"A Well-Regulated Economy, Being Necessary to the Security of A Free State: Then the Rights of Nations to Global Commerce, Shall Not Be Infringed--and including without any interference from the gun nuts, the families believing: Mostly in the rights of Somali pirtates." An Anarchy actually arises from some of the foregoing(?), when Widespread Wealth Worldwide is in place. So For now, there is Worldwide outrage with the Republican lunatic fringe.
World to US: Stop 'tap dancing' and solve default crisis - World News
The origins of global commerce, in Western Civilization, are likely Summerian, 5000 years ago. 5000 years ago it was clear to the holy people that Cajones were the critical parts of a functioning and fertile commerce. Those with more to be stored were rewarded, in easily the first of the planet's usury, or interest rates. The redemption of the coinage would be the blessings of fertility--Lamborghinis actually not at all involved. A more serious backing of currency was involved. Fertility was the expected outcome.
Fixed percentage usury would be in place in extensive commerce. An outcome of that would be found in the Code of Hammarabi. The adult male unable to keep up in the fixed percentage, usury economy--could sell off the wife and kids to settle debts.
The original liberals would be said to have understood about aggravation(?).
The Code of Moses would arise a few hundred years later. Being more a code of relationships, then Western religions would go forward using that Code as a basis.
Jesus Ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Called, "O'Christ," would take from the Greek religions, most likely, and create an analysis of the Code of Moses. Actually, the Code was of human relationship rules. In fact you can even save your own sorry asses, even on the Sabbath. In Matthew 25:14-30, the above noted part of the Code of Hammarabi appears. The servant with one talent could never keep up in the original, Sumer-invented economy. "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth" would be the outcome of that reported, foreclosure crisis. The Code of Moses had not proposed a serious remedy. So that would originate in Matthew 20:1-16.
Israel had twice been conquered by the more advanced, Pantheon, civilizations. A vertical line, like a ruler, would have number points on it. Like in the Obama-Biden, Make-Work-Pay, refundable income tax credit. Then horizonal lines, of equal distance, could be drawn in at each scale point. Then the computing flaw of the Sumer economy would fit in as an upside down right-triangle, subject to the Pythagorean Theorem. In Matt. 25:14-30, the household that should have been enriched eight talents, was really only newly enriched seven. Probably that made sense at the time. For one thing, the deciminal point itself would not be invented for another thousand years. Seven likely made some sense.
Again, instead of "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth," and family members sold into slavery--a new and "Good" householder was described, who was different from the Sumer-economy based household. In the more modern context, WWII would be far less likely to happen--even though really, in fact it did happen. Famously, the millions would go off to the boxcars, and then to the death camps, in that celebration of, "Orgin of Species." There would be extensive, "Outer Darkness."
The Older, regulated economy of Adam Smith--even famous for regulation of the fixed percentage usury--would be replaced with a regulated economy--in any economy, well-understood. It would be based on a thriving market at all income levels. That would include the formerly poor. That never happens in the Conservative-regulated, Sumer economy. Usury is arithmetic, and easily a device of regulation.
Since everyone in any community suddenly would have a stake in any part of any other economy, or any sector of any economy: Then international, global attention, would be an expected outcome.
And so it now is.
In the more modern Matthew 25 kind of parallel, the world saw Cheney, the world saw Paulson, and the world saw Bush--not too really up on things, likely not too able to really keep up too much. An Al Gore White House, might have gone forward with an indexed flat amount, Refundable Income Tax Credit--to account for the inflation of the volume sales, and any scarcities noted going forward. The fixed percentage usury would remain in place, but in the way the Quakers say it: A remedy would also be in place.
The Clintons had acknowledged the new arithmetic explanation, February, 1992. Bush-Cheney made no similar advancement. The Clintons would famously avoid any mention of default. They could go forward with Amendment 14, in the New Economy. A credit market currency is in that Euclidean basis. Each of those lines can have an infinite number of points. Many will say that $55.0 tril of them, comes pretty close. Maybe Al Gore could have let them count those points in dimes, or even in pennies! Bush-Cheney, instead, would wonder at why the income tax cuts didn't work, with only half the filers having zero federal income tax liability. They were poor, anyway. Only the rich should buy(?)!
Anyone might think that in the U. S. House, they actually still think they are doing the right thing. Sir Issac Newton may have had the same delusions.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(And so Grandfather would climb to the mesa plateau, and see the vision: Billions and Billions running after young warrior, pitchfork, waving, torches bearing, hangman's rope in hand! "He shall be, 'Running Live Target Price,'" grandfather would announce! Someone would try to make the correction, "No! Grandfather. He shall be called, 'Live Running Target Practice!' He shall be called that, forever!" Grandfathers being what they are, of course, the Happy Hunting Ground had already happened. And so the vision name would be forever, not to be modified on any tongue--even with an earring, in it(?)!)
World to US: Stop 'tap dancing' and solve default crisis - World News
The origins of global commerce, in Western Civilization, are likely Summerian, 5000 years ago. 5000 years ago it was clear to the holy people that Cajones were the critical parts of a functioning and fertile commerce. Those with more to be stored were rewarded, in easily the first of the planet's usury, or interest rates. The redemption of the coinage would be the blessings of fertility--Lamborghinis actually not at all involved. A more serious backing of currency was involved. Fertility was the expected outcome.
Fixed percentage usury would be in place in extensive commerce. An outcome of that would be found in the Code of Hammarabi. The adult male unable to keep up in the fixed percentage, usury economy--could sell off the wife and kids to settle debts.
The original liberals would be said to have understood about aggravation(?).
The Code of Moses would arise a few hundred years later. Being more a code of relationships, then Western religions would go forward using that Code as a basis.
Jesus Ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Called, "O'Christ," would take from the Greek religions, most likely, and create an analysis of the Code of Moses. Actually, the Code was of human relationship rules. In fact you can even save your own sorry asses, even on the Sabbath. In Matthew 25:14-30, the above noted part of the Code of Hammarabi appears. The servant with one talent could never keep up in the original, Sumer-invented economy. "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth" would be the outcome of that reported, foreclosure crisis. The Code of Moses had not proposed a serious remedy. So that would originate in Matthew 20:1-16.
Israel had twice been conquered by the more advanced, Pantheon, civilizations. A vertical line, like a ruler, would have number points on it. Like in the Obama-Biden, Make-Work-Pay, refundable income tax credit. Then horizonal lines, of equal distance, could be drawn in at each scale point. Then the computing flaw of the Sumer economy would fit in as an upside down right-triangle, subject to the Pythagorean Theorem. In Matt. 25:14-30, the household that should have been enriched eight talents, was really only newly enriched seven. Probably that made sense at the time. For one thing, the deciminal point itself would not be invented for another thousand years. Seven likely made some sense.
Again, instead of "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth," and family members sold into slavery--a new and "Good" householder was described, who was different from the Sumer-economy based household. In the more modern context, WWII would be far less likely to happen--even though really, in fact it did happen. Famously, the millions would go off to the boxcars, and then to the death camps, in that celebration of, "Orgin of Species." There would be extensive, "Outer Darkness."
The Older, regulated economy of Adam Smith--even famous for regulation of the fixed percentage usury--would be replaced with a regulated economy--in any economy, well-understood. It would be based on a thriving market at all income levels. That would include the formerly poor. That never happens in the Conservative-regulated, Sumer economy. Usury is arithmetic, and easily a device of regulation.
Since everyone in any community suddenly would have a stake in any part of any other economy, or any sector of any economy: Then international, global attention, would be an expected outcome.
And so it now is.
In the more modern Matthew 25 kind of parallel, the world saw Cheney, the world saw Paulson, and the world saw Bush--not too really up on things, likely not too able to really keep up too much. An Al Gore White House, might have gone forward with an indexed flat amount, Refundable Income Tax Credit--to account for the inflation of the volume sales, and any scarcities noted going forward. The fixed percentage usury would remain in place, but in the way the Quakers say it: A remedy would also be in place.
The Clintons had acknowledged the new arithmetic explanation, February, 1992. Bush-Cheney made no similar advancement. The Clintons would famously avoid any mention of default. They could go forward with Amendment 14, in the New Economy. A credit market currency is in that Euclidean basis. Each of those lines can have an infinite number of points. Many will say that $55.0 tril of them, comes pretty close. Maybe Al Gore could have let them count those points in dimes, or even in pennies! Bush-Cheney, instead, would wonder at why the income tax cuts didn't work, with only half the filers having zero federal income tax liability. They were poor, anyway. Only the rich should buy(?)!
Anyone might think that in the U. S. House, they actually still think they are doing the right thing. Sir Issac Newton may have had the same delusions.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(And so Grandfather would climb to the mesa plateau, and see the vision: Billions and Billions running after young warrior, pitchfork, waving, torches bearing, hangman's rope in hand! "He shall be, 'Running Live Target Price,'" grandfather would announce! Someone would try to make the correction, "No! Grandfather. He shall be called, 'Live Running Target Practice!' He shall be called that, forever!" Grandfathers being what they are, of course, the Happy Hunting Ground had already happened. And so the vision name would be forever, not to be modified on any tongue--even with an earring, in it(?)!)
Last edited:
