Gun-Free Zones

[PoliticalChic]

I love when the brainless (see what I did there?) post....they make it soooooo easy.


Watch this:


. “Obama In Paris: Mass Shootings Don’t Happen In Other Countries…. The only problem with his answer was that he was standing in Paris, where a mass shooting conducted by Islamic State terrorists had just taken place, killing over 100 people.”
Obama In Paris: Mass Shootings Don’t Happen In Other Countries | Breitbart

“'Children's bodies are everywhere': NINETEEN people are killed in Crimean school massacre after student walks into canteen and opens fire –“ Crimea shooting: NINETEEN people are killed in school massacre | Daily Mail Online

Yeah they have a real problem, a mass shooting every few years. We are lucky to go a week. You are indeed brainless.

Link or lie?

You want me to link to the mass shootings they don’t have? How about we compare homicide rates? Here it takes an angry kid for a mass shooting, there international terrorists. How dumb are you?

OK....time for the education you are so sorely lacking.



1. "In fact, what the media isn’t saying is that many of the fatalities in the Mass Shooting Tracker are actually gang-related – not acts of terrorism or irrational mayhem.


According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 12,272 deaths from gunfire in the US so far in 2015. But of these 12,272 deaths, 4,038 stemmed from an officer-involved shooting, 2,085 from a home invasion robbery, 1,755 from accidents, and 1,133 from self-defense.


The number of people killed in “mass shootings” to date in 2015 is 309 – but even these “mass shootings” include gang violence, robberies, and family murder-suicide incidents. As Mark Follman points out in the New York Times, “including them in the same breath suggests that a 1 am gang fight in a Sacramento restaurant, in which two were killed and two injured, is the same kind of event as a deranged man walking into a community college classroom and massacring nine and injuring nine others.”


When you eliminate incidents like gang shootouts, robberies and family murder-suicides, it turns out the number of “mass shootings” are actually far less than the media is claiming.


Mother Jones, that bastion of gun rights fanaticism, counts 73 incidents of mass shootings over the past three decades – roughly two a year."
MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?


- See more at: MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?






2. "On December 3, The Washington Post reported that gun crime has been on the decline for about 20 years, except for high-profile shootings in gun-free zones; WaPo claims those shootings are on the increase.

According to WaPo, “In 1993, there were seven homicides by firearm for every 100,000 Americans. … By 2013, that figure had fallen by nearly half, to 3.6 [per 100,000].”


Breitbart News previously pointed to this decline and explained it correlated with a massive increase in privately owned firearms over the same period of time. For example,Congressional Research Service showed that the number of privately owned firearms increased from 192 million in 1994 to 310 million in 2009. And record background checks under Obama make it easy to see how tens of millions more privately owned guns have found their way into Americans’ hands since 2009.

So gun ownership increased for 20 years, but “gun homicides” decreased–except in gun free zones." WaPo: Gun Violence Declining, Except in Gun-Free Zones




3. "More than 40 percent of all 2015’s mass shootings didn’t kill anybody. Another 104, just under 30 percent, had a single fatality, which means more than two-thirds of all “mass shootings” aren’t even multi-homicide events.

Of the 355 “mass shootings” noted by the Post, only 40 of them (about 11 percent) meet the threshold of a “mass murder” as defined by the FBI, meaning there were at least four fatalities. But even these weren’t all mass shootings in the conventional sense. As pointed out by the Washington Free Beacon, many of them were insteadgrisly murder-suicides, gangland massacres, or robberies, eliminating at least 15 more “mass shootings” from the list."
355?! Why This Number Is Meaningless When It Comes To Mass Shootings





Did you notice that everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.....unlike you, brainless.



I guess you have to retract this, " We are lucky to go a week."


Smashed another custard pie in your ugly kisser!!!!

And we have mass shootings constantly. Our homicide rate is 4-5X higher than countries with strong gun control. You can flop around all you want, we have mass shootings regularly. Law enforcement gunned down regularly. Problems gun control countries don’t have.

"And we have mass shootings constantly. "

So now you need an English lesson???


Sure, you dunce.


constantly
adverb
con·stant·ly | \ ˈkän(t)-stənt-lē \
Definition of constantly


1: without variation, deviation, or change : ALWAYSconstantly on the alertconstantly improvinga temperature that's constantly maintained… the fear of the sea was constantly in my mind, battling with the fear of my companions.— Robert Louis Stevenson
2: with regular occurrence : INCESSANTLY


So, 'constantly' more accurately refers to your drooling.



"Mother Jones, that bastion of gun rights fanaticism, counts 73 incidents of mass shootings over the past three decades – roughly two a year."
MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?


Two a year....like the number of times you go for your worming.

 

[Brain357]

Yeah they have a real problem, a mass shooting every few years. We are lucky to go a week. You are indeed brainless.

Link or lie?

You want me to link to the mass shootings they don’t have? How about we compare homicide rates? Here it takes an angry kid for a mass shooting, there international terrorists. How dumb are you?

OK....time for the education you are so sorely lacking.



1. "In fact, what the media isn’t saying is that many of the fatalities in the Mass Shooting Tracker are actually gang-related – not acts of terrorism or irrational mayhem.


According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 12,272 deaths from gunfire in the US so far in 2015. But of these 12,272 deaths, 4,038 stemmed from an officer-involved shooting, 2,085 from a home invasion robbery, 1,755 from accidents, and 1,133 from self-defense.


The number of people killed in “mass shootings” to date in 2015 is 309 – but even these “mass shootings” include gang violence, robberies, and family murder-suicide incidents. As Mark Follman points out in the New York Times, “including them in the same breath suggests that a 1 am gang fight in a Sacramento restaurant, in which two were killed and two injured, is the same kind of event as a deranged man walking into a community college classroom and massacring nine and injuring nine others.”


When you eliminate incidents like gang shootouts, robberies and family murder-suicides, it turns out the number of “mass shootings” are actually far less than the media is claiming.


Mother Jones, that bastion of gun rights fanaticism, counts 73 incidents of mass shootings over the past three decades – roughly two a year."
MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?


- See more at: MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?






2. "On December 3, The Washington Post reported that gun crime has been on the decline for about 20 years, except for high-profile shootings in gun-free zones; WaPo claims those shootings are on the increase.

According to WaPo, “In 1993, there were seven homicides by firearm for every 100,000 Americans. … By 2013, that figure had fallen by nearly half, to 3.6 [per 100,000].”


Breitbart News previously pointed to this decline and explained it correlated with a massive increase in privately owned firearms over the same period of time. For example,Congressional Research Service showed that the number of privately owned firearms increased from 192 million in 1994 to 310 million in 2009. And record background checks under Obama make it easy to see how tens of millions more privately owned guns have found their way into Americans’ hands since 2009.

So gun ownership increased for 20 years, but “gun homicides” decreased–except in gun free zones." WaPo: Gun Violence Declining, Except in Gun-Free Zones




3. "More than 40 percent of all 2015’s mass shootings didn’t kill anybody. Another 104, just under 30 percent, had a single fatality, which means more than two-thirds of all “mass shootings” aren’t even multi-homicide events.

Of the 355 “mass shootings” noted by the Post, only 40 of them (about 11 percent) meet the threshold of a “mass murder” as defined by the FBI, meaning there were at least four fatalities. But even these weren’t all mass shootings in the conventional sense. As pointed out by the Washington Free Beacon, many of them were insteadgrisly murder-suicides, gangland massacres, or robberies, eliminating at least 15 more “mass shootings” from the list."
355?! Why This Number Is Meaningless When It Comes To Mass Shootings





Did you notice that everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.....unlike you, brainless.



I guess you have to retract this, " We are lucky to go a week."


Smashed another custard pie in your ugly kisser!!!!

And we have mass shootings constantly. Our homicide rate is 4-5X higher than countries with strong gun control. You can flop around all you want, we have mass shootings regularly. Law enforcement gunned down regularly. Problems gun control countries don’t have.

"And we have mass shootings constantly. "

So now you need an English lesson???


Sure, you dunce.


constantly
adverb
con·stant·ly | \ ˈkän(t)-stənt-lē \
Definition of constantly


1: without variation, deviation, or change : ALWAYSconstantly on the alertconstantly improvinga temperature that's constantly maintained… the fear of the sea was constantly in my mind, battling with the fear of my companions.— Robert Louis Stevenson
2: with regular occurrence : INCESSANTLY


So, 'constantly' more accurately refers to your drooling.



"Mother Jones, that bastion of gun rights fanaticism, counts 73 incidents of mass shootings over the past three decades – roughly two a year."
MercatorNet: Are these horrific mass killings really happening ‘daily’?


Two a year....like the number of times you go for your worming.

Your lies are getting impressive.

List of mass shootings in the United States - Wikipedia

 

[M14 Shooter]

Gun free zones get people killed.
As intended.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

 

[Brain357]

Gun free zones get people killed.
As intended.

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

 

[Brain357]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

Must be coincidence that country with most guns and weak laws has most gun problems. For sure.

 

[Brain357]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

Sure working well here.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

Must be coincidence that country with most guns and weak laws has most gun problems. For sure.

So... you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc?
Why then did you bring it up?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

Sure working well here.

So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?

 

[Brain357]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

Must be coincidence that country with most guns and weak laws has most gun problems. For sure.

So... you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc?
Why then did you bring it up?

Probably has something to do with the lack of guns....

 

[emilynghiem]

Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'

One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.


1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college

a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com

QED....Liberalism....insanity.

The worse one was the Fort Hood Shooting,
where trained officers on a military base couldn't
even defend themselves.

After that one made no sense,
nothing else does either!

 

[Brain357]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

Sure working well here.

So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?

Because it’s true. We have the most guns and most gun deaths. That sure proves my claim.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

Must be coincidence that country with most guns and weak laws has most gun problems. For sure.

So... you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc?
Why then did you bring it up?

Probably has something to do with the lack of guns....

That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?

 

[Brain357]

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings. Their police aren’t shot regularly either. And they don’t have a school shooting problem. Oh and their homicide rates are a small fraction of ours.

Why is that?

Must be coincidence that country with most guns and weak laws has most gun problems. For sure.

So... you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc?
Why then did you bring it up?

Probably has something to do with the lack of guns....

That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?

Cause real gun control works. Even the obvious goes right over your head.

 

[miketx]

The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.

The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.

Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.

More guns is the problem - not the answer.

Bullshit, if you filth couldn't lie the bandwidth limit would never be reached.

 

[rightwinger]

Get rid of gun free zones
What a concept

So parents visiting your child’s school can sling an AK 47 as they walk down the hall

The loud drunk sitting next to you at the bar can fondle his Glock

The idiot at the football game with the other teams jersey can bring along his assault rifle

 

[M14 Shooter]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

Sure working well here.

So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?

Because it’s true. We have the most guns and most gun deaths. That sure proves my claim.

How dumb are you?
As you cannot show the necessary relationship between "most guns" and "most gun deaths", your statement -- even if true - does not prove your claim.
You are indeed brainless.

.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?

Cause real gun control work.

Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.

 

[Brain357]

Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.

You cannot prove this to be true.

Sure working well here.

So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?

Because it’s true. We have the most guns and most gun deaths. That sure proves my claim.

How dumb are you?
As you cannot show the necessary relationship between "most guns" and "most gun deaths", you statement -- even if true - does not prove your claim.
You are indeed brainless.

.

Yes you are brainless. The facts don’t lie, but you sure do.