Gun-Free Zones

You cannot prove this to be true.
Sure working well here.
So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?
Because it’s true. We have the most guns and most gun deaths. That sure proves my claim.
How dumb are you?
As you cannot show the necessary relationship between "most guns" and "most gun deaths", you statement -- even if true - does not prove your claim.
You are indeed brainless.
Yes you are brainless. The facts don’t lie, but you sure do.
I accept your concession of the point.
Run along now, son.
 
Sure working well here.
So, not only can you not prove your claim true, you -know- you cannot prove your claim true.
Why then did you make said claim?
Because it’s true. We have the most guns and most gun deaths. That sure proves my claim.
How dumb are you?
As you cannot show the necessary relationship between "most guns" and "most gun deaths", you statement -- even if true - does not prove your claim.
You are indeed brainless.
Yes you are brainless. The facts don’t lie, but you sure do.
I accept your concession of the point.
Run along now, son.
Your point seems to be ignoring the facts. Continue on with that if you wish.
 
Which specific gun free zones do people want to bring their guns to?
 
The worse one was the Fort Hood Shooting,
where trained officers on a military base couldn't
even defend themselves.
After that one made no sense,
nothing else does either!
Anti-gun loons support gun free zones because it provides the opportunity to prey on the unarmed.
This provides two benefits:
- More dead bodies - hopefully of white middle class kids - to promote their mindless anti-gun agenda
- More calls for the state to provide for the safety and security of the public

The ends, you see, justify the means.
 
Last edited:
The worse one was the Fort Hood Shooting,
where trained officers on a military base couldn't
even defend themselves.
After that one made no sense,
nothing else does either!
Anti-gun loons support gun free zones because it provides the opportunity to prey on the unarmed.
This provides two benefits:
- More dead bodies - hopefully of white middle class kids - to promote their mindless anti-gun agenda
- More calls for the state to provide for the safety and security of the public

The end, you see, justify the means.
Pro gun loons want more and more dangerous guns available. We regularly have a new worst mass shooting thanks to weapons pro gun loons made legal. The guns used in Vegas should have been illegal.
 
That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?
Cause real gun control work.
Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.
And yet countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours. Sorry you lose kid.
Which Countries?
And are you measuring as a percentage of population or are you simply using raw numbers which is an invalid way of counting them considering we have a higher population that most other countries?
 
That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?
Cause real gun control work.
Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.
And yet countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours. Sorry you lose kid.
Which Countries?
And are you measuring as a percentage of population or are you simply using raw numbers which is an invalid way of counting them considering we have a higher population that most other countries?
Using rates obviously. UK, Germany, France, Japan, Denmark.. many to choose from really.
 
That sounds like a guess on your part.
I'll ask again:
If you don't know why countries with strong gun control don’t have constant mass shootings, etc, why did you bring it up?
Cause real gun control work.
Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.
And yet countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours. Sorry you lose kid.
Which Countries?
And are you measuring as a percentage of population or are you simply using raw numbers which is an invalid way of counting them considering we have a higher population that most other countries?
Using rates obviously. UK, Germany, France, Japan, Denmark.. many to choose from really.
Where is your link proving such a claim?
 
The worse one was the Fort Hood Shooting,
where trained officers on a military base couldn't
even defend themselves.
After that one made no sense,
nothing else does either!
Anti-gun loons support gun free zones because it provides the opportunity to prey on the unarmed.
This provides two benefits:
- More dead bodies - hopefully of white middle class kids - to promote their mindless anti-gun agenda
- More calls for the state to provide for the safety and security of the public

The ends, you see, justify the means.
Which specific gun free zones do you want to eliminate?
 
Cause real gun control work.
Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.
And yet countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours. Sorry you lose kid.
Which Countries?
And are you measuring as a percentage of population or are you simply using raw numbers which is an invalid way of counting them considering we have a higher population that most other countries?
Using rates obviously. UK, Germany, France, Japan, Denmark.. many to choose from really.
Where is your link proving such a claim?
This actually news to you?

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia
 
Gun free zones get people killed.
As intended.
Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.



Which gun laws do criminals obey?
Oh you are back. No comment on France having years with no mass shootings while we have them regularly?



1. What gun laws will criminals obey?

Or.....are gun laws merely meant to restrict law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves from the criminals that Liberals support?


2. Since Liberals favor open borders, why would there be any expectation that illegal guns wouldn't always be available to criminals?


3. Why did you choose an avi so clearly the obverse of your condition?
 
Homicide rates
US 5.35
Japan .28
UK 1.2
Italy .67
France 1.35

Oh and mass shootings are rare. School shootings almost never happen. Cops getting shot almost never happens.... only with our gun culture.
 
Gun free zones get people killed.
As intended.
Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.



Which gun laws do criminals obey?
Oh you are back. No comment on France having years with no mass shootings while we have them regularly?



1. What gun laws will criminals obey?

Or.....are gun laws merely meant to restrict law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves from the criminals that Liberals support?


2. Since Liberals favor open borders, why would there be any expectation that illegal guns would always be available to criminals?


3. Why did you choose an avi so clearly the obverse of your condition?
Oh you jump around again. Try to focus. We have mass shootings constantly and France goes years without them. Their homicide rate is a fraction of ours. This is true with countries with strong gun control.
 
Gun free zones get people killed.
As intended.
Weak gun laws get people killed and sell guns as intended.



Which gun laws do criminals obey?
Oh you are back. No comment on France having years with no mass shootings while we have them regularly?



1. What gun laws will criminals obey?

Or.....are gun laws merely meant to restrict law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves from the criminals that Liberals support?


2. Since Liberals favor open borders, why would there be any expectation that illegal guns would always be available to criminals?


3. Why did you choose an avi so clearly the obverse of your condition?
Oh you jump around again. Try to focus. We have mass shootings constantly and France goes years without them. Their homicide rate is a fraction of ours. This is true with countries with strong gun control.




Don't be afraid.....confront the reality of gun laws.

1. What gun laws will criminals obey?

Or.....are gun laws merely meant to restrict law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves from the criminals that Liberals support?


2. Since Liberals favor open borders, why would there be any expectation that illegal guns wouldn't always be available to criminals?


3. Why did you choose an avi so clearly the obverse of your condition?
 
Your lies are getting impressive.
You cannot show this to be true.
And yet countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours. Sorry you lose kid.
Which Countries?
And are you measuring as a percentage of population or are you simply using raw numbers which is an invalid way of counting them considering we have a higher population that most other countries?
Using rates obviously. UK, Germany, France, Japan, Denmark.. many to choose from really.
Where is your link proving such a claim?
This actually news to you?

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia
Homicide by what weapon gun, dagger, axe, etc. You need to check for gun deaths period or it doesn't count.
 

Forum List

Back
Top