Gun owner shoots guy who tried to do "the knock-out game" on him

[KGB]

Let me guess. You think your point of view on this is a "conservative" one, right?

Scenario:

Guy comes up to you.....you are armed with your glock....and attempts to taze you. His tazer malfunctions and he quickly turns to run away.

You gonna shoot him in the back?

Yes. He won't be knocking anyone else out in the future.

This was not the first time this punk had done this. Sooner or later, they are going to seriously injure someone. If they punch someone with a brain shunt, they could kill them.

So yes, I would shoot him in defense of myself and others. Damn skippy I would.

You might be just a little off. Intelligent......but a little off. Let me explain.

I have not mentioned punching anyone. I asked if you would shoot a person in the back.....who was fleeing after they tried to taze you, but failed. No physical injury came to you. The dude is running away.

If your answer is yes........you might have some unattended issues. You ain't the fucking judge....you ain't the jury....and you ain't the executioner.

I would not shoot the guy. I would call 911 and get back to living my life. I would have a story to tell.

Your life would likely never be the same. You have just shot someone. If you killed him.....you killed a man. If you did not kill him....do you think you have rehabilitated him?

Want to answer again?

What you are missing is that the assault already happened. The taser working or not is irrelevant. The threshold already was meant by the action itself. So to answer your question, yes & with extreme prejudice.

 

[ogibillm]

Yes. He won't be knocking anyone else out in the future.

This was not the first time this punk had done this. Sooner or later, they are going to seriously injure someone. If they punch someone with a brain shunt, they could kill them.

So yes, I would shoot him in defense of myself and others. Damn skippy I would.

You might be just a little off. Intelligent......but a little off. Let me explain.

I have not mentioned punching anyone. I asked if you would shoot a person in the back.....who was fleeing after they tried to taze you, but failed. No physical injury came to you. The dude is running away.

If your answer is yes........you might have some unattended issues. You ain't the fucking judge....you ain't the jury....and you ain't the executioner.

I would not shoot the guy. I would call 911 and get back to living my life. I would have a story to tell.

Your life would likely never be the same. You have just shot someone. If you killed him.....you killed a man. If you did not kill him....do you think you have rehabilitated him?

Want to answer again?

What you are missing is that the assault already happened. The taser working or not is irrelevant. The threshold already was meant by the action itself. So to answer your question, yes & with extreme prejudice.

you can't shoot a fleeing individual and claim self defense. so go ahead, shoot with extreme prejudice, and then go rot in jail

 

[KGB]

You might be just a little off. Intelligent......but a little off. Let me explain.

I have not mentioned punching anyone. I asked if you would shoot a person in the back.....who was fleeing after they tried to taze you, but failed. No physical injury came to you. The dude is running away.

If your answer is yes........you might have some unattended issues. You ain't the fucking judge....you ain't the jury....and you ain't the executioner.

I would not shoot the guy. I would call 911 and get back to living my life. I would have a story to tell.

Your life would likely never be the same. You have just shot someone. If you killed him.....you killed a man. If you did not kill him....do you think you have rehabilitated him?

Want to answer again?

What you are missing is that the assault already happened. The taser working or not is irrelevant. The threshold already was meant by the action itself. So to answer your question, yes & with extreme prejudice.

you can't shoot a fleeing individual and claim self defense. so go ahead, shoot with extreme prejudice, and then go rot in jail

he already crossed the threshold with assault with a deadly weapon. I have no idea on whether he will turn back. Nice try....

 

[ogibillm]

What you are missing is that the assault already happened. The taser working or not is irrelevant. The threshold already was meant by the action itself. So to answer your question, yes & with extreme prejudice.

you can't shoot a fleeing individual and claim self defense. so go ahead, shoot with extreme prejudice, and then go rot in jail

he already crossed the threshold with assault with a deadly weapon. I have no idea on whether he will turn back. Nice try....

yeah. you'd go to jail on at least manslaughter charges. there's a pharmacist in oklahoma that i can refer you to if you doubt it.

 

[Katzndogz]

Let me guess. You think your point of view on this is a "conservative" one, right?

Scenario:

Guy comes up to you.....you are armed with your glock....and attempts to taze you. His tazer malfunctions and he quickly turns to run away.

You gonna shoot him in the back?

Yes. He won't be knocking anyone else out in the future.

This was not the first time this punk had done this. Sooner or later, they are going to seriously injure someone. If they punch someone with a brain shunt, they could kill them.

So yes, I would shoot him in defense of myself and others. Damn skippy I would.

You might be just a little off. Intelligent......but a little off. Let me explain.

I have not mentioned punching anyone. I asked if you would shoot a person in the back.....who was fleeing after they tried to taze you, but failed. No physical injury came to you. The dude is running away.

If your answer is yes........you might have some unattended issues. You ain't the fucking judge....you ain't the jury....and you ain't the executioner.

I would not shoot the guy. I would call 911 and get back to living my life. I would have a story to tell.

Your life would likely never be the same. You have just shot someone. If you killed him.....you killed a man. If you did not kill him....do you think you have rehabilitated him?

Want to answer again?

If you shoot one of these thugs you didn't kill a man, or even a human being. You killed a predator and a dangerous predator at that. It's the same as if you were being stalked and threatened by any other rabid mindless animal.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Apparently this happened in August. This video just came out now.

Some slimeball tried the street-gang stunt where you sneak up on someone and hit him as hard as you can (or in this case tase him) to try to knock him out. A complete stranger who never did anything to you.

This time the slimeball's taser malfunctioned. And then he quickly found out the victim was armed.

Now the slimeball has been in jail for the last few months, recovering from gunshot wounds. Gee, that's too bad.

Turns out the slimeball had done this 6 or 7 times.

Now he calls it a "lesson learned".

I would call that Justice... except that his other half dozen victims haven't had their shot at him yet.

See video: @WZ - YouTube

This is why we should have public caning as a punishment. When someone is caught doing something like this to another person, the sentence should be 50 lashes.

Only if it's 50 lashes with a barbed-wire scourge, applied to the face.

 

[Katzndogz]

you can't shoot a fleeing individual and claim self defense. so go ahead, shoot with extreme prejudice, and then go rot in jail

he already crossed the threshold with assault with a deadly weapon. I have no idea on whether he will turn back. Nice try....

yeah. you'd go to jail on at least manslaughter charges. there's a pharmacist in oklahoma that i can refer you to if you doubt it.

So far neither of the men who shot these thugs nor the one that stabbed two and killed one have been prosecuted for their bravery and heroism.

 

[ogibillm]

he already crossed the threshold with assault with a deadly weapon. I have no idea on whether he will turn back. Nice try....

yeah. you'd go to jail on at least manslaughter charges. there's a pharmacist in oklahoma that i can refer you to if you doubt it.

So far neither of the men who shot these thugs nor the one that stabbed two and killed one have been prosecuted for their bravery and heroism.

none of them were fleeing.

and bravery and heroism is a bit much for bringing a gun to a fist fight.

 

[Rozman]

Hard to defend yourself when you are out cold before you hit the ground face first...
And not a word from the prominent black leaders of our time.
They only seem interested once or twice every few years when a white commits a crime against a black.
Then it's news for weeks....

 

[AmericanFirst]

Let me guess. You think your point of view on this is a "conservative" one, right?

Scenario:

Guy comes up to you.....you are armed with your glock....and attempts to taze you. His tazer malfunctions and he quickly turns to run away.

You gonna shoot him in the back?

Nope, legs.

 

[Antares]

Rabid dog........human being........

Lawless thug dead.
End of story.

 

[Rambunctious]

Apparently this happened in August. This video just came out now.

Some slimeball tried the street-gang stunt where you sneak up on someone and hit him as hard as you can (or in this case tase him) to try to knock him out. A complete stranger who never did anything to you.

This time the slimeball's taser malfunctioned. And then he quickly found out the victim was armed.

Now the slimeball has been in jail for the last few months, recovering from gunshot wounds. Gee, that's too bad.

Turns out the slimeball had done this 6 or 7 times.

Now he calls it a "lesson learned".

I would call that Justice... except that his other half dozen victims haven't had their shot at him yet.

See video: @WZ - YouTube

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

LoneLaugher clearly hasn't ventured out of his bubble much.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Idiot. I posed a hypothetical. The willingness of some Internet warriors to proclaim that they would shoot a fleeing man in the back.......is way more interesting than your dopey comment about bubbles.

How about you, dummy. Would you shoot a man in the back as he ran away from you? That is....if you were permitted by law to possess a firearm?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Cool story bro..wait, that's not a street gang stunt. Its already sinister enough without adding in bullshit just for effect

You're right, its not a gang thing. It's a black thing.

Glad you corrected the record.

 

[Antares]

Idiot. I posed a hypothetical. The willingness of some Internet warriors to proclaim that they would shoot a fleeing man in the back.......is way more interesting than your dopey comment about bubbles.

How about you, dummy. Would you shoot a man in the back as he ran away from you? That is....if you were permitted by law to possess a firearm?

You are a sissy ass with no real life experience.

I am a military trained shooter....

Try and knock me out.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Idiot. I posed a hypothetical. The willingness of some Internet warriors to proclaim that they would shoot a fleeing man in the back.......is way more interesting than your dopey comment about bubbles.

How about you, dummy. Would you shoot a man in the back as he ran away from you? That is....if you were permitted by law to possess a firearm?

No I would not. Nor would I judge someone who did. Changes nothing about the bubble you've encased yourself in.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The black culture & community seems to be imploding.

Can you imagine if this were white teens attacking elderly blacks and black women?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Idiot. I posed a hypothetical. The willingness of some Internet warriors to proclaim that they would shoot a fleeing man in the back.......is way more interesting than your dopey comment about bubbles.

How about you, dummy. Would you shoot a man in the back as he ran away from you? That is....if you were permitted by law to possess a firearm?

You are a sissy ass with no real life experience.

I am a military trained shooter....

Try and knock me out.

You are a military trained shooter?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Idiot. I posed a hypothetical. The willingness of some Internet warriors to proclaim that they would shoot a fleeing man in the back.......is way more interesting than your dopey comment about bubbles.

How about you, dummy. Would you shoot a man in the back as he ran away from you? That is....if you were permitted by law to possess a firearm?

No I would not. Nor would I judge someone who did. Changes nothing about the bubble you've encased yourself in.

You would not judge someone? Are you serious? ALL YOU DO IS JUDGE PEOPLE.

In this thread, you are judging black Americans. Do you realize that?