Harvesting organs

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
54,082
53,117
3,605
For those of you on the left, you have no problem harvesting the organs of the unborn because by law they have no rights.

But what of those in prison? Should those in prison have their organs harvested? Communist China does this, granted, they kill them to get them. However, what if they wait till they die? Should they then have their organs harvested for the collective good of society?
 
abortedbaby07.jpg


What you call tissue, the ones selling the "tissue" calls them hearts, livers........
They know better than you do what is being sold. And remember, no anesthesia. The harvesting is what kills them. Ouch!
 
Whom ever is offended by pictures of aborted infants, should be. We should all be offended enough to insist that the pictures no longer exist, because the practice of ripping infants to shreds no longer exists.
Stop burying your head in the sand and face the truth. It's not pictures that are offensive. It is the deed itself that should offend you.
 
Whom ever is offended by pictures of aborted infants, should be. We should all be offended enough to insist that the pictures no longer exist, because the practice of ripping infants to shreds no longer exists.
Stop burying your head in the sand and face the truth. It's not pictures that are offensive. It is the deed itself that should offend you.


Such outrage about zygotes by the fetus masterabaters , yet so quite about living children
 
Prisoners have always been able to donate organs.
There's no law against it. The transplant community, however, is not eager to use inmates' organs because of the high risk for disease environment in which the inmates live. Death row inmates, moreover, cannot donate. Thus, while inmates CAN donate, they typically do not.
 
Whom ever is offended by pictures of aborted infants, should be. We should all be offended enough to insist that the pictures no longer exist, because the practice of ripping infants to shreds no longer exists.
Stop burying your head in the sand and face the truth. It's not pictures that are offensive. It is the deed itself that should offend you.


Such outrage about zygotes by the fetus masterabaters , yet so quite about living children
Interesting that you would call a near full term baby a zygote. Also, note who wants to allow those children's parents the ability to choose a quality school and who wants to leave them trapped in hell holes.
 
Whom ever is offended by pictures of aborted infants, should be. We should all be offended enough to insist that the pictures no longer exist, because the practice of ripping infants to shreds no longer exists.
Stop burying your head in the sand and face the truth. It's not pictures that are offensive. It is the deed itself that should offend you.


Such outrage about zygotes by the fetus masterabaters , yet so quite about living children


zygote:

upload_2015-9-15_16-5-56.jpeg


6 month old in incubator striving to live:



You not knowing the difference? Priceless.
 
Whom ever is offended by pictures of aborted infants, should be. We should all be offended enough to insist that the pictures no longer exist, because the practice of ripping infants to shreds no longer exists.
Stop burying your head in the sand and face the truth. It's not pictures that are offensive. It is the deed itself that should offend you.
The fact that so many MEN favor abortion and don't feel disgust at the very idea of selling these baby parts doesn't surprise me.

The men don't have to go through or live with the abortion.

If it's a women's right to choose why are so many men eager to defend planned parenthood?
 
Does the word "harvested" translate to "without consent" ?

Well we know the dead didn't give their consent, and for the most part neither do the mothers. If they do it's because they have been told by PP that it is nothing more than tissue, and that they are doing a great service to humanity. Bet if you let those women watch a video of live fetus harvesting, they wouldn't consent.
 
Does the word "harvested" translate to "without consent" ?

My point is, unborn children are without rights under the law. Similarly, criminals in prison have by in large lost their rights as well. Why not then just take their organs without their consent like you do the unborn children?

Of course, they could do blood tests on these prisoners to see if they are good candidates for a transplant. It might even motivate them to crack down on prison rapes in order to limit STD transmissions to other prisoners, all in the name of preserving the organs that organizations like Planned Parenthood lust after.
 

Forum List

Back
Top