Derideo_Te
Je Suis Charlie
- Mar 2, 2013
- 20,461
- 7,961
- 360
You have no "right" to healthcare.
So no one has a "right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have no "right" to healthcare.
Well, I think the link was an old one. But, it brings up an odd point. Rand complains that the fed govt could tell him who to treat and how much to charge. But the fed govt already pretty well sets the amount private insures will pay for a procedure. I don't see why the federal govt couldn't tell docs they have to take the medicare rate and not charge individuals more ..... BECAUSE the govt already does that with Medicaid.The main point being made is that today is Rand Paul's turn to capture headlines by saying stupid stuff that patronizes the rw nut base.
Right, the US signed the UN Declaration of Human rights in late 1940s which included ... So Rand knew when he became a doctor and so did everyone else... So he choose his profession knowing this...
This is like a guy becoming a soldier and saying it is slavery to go to war...
Saying that who is forcing him to treat people?
Is that self referential? Because your statement is ignorant and short-sighted, whatever that's supposed to meanThe statement was ignorant and short sighted. He understands neither "the right to healthcare" or "slavery."
If a person doesnt have food he'll die. Is there a right to food? If a person doesnt have clothing he'll die. Is there a right to clothing?How is he wrong? A "right" is something you have that cannot be abridged. It is not something you can force others to provide for you. You have the right, for example, to free political speech. That means you can say whatever you want to about a politician. You don't, though, have the right to force your neighbor to pay for commercial time so you can say those things on TV. You can have the "right" to healthcare to the extent that no one can legally prevent you from accessing it, but forcing your neighbor to pay for your health insurance is not a right. Forcing one person to work for another person is.....
If a person doesn't have access to health care they can die. A person has the right to live.
If you disagree then all yours and conservatives screaming about abortion and right to life is just the lie I've believed it is for many decades.
Well, I think the link was an old one. But, it brings up an odd point. Rand complains that the fed govt could tell him who to treat and how much to charge. But the fed govt already pretty well sets the amount private insures will pay for a procedure. I don't see why the federal govt couldn't tell docs they have to take the medicare rate and not charge individuals more ..... BECAUSE the govt already does that with Medicaid.The main point being made is that today is Rand Paul's turn to capture headlines by saying stupid stuff that patronizes the rw nut base.
Then I suppose all of those slaves should have been returned, but where is that written?That's an interesting link. I had known that southern states, like Mississippi, stated one reason supporting seceding was northern states not applying the fugitive slave act, but I either didn't know, or had forgotten, it required a non-judicial hearing to identify a run away slave where the slave didn't even get to speak. I had thought that the northern states just refused to apply state dollars to enforcing a federal law, like some states now refuse to prosecuted pot crimes. But the feds can still use federal courts to enforce federal law, so there's no nullification involved.Where? Slavery was a federally protected right, so why would it need preserved? Many northern states, Wisconsin for example, decided to exercise their states' rights and nullify and refuse to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act. But you had no idea about that did you?This poster knows nothing about the history of states' rights in battling slavery and so cannot be taken seriously on the issue.I know you graduated from a government school controlled by the education wing of the democrat party....so you don't understand history, the truth or reality......but how is Rand Paul being against the government setting doctors wages being pro fucking slavery.....do you even think before you post....
Oh...I get it....you think you just have to say Ramd Paul is pro slavery....then your lefty nitwit fellow travelers will take up that point up and repeat it like trained seals and then the democrats in the main stream press will push the idea and wherever he goes they will ask him..." Senator Paul...why do you support slavery" and then your smear job will be complete....
You leftists,are vile and disgusting human beings....
It is logical to speculate that Rand Paul would have been a states right champion from Kentucky in the 1800's,
which makes it therefore logical to speculate that he would have supported his state's right to keep slavery legal.
The history of states' rights in trying to preserve slavery is what you should have said.
Ableman v. Booth How State Nullification Can Defy Tyrannical Government
Still, nullification is unconstitutional..
On the contrary, you have the right to access healthcare. No one will stop you. What you DON'T have the right to do is force other people to pay for it. That would be no different from going into your neighbor's house and taking his money at gunpoint to pay for your Viagra. And, your last sentence is beyond stupid, thus ignored.How is he wrong? A "right" is something you have that cannot be abridged. It is not something you can force others to provide for you. You have the right, for example, to free political speech. That means you can say whatever you want to about a politician. You don't, though, have the right to force your neighbor to pay for commercial time so you can say those things on TV. You can have the "right" to healthcare to the extent that no one can legally prevent you from accessing it, but forcing your neighbor to pay for your health insurance is not a right. Forcing one person to work for another person is.....
If a person doesn't have access to health care they can die. A person has the right to live.
If you disagree then all yours and conservatives screaming about abortion and right to life is just the lie I've believed it is for many decades.
I need a car to get to work. I demand a Lexus.If a person doesnt have food he'll die. Is there a right to food? If a person doesnt have clothing he'll die. Is there a right to clothing?How is he wrong? A "right" is something you have that cannot be abridged. It is not something you can force others to provide for you. You have the right, for example, to free political speech. That means you can say whatever you want to about a politician. You don't, though, have the right to force your neighbor to pay for commercial time so you can say those things on TV. You can have the "right" to healthcare to the extent that no one can legally prevent you from accessing it, but forcing your neighbor to pay for your health insurance is not a right. Forcing one person to work for another person is.....
If a person doesn't have access to health care they can die. A person has the right to live.
If you disagree then all yours and conservatives screaming about abortion and right to life is just the lie I've believed it is for many decades.
Logical fallacies are all the Left has.
Actually, what occurs is private insurers just go with the medicare rates.Well, I think the link was an old one. But, it brings up an odd point. Rand complains that the fed govt could tell him who to treat and how much to charge. But the fed govt already pretty well sets the amount private insures will pay for a procedure. I don't see why the federal govt couldn't tell docs they have to take the medicare rate and not charge individuals more ..... BECAUSE the govt already does that with Medicaid.The main point being made is that today is Rand Paul's turn to capture headlines by saying stupid stuff that patronizes the rw nut base.
Actually, the government doesn't set insurers payments - that is determined by the market. The government does, however, have the right to determine Medicare/Medicaid/Tricare payments (since they are the insurer).
Commercial insurance is a contract between the doctor and the insurer - that is why your doctor will accept some insurances and not others.
On the contrary, you have the right to access healthcare. No one will stop you. What you DON'T have the right to do is force other people to pay for it. That would be no different from going into your neighbor's house and taking his money at gunpoint to pay for your Viagra. And, your last sentence is beyond stupid, thus ignored.How is he wrong? A "right" is something you have that cannot be abridged. It is not something you can force others to provide for you. You have the right, for example, to free political speech. That means you can say whatever you want to about a politician. You don't, though, have the right to force your neighbor to pay for commercial time so you can say those things on TV. You can have the "right" to healthcare to the extent that no one can legally prevent you from accessing it, but forcing your neighbor to pay for your health insurance is not a right. Forcing one person to work for another person is.....
If a person doesn't have access to health care they can die. A person has the right to live.
If you disagree then all yours and conservatives screaming about abortion and right to life is just the lie I've believed it is for many decades.
Where in the constitution is the right to healthcare found?
How is he wrong? A "right" is something you have that cannot be abridged. It is not something you can force others to provide for you. You have the right, for example, to free political speech. That means you can say whatever you want to about a politician. You don't, though, have the right to force your neighbor to pay for commercial time so you can say those things on TV. You can have the "right" to healthcare to the extent that no one can legally prevent you from accessing it, but forcing your neighbor to pay for your health insurance is not a right. Forcing one person to work for another person is.....
If a person doesn't have access to health care they can die. A person has the right to live.
If you disagree then all yours and conservatives screaming about abortion and right to life is just the lie I've believed it is for many decades.
Slavery forced the sale of the children of slaves. Slavery many times lead to sexual assault and rape. Slavery enabled Masters to use lethal punishment when ever they wished.
So basically, Paul does not understand slavery. If he does make the General, which I doubt he does, this statement will be used against him.
He is 100% correct. You have no "right" to healthcare.
Food, clothing and shelter are rights! Dems have the right to live where they please regardless of ability to pay
He is 100% correct. You have no "right" to healthcare.
And yet, he has a "right" to that very same health care except that he doesn't have to pay for himself.
That's what the taxpayers (slaves) are for.