Hands up, Dont Shoot! They shot anyway..

[ClosedCaption]

So how did they see it if it didn't happen? Are you going with the hypnosis ray conspiracy?

The testimony from these witnesses was alternately branded inconsistent, not credible, unreliable, incoherent, and based on rumor and hearsay.

Federal agents declared that “material portions” of Brown sidekick Dorian Johnson’s account were found to “lack credibility.”

Two women who gave a series of media interviews about the shooting--Piaget Crenshaw and Tiffany Mitchell--were deemed unreliable by federal officials.

The 19-year-old Crenshaw’s account was “riddled with inconsistencies” and certain details she provided “lack credibility,” according to the report.

A construction worker who was laying pipe with a coworker near the shooting site was branded “not credible.” The other worker refused to meet with federal investigators.

Perjuryfest '14: Michael Brown Probe Marred By Lying, Delusional "Witnesses"​

Any other questions?

​

Yeah, what makes the video where the reacted to the shooting not credible? I want to see the part where they say it didn't happen and why. You can call anyone not credible but they can't say that it didn't happen because it's right there on tape

 

[ClosedCaption]

That does not necessarily mean they lied (although some confessed that they did), but there are signs that their memories were shaped by the false narrative that took hold after the shooting: that Wilson gunned down Brown as the latter stood still with his arms raised in surrender

Yeah but these guys were in the scene and saw it happen right after the shots. So, we're they influenced by the media BEFORE THE media was there? Thats unlikely since THE MEDIA WASN'T THERE!

 

[ClosedCaption]

I asked if the white guys on the scene when it happened part of this hypno ray conspiracy or not?

There's no conspiracy. Some witnesses on scene said he had his hands up. Other witnesses...plus forensics and coroner evidence...show that was a lie.

Actually they didnt show that at all. Also, cameras on scene showed people saw it happen. How? Hypno ray? Was there a giant clock swinging over Fergueson?

Call Eric Holder and ask him. Every crime scene in America often involves conflicting witness statements. It's nothing new. This case has been THOROUGHLY investigated by several groups. It's over. Wilson shot in self defense. Case closed.


In 25 years....there will be a convention in Vegas discussing Elvis and UFO sightings, JFK and bigfoot....and Michael Browns hands being up in surrender.

Does Eric Holder know why people on scene saw it happen in real time? This wasnt a conflict this was on video at the scene.

Do you want to answer the question? The FBI had 40 some agents in Ferguson investigating that shooting and yet they pressed NO CHARGES. So the question is simply, if he really had his hands up and was trying to surrender why did Eric Holder's FBI clear him? Were they in on the fix too?

They cleared him because they couldn't prove he had his hands up from a dead body on the ground silly. But what they couldn't say is that the people who saw it as it happened were manipulated by the media because they were on the scene as it happened.

Maybe it was that hypnosis ray beamed down on Furgeson?

 

[jknowgood]

There's no conspiracy. Some witnesses on scene said he had his hands up. Other witnesses...plus forensics and coroner evidence...show that was a lie.

Actually they didnt show that at all. Also, cameras on scene showed people saw it happen. How? Hypno ray? Was there a giant clock swinging over Fergueson?

Call Eric Holder and ask him. Every crime scene in America often involves conflicting witness statements. It's nothing new. This case has been THOROUGHLY investigated by several groups. It's over. Wilson shot in self defense. Case closed.


In 25 years....there will be a convention in Vegas discussing Elvis and UFO sightings, JFK and bigfoot....and Michael Browns hands being up in surrender.

Does Eric Holder know why people on scene saw it happen in real time? This wasnt a conflict this was on video at the scene.

Do you want to answer the question? The FBI had 40 some agents in Ferguson investigating that shooting and yet they pressed NO CHARGES. So the question is simply, if he really had his hands up and was trying to surrender why did Eric Holder's FBI clear him? Were they in on the fix too?

They cleared him because they couldn't prove he had his hands up from a dead body on the ground silly. But what they couldn't say is that the people who saw it as it happened were manipulated by the media because they were on the scene as it happened.

Maybe it was that hypnosis ray beamed down on Furgeson?

Okay then we have proof that planned parenthood is doing things unethical. You ready to go after them? Or are you going on talking points?

 

[ClosedCaption]

When they find no wrong doing will you scream about how they aren't to be believed?

 

[jknowgood]

When they find no wrong doing will you scream about how they aren't to be believed?

You are for planned parenthood, video showing they are guilty. Brown proven guilty by Obama's guy, and you still choose to be stupid.

 

[Missourian]

Yeah but these guys were in the scene and saw it happen right after the shots. So, we're they influenced by the media BEFORE THE media was there? Thats unlikely since THE MEDIA WASN'T THERE!

Apparently that video was shot quite a while after the shots, and the contractor was simply regurgitating what he had heard after the shooting. Witness 122 is the contractor in the pinkish shirt:

Nor was Witness 122’s account accurate. He claimed that three police officers were present during the shooting and that Brown was shot by the “heavyset” one. Wilson is not heavy-set and he was the only officer present.

The FBI also discredited other key elements of Witness 122’s account. It reported that both contractors “claimed to have witnessed bullets go through Brown and exit his back, as evidenced by his shirt ‘popping back’ and ‘stuff coming through.’ However, in his interview with federal prosecutors, Witness 122 explained that he thought that Brown was shot in the back and stumbled until he saw media reports about the autopsy commissioned by Brown’s family. After learning about that autopsy, he realized that Brown was not shot in the back and admittedly changed his account."

Both contractors eventually recanted part of their stories, acknowledging they hadn’t seen Brown fall because a corner of a building obstructed their view.

Why did the Justice Department conclude that 'Hands Up, Don't Shoot' was a myth?​

 

[ClosedCaption]

They're picking apart every part of his story except the part where he saw his hands up when he got shot. He can talk about what color are he saw, how many officers were there or he recanted part of the story...but they did not say that he didn't see his hands up or he recanted that part of the story.

 

[Missourian]

They're picking apart every part of his story except the part where he saw his hands up when he got shot. He can talk about what color are he saw, how many officers were there or he recanted part of the story...but they did not say that he didn't see his hands up or he recanted that part of the story.

They didn't see anything.

They made the whole story up.

There weren't three cops there, the "heavy set" one didn't do the shooting, Brown wasn't shot in the back and there were no through shots with "stuff coming out" his back plus they admitted to deceit when it was exposed that they couldn't possibly have seen Brown fall.

They are what we call "liars"...people who make things up that aren't true.

Bottom line...they may have heard the shooting, but they didn't see anything...they told a story that they heard from others and passed it off as their own.

They lied about seeing the shooting.

Read the DOJ report.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Why would the police shoot an unarmed man who isn't threatening them and has his hands up? These are more criminal police officers that need to be in prison.

Here are some instances of cops acting accordingly, the first the cop shows great restraint, EVEN when the man charges him and the cop falls down backwards, and the second (caution, graphic) shows the cops using appropriate force.






Compare those videos to the one in the OP. In the OP the cops should never have fired a shot.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The picture only shows one hand, we have NO IDEA what the other hand has in it nor what it is doing. Pretty simple concept.

 

[bucs90]

There's no conspiracy. Some witnesses on scene said he had his hands up. Other witnesses...plus forensics and coroner evidence...show that was a lie.

Actually they didnt show that at all. Also, cameras on scene showed people saw it happen. How? Hypno ray? Was there a giant clock swinging over Fergueson?

Call Eric Holder and ask him. Every crime scene in America often involves conflicting witness statements. It's nothing new. This case has been THOROUGHLY investigated by several groups. It's over. Wilson shot in self defense. Case closed.


In 25 years....there will be a convention in Vegas discussing Elvis and UFO sightings, JFK and bigfoot....and Michael Browns hands being up in surrender.

Does Eric Holder know why people on scene saw it happen in real time? This wasnt a conflict this was on video at the scene.

Do you want to answer the question? The FBI had 40 some agents in Ferguson investigating that shooting and yet they pressed NO CHARGES. So the question is simply, if he really had his hands up and was trying to surrender why did Eric Holder's FBI clear him? Were they in on the fix too?

They cleared him because they couldn't prove he had his hands up from a dead body on the ground silly. But what they couldn't say is that the people who saw it as it happened were manipulated by the media because they were on the scene as it happened.

Maybe it was that hypnosis ray beamed down on Furgeson?

You ever investigated a violent incident before? No...I know you havent. But what any seasoned detective will say is if 100 people witness the same incident...you'll get 50 different versions....some drastically different. It's just how the brain works.

Holder sent 47 of America's best agents down there. They determined.....Ferguson was racist because they couldn't charge Wilson with anything.

 

[bucs90]

The picture only shows one hand, we have NO IDEA what the other hand has in it nor what it is doing. Pretty simple concept.

Yep. That hand could be up in surrender...or presenting a knife. Don't know. Ill comment once we know more.

 

[bucs90]

Why would the police shoot an unarmed man who isn't threatening them and has his hands up? These are more criminal police officers that need to be in prison.

Here are some instances of cops acting accordingly, the first the cop shows great restraint, EVEN when the man charges him and the cop falls down backwards, and the second (caution, graphic) shows the cops using appropriate force.






Compare those videos to the one in the OP. In the OP the cops should never have fired a shot.

And they wonder why cops dont approach traffic stops with an open arm hug and smiley face sticker.

 

[Asclepias]

Why would the police shoot an unarmed man who isn't threatening them and has his hands up? These are more criminal police officers that need to be in prison.

Here are some instances of cops acting accordingly, the first the cop shows great restraint, EVEN when the man charges him and the cop falls down backwards, and the second (caution, graphic) shows the cops using appropriate force.






Compare those videos to the one in the OP. In the OP the cops should never have fired a shot.

And they wonder why cops dont approach traffic stops with an open arm hug and smiley face sticker.

I dont wonder. I know they are typically assholes that got beat as children and need to take their anger out on the same people they were taught to fear.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Just because they tripped them up on parts of the story After it happened. They can't say when they reacted on tape isn't what they saw at the time goofy.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Holder sent 47 of America's best agents down there. They determined.....Ferguson was racist because they couldn't charge Wilson with anything.

Because silly, I've asked you several times WHAT IS proof of racism? Even you and your silly responses like in my signature couldn't come up with a response.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Holder sent 47 of America's best agents down there. They determined.....Ferguson was racist because they couldn't charge Wilson with anything.

Because silly, I've asked you several times WHAT IS proof of racism? Even you and your silly responses like in my signature couldn't come up with a response.

You sure claim to know. Perhaps you can explain to us how Wilson was racist?

 

[bucs90]

Holder sent 47 of America's best agents down there. They determined.....Ferguson was racist because they couldn't charge Wilson with anything.

Because silly, I've asked you several times WHAT IS proof of racism? Even you and your silly responses like in my signature couldn't come up with a response.

Thanks for honoring my wisdom in your tags. And know what? Wilson is still innocent.

 

[bucs90]

Holder sent 47 of America's best agents down there. They determined.....Ferguson was racist because they couldn't charge Wilson with anything.

Because silly, I've asked you several times WHAT IS proof of racism? Even you and your silly responses like in my signature couldn't come up with a response.

You sure claim to know. Perhaps you can explain to us how Wilson was racist?

Being a cop. That's enough for them