greenhouse gas measurements keep rising

Dot Com

Nullius in verba
Feb 15, 2011
52,842
7,882
1,830
Fairfax, NoVA
how much proof do deniers need??? :mad:

Greenhouse gas volumes reached new high in 2012 - WMO
"For all these major greenhouse gases the concentrations are reaching once again record levels," WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud told a news conference in Geneva at which he presented the U.N. climate agency's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin .

"This year is worse than last year, 2011. 2011 was worse than 2010," he said. "Every passing year makes the situation somewhat more difficult to handle, it makes it more challenging to stay under this symbolic 2 degree global average."

discuss...
 
No -- I won't discuss.. Not another thread that you abandon..

Tell me what you THINK this means in light of US CO2 emissions NOW BEING LOWER than they were in 2000...
 
how much proof do deniers need??? :mad:

Greenhouse gas volumes reached new high in 2012 - WMO
"For all these major greenhouse gases the concentrations are reaching once again record levels," WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud told a news conference in Geneva at which he presented the U.N. climate agency's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin .

"This year is worse than last year, 2011. 2011 was worse than 2010," he said. "Every passing year makes the situation somewhat more difficult to handle, it makes it more challenging to stay under this symbolic 2 degree global average."

discuss...

CO2 Does not drive climate
 
look up "global"

So what do want from me?

Your hero Doc Hansen just told you what to do.. Your weenie solar and wind aint a solution. Never was.. You need to revive and UPDATE a LOT of nuclear power in this country. And EXPORT the technology and the fuel to the rest of the world.

Get busy.... IF you believe this needs to happen... I personally don't think CO2 explains the Global climate..
 
meanwhile, Fukushima sits smoldering.

google this: fukushima contamination

And half of NE Japan is still swirling around in the PAcific. A garbage pile as large as Texas.. There were BIGGER losses in that disaster than Fukushima.

Tell ya what... IGNORING all those 65 yr old nuclear plants sitting around past their prime is just not smart.. But right now -- they are supplying 20% or so of your electricity.. Reliably and safely..

What's your point? You do not want a FIX for your imagined CO2 crisis? Doc Hansen and I just TOLD you how to fix the problem IMMEDIATELY...
 
Not only does this AVAILABLE tech fix solve your imaginary CO2 crisis --- but it also allows you to

1) Close every coal fired plant in the country.
2) Tear down the dams and free the salmon.
3) Save TENS of billions on subsidies for useless gimmicks and mining.
4) Charge all the silly EVs you want with truly zero emissions.

What the fuck you waiting on clown? Get crackin'...
 
There were BIGGER losses in that disaster than Fukushima.

Perhaps none so expensive to clean up.

There was some unexpected incompetence in the mgt of that plant. As indicated by the refusal to accept help DURING the crisis. The operators and volunteers are all heros. But some of the key industry flaks and some politicians need to be trashed.

They pretty much don't have a choice but to build the waste disposal on that site for the rest of the containment and clean-up.
 
Not only does this AVAILABLE tech fix solve your imaginary CO2 crisis --- but it also allows you to

1) Close every coal fired plant in the country.
2) Tear down the dams and free the salmon.
3) Save TENS of billions on subsidies for useless gimmicks and mining.
4) Charge all the silly EVs you want with truly zero emissions.

What the fuck you waiting on clown? Get crackin'...

theres one small "catch" though. One mistake, ONE, & you have a 10,000 year problem.

Oh!. Nice personal insult. :rolleyes:
 
Not only does this AVAILABLE tech fix solve your imaginary CO2 crisis --- but it also allows you to

1) Close every coal fired plant in the country.
2) Tear down the dams and free the salmon.
3) Save TENS of billions on subsidies for useless gimmicks and mining.
4) Charge all the silly EVs you want with truly zero emissions.

What the fuck you waiting on clown? Get crackin'...

theres one small "catch" though. One mistake, ONE, & you have a 10,000 year problem.

Oh!. Nice personal insult. :rolleyes:

Didnt we bomb hiroshima and nagasaki just 70 yrs ago? Why dont u check in and see when people are ever gonna live there again. Sorry for calling u a clown. Wanted to make sure u didnt dissappear yet.

Got a question for you that none of the folks standing in the way of reviving nuclear power have ever answered. WHICH are you more afraid off? The CERTAIN AND COMPLETE destruction of the planet by your Global Warming? Or the potential risks of generating electricity with nuclear power?
 
I'm saying that your single solution is too easy & has one BIG catch (see chernobyl) It might be better to use a mix of energy sources to help detox us off of carbon burning fuels
 
I'm saying that your single solution is too easy & has one BIG catch (see chernobyl) It might be better to use a mix of energy sources to help detox us off of carbon burning fuels

There are no other real alternatives. You be played. You cant run advanced societies on "maybe" power generation. Stuff thats on one hour and off the next. If thats what youre waiting for ----- and u believe co2 is apollutant ---- the worlds gonna burn before wind and solar provide more than 20% at best with costs u havent even been told about yet.

we gots what we gots. Fresh out of fairy dust.
 
how many reactors does Germany have running? :eusa_whistle:


They are idiots as proven by looking at the skyrocketing costs to consumers and (more importantly to you) the INCREASES in CO2 that they are producing..

EEG-Umlage-2003-2014.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top