Hey n00bama, My Savings Called...

concept

Evil Mongering
Jun 19, 2009
2,040
344
48
West Mi
CitizenLink: Marriage Penalty Hidden in Health Care Reform

A closer look at premium payments in both the House and Senate health care bills shows higher premiums that might discourage couples tying the knot.

For instance, in the House version, an unmarried couple each making $30,000 a year would pay $1,320 combined each year for private health insurance. If that couple chose to marry, their premium would jump to $12,000 a year, a difference of $10,680.

Allen Quist, a former Minnesota State legislator and current candidate for Congress, discovered the penalty while looking at numbers from the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy & Commerce, and Education & Labor.

"This extraordinary penalty people will pay, should they marry, extends all the way from a two-person combined income of $58,280 to $86,640, a spread of $28,360," he wrote in a blog post. "A large number of people fall within this spread. As premiums for private insurance escalate, as expected, the marriage penalty will become substantially larger."

The Senate bill includes a similar penalty.

What? What's up with the large marriage penalty?

An little assault on marriage there by the dopey left. I can only imagine what other nuggets are buried in these atrocities.

:rolleyes:
 
hey jackass, a married couple in their late 50's pays 12 K a year where the fuck have you been
 
oh and by the way we are much past child bearing years unless you are like those old fucks in congress that should know better, or like Strom Diaper Thurman, but we paID HIS AIDS TO CHANGE HIS SHITTY DIapers too
 
no, so what has changed, it has always cost more to be maRRIED, OH AND BY THE WAY, IT'S ON THE INTERNETS , IT MUST BE TRUE
 
With the new plan now on the table (because this admin always changes from its starting point when the people bark) we are supposed to get what they get .... Im sure they aren't paying 12000.
 
CitizenLink: Marriage Penalty Hidden in Health Care Reform

A closer look at premium payments in both the House and Senate health care bills shows higher premiums that might discourage couples tying the knot.

For instance, in the House version, an unmarried couple each making $30,000 a year would pay $1,320 combined each year for private health insurance. If that couple chose to marry, their premium would jump to $12,000 a year, a difference of $10,680.

Allen Quist, a former Minnesota State legislator and current candidate for Congress, discovered the penalty while looking at numbers from the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy & Commerce, and Education & Labor.

"This extraordinary penalty people will pay, should they marry, extends all the way from a two-person combined income of $58,280 to $86,640, a spread of $28,360," he wrote in a blog post. "A large number of people fall within this spread. As premiums for private insurance escalate, as expected, the marriage penalty will become substantially larger."

The Senate bill includes a similar penalty.

What? What's up with the large marriage penalty?

An little assault on marriage there by the dopey left. I can only imagine what other nuggets are buried in these atrocities.

:rolleyes:

What's up???

I'll tell you what's up. I heard about this shit yesterday.

Statistically, in the Black Community a dirty little secret is that 70% of all children are born out of wedlock....which is a major contributor to poverty. It is a main reason Welfare makes poverty worse. The father of the child moves in and the mother loses her Welfare check. So families are split....money isn't pooled under one roof.

So...this little scheme is designed to keep young people poor.....and thus dependent on the Democrat Party.

Dependant supporters are loyal supporters.
 
Last edited:
hey jackass, a married couple in their late 50's pays 12 K a year where the fuck have you been

tsk tsk tsk,, no fowl language or name calling wry catcher doesn't like it.... oh wait you are on the left right? Kerry On!:eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top