Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
.02kt. Pretty small.
Detonate one at the Capitol and the people on the Library of Congress might not notice.
NUKEMAP by Alex Wellerstein
NUKEMAP is a website for visualizing the effects of nuclear detonations.nuclearsecrecy.com
View attachment 809927
By not answering it, you're admitting to understanding that the purpose of the 2A allows the people to keep a gov't in check first and foremost. This was also reinforced by individual state constitutions. Personal defense is a secondary right from the 2A. The primary role of the 2A is protection from the gov't.No, it certainly doesn't.
But is there anything to gain in answering that?
I know. the govurmunt if coming at midnight to take all your guns.By not answering it, you're admitting to understanding that the purpose of the 2A allows the people to keep a gov't in check first and foremost. This was also reinforced by individual state constitutions. Personal defense is a secondary right from the 2A. The primary role of the 2A is protection from the gov't.
Why do you lie to yourself like this?No, it certainly doesn't.
I know. the govurmunt if coming at midnight to take all your guns.
The moron you are debating with is a Canadian who has been trying to influence US domestic discussions on this board as long as I've been here. He has no clue as to how freedom works.By not answering it, you're admitting to understanding that the purpose of the 2A allows the people to keep a gov't in check first and foremost. This was also reinforced by individual state constitutions. Personal defense is a secondary right from the 2A. The primary role of the 2A is protection from the gov't.
He's been pacified.The moron you are debating with is a Canadian who has been trying to influence US domestic discussions on this board as long as I've been here. He has no clue as to how freedom works.
‘Usually, the motivation for purchasing the AR-15 is simple: People want one because they want one. Most times, the person who buys an AR-15 comes into the store already knowing that they intend to purchase one.
I’ve pressed some customers about why they want an AR-15, but no one could ever come up with a legitimate justification for needing that particular weapon.
Some members of the tinfoil hat brigade have come up with the reply, “We need these weapons because we want to be effective against the government if it becomes tyrannical. That’s part of our Second Amendment right.” Personally, I think that’s ludicrous, but it has become an increasingly popular justification for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle.
[…]
If banning them outright seems like too extreme a solution to be politically palatable, here’s another option: Reclassify semi-automatic rifles as Class 3 firearms.’
Opinion: Here's the reason people tell me they want to buy an AR-15. And it's simply ludicrous | CNN
No weapon has been more in the public eye than the AR-15, in large part because of the tragic role it has played in some of this country's deadliest shootings, former DC police officer Michael Fanone writes. Fanone, who owns one of the weapons, writes that the AR-15 has the dubious distinction...www.cnn.com
I disagree with the article’s author about ‘banning’ AR 15s or subjecting them to the provisions of the NFA. ‘Bans’ don’t work, they’re unwarranted government excess and overreach and likely un-Constitutional.
But he’s correct about wanting to own an AR 15 to ‘defend against government tyranny’ as being ridiculous nonsense.
Possessing an AR 15 is a want, not a ‘need.’
And there’s nothing wrong with that; citizens are not required to ‘justify’ exercising a fundamental right as a ‘prerequisite’ to indeed do so.
As is always the case after a mass shooting or similar event, we see inane, baseless reasons contrived to ‘justify’ owning an AR 15 in a pathetic and unnecessary attempt to fend-off a ‘ban’ of such weapons where there is no political will to do so.
Everytime the gun grabber democrats open their mouths, AR sales go through the roof. Colt loves democrats.Libs really created the desire for this. Lib propaganda says that there is no more efficient killing machine that the AR15. People who are shopping for a gun believe that, and not wanting to come to a gun flight underarmed, they insist on what they see as the best.
I know. He tries to pretend he understands how this country works, but has no real world experience and only formulates his opinion based on our very biased media, here and there.The moron you are debating with is a Canadian who has been trying to influence US domestic discussions on this board as long as I've been here. He has no clue as to how freedom works.
Wrong again. You really should stop trying to pretend you have a valid opinion on anything relate to the 2A.I know. the govurmunt if coming at midnight to take all your guns.
He's been pacified.
What more need be said?
your premise is a lie,,‘Usually, the motivation for purchasing the AR-15 is simple: People want one because they want one. Most times, the person who buys an AR-15 comes into the store already knowing that they intend to purchase one.
I’ve pressed some customers about why they want an AR-15, but no one could ever come up with a legitimate justification for needing that particular weapon.
Some members of the tinfoil hat brigade have come up with the reply, “We need these weapons because we want to be effective against the government if it becomes tyrannical. That’s part of our Second Amendment right.” Personally, I think that’s ludicrous, but it has become an increasingly popular justification for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle.
[…]
If banning them outright seems like too extreme a solution to be politically palatable, here’s another option: Reclassify semi-automatic rifles as Class 3 firearms.’
Opinion: Here's the reason people tell me they want to buy an AR-15. And it's simply ludicrous | CNN
No weapon has been more in the public eye than the AR-15, in large part because of the tragic role it has played in some of this country's deadliest shootings, former DC police officer Michael Fanone writes. Fanone, who owns one of the weapons, writes that the AR-15 has the dubious distinction...
I disagree with the article’s author about ‘banning’ AR 15s or subjecting them to the provisions of the NFA. ‘Bans’ don’t work, they’re unwarranted government excess and overreach and likely un-Constitutional.
But he’s correct about wanting to own an AR 15 to ‘defend against government tyranny’ as being ridiculous nonsense.
Possessing an AR 15 is a want, not a ‘need.’
And there’s nothing wrong with that; citizens are not required to ‘justify’ exercising a fundamental right as a ‘prerequisite’ to indeed do so.
As is always the case after a mass shooting or similar event, we see inane, baseless reasons contrived to ‘justify’ owning an AR 15 in a pathetic and unnecessary attempt to fend-off a ‘ban’ of such weapons where there is no political will to do so.
