- Thread starter
- #41
You claim a conspiracy among climate scientists. There is no conspiracy among climate scientists.
You claim climate scientists are dumb - or at least dumber than you. They are all much smarter than you.
You claim censorship in the science journals. There is no censorship in the science journals.
You claim there is no consensus for AGW. There is a very strong consensus for AGW.
You claim CO2 does not warm the atmosphere. CO2 warms the atmosphere.
You reject anthropogenicity because similar conditions have existed in the past. The past doesn't refute anthropogenicity.
You claim AGW has no evidence. AGW has mountains of evidence
You claim the records are being altered for an illicit cause. That records are not being altered for an illicit cause.
You claim climate scientists are dumb - or at least dumber than you. They are all much smarter than you.
You claim censorship in the science journals. There is no censorship in the science journals.
You claim there is no consensus for AGW. There is a very strong consensus for AGW.
You claim CO2 does not warm the atmosphere. CO2 warms the atmosphere.
You reject anthropogenicity because similar conditions have existed in the past. The past doesn't refute anthropogenicity.
You claim AGW has no evidence. AGW has mountains of evidence
You claim the records are being altered for an illicit cause. That records are not being altered for an illicit cause.