Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, the assault weapons ban was about the stupidest shit ever in the first place. SKS's and AK-47's were assault weapons because they look 'mean', but mini-30's and other guns with similar capabilities are not assault weapons because they look normal. A weapon with 3 after market upgrades like stock, forearm, or muzzlebreak were not legal because more than 2 upgrades makes them look 'mean' even though the functionality of the weapon is unchanged. All this was decided by a group of ladies looking through a gun magazine and picking out the one's that looked 'mean'.
Are you advocating more guns should be added to the ban?
I wanna .50 cal Barrett for squirell hunting.
btw I own many guns and enjoy shooting them.
Well, the assault weapons ban was about the stupidest shit ever in the first place. SKS's and AK-47's were assault weapons because they look 'mean', but mini-30's and other guns with similar capabilities are not assault weapons because they look normal. A weapon with 3 after market upgrades like stock, forearm, or muzzlebreak were not legal because more than 2 upgrades makes them look 'mean' even though the functionality of the weapon is unchanged. All this was decided by a group of ladies looking through a gun magazine and picking out the one's that looked 'mean'.
Their must not be any infringement on the rights to purchase any weapon.Guns, rifles, shotguns, Assault Rifles, No limitations or exclusions.
The assault rifle ban is unconstitutional!!, and illegal. Thats why it was given a lifespan of 4 years.!!
Well, the assault weapons ban was about the stupidest shit ever in the first place. SKS's and AK-47's were assault weapons because they look 'mean', but mini-30's and other guns with similar capabilities are not assault weapons because they look normal. A weapon with 3 after market upgrades like stock, forearm, or muzzlebreak were not legal because more than 2 upgrades makes them look 'mean' even though the functionality of the weapon is unchanged. All this was decided by a group of ladies looking through a gun magazine and picking out the one's that looked 'mean'.
Their must not be any infringement on the rights to purchase any weapon.Guns, rifles, shotguns, Assault Rifles, No limitations or exclusions.
The assault rifle ban is unconstitutional!!, and illegal. Thats why it was given a lifespan of 4 years.!!
I don't really see the difference between an "assault rifle" and a regular semi-auto rifle. What is it the size of the clip?
I think we should be allowed to buy fully auto weapons.
Their must not be any infringement on the rights to purchase any weapon.Guns, rifles, shotguns, Assault Rifles, No limitations or exclusions.
The assault rifle ban is unconstitutional!!, and illegal. Thats why it was given a lifespan of 4 years.!!
I don't really see the difference between an "assault rifle" and a regular semi-auto rifle. What is it the size of the clip?
I think we should be allowed to buy fully auto weapons.
Only with special training should one be allowed to own fully auto weapons.
Remmeber the kid that shot his brains out at a shooting range with an Uzi? while his father watched?
Their must not be any infringement on the rights to purchase any weapon.Guns, rifles, shotguns, Assault Rifles, No limitations or exclusions.
The assault rifle ban is unconstitutional!!, and illegal. Thats why it was given a lifespan of 4 years.!!
I don't really see the difference between an "assault rifle" and a regular semi-auto rifle. What is it the size of the clip?
I think we should be allowed to buy fully auto weapons.
Only with special training should one be allowed to own fully auto weapons.
Remmeber the kid that shot his brains out at a shooting range with an Uzi? while his father watched?
I don't really see the difference between an "assault rifle" and a regular semi-auto rifle. What is it the size of the clip?
I think we should be allowed to buy fully auto weapons.
Only with special training should one be allowed to own fully auto weapons.
Remmeber the kid that shot his brains out at a shooting range with an Uzi? while his father watched?
I think they are trying to challenge the Fully auto assault weapon ban in court. It may also be unconstitutional.!
I don't really see the difference between an "assault rifle" and a regular semi-auto rifle. What is it the size of the clip?
I think we should be allowed to buy fully auto weapons.
Only with special training should one be allowed to own fully auto weapons.
Remmeber the kid that shot his brains out at a shooting range with an Uzi? while his father watched?
Why should my rights be restricted because of someone else's incompetence? I know that's a controversial opinion I hold, I just see nothing in the Constitution which limits my ability to own a firearm with certain capabilities. Explosives I am definitely ok with having banned, especially in urban environments where one would be endangering their neighbors.
Tell me again when Obama said he was going to take away your guns?
All this shows me is a bunch of wacko's who live in fear, felt the need to buy even more guns.
Guess what sweetheart? We have a Constitutional RIGHT to own firearms, we don't need a reason.
You don't say?
Now how about you applaud the President for not trying to put any new laws on the books that infringe on that right?
Only with special training should one be allowed to own fully auto weapons.
Remmeber the kid that shot his brains out at a shooting range with an Uzi? while his father watched?
Why should my rights be restricted because of someone else's incompetence? I know that's a controversial opinion I hold, I just see nothing in the Constitution which limits my ability to own a firearm with certain capabilities. Explosives I am definitely ok with having banned, especially in urban environments where one would be endangering their neighbors.
Becuase of the need to protect others.
Should anyone be allowed to be a DR. with no training?
Why should my rights be restricted because of someone else's incompetence? I know that's a controversial opinion I hold, I just see nothing in the Constitution which limits my ability to own a firearm with certain capabilities. Explosives I am definitely ok with having banned, especially in urban environments where one would be endangering their neighbors.
Becuase of the need to protect others.
Should anyone be allowed to be a DR. with no training?
Because of the need to protect others from what? What the hell are you blathering about?
I do not support the government in endorsing who they feel to be qualified to do anything. Their license issuing and testing and regulating of professionals is a joke. I would much rather go to doctors who were independently approved by a third party group. I don't believe in paying a doctor $150 to get a prescription for something I already know I need.
Becuase of the need to protect others.
Should anyone be allowed to be a DR. with no training?
Because of the need to protect others from what? What the hell are you blathering about?
I do not support the government in endorsing who they feel to be qualified to do anything. Their license issuing and testing and regulating of professionals is a joke. I would much rather go to doctors who were independently approved by a third party group. I don't believe in paying a doctor $150 to get a prescription for something I already know I need.
Just order your meds over the net then and maybe die from drug interactions or some other complications.
Because of the need to protect others from what? What the hell are you blathering about?
I do not support the government in endorsing who they feel to be qualified to do anything. Their license issuing and testing and regulating of professionals is a joke. I would much rather go to doctors who were independently approved by a third party group. I don't believe in paying a doctor $150 to get a prescription for something I already know I need.
Just order your meds over the net then and maybe die from drug interactions or some other complications.
Please draw the logical connections to what you just wrote. How does my imminent death follow from having someone other than the government tell me which doctors are capable and which aren't? Are you implying that even with 8 years education and far more extensive testing to prove competence than what the government currently provides, I would not be able to count on a pharmacist to advise me on drug interactions unless the government licenses them? Then some sort of government magic descends on these people and they crap gold nuggets?
Tell me again when Obama said he was going to take away your guns?
All this shows me is a bunch of wacko's who live in fear, felt the need to buy even more guns.
i love the retards that think they will take out the army if/when any president tries to turn the usa into a dictatorship. the sheep in the military will kill any citizen that fights back like they have done in the past.