Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
From the looks of him....all his life.
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
From the looks of him....all his life....
Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'
One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.
1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college
a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com
QED....Liberalism....insanity.
It was not a "gun free zone"
UPDATE OCT 1, 2015 8:09 PM
The conservative site Breitbart and others assert that guns were banned at UCC. This is not true. The student code of conduct bans guns "without written authorization." Under Oregon law, the university could not ban people with a valid concealed carry license from bringing their weapons on campus. (They could ban gun from various buildings and facilities.) Conservative writer Dana Loesch, who initially claimed the campus was a "gun free zone," updated her article to clarify that individuals with concealed carry permits were allowed to bring guns on campus.
There was, in fact, someone on campus with a concealed carry weapon at the time of the massacre. A local reporter explained to CNN that it was legal for him to have such a weapon on campus.
UCC Was Not A āGun Free Zoneā Because Public Colleges In Oregon Canāt Ban Guns
Gads....you Libs are screaming like stuck pigs...
I guess you recognize that the blood of the victims is on your hands, huh?
"Umpqua Community College is a posted Gun Free Zone but allows concealed carry under Oregon law. The college security page states the following:
āPossession, use, or threatened use of firearms (including but not limited to BB guns, air guns, water pistols, and paint guns) ammunition, explosives, dangerous chemicals, or any other objects as weapons on college property, except as expressly authorized by law or college regulations, is prohibited.
Possession of knives with a blade longer than 4ā is prohibited.
Brandishing weapons is prohibited.
Misuse of personal defensive weapons ā e.g., pepper spray, etc. is prohibited. The owner is responsible and accountable for any misuse of these devices.ā
Read more: Shooting at Umpqua Community College, Oregon
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
From the looks of him....all his life....
Now....if it turns out that this savage grew up in parochial schools......it'd be headline news throughout the MSM.
Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'
One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.
1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college
a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com
QED....Liberalism....insanity.
It was not a "gun free zone"
UPDATE OCT 1, 2015 8:09 PM
The conservative site Breitbart and others assert that guns were banned at UCC. This is not true. The student code of conduct bans guns "without written authorization." Under Oregon law, the university could not ban people with a valid concealed carry license from bringing their weapons on campus. (They could ban gun from various buildings and facilities.) Conservative writer Dana Loesch, who initially claimed the campus was a "gun free zone," updated her article to clarify that individuals with concealed carry permits were allowed to bring guns on campus.
There was, in fact, someone on campus with a concealed carry weapon at the time of the massacre. A local reporter explained to CNN that it was legal for him to have such a weapon on campus.
UCC Was Not A āGun Free Zoneā Because Public Colleges In Oregon Canāt Ban Guns
Gads....you Libs are screaming like stuck pigs...
I guess you recognize that the blood of the victims is on your hands, huh?
"Umpqua Community College is a posted Gun Free Zone but allows concealed carry under Oregon law. The college security page states the following:
āPossession, use, or threatened use of firearms (including but not limited to BB guns, air guns, water pistols, and paint guns) ammunition, explosives, dangerous chemicals, or any other objects as weapons on college property, except as expressly authorized by law or college regulations, is prohibited.
Possession of knives with a blade longer than 4ā is prohibited.
Brandishing weapons is prohibited.
Misuse of personal defensive weapons ā e.g., pepper spray, etc. is prohibited. The owner is responsible and accountable for any misuse of these devices.ā
Read more: Shooting at Umpqua Community College, Oregon
So you are wrong.
The law says if you have a ccw, you can carry on College grounds.
That is compltely wrong. Students at the college are not allowed to carry. The campus is posted as a gun free zone.The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.
The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.
Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.
More guns is the problem - not the answer.
If you didnt have wrong facts, you'd have no facts at all.
View attachment 51284
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
From the looks of him....all his life....
Now....if it turns out that this savage grew up in parochial schools......it'd be headline news throughout the MSM.
If you weren't married you might have answered that ad.
Sounds like he was up your alley.
That is compltely wrong. Students at the college are not allowed to carry. The campus is posted as a gun free zone.The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.
The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.
Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.
More guns is the problem - not the answer.
If you didnt have wrong facts, you'd have no facts at all.
This is a lie, one easily proved by using google so you have no excuse
Idiot. The law also says schools can post no-carry. And this one did.Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'
One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.
1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college
a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com
QED....Liberalism....insanity.
It was not a "gun free zone"
UPDATE OCT 1, 2015 8:09 PM
The conservative site Breitbart and others assert that guns were banned at UCC. This is not true. The student code of conduct bans guns "without written authorization." Under Oregon law, the university could not ban people with a valid concealed carry license from bringing their weapons on campus. (They could ban gun from various buildings and facilities.) Conservative writer Dana Loesch, who initially claimed the campus was a "gun free zone," updated her article to clarify that individuals with concealed carry permits were allowed to bring guns on campus.
There was, in fact, someone on campus with a concealed carry weapon at the time of the massacre. A local reporter explained to CNN that it was legal for him to have such a weapon on campus.
UCC Was Not A āGun Free Zoneā Because Public Colleges In Oregon Canāt Ban Guns
Gads....you Libs are screaming like stuck pigs...
I guess you recognize that the blood of the victims is on your hands, huh?
"Umpqua Community College is a posted Gun Free Zone but allows concealed carry under Oregon law. The college security page states the following:
āPossession, use, or threatened use of firearms (including but not limited to BB guns, air guns, water pistols, and paint guns) ammunition, explosives, dangerous chemicals, or any other objects as weapons on college property, except as expressly authorized by law or college regulations, is prohibited.
Possession of knives with a blade longer than 4ā is prohibited.
Brandishing weapons is prohibited.
Misuse of personal defensive weapons ā e.g., pepper spray, etc. is prohibited. The owner is responsible and accountable for any misuse of these devices.ā
Read more: Shooting at Umpqua Community College, Oregon
So you are wrong.
The law says if you have a ccw, you can carry on College grounds.
WHich one of is lying, asshole? The school was posted. It was a gun free zone.That is compltely wrong. Students at the college are not allowed to carry. The campus is posted as a gun free zone.The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.
The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.
Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.
More guns is the problem - not the answer.
If you didnt have wrong facts, you'd have no facts at all.
This is a lie, one easily proved by using google so you have no excuse
Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'
One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.
1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college
a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com
QED....Liberalism....insanity.
WHich one of is lying, asshole? The school was posted. It was a gun free zone.That is compltely wrong. Students at the college are not allowed to carry. The campus is posted as a gun free zone.The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.
The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.
Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.
More guns is the problem - not the answer.
If you didnt have wrong facts, you'd have no facts at all.
This is a lie, one easily proved by using google so you have no excuse
Most state laws allow private property to be posted. In this case it is a state school and most schools have laws prohibiting carry on school grounds.Splashed across the headlines, one more result of the Legal initiative known as 'Gun-Free Zones.'
One ineffective, inane, policy, like welfare, that accomplished the very opposite of the problem it claims to solve.
1. "Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college"Ten killed in shooting at Ore. community college
a. And, another result of Liberal antipathy to religion:
"Father of Umpqua college shooting victim: Gunman singled out Christians" Umpqua College gunman apparently targeted Christians - CNN.com
QED....Liberalism....insanity.
Are gun-free zones even legal? Can't put up a sign and contravene a law allowing possession of a weapon on your person if only a private company can you? Is it a private property thing enabling it?
View attachment 51284
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
From the looks of him....all his life....
Now....if it turns out that this savage grew up in parochial schools......it'd be headline news throughout the MSM.
If you weren't married you might have answered that ad.
Sounds like he was up your alley.
The Oregon shooting was not a "gun free zone" and, in fact, there's no such thing. It was reported yesterday that there was an armed guard on campus but they're now saying there was not. Students at that college are allowed cc guns.
The gun nuts who say more guns will keep us safe never think it through. They've said they want armed teachers, armed students and even want very young students to have access to guns.
Unless the shooter obeys a sign that says: Start shooting here because these people are armed, there's little reason to believe the guns would be in the right place at the right time. More to the point, victims would not, could not react fast enough to stop the shooter. While the teacher or student fumbling to get their own gun out, the shooter has finished his rampage and shot himself.
More guns is the problem - not the answer.
View attachment 51284
Chris Harper-MercerPhoto: Myspace
Gunman Chris Harper-Mercerās disdain for religion was evident in an online profile, in which he became a member of a ādoesnāt like organized religionā group on an Internet dating site.
I wonder how much time he spent in government schools.
From the looks of him....all his life....
Now....if it turns out that this savage grew up in parochial schools......it'd be headline news throughout the MSM.
If you weren't married you might have answered that ad.
Sounds like he was up your alley.
'Chris Harper Mercer...conservative, republican'
This is what I've found .....not a public school grad...
"Lists of South Bay graduates from 2009 published in the Daily Breeze showed Harper Mercer graduated from the Switzer Learning Center in Torrance with four other students. Switzer teaches students with learning disabilities and emotional issues.
A former behavioral aide at Switzer, who did not want her name used, said the majority of the students at the school are from foster, low-income and single-parent homes. Some of these students were expelled from other schools or had been in trouble with the law.
The school is divided among special needs students and those with behavioral problems."
Oregon gunman Chris Harper-Mercer lived in Torrance, graduated from Switzer Center
As much as I regret it....it seems he is one or our nuts.
All that remains now if for you to take responsibility for Jared Lee Loughner one of your nuts....a Democrat raised in a school directly financed by Barack Obama.
The reason for this thread: the second amendment should be honored....the law-abiding, because they are law-abiding, should be free to carry guns.
Imagine....if the victims of Chris Harper Mercer and Jared Lee Loughner were all armed, and not disenfranchised due to Liberal gun-free zone policies, we might not be having this conversation.
In fact, even as crazy as they each were.....they might have had second thoughts about attacking an armed populace.
