'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.'

What America has painfully learned since former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was first announced as John McCain's running mate in 2008 is that it is completely acceptable for media members to mercilessly attack a woman in print or on television and radio if she is a conservative.

No, Palin was criticized because she was/is ignorant – it had nothing to do with gender.

In reality, not only is it condoned, it's applauded.

You can even win awards for doing so - just ask Katie Couric.

Couric asked questions appropriate for any VP candidate, particularly McCain’s running mate. The interview was a disaster for Palin because she is ignorant and couldn’t answer the questions.
.....Demonstrating the breadth & depth required....for a pageant-contestant.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww]YouTube - ‪Miss Teen USA 2007 - South Carolina answers a question‬‏[/ame]

(...Or, for that matter, a Teabagger.)

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_09xPF_9UjM]YouTube - ‪"Hardball": Katy Abram Told Medicare Is "Successful Socialism"‬‏[/ame]
*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't come in here spouting there is no sexist bias in the liberal media,then refuse to back up your claims and expect to be taken seriously. It don't wash. :eusa_hand:

Neither does deflection.

I never ONCE said that there was no sexism. There is sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...all in politics. What I said was is that the candidates were not treated any differently by the media (and that includes pundits) based on whether they were conservative or liberal.

well now that you admit to the sexism that goes on maybe you can admit to the fact that the same people who got all bent when Hillary got mistreated are the very same ones who trash Palin and Coulter at every opportunity.

nevah evah in a million years will she admit that fact! :lol:
 
I never ONCE said that there was no sexism. There is sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...all in politics. What I said was is that the candidates were not treated any differently by the media (and that includes pundits) based on whether they were conservative or liberal.

I don't care what you "say" is supposedly true. I have read articles written by women who experienced the bias first hand,and later talked about it openly via the media curcuit (see Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton). I will take their word for it thanks. :eusa_hand:

There is no bias. WOMEN are subject to sexism in politics...it is not unique to one party or the other. Minorities are subject to bigotry in politics...no party bias needed. What don't you get?

That you are telling me Laura Bush was treated the same as Michelle Obama?

ROFL!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Don't come in here spouting there is no sexist bias in the liberal media,then refuse to back up your claims and expect to be taken seriously. It don't wash. :eusa_hand:

Neither does deflection.

I never ONCE said that there was no sexism. There is sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...all in politics. What I said was is that the candidates were not treated any differently by the media (and that includes pundits) based on whether they were conservative or liberal.

I will give you one example of different treatment. Watch the Chris Matthews show when he has a Liberal guest. It is all fun, smiles, agreement and a few softball questions. Then watch him interview a Conservative guest and get back to me.

That is the case on almost every show all day long on MSNBC. I call it the AOATT network since it is All Obama All The Time.

And pundits on Fox are different how exactly? Have you watched a Hannity "interview" (gush, gush)...
 
EXCUSE ME AGAIN!

But while everyone is donning sackclothe and ashes over some supposed slurs thrown toward Amy and Chelsea (for which I have yet to see a scintilla of evidence.)

Does anyone remember how Juanita Broaderick was treated? Lewinsky? Paula Jones?

It was like I was back in high school.

The SAME SEXIST DOUBLE STANDARD that feminists supposedly were fighting against WAS ENSHRINED IN PUBLIC POLICY AND THEY TOOK IT DOWN IT EVEN ATTACKING FIVE YEAR OLDS!

Bill Clinton was some "victim" of his hormones. "I mean he couldn't help himself. After all he's a guy!" Poor wittle Bill Clinton.

And the women were "nuts and sluts!"

The guy is a hero and a victim, the girl is a gutter slut!

And the same feminists who were going after sexual harrassment after the Anita Hill debacle failed to take down Clarence Thomas, took their rage on the road and started attacking five years olds with "sexual harrassment."

But the same people who went after five year olds for "kissing a girls buttons," suddenly turned a blind eye when it came to Old Billy Boy!

Bubba was a victim and feminists went so far as to write they would get on their hands and knees and give Bubba a Lewinsky as long as he kept abortion legal.

ANYONE REMEMBER THAT? I SURE AS HELL DO!

And anyone want to remember how the BUSH TWINS WERE TREATED.

Comedy Central was even doing "That's my Bush" with the Bush Twins as incestuous lesbians.

And you libs claim oppression over Chelsea and Amy?

HAR DE HAR HAR!

What selective memories you all have!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Notice how liberals won't address the different treatment the women against Clinton got?
 
I don't care what you "say" is supposedly true. I have read articles written by women who experienced the bias first hand,and later talked about it openly via the media curcuit (see Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton). I will take their word for it thanks. :eusa_hand:

There is no bias. WOMEN are subject to sexism in politics...it is not unique to one party or the other. Minorities are subject to bigotry in politics...no party bias needed. What don't you get?

That you are telling me Laura Bush was treated the same as Michelle Obama?

ROFL!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Provide examples of how they haven't been.
 
I have a personal bug about any guy who thinks it's relevant to comment about a woman's "fuck-ability"... I have news for you.... most of these women wouldn't fuck you if their very lives depended on it.
Aw, c'mon, now.....we're talkin' "conservative"-women, here.

That shouldn't include marriage?????

:eusa_eh:
 
I never ONCE said that there was no sexism. There is sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...all in politics. What I said was is that the candidates were not treated any differently by the media (and that includes pundits) based on whether they were conservative or liberal.

I don't care what you "say" is supposedly true. I have read articles written by women who experienced the bias first hand,and later talked about it openly via the media curcuit (see Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton). I will take their word for it thanks. :eusa_hand:

There is no bias. WOMEN are subject to sexism in politics...it is not unique to one party or the other. Minorities are subject to bigotry in politics...no party bias needed. What don't you get?

You state the candidates were not treated differently...then when showed you are wrong... can't even back up your BS with anything other than your useless bluster. What don't you get? This ain't hard.
 
What America has painfully learned since former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was first announced as John McCain's running mate in 2008 is that it is completely acceptable for media members to mercilessly attack a woman in print or on television and radio if she is a conservative.

In reality, not only is it condoned, it's applauded.

You can even win awards for doing so - just ask Katie Couric.

Tantaros on Schultz-Ingraham Affair: 'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.' | NewsBusters.org

Hmm, sounds like you are over-reaching on your typical con-slur "hatred." But I agree, the media can bash any women or man or child, and do. Not sure what cons has to do with it, the media dosn't care if the women is a slut.
Absolutely!!!

The media still covers Newt Gingrich!!
 
There is no bias. WOMEN are subject to sexism in politics...it is not unique to one party or the other. Minorities are subject to bigotry in politics...no party bias needed. What don't you get?

That you are telling me Laura Bush was treated the same as Michelle Obama?

ROFL!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Provide examples of how they haven't been.


EASY!

Laura:

Is Laura Bush going to hell? Is Laura Bush going to hell? - SFGate

The Dissing of Laura Bush: Opinion: The Dissing of Laura Bush - WSJ.com


Michelle:

Stupids "inspired" by Michelle Obama: BBC News - Students 'inspired' by Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Travels in Style: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...els-in-style/2011/05/23/AFN9Vg9G_gallery.html

The first lady visited a DC middle school as part of her Let's Move! campaign and did some moves of her own
Michelle Obama - Salon.com



It's so damn obvious, but I doubt it will permeate your unwillingness to see anything but your own bias.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
I notice hypocritically dishonest liberals STILL won't address the obvious misogyny against any woman who caused a problem for Horn Dog Clinton during his time as President.
 
That you are telling me Laura Bush was treated the same as Michelle Obama?

ROFL!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Provide examples of how they haven't been.


EASY!

Laura:

Is Laura Bush going to hell? Is Laura Bush going to hell? - SFGate

The Dissing of Laura Bush: Opinion: The Dissing of Laura Bush - WSJ.com


Michelle:

Stupids "inspired" by Michelle Obama: BBC News - Students 'inspired' by Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Travels in Style: Michelle Obama travels in style - The Washington Post

The first lady visited a DC middle school as part of her Let's Move! campaign and did some moves of her own
Michelle Obama - Salon.com



It's so damn obvious, but I doubt it will permeate your unwillingness to see anything but your own bias.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You've got two opinion pieces compared to news pieces. Try again big fella. While you're out there casting about...have a listen to the things Limpbaugh says about Michelle...
 
Do you guys even remember how you have treated Hilary and pelosi ?

Boxer and Di Fi?

Amy Carter when she was but a child?

Chelsea?


You never seen to mind women being treated like crap unless its some right wing woman.

No, I don't Please elaborate.

On his TV show, early in the Clinton administration, Limbaugh put up a picture of Socks, the White House cat, and asked, 'Did you know there's a White House dog?' Then he put up a picture of Chelsea Clinton, who was 13 years old at the time and as far as I know had never done any harm to anyone.

When viewers objected, he claimed, in typical Limbaugh fashion, that the gag was an accident and that without his permission some technician had put up the picture of Chelsea -- which I found as disgusting as his original attempt at humor.

Hannity's memory lapse: "I don't remember Chelsea Clinton being attacked" | Media Matters for America
He's always been a gutless-coward.....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNK4byQkn7w]YouTube - ‪A Bully Gets Bullied‬‏[/ame]​
 
Provide examples of how they haven't been.


EASY!

Laura:

Is Laura Bush going to hell? Is Laura Bush going to hell? - SFGate

The Dissing of Laura Bush: Opinion: The Dissing of Laura Bush - WSJ.com


Michelle:

Stupids "inspired" by Michelle Obama: BBC News - Students 'inspired' by Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Travels in Style: Michelle Obama travels in style - The Washington Post

The first lady visited a DC middle school as part of her Let's Move! campaign and did some moves of her own
Michelle Obama - Salon.com



It's so damn obvious, but I doubt it will permeate your unwillingness to see anything but your own bias.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You've got two opinion pieces compared to news pieces. Try again big fella. While you're out there casting about...have a listen to the things Limpbaugh says about Michelle...

Oh you mean news pieces about Laura where they claimed she killed somebody?

Excuse me, if it is more difficult to get news pieces for Laura from three years ago, as compared to Michelle today?

Give me a break!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
What America has painfully learned since former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was first announced as John McCain's running mate in 2008 is that it is completely acceptable for media members to mercilessly attack a woman in print or on television and radio if she is a conservative.

In reality, not only is it condoned, it's applauded.

You can even win awards for doing so - just ask Katie Couric.

Tantaros on Schultz-Ingraham Affair: 'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.' | NewsBusters.org

That's funny.

I thought the Last Acceptable Misogyny in the U.S. was Republican attacks on Planned Parenthood.
 
Do you guys even remember how you have treated Hilary and pelosi ?

Boxer and Di Fi?

Amy Carter when she was but a child?

Chelsea?


You never seen to mind women being treated like crap unless its some right wing woman.

It's one thing to question their policies, but yet another to say they're a stupid **** and their kids are all sluts and retards.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top