Google Helped Hillary Win The Popular Vote

Another hollow lie told by the Democrats...."Hillary won the popular vote."

"When Donald Trump surprised the world by winning the 2016 election, liberals clung to the idea that his victory was illegitimate because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. According to a psychologist who supported Clinton in 2016, however, Google's bias in Clinton's favor may remove even that symbolic victory from her."

"Almost all of Clinton's popular vote margin could be attributed to Google bias, making her win "negligible." Dr. Robert Epstein, a psychologist who earned his Ph.D. at Harvard, actually reported this finding last year, but he explains how it works in the upcoming film "The Creepy Line.""

New Movie Claims Google Handed the Popular Vote to Hillary Clinton in 2016

A Republican site, hardly not bias.

Yet informative and you would never have known this if I didn't post a link apparently. And so what if it is right biased? Nearly all MSM is left biased.....You can't get the whole picture by ignoring what you don't agree with. This is what TDS does to people.
 
Another hollow lie told by the Democrats...."Hillary won the popular vote."

"When Donald Trump surprised the world by winning the 2016 election, liberals clung to the idea that his victory was illegitimate because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. According to a psychologist who supported Clinton in 2016, however, Google's bias in Clinton's favor may remove even that symbolic victory from her."

"Almost all of Clinton's popular vote margin could be attributed to Google bias, making her win "negligible." Dr. Robert Epstein, a psychologist who earned his Ph.D. at Harvard, actually reported this finding last year, but he explains how it works in the upcoming film "The Creepy Line.""

New Movie Claims Google Handed the Popular Vote to Hillary Clinton in 2016
Whatever happened to the movement to make the popular vote the determining factor to how our elections are won? No, that would be too hard. Better to blame Russia and Jill Stein.
 
if a media source doesnt suck RW ass like Fox does they're considered baised ....
 
Clinton Derangement Syndrom!

That's "SyndromE" BTW.....From my link in the OP...

During the interview, Epstein lamented Trump's win and his presidency, but he insisted that Google's power is a much more important and terrifying issue.

Google Exec Boasted About Helping Hillary Clinton by Boosting Latino Turnout in 2016

"This is not a problem for conservatives. This is a problem for humanity," the psychologist told PJ Media. "Who gave a handful of executives in Silicon Valley the right to decide what billions of people around the world can see and cannot see? Who gave them that power?"

Payback is a bitch isn't it? :113: This is just more proof that Trump probably WON the popular vote legitimately. Unlike the illegitimate Hillary.

edthecynic is new in trying to co-opt right wing terminology. He’ll get it down eventually :)
But in the meantime he should stick with “cuck” and “snowflake”
 
“clung to the idea that his victory was illegitimate because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote”

The only way Trump could be illegitimate is if he lost the election in the electoral college. That’s how we elect presidents.
Even so it was a close call. But we should always remember the larger point of this story. We won even with Google shenanigans. We won with the largest, wealthiest and most powerful corporations the world has ever seen opposing us. We won even with the stranglehold on information the pro-hillary media has. We won despite Silicon Valley alone contributing 3/4 of a *billion* dollars towards our defeat. We won with Hollywood monopolizing the air waves with Trump hate. We won with the FBI spying on Trump and the Deep State undermining him.
We, Trump, won against all odds. But no surprise it was a close call.
 
Hillary won the popular vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,000,000 votes so Hillary really only won the popular vote in one state.

Figures lie and liars figure. Bottom line Hilary won the popular vote in 20 states but lost the EC vote.
,

Blue is as shitty at math as he is lying - 4000000 eh ?


The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%)


2.9 million - 4 million ... same thing to idiots.

BluesLegend said she won the vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, not in the entire nation. Clinton 8,753,788 to Trump 4,483,810. California Election Results 2016

Now, the idea that she only won the popular vote in 1 state is simply false.
 
Clinton Derangement Syndrom!

That's "SyndromE" BTW.....From my link in the OP...

During the interview, Epstein lamented Trump's win and his presidency, but he insisted that Google's power is a much more important and terrifying issue.

Google Exec Boasted About Helping Hillary Clinton by Boosting Latino Turnout in 2016

"This is not a problem for conservatives. This is a problem for humanity," the psychologist told PJ Media. "Who gave a handful of executives in Silicon Valley the right to decide what billions of people around the world can see and cannot see? Who gave them that power?"

Payback is a bitch isn't it? :113: This is just more proof that Trump probably WON the popular vote legitimately. Unlike the illegitimate Hillary.

Even if you blame Google bias for the vote numbers, Trump still did not win the popular vote. At best you could say that you think he should have.
 
Even if you blame Google bias for the vote numbers, Trump still did not win the popular vote. At best you could say that you think he should have.

Which is why we have the EC....Trump won and is President. Democrat propaganda lost.
 
Even if you blame Google bias for the vote numbers, Trump still did not win the popular vote. At best you could say that you think he should have.

Which is why we have the EC....Trump won and is President. Democrat propaganda lost.

Trump won, it was completely legitimate, I've never thought otherwise. I'm just saying that Clinton won the overall popular vote, whatever might have influenced how people voted.
 
Hillary won the popular vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,000,000 votes so Hillary really only won the popular vote in one state.

Figures lie and liars figure. Bottom line Hilary won the popular vote in 20 states but lost the EC vote.
,

Blue is as shitty at math as he is lying - 4000000 eh ?


The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%)


2.9 million - 4 million ... same thing to idiots.

BluesLegend said she won the vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, not in the entire nation. Clinton 8,753,788 to Trump 4,483,810. California Election Results 2016

Now, the idea that she only won the popular vote in 1 state is simply false.

Liberals heads explode when I point out Trump won the popular vote overall in the other 49 states by 1 million votes. Its the same BS the libs are constantly harping about Hillary won the popular vote Hillary won the popular vote like the 30 states Trump won don't count for anything.

When you consider that Trump won the overall popular vote in 49 states, isn't that the will of the people? Why should California haven to millions of illegals and their anchor baby offspring overturn the will of the people in the other 49 states? There you go, category 10 liberal butthurt right there.
 
Another hollow lie told by the Democrats...."Hillary won the popular vote."

"When Donald Trump surprised the world by winning the 2016 election, liberals clung to the idea that his victory was illegitimate because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. According to a psychologist who supported Clinton in 2016, however, Google's bias in Clinton's favor may remove even that symbolic victory from her."

"Almost all of Clinton's popular vote margin could be attributed to Google bias, making her win "negligible." Dr. Robert Epstein, a psychologist who earned his Ph.D. at Harvard, actually reported this finding last year, but he explains how it works in the upcoming film "The Creepy Line.""

New Movie Claims Google Handed the Popular Vote to Hillary Clinton in 2016

He only won the vote in Mi, WI and PA by 80,000 votes.

And that matters for what?

HRC1-NP.jpg
 
Hillary won the popular vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,000,000 votes so Hillary really only won the popular vote in one state.

Figures lie and liars figure. Bottom line Hilary won the popular vote in 20 states but lost the EC vote.
,

Blue is as shitty at math as he is lying - 4000000 eh ?


The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%)


2.9 million - 4 million ... same thing to idiots.

BluesLegend said she won the vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, not in the entire nation. Clinton 8,753,788 to Trump 4,483,810. California Election Results 2016

Now, the idea that she only won the popular vote in 1 state is simply false.

Liberals heads explode when I point out Trump won the popular vote overall in the other 49 states by 1 million votes. Its the same BS the libs are constantly harping about Hillary won the popular vote Hillary won the popular vote like the 30 states Trump won don't count for anything.

When you consider that Trump won the overall popular vote in 49 states, isn't that the will of the people? Why should California haven to millions of illegals and their anchor baby offspring overturn the will of the people in the other 49 states? There you go, category 10 liberal butthurt right there.

That's the argument. More states voted for Trump, more people voted for Clinton. What a person considers more important between those choices (or if they believe some other characteristic is more important or there is a better way) will determine their stand in the EC vs popular vote argument.

However, simply removing California from the equation in order to reach the numbers you want does not indicate "the will of the people." Californians are part of "the people."
 
if we deducted "The Stupid Vote" from 2016, it would of been about Trump at 65 Million and Hillary with 43 votes
 
Hillary won the popular vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,000,000 votes so Hillary really only won the popular vote in one state.
well you need to deduct the 10 million fraud/illegal votes too. then Trump wins by about 8 Million votes. i wonder if all those dead people went back to their graves after they voted

No one illegal voted, maybe a few, but how about the surpassed votes. Trump lost the maj vote, deal with it.
Prove suppressed votes bitch
 
Hillary won the popular vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,000,000 votes so Hillary really only won the popular vote in one state.

Figures lie and liars figure. Bottom line Hilary won the popular vote in 20 states but lost the EC vote.
,

Blue is as shitty at math as he is lying - 4000000 eh ?


The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%)


2.9 million - 4 million ... same thing to idiots.

BluesLegend said she won the vote in California by 4,000,000 votes, not in the entire nation. Clinton 8,753,788 to Trump 4,483,810. California Election Results 2016

Now, the idea that she only won the popular vote in 1 state is simply false.

Liberals heads explode when I point out Trump won the popular vote overall in the other 49 states by 1 million votes. Its the same BS the libs are constantly harping about Hillary won the popular vote Hillary won the popular vote like the 30 states Trump won don't count for anything.

When you consider that Trump won the overall popular vote in 49 states, isn't that the will of the people? Why should California haven to millions of illegals and their anchor baby offspring overturn the will of the people in the other 49 states? There you go, category 10 liberal butthurt right there.

That's the argument. More states voted for Trump, more people voted for Clinton. What a person considers more important between those choices (or if they believe some other characteristic is more important or there is a better way) will determine their stand in the EC vs popular vote argument.

However, simply removing California from the equation in order to reach the numbers you want does not indicate "the will of the people." Californians are part of "the people."
Sure it does. You’re fked up
 

Forum List

Back
Top