When the world catches on fire it's a good thing not to throw fuel on the fire

They are only anti war when a Republi8can is in office. They clearly support the illegal wars of Obama..
 
Folks this IS what makes democrats not only ignorant but a danger to our future.


6:25 p.m.

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she would "take more of a leadership position" and stand up to Russian President Vladimir Putin over Syria."

What person of SOUND mind even thinks Putin is going to give up that air space? Obama was punked and ran and NOW it's CLEARLY Putin's air space. AND he has China's backing. Your are NOT taking that air space for nothing. Someones or MANY have die for that to happen.

And then this little kernel to the viewers.

"Asked during the Democratic debate about Russia's increasing involvement in the Syrian civil war, Clinton says she would take a harder line against Putin. She says, "we have to stand up to his bullying" and "make clear" that Russia has to be part of the solution."

Putin is killings MUSLIMS and we DON'T have to do a damn thing. He has killed MORE terrorists in a week then Obama in a year. They are DEAD MUSLIMS for crying out loud. Does it really matter who kills them? Why is Hillary INSISTING/DEMANDING your sons or grandsons do it? Why?

Then she gets down right ignorant with this little jewel.

"Clinton also says she would create "safe zones" to try to ease the massive refugee crisis destabilizing the region."

That's boots on the ground folks. You CAN'T make a safe zone from the air. Ask ANY vet here from EITHER party. Ground control means ground troops. Its like that idiot Hillary wants to argue with Putin over a pile of dog sh8t.

The SMART thing to do IF Hillary was NOT a war loving IDIOT would to be NOT to claim that pile of dog sh8t. Its NOT hers or ours anyway. We get into wars because stupid people do stupid things. And to be willing to fight over who wants a pile of dog sh8t is stupid.

If you want your sons or grand sons dead VOTE HILLARY. She will put them in a box right next to the dog sh8t they were fighting for.

The Latest: O'Malley raps Clinton's no-fly zone in Syria


That's patently false.
 
Hillary could call for invading Iraq and cutting taxes for the wealthy and Democrats would still support her.
 

Forum List

Back
Top