- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,441
- 2,300
Polls on questions like this can be easily manipulated.
Want people to support DACA? "Do you support allowing hard working people to stay in the US legally, who were brought here as young children through no fault of their own?"
Want people to oppose DACA? "Do you support allowing illegal immigrants permanent resident status just because their parents brought them here illegally decades ago?"
It's why you can't put any weight to polls on things like this.
Quote me a poll which asks DACA question in that form or any other form you find biased.
Polling usually releases all questions, exactly how they were asked.
Your blanket "can't trust them because they may ask a question a certain way" is just a form of denial.
http://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-con..._Jan2018-Refield_RegisteredVoters_Topline.pdf
Do you think that children who were brought into this country illegally by their parents, many of whom are now in their 20s and 30s, should be given a path to U.S. citizenship or should not be entitled to a path to citizenship without first returning home?
This question puts the affirmative first, and tries to explain the situation, thus generating sympathy for the "yes" answer. Also uses the word "children".
What the fuck? The question ACCURATELY describes the situation.
Children is EXACTLY what those people were when they were brought into this country.
I'm sorry you cannot deal with reality that most Americans want to give them path to citizenship.
it's designed to elicit an emotional response and get a supportive answer.
They could have used the word minors, which would have been more neutral.
Bullshit, they were, in most plain language - children
No, minors is the technical term, children is to elicit an emotional response, like calling them "Dreamers".
Stop trying to deny the attempts at emotional manipulation in polls like this, as well as with the media.