Dragon
Senior Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 5,481
- 588
- 48
That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
That you hear that from liberals is the obvious lie. The only people who say it is conservatives, saying that liberals say it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
Do you really think everyone who opposes abortion is a religious bigot? Doesn't that make you a bigot?
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s320x320/401518_337340406287044_337099606311124_1147557_1919899386_n.jpg/IMG]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/pages/Atheists-Against-Abortion/337099606311124/URL][/quote]
still slow on the uptake?
they are bigots NOT because they oppose abortion. they are religious bigots because they want to censor those whom they feel disagree with their religious views[/QUOTE]
Hey, genius, Portland Oregon is hardly the Bible Belt, and the LA Times is hardly a right wing paper.
[url=http://blog.oregonlive.com/oregonianeditors/2012/03/doonesbury_editors_decide_not.html]'Doonesbury': Editors decide not to run next week's strip | OregonLive.com[/url]
Maybe, just maybe,m if you weren't a bigot you would have actually read the story you posted instead of jumping to conclusions.
Then again, if you weren't a bigot it wouldn't be half as much fun making you look like a complete idiot.[/QUOTE]
The publishers of most papers are moderate to conservative. Publishers bend to the outrage (feigned or real) of the organized religious voices out there.
[FONT="Arial Narrow"]The comic strips feature a woman who goes to an abortion clinic and is confronted by several people who suggest she should be ashamed. Among them is a doctor who reads a script on behalf of Texas Gov. Rick Perry welcoming her to a "compulsory transvaginal exam," and a middle-aged legislator who calls her a "slut."[/FONT]
- [url=http://online.wsj.com/article/AP6b8c02507abb4d348548a8ec97eaae84.html]Papers move, scrap 'Doonesbury' abortion law strip - WSJ.com[/url]
They revel in their hypocrisy.That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
Interestingly enough, none of them say anything here, either about the cartoons about Rice.
Maybe I'm the bent one thinking that avoiding hypocrisy is much more important than partisanship.
They revel in their hypocrisy.That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
Interestingly enough, none of them say anything here, either about the cartoons about Rice.
Maybe I'm the bent one thinking that avoiding hypocrisy is much more important than partisanship.
circle jerk in the echo chamber?
eh, old news.
Nope. That's what I hear from liberals. As you have no access to or knowledge of my life, you are speaking from ignorance or just lying. It doesn't matter all that much to me which it is.That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
That you hear that from liberals is the obvious lie.
....
Yes, the left have been hypocrites for as long as I can remember.They revel in their hypocrisy.That's what I hear from them and obviously it's a lie.
Interestingly enough, none of them say anything here, either about the cartoons about Rice.
Maybe I'm the bent one thinking that avoiding hypocrisy is much more important than partisanship.
circle jerk in the echo chamber?
eh, old news.
That's especially ironic coming from a leftist.circle jerk in the echo chamber?
eh, old news.
One wonders why they bother, though. It's like they're creating their own little imaginary world and reinforcing it with sound bites. I can dig that; I like a good fantasy novel or computer game or movie. But one should always be able to distinguish such things from reality.
still slow on the uptake?
they are bigots NOT because they oppose abortion. they are religious bigots because they want to censor those whom they feel disagree with their religious views
Hey, genius, Portland Oregon is hardly the Bible Belt, and the LA Times is hardly a right wing paper.
'Doonesbury': Editors decide not to run next week's strip | OregonLive.com
Maybe, just maybe,m if you weren't a bigot you would have actually read the story you posted instead of jumping to conclusions.
Then again, if you weren't a bigot it wouldn't be half as much fun making you look like a complete idiot.
The publishers of most papers are moderate to conservative. Publishers bend to the outrage (feigned or real) of the organized religious voices out there.
The comic strips feature a woman who goes to an abortion clinic and is confronted by several people who suggest she should be ashamed. Among them is a doctor who reads a script on behalf of Texas Gov. Rick Perry welcoming her to a "compulsory transvaginal exam," and a middle-aged legislator who calls her a "slut."
- Papers move, scrap 'Doonesbury' abortion law strip - WSJ.com
circle jerk in the echo chamber?
eh, old news.
One wonders why they bother, though. It's like they're creating their own little imaginary world and reinforcing it with sound bites. I can dig that; I like a good fantasy novel or computer game or movie. But one should always be able to distinguish such things from reality.
circle jerk in the echo chamber?
eh, old news.
One wonders why they bother, though. It's like they're creating their own little imaginary world and reinforcing it with sound bites. I can dig that; I like a good fantasy novel or computer game or movie. But one should always be able to distinguish such things from reality.
How are your delusions any different than theirs? At least theirs is based on the observed difference in the way the media reacts to different stories, yours is simply based on the belief that anyone who takes offense at a strip you like is a religious bigot. I bet you can't actually find any religious bigots on the LA Times editorial board to use to justify your idiocy, since I already blasted Dante's assumption that the publisher made the decision.
You almost gotta laugh. The radical anti-Christian bigots worry about the hurt feelings of a rich guy who draws cartoons but they don't seem fazed about American Soldiers murdered by the jihad because a couple of copies of the koran were burned.
It's a cartoon strip a-holes! More proof the religious sects in America are not much different than the crazies who went after Denmark cartoonists.
You almost gotta laugh. The radical anti-Christian bigots worry about the hurt feelings of a rich guy who draws cartoons but they don't seem fazed about American Soldiers murdered by the jihad because a couple of copies of the koran were burned.
hey doosh, some of us stuck up for the Danish cartoon showing Allah...
Some soldier was fuckin' stupid enough to burn Korans? Court Martial? It's fuckin' Afghanistan. Jesus Christ some of you faux warrior types just don't get it.
People care about US Soldiers, just we all don't hide behind them while scoring cheap political points
Interestingly enough, none of them say anything here, either about the cartoons about Rice.
One wonders why they bother, though. It's like they're creating their own little imaginary world and reinforcing it with sound bites. I can dig that; I like a good fantasy novel or computer game or movie. But one should always be able to distinguish such things from reality.
How are your delusions any different than theirs? At least theirs is based on the observed difference in the way the media reacts to different stories, yours is simply based on the belief that anyone who takes offense at a strip you like is a religious bigot. I bet you can't actually find any religious bigots on the LA Times editorial board to use to justify your idiocy, since I already blasted Dante's assumption that the publisher made the decision.
the thing is, you are unaware of how pathetic you look taking yourself so seriously on an anonymous internet forum.
got friends?
It's a cartoon strip a-holes! More proof the religious sects in America are not much different than the crazies who went after Denmark cartoonists.
Rush Limbaugh is a talk show host, a-hole.