GOP House Whip Scalise: Maybe In Fact Set To Free The Cows, Instead(?)!

[mascale]

So apparently in Louisiana, there are some yet unwilling to make a policy statement about Amendment 13, which abolished involuntary servitude--except that it was badly, (GOP), worded--and needed Amendment 14. Many are still unsure, of course, if Amendment 14 should be the more hated of the two. That one goes to civil liberties. You cannot just convict based on race, and set the coloreds back to slavery, allowed under Amendment 13. So why should anyone, maybe it is thought, apologize for what Amendment 13 was unable to do(?)!

Rep. Steve Scalise is widely now shown disinclined to apologize for previous Louisiana State Policy, regarding slavery.

Minutes highlight Scalise efforts to kill resolution apologizing for slavery

Anyone can see that the Republican, U. S. House members, know exactly who they need to convince(?)! Their leader, McCarthy, for example: Is from the Blue State of California. It is widely thought there that Amendments 13 and 14: Were actually a viable outcome. No doubt is left in doubt that the cows were not what Lincoln tried to free. . . .until this year(?).

The Republicans of 2015 seem yet unwilling to concede that they were only partially elected, even though "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is so far about them. The Senate is supposed to be imbalance, small state over large state. The House is supposed to be the other way around, on the basis that everyone in fact will vote.

What the Framers intended in the original document itself, of course, is not always openly discussed.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes now in Washington, D., C., now squat cross-legged, ready to "Chant and Be Happy!")

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

So apparently in Louisiana, there are some yet unwilling to make a policy statement about Amendment 13, which abolished involuntary servitude--except that it was badly, (GOP), worded--and needed Amendment 14. Many are still unsure, of course, if Amendment 14 should be the more hated of the two. That one goes to civil liberties. You cannot just convict based on race, and set the coloreds back to slavery, allowed under Amendment 13. So why should anyone, maybe it is thought, apologize for what Amendment 13 was unable to do(?)!

Rep. Steve Scalise is widely now shown disinclined to apologize for previous Louisiana State Policy, regarding slavery.

Minutes highlight Scalise efforts to kill resolution apologizing for slavery

Anyone can see that the Republican, U. S. House members, know exactly who they need to convince(?)! Their leader, McCarthy, for example: Is from the Blue State of California. It is widely thought there that Amendments 13 and 14: Were actually a viable outcome. No doubt is left in doubt that the cows were not what Lincoln tried to free. . . .until this year(?).

The Republicans of 2015 seem yet unwilling to concede that they were only partially elected, even though "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is so far about them. The Senate is supposed to be imbalance, small state over large state. The House is supposed to be the other way around, on the basis that everyone in fact will vote.

What the Framers intended in the original document itself, of course, is not always openly discussed.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes now in Washington, D., C., now squat cross-legged, ready to "Chant and Be Happy!")

This is a non-story!

 

[mascale]

The article seems to be getting reprinted, starting days ago. The Tea Party agenda is widely noted to have basis in original Constitutional wording and meanings. Slavery was a part of the document, which did have to be amended, and likely so, going forward.

Entire nation-states now have to wonder just how Washington, D. C. thinks: If various factions really do(?). "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is likely a better description of what the new Majorities are all about.

The House Majority Whip is of a faction. That the faction is strange and distorted, needs to be noted. Even high school wrestlers, even today, should not interpret the arrest of a terror suspect, as a message, to not Tweet your Intentions(?).!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Venice Beach Contortionist, doing "Occupy Washington, D. C.," maybe sit with legs crossed behind him, to prevent. . . . .well(?)!")

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The article seems to be getting reprinted, starting days ago. The Tea Party agenda is widely noted to have basis in original Constitutional wording and meanings. Slavery was a part of the document, which did have to be amended, and likely so, going forward.

Entire nation-states now have to wonder just how Washington, D. C. thinks: If various factions really do(?). "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is likely a better description of what the new Majorities are all about.

The House Majority Whip is of a faction. That the faction is strange and distorted, needs to be noted. Even high school wrestlers, even today, should not interpret the arrest of a terror suspect, as a message, to not Tweet your Intentions(?).!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Venice Beach Contortionist, doing "Occupy Washington, D. C.," maybe sit with legs crossed behind him, to prevent. . . . .well(?)!")

Scalise did the right thing in killing the bill.

 

[mascale]

"Occupy Washington D. C.," on behalf of the financial institutions, is already under way this week. The 1% probably see themselves as being under-represented, after all. It would be said that the House Majority Leadership, overall, seems to think that there has been some terrible mistake, created(?). The matter in Louisiana did get passed. It is not clear that the Rep. Scalise, even then, was for it.

Senator McConnell would tend to think that ability to get to a polling place is all that matters in a low turn-out election. A referendum is in that manner created. Then when taken apart--seeing just who gets what as an outcome--tends not to support the Democratic-Republic concept as a workable political system-form in a diversity-based population. The caveat is in the "Occupy Washington, D. C." lampoon. There is a tendency to an exploitation of labor involved. Senator Rubio, and the fellow from Virginia, agree that middle income wage-growth is stagnant.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(After All: Sticks and Stones, may break many bones, but words on paper tend to kill(?). . .or even get all kinds of ordinary people killed(?)! They even seem to know this, in France. . . .which apparently has no Sunday afternoon football, on TV(?)!)