Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
You don't know enough about physics to form a valid opinion of his research.
One need not be a physicist to validly criticize the assertion that "physics" proves the non-existence of God or that physics is even capable of "proving" any such thing.
Until and unless "physics" can answer the question of where the stuff that comprised the original material for the Big Bang came from (in addition to addressing why the laws of physics get magically suspended at that instant), then what Hawking said is nothing more than his own uninformed guesswork.
Until you can verify and prove that The universe was created in six days about 6000 years ago. Two naked teens and a snake in garden determined the fate of the whole human race. There was a flood in which the water level reached a hight of 29.000 ft and evaporated in a few weeks. Big fish puked up live men. Walls came tumbling at the sound of a trumpet. A virgin gave birth to the god of the universe wno was also himself and a holy ghost. A man was able to walk on water. People were healed of leprosy by laying hands on them. Water was turned into fine wine. 5000 hungry men plus women and children who also ate were fed with two fish and five loaves then 12 baskets of leftovers were collected. A man was hung on a cross and bled like a hog only to show up two days later fit as a fiddle. etc. etc.
Keep your ignorant theories about all religions to yourself. One is as bad as the rest because they were all devised by primitives who were almost as screwed up and brainwashed as you are.
Wouldn't it be easier for me to prove you have no idea what the Bible actually says?