And Chimpola is virtually indistinguishable from leftist hardliner LBJ.....So much for Boiking's credentials as being any kind of "moderate".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama's 1st term= Bu$h II's 3rd term to a degree. Obamneycare was a creature of guess who? The American Enterprise Institute (research arm of Fox News ) (Google it) MAYBE Obama will be a REAL Leftist once he's reelected & doesn't have to be concerned w/ Independent/Undecideds.
You eXtreme Rightards need to put the kool aid down
The "far right" theocrats are the neocons, you nincompoop.Always amusing to get critiques from far left progressive/socialist fundie kooks like Spamahontas, about how immoderate the GOP has become.
Hey Jethro, is this a 'critique from a far left progressive/socialist fundie kook'?
Victor Gold, former speechwriter for George Herbert Walker Bush is a Goldwater conservative...his book explains how the GOP was hijacked away from conservatives by far right theocrats and far left neocons...starting in 1980...
Let's add.....In actions, not words.
I want to hear this one.
After four decades as a Republican insider, Victor Gold reveals how the holy-rollers and the Neo-Cons have destroyed the GOP. Now he's fighting to get his party back
Yes, we should take input from a Party that has run up annual trillion deficits, taken God out of their party, got us downgraded and can't wait to take orders from Putin.
Thaaaaaaaaank you
Hate to break the news to you but Obama is a moderate. I should know, I'm a Progressive
The "far right" theocrats are the neocons, you nincompoop.Always amusing to get critiques from far left progressive/socialist fundie kooks like Spamahontas, about how immoderate the GOP has become.
Hey Jethro, is this a 'critique from a far left progressive/socialist fundie kook'?
Victor Gold, former speechwriter for George Herbert Walker Bush is a Goldwater conservative...his book explains how the GOP was hijacked away from conservatives by far right theocrats and far left neocons...starting in 1980...
Actually, they're not.....Holy rollers like Santorum totally buy into international warmongering, domestic nanny-statism, and support the socialistic welfare state every bit as much as any other of them.After four decades as a Republican insider, Victor Gold reveals how the holy-rollers and the Neo-Cons have destroyed the GOP. Now he's fighting to get his party back
Do you realize that "holy-rollers" and "Neo-Cons" are entirely different groups? The title is an Oxymoron because even though there is some overlap, you can't prioritize the socon agenda over the neocon agenda and vice versa at the same time. And the majority of Socons are not neocons and the majority of neocons are not socons. The author is the regular type of moron and it' kills his credibility that he doesn't know the difference.
Actually, they're not.....Holy rollers like Santorum totally buy into international warmongering, domestic nanny-statism, and support the socialistic welfare state every bit as much as any other of them.After four decades as a Republican insider, Victor Gold reveals how the holy-rollers and the Neo-Cons have destroyed the GOP. Now he's fighting to get his party back
Do you realize that "holy-rollers" and "Neo-Cons" are entirely different groups? The title is an Oxymoron because even though there is some overlap, you can't prioritize the socon agenda over the neocon agenda and vice versa at the same time. And the majority of Socons are not neocons and the majority of neocons are not socons. The author is the regular type of moron and it' kills his credibility that he doesn't know the difference.
Let's add.....In actions, not words.
I want to hear this one.
I'm surprised you can't answer it yourself.
1) By becoming addicted to tax cuts as the basis for all economic policy - a far cry from conservative governments of earlier eras.
2) By constantly wanting to over-fund the military - something not a given even going back to the 1950's.
3) By basically ignoring all scientific evidence of climate change - in the past conservatives have often triumphed scientific thinking.
4) By opposing and diminishing development aid, whereas earlier conservatives often felt development aid was a Christian act.
5) By opposing immigration and immigrants - whereas earlier conservatives often felt the economy benefitted from incoming cheap labour.
Shall I go on?
Actually, they're not.....Holy rollers like Santorum totally buy into international warmongering, domestic nanny-statism, and support the socialistic welfare state every bit as much as any other of them.Do you realize that "holy-rollers" and "Neo-Cons" are entirely different groups? The title is an Oxymoron because even though there is some overlap, you can't prioritize the socon agenda over the neocon agenda and vice versa at the same time. And the majority of Socons are not neocons and the majority of neocons are not socons. The author is the regular type of moron and it' kills his credibility that he doesn't know the difference.
I agreed there is overlap, giving an example of someone in both groups doesn't make them the same. Obama has ruled as a neocon, does that mean he's a socon?
The "far right" theocrats are the neocons, you nincompoop.Always amusing to get critiques from far left progressive/socialist fundie kooks like Spamahontas, about how immoderate the GOP has become.
Hey Jethro, is this a 'critique from a far left progressive/socialist fundie kook'?
Victor Gold, former speechwriter for George Herbert Walker Bush is a Goldwater conservative...his book explains how the GOP was hijacked away from conservatives by far right theocrats and far left neocons...starting in 1980...
The "far right" theocrats are the neocons, you nincompoop.Hey Jethro, is this a 'critique from a far left progressive/socialist fundie kook'?
Victor Gold, former speechwriter for George Herbert Walker Bush is a Goldwater conservative...his book explains how the GOP was hijacked away from conservatives by far right theocrats and far left neocons...starting in 1980...
Here is your list of names for the day...
Henry 'Scoop' Jackson, Richard 'Prince of Darkness' Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby, Douglas Feith, Robert Kagan, Norman Podhoretz, John Podhoretz, Alan Dershowtiz, Daniel Pipes, Eliot Cohen, Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, Max Boot, James Schlesinger, Marc Grossman, Joshua Bolten, Frank Gaffney, Michael Rubin.
If you don't find them at Sunday services at Falwell's Thomas Road Baptist Church, or sitting around watching Pat Robertson's 'The 700 Club', check the Synagogues...
oy vay!
Let's add.....In actions, not words.
I want to hear this one.
I'm surprised you can't answer it yourself.
1) By becoming addicted to tax cuts as the basis for all economic policy - a far cry from conservative governments of earlier eras.
2) By constantly wanting to over-fund the military - something not a given even going back to the 1950's.
3) By basically ignoring all scientific evidence of climate change - in the past conservatives have often triumphed scientific thinking.
4) By opposing and diminishing development aid, whereas earlier conservatives often felt development aid was a Christian act.
5) By opposing immigration and immigrants - whereas earlier conservatives often felt the economy benefitted from incoming cheap labour.
Shall I go on?
Hate to break the news to you but Obama is a moderate. I should know, I'm a Progressive
Democrats would claim Pol Pot is a moderate if he was running for office in this country.
Let's add.....In actions, not words.
I want to hear this one.
I'm surprised you can't answer it yourself.
1) By becoming addicted to tax cuts as the basis for all economic policy - a far cry from conservative governments of earlier eras.
2) By constantly wanting to over-fund the military - something not a given even going back to the 1950's.
3) By basically ignoring all scientific evidence of climate change - in the past conservatives have often triumphed scientific thinking.
4) By opposing and diminishing development aid, whereas earlier conservatives often felt development aid was a Christian act.
5) By opposing immigration and immigrants - whereas earlier conservatives often felt the economy benefitted from incoming cheap labour.
Shall I go on?