Guess The Far Left Is Still In Panic Mode Because Of Trump's High Approval Going Into The Mid-Terms.

Because it is protected class by you far left drones.

It has only been posted over and over on this board. Thread after thread.

So if you missed all those threads and all those posts, then nothing I post here will make any difference!

Gee Why don't you move to Canada and just stay and see what "rights" you have there.

But yes someone that is illegal that get deported over and over and then kills someone get to be released back into the public, is a prime example. How many convicted murders do you see walk free that are US citizens?

You can thank the far left for that one.

So, a convicted illegal immigrant murderer was just let free? Can you provide a link to something?

Seriously you just asked for a link?

Man you far left drones really do not pay attrition to the outside world do you!

Next you will be wanting link proving the sky is blue.

Do your own research, learn about the outside world!

Again those threads on the board, do a search.

I’m asking you to support your assertion.

It seems like you can’t or won’t.

Either way, it’s an automatic debate loss.

No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!

Dude.

I can walk outside and see blue sky.

I cannot walk outside and see an illegal alien convicted of murder being set free.

If it’s so common, you should easily find a link to support YOUR assertion.

Do you really need to be shamed into supporting your argument?

Yes next you will want links proving that people come into the US illegally.

My "assertions" has already been supported, you need to research it if you want a real debate and know what is happening.

You need to be able to know both sides in order to have a debate, you only know one, the far left side.

Once you educate yourself off far left hack sites, then maybe a real debate can take place.
 
So, a convicted illegal immigrant murderer was just let free? Can you provide a link to something?

Seriously you just asked for a link?

Man you far left drones really do not pay attrition to the outside world do you!

Next you will be wanting link proving the sky is blue.

Do your own research, learn about the outside world!

Again those threads on the board, do a search.

I’m asking you to support your assertion.

It seems like you can’t or won’t.

Either way, it’s an automatic debate loss.

No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!

Dude.

I can walk outside and see blue sky.

I cannot walk outside and see an illegal alien convicted of murder being set free.

If it’s so common, you should easily find a link to support YOUR assertion.

Do you really need to be shamed into supporting your argument?

Yes next you will want links proving that people come into the US illegally.

My "assertions" has already been supported, you need to research it if you want a real debate and know what is happening.

You need to be able to know both sides in order to have a debate, you only know one, the far left side.

Once you educate yourself off far left hack sites, then maybe a real debate can take place.

YOU made the original point. And refuse to support it with data, or even an anecdote.
 
Seriously you just asked for a link?

Man you far left drones really do not pay attrition to the outside world do you!

Next you will be wanting link proving the sky is blue.

Do your own research, learn about the outside world!

Again those threads on the board, do a search.

I’m asking you to support your assertion.

It seems like you can’t or won’t.

Either way, it’s an automatic debate loss.

No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!

Dude.

I can walk outside and see blue sky.

I cannot walk outside and see an illegal alien convicted of murder being set free.

If it’s so common, you should easily find a link to support YOUR assertion.

Do you really need to be shamed into supporting your argument?

Yes next you will want links proving that people come into the US illegally.

My "assertions" has already been supported, you need to research it if you want a real debate and know what is happening.

You need to be able to know both sides in order to have a debate, you only know one, the far left side.

Once you educate yourself off far left hack sites, then maybe a real debate can take place.

YOU made the original point. And refuse to support it with data, or even an anecdote.

My job in the debate is not to educate you, you should have done that already!

In order to have this debate you need to be educated on the subject. Come back when you have been.

Otherwise you would not have asked that question.

So get over your far left bias and educate yourself on the subject.

Learn what a real debate is and learn you need to know all sides in the debate, not just the far left side.

That is why it is pointless to "debate" with any far left drone!
 
I’m asking you to support your assertion.

It seems like you can’t or won’t.

Either way, it’s an automatic debate loss.

No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!

Dude.

I can walk outside and see blue sky.

I cannot walk outside and see an illegal alien convicted of murder being set free.

If it’s so common, you should easily find a link to support YOUR assertion.

Do you really need to be shamed into supporting your argument?

Yes next you will want links proving that people come into the US illegally.

My "assertions" has already been supported, you need to research it if you want a real debate and know what is happening.

You need to be able to know both sides in order to have a debate, you only know one, the far left side.

Once you educate yourself off far left hack sites, then maybe a real debate can take place.

YOU made the original point. And refuse to support it with data, or even an anecdote.

My job in the debate is not to educate you, you should have done that already!

In order to have this debate you need to be educated on the subject. Come back when you have been.

Otherwise you would not have asked that question.

So get over your far left bias and educate yourself on the subject.

Learn what a real debate is and learn you need to know all sides in the debate, not just the far left side.

That is why it is pointless to "debate" with any far left drone!

The only thing we’ve debated is why one should/shouldn’t support their own argument.

In fact, the whole thing has been dragged off tooic because of you.
 
Last edited:
Could you give some examples of more rights the left wants for illegal immigrants?

What are the extra rights?

Because it is protected class by you far left drones.

It has only been posted over and over on this board. Thread after thread.

So if you missed all those threads and all those posts, then nothing I post here will make any difference!

Gee Why don't you move to Canada and just stay and see what "rights" you have there.

But yes someone that is illegal that get deported over and over and then kills someone get to be released back into the public, is a prime example. How many convicted murders do you see walk free that are US citizens?

You can thank the far left for that one.

So, a convicted illegal immigrant murderer was just let free? Can you provide a link to something?

Seriously you just asked for a link?

Man you far left drones really do not pay attrition to the outside world do you!

Next you will be wanting link proving the sky is blue.

Do your own research, learn about the outside world!

Again those threads on the board, do a search.

I’m asking you to support your assertion.

It seems like you can’t or won’t.

Either way, it’s an automatic debate loss.

No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!
It's always up to the one making the claim to offer the proof. And BTW, it's "lose" not "loose."
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh

Yes thank you proving my point that it is not my job to educate you!

So when you get educated on the subject please come back.

You got it twisted.

You made the assertion. i asked a question. A question is not an assertion, no matter the extraordinary height and length of your illogical leaps in reading it as such.
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
It's your job to back up your claim, but by not doing so, then it's your "opinion" and not a fact.
 
No my assertion has already been supported many times, but you have to know the subject at hand, that is why I asked to do your own research. If you have to ask for proof of common knowledge then you loose the debate!

Just like asking for a link to the sky being blue!

Dude.

I can walk outside and see blue sky.

I cannot walk outside and see an illegal alien convicted of murder being set free.

If it’s so common, you should easily find a link to support YOUR assertion.

Do you really need to be shamed into supporting your argument?

Yes next you will want links proving that people come into the US illegally.

My "assertions" has already been supported, you need to research it if you want a real debate and know what is happening.

You need to be able to know both sides in order to have a debate, you only know one, the far left side.

Once you educate yourself off far left hack sites, then maybe a real debate can take place.

YOU made the original point. And refuse to support it with data, or even an anecdote.

My job in the debate is not to educate you, you should have done that already!

In order to have this debate you need to be educated on the subject. Come back when you have been.

Otherwise you would not have asked that question.

So get over your far left bias and educate yourself on the subject.

Learn what a real debate is and learn you need to know all sides in the debate, not just the far left side.

That is why it is pointless to "debate" with any far left drone!

The only thing we’ve debated is why one should/shouldn’t support their own argument.

In fact, the whole thing has been dragged off tooic because of you.

No it was because of you and not being educated on the subject at hand.

You chose to come after someone when you do not know the subject matter, not me.

My assertion still stands.

And thus proving the OP that the far left is in panic mode.
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
It's your job to back up your claim, but by not doing so, then it's your "opinion" and not a fact.

No when two sides debate they both know the subject matter. Read the rules posted on debate.

Clearly one person did not know it otherwise that question would not be asked.
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh

Yes thank you proving my point that it is not my job to educate you!

So when you get educated on the subject please come back.

You got it twisted.

You made the assertion. i asked a question. A question is not an assertion, no matter the extraordinary height and length of your illogical leaps in reading it as such.

Yes but you shown you do not know the subject matter, thus rendering your question moot.

Come back when you get educated on the subject matter.
 
Polls show as of today Donald Trump numbers are basically unchanged since being elected. The majority, 53% on average disapprove and 41% approve. How anyone can think these numbers indicate his approval numbers are going is unknown. Seems kind of delusional.
 
Polls show as of today Donald Trump numbers are basically unchanged since being elected. The majority, 53% on average disapprove and 41% approve. How anyone can think these numbers indicate his approval numbers are going is unknown. Seems kind of delusional.

Yes and we have seen Obama have high poll numbers yet lost 1000 seats across the nation and left the DNC bankrupt.

or do you far left drones just ignore that fact?
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
It's your job to back up your claim, but by not doing so, then it's your "opinion" and not a fact.

No when two sides debate they both know the subject matter. Read the rules posted on debate.

Clearly one person did not know it otherwise that question would not be asked.

According to evidence, you’re not educated on the subject, either.

It’s easy to make shit up that way, isn’t it?
 
Even though I thought it was common knowledge, let me support my point:

Rules of debate

Pay particular attention to rule #5. “He who asserts must prove.”

Kosh
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
It's your job to back up your claim, but by not doing so, then it's your "opinion" and not a fact.

No when two sides debate they both know the subject matter. Read the rules posted on debate.

Clearly one person did not know it otherwise that question would not be asked.

According to evidence, you’re not educated on the subject, either.

It’s easy to make shit up that way, isn’t it?

And how would you know if you say there is no evidence to support my assertion?

See that is why you need to be educated on any subject in order to have a debate.
 
I just told him the same thing, and corrected his grammar as an added bonus...

Oh my grammar/spelling Nazi..

If that is all you have then so be it, but you need to be educated on the subject!

Come back when you have been!

It is not my job to educate you in debate..
It's your job to back up your claim, but by not doing so, then it's your "opinion" and not a fact.

No when two sides debate they both know the subject matter. Read the rules posted on debate.

Clearly one person did not know it otherwise that question would not be asked.

According to evidence, you’re not educated on the subject, either.

It’s easy to make shit up that way, isn’t it?

And how would you know if you say there is no evidence to support my assertion?

See that is why you need to be educated on any subject in order to have a debate.

Since you aren’t providing evidence, the logical conclusion is that there isn’t any, or you could have put me in my place ages ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top